April 18, 2024

You’re the Boss Blog: YogaFit Tries to Escape the Discount Trap

She Owns It

Portraits of women entrepreneurs.

Beth Shaw: Suzanne DeChillo/The New York Times Beth Shaw: “We’ve undervalued ourselves.”

At the last She Owns It business group meeting, Beth Shaw, who owns YogaFit, started the discussion by sharing some painful lessons she has learned from discounting her company’s yoga teacher training.

“We have been running so many different discount codes, many of which have no expiration date, that we had people using the same code for multiple trainings when they shouldn’t have,” she said. “The customer service team is using those discounts as a way to make the sale, as opposed to focusing on the quality of our service, and so it’s a huge problem right now.” But with the help of a sales consultant who pointed out the dangers of indiscriminate discounting, she is devising solutions. Effective June 30, the open-ended discounts will end, Ms. Shaw said.

She said she had discovered that some of YogaFit’s training courses were run in a way that left the company no possibility of making a profit. “You can’t stay in business like that,” she added. When she reviewed what customers paid for her training, factoring in the discount codes, she said she found YogaFit’s offerings were “ridiculously underpriced.”

To fix the problem, she plans to assess the real costs of running YogaFit’s training and price it accordingly — steps, she concedes, she ideally would have taken sooner. But she said learning how to build a business has been an evolving process. Additionally, her customer-service team will need to be educated.

Susan Parker, who owns a dress manufacturer, Bari Jay, wondered whether simply ending the open-ended discounts on June 30 might solve the problem. “I assume every training is slightly different?” she asked.

Yes, Ms. Shaw said.

Ms. Parker said Ms. Shaw might have a bigger problem if she were selling, for example, a dress with a price that suddenly went from $100 to $120. She said Ms. Shaw is selling more of an experience, and may wipe the slate clean by ending the discounts.

Not necessarily, Ms. Shaw said, noting that the company does a lot of repeat business. “We have trained our customers in a bad way,” she said. “A lot of people were taking advantage of those discount codes.”

“How did you price these originally?” asked Alexandra Mayzler, who owns Thinking Caps Group.

Ms. Shaw said she looked at comparable offerings and “kind of undercut.” She went on to describe YogaFit’s product as unique because the company provides training across the country and internationally. This gives customers the chance to continue their training with YogaFit even when they move or travel.

“What’s the purpose of undercutting the competition?” asked Jessica Johnson, who owns Johnson Security Bureau.

“That’s a good question,” Ms. Shaw said. “I think we’ve undervalued ourselves dramatically.”

“I don’t have that problem — most of the time,” Ms. Johnson said. Sometimes, she said, “People expect me to have lower rates because they’re like, ‘Oh, you’re small, you’re a woman, you’re a minority, you’re in the ‘hood.’” She said prospects were often surprised to learn her prices. “I had a potential client say, ‘Well, I can get that for $14.’” Her standard response? “If you can get it for $14, get it for $14. And then when that doesn’t work out, call me back.”

Ms. Johnson said potential clients even approach her by stating they are unhappy with their current security firm and wonder if Johnson Security can give them a better price. In fact, this happened just last month. “I’m looking at the guy, like, ‘Really? I’m not going to match those numbers,’” she said.

“Because you get what you pay for,” said Deirdre Lord, who owns the Megawatt Hour, an energy start-up.

“Exactly,” Ms. Johnson said.

Ms. Mayzler said she had had similar experiences with prospective clients who told her they could get the same service for less. “If you think it’s the same service, then maybe we’re not the right fit for you,” she said she told them.

“It’s one thing to negotiate for better rates, but then it’s another thing when potential clients or clients try to use that as leverage and shop just the price,” Ms. Johnson said. “There are competitors that will take the business at any cost — even if it’s at a loss. It sends the wrong message.”

Ms. Shaw agreed: “When you draw a line in the sand, it’s funny how many people will actually come to that line and come over it, but you have to hold strong.”

In future posts, the owners will discuss the challenges of pricing a newly created product or service.

You can follow Adriana Gardella on Twitter.

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/13/yogafit-tries-to-escape-the-discount-trap/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Google Takes on Amazon and Microsoft for Cloud Computing Services

Google said Tuesday that it was doubling its office space near Seattle, just miles from the campuses of Amazon and Microsoft, and stepping up the hiring of engineers and others who work on cloud technology.

It is part of Google’s dive into a business known as cloud services — renting to other businesses access to its enormous data storage and computing power, accessible by the Internet.

In cloud computing, dozens or even thousands of computer servers are joined to create a giant machine capable of handling many tasks at once, from storing data to running Web sites and mobile apps to tackling complicated analytical problems.

Individual software developers, large companies and governments rent these services to run their operations often at a fraction of the cost of buying and managing their own machines.

Amazon Web Services, or A.W.S., is far and away the leader in this area. Amazon expects that this business will eventually be as big as its retail operation.

A.W.S. is followed by Microsoft’s Windows Azure and offerings from other companies including Rackspace, Verizon, I.B.M. and Hewlett-Packard.

Google says the cloud business is a new source of profit and a way to improve the Internet by providing other companies access to its sophisticated computing services.

Analysts say it is also a strategy to lure developers and businesses to use Google products instead of those of archrivals like Amazon and Microsoft.

The cloud business has become so vital to these companies, said James Staten, an analyst at Forrester, because it is crucial to other businesses like mobile apps and online video and music.

Most of the apps that run on Google Android phones, for instance, are built using Amazon’s cloud, and Google would like to wrest back control. Microsoft, Amazon and Google are all competing to host online video, a booming business that relies on cloud services.

“Almost every major consultancy supports Amazon; almost every advertising agency runs on Amazon; if I need to hire 10 people tomorrow to help me build my application, it’s super easy to find people who have Amazon experience,” Mr. Staten said.

Google plans a major recruiting effort to increase its Seattle-area engineering staff by as much as five times. There is already fierce competition among tech companies for talented engineers, and many of those with skills in cloud computing work at Google’s rivals in Seattle.

“We’re not the first in this rodeo, but we have the history of Google,” said Brian Goldfarb, Google’s leader of cloud platform marketing, who joined the company last year after a decade at Microsoft. “We have the best data centers on the planet. You can’t really give engineers a bigger, badder thing to work on.”

Google is also adding 180,000 square feet to its office in Kirkland, Wash., which together with its Seattle office already houses more than 1,000 employees, making it Google’s third largest in the country after its headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., and its office in New York.

The new office space will have all the requisite perks of tech businesses, where typical office cubicles and fluorescent lights are not enough. It will meet green building standards, with a solar roof and wood from recycled shipping containers. The Seattle office, on a canal, has kayaks and paddleboards for employees, and the Kirkland office uses boats for conference rooms, not to mention the office’s espresso bars, massage parlor and climbing wall.

Though the cloud business is still in its early days, Google is already late to the game.

Over the years, Google, Amazon and Microsoft had each built world-class clouds, consisting of several giant data centers in different countries, to run their own businesses — doing things like searching the Web, hosting online video, managing business software and operating an online mall. Amazon was the first to rent its data storage and computing power to outside customers when it started A.W.S. in 2004, and Microsoft and Google followed. Another company with huge data centers and computing power, Apple, does not rent its cloud.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/technology/google-takes-on-amazon-and-microsoft-for-cloud-computing-services.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Vanguard Aims at Small Companies With Low-Cost 401(k)s

Vanguard says it will begin offering low-cost 401(k) packages for smaller companies later this year.

Vanguard says the packages will target plans with assets of less than $20 million and will include record keeping, participant education and call-center support. The offerings will emphasize low-cost index funds, including the Vanguard Target Retirement Funds. The plans will be administered by Ascensus, a retirement-plan servicer.

The move is likely to be welcomed by smaller companies, where employees often face difficulty getting good, low-cost retirement plan options.

The move by Vanguard may be partly defensive because demand for lower-cost options based on index and exchange-traded funds has been growing and more companies are entering the market.

Earlier this year, Charles Schwab announced it would begin marketing a 401(k) package that included only index funds, which would be in place for 2012. And next year, Schwab also plans to offer 401(k) plans comprising only exchanged-traded funds.

Schwab’s move follows offerings from players like ING Direct’s ShareBuilder 401K, which was an early adopter of plans offering index funds and E.T.F.’s.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1f47e6622bb51374c57379e0b2ce6544

Bucks: New Site to Buy and Sell Remodeling Supplies

You know they’re out there, in your garage: Boxes of tiles, left over from that bathroom remodeling project; old doors; maybe even an odd chandelier that doesn’t fit your current décor. You keep thinking you’ll have a yard sale and get rid of all that stuff but never get around to it.

Sound familiar?

It does to Matt Knox, co-founder and chief executive of DiggersList, a Web site that aims to provide an online marketplace for leftover remodeling and construction materials, as well as consumer items, that are looking for a new home. The Los Angeles-based company started the site in late 2009, primarily as a site for contractors, but it serves lots of do-it-yourselfers, too. It’s most active in major metropolitan areas.

A key attraction is the site’s relationship with The ReStore, the Habitat for Humanity affiliate that sells used and surplus construction and home-improvement materials. If you post something on Diggerslist and it doesn’t sell, you can opt to donate it — and a ReStore representative will pick it up so that ReStore can try to sell it.

About 250 of the roughly 700 ReStores have a presence on DiggersList, Mr. Knox said. The site recently enhanced its offerings by creating storefronts for the ReStores, so people can see what’s available at their local outlet. A new feature, he said, will allow users who “follow” a particular ReStore electronically (similar to following an account on Twitter) to monitor deals they are interested in and receive coupons from the store.

A good part of the site’s traffic, though, is consumer-to-consumer sales. Mr. Knox says. For example, he wants to build a patio in his backyard and just bought a load of bricks from a seller in a neighboring community. It’s local, so “I’ll drive over to get them,” he says. But some items are small enough to ship and can be purchased even if users are located outside the market where it’s for sale.

Offerings include reclaimed barn boards, stainless steel bar sinks and an impressive variety of commodes.

Users can register on the site free and post their items free; eventually, premium offerings may be added for a fee.

Have you tried DiggersList? Let us know what you found.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=7f7e920e8acaf8a410a5a487fc129e70

You’re the Boss: Is Better Task Management on Your To-Do List?

Tech Support

What small-business owners need to know about technology.

Like many small-business owners, Keith Goldstein often has so much on his plate that it’s hard to keep track of it all. So Mr. Goldstein, who owns 60-employee Everest Waterproofing and Restoration in San Francisco, does what most people do to remember what needs to get done: He writes it down on a “to-do” list. Sometimes he scribbles a list in a notebook, but he prefers to type it into his iPad, whence it’s zipped by app to his e-mail. “I use my inbox as my real to-do list,” he said. “If a note isn’t an action item I move it out of the inbox, so whatever is in there is about something I need to get done.”

Whatever works. But if your system isn’t working, here are some tools that may help. If you want a bare-bones, simple-to-use task manager, you’d probably do fine with Google Tasks or Yahoo’s task manager. Both are free. But a few of the more ambitious offerings seem especially useful. One is is Todoist, which offers the sort of power that really lets you go nuts being hyper-organized (if that’s your thing). As with most of these tools, you start off by establishing a project or category for a set of tasks, like “Stuff to do at the office,” or “Tasks related to the Acme Account.” Then you type in the task (“call Cindy Smith about the late payment”) at which point you can set a due date and one of four color-coded priorities. For any task, you can also create sub-tasks (“find Cindy’s phone number”). You can also add notes, include links to Web pages or e-mail notes, attach files, schedule reminders, add searchable tags (“finance” or “travel”), and sync tasks to your online calendar. Tasks can also be set to automatically repeat at any time period you specify. (Some of the advanced features are only available with a $5-a-month or $29-a-year upgrade.)

Where Todoist and other powerful tools earn their keep is in their ability to draw your attention where it belongs, task-wise. So, for example, you can summon only those tasks that are two or more days overdue, highest priority, and related to a crucial customer. Or you can get an overview of everything that’s due today, sorted by priority. Some people find Todoist a little overwhelming, but I didn’t find it all that hard to get the hang of. A bigger weakness is an absence of syncable apps or good mobile access for smartphones other than iPhone and Android.

A wide variety of mobile apps, on the other hand, is a strong point of Remember the Milk, the other leading tool. R.T.M. does pretty much everything Todoist does, except that you can’t create sub-tasks. It also offers what I think is a slightly clearer, more controllable view of the tasks you want to focus on. (One complaint I have with both Todoist and R.T.M. is that backing your task data up to your PC is surprisingly inconvenient.) R.T.M. is free — unless you want one of those smartphone apps, in which case you pay $25 a year.

If, like Mr. Goldstein, you prefer an e-mail-centric version of task management, consider Taskforce, a relatively new, free tool that shines at creating tasks around incoming e-mail — or, conversely, that lets you take a task-oriented approach to dealing with your e-mail. Taskforce integrates especially well with Gmail, where pressing a button converts an e-mail note into an item on your task list. It also lets you delay a task before it’s brought to your attention, a feature I wish other task managers offered.

Boomerang is also e-mail-based, and free. You install it on Gmail, at which point every e-mail note you write or receive will have a new feature: a “boomerang” button that, when clicked, provides the option of making the note disappear and then turn up again in your inbox at whatever later time or date you specify. It’s a bit like Taskforce, except the note itself becomes the actual reminder, as with Mr. Goldstein’s system. Not only is this a great way to be nudged to take care of something at the right time, but it also keeps both your mailbox and to-do list less cluttered. Plus — and this is my favorite feature — you can opt to have any note you send out reappear in your inbox only if the note’s recipient doesn’t reply within a specified period of time. In other words, you get a timely reminder that someone hasn’t gotten back to you. I’m sure all of this will be standard on e-mail tools in the future. But why wait?

If you really want to go all out, and you share my penchant for geekily powerful applications, consider Gantter. It’s really more of a project-management tool, and it requires a bit of effort to master. But the big payoff is the ability to generate hugely enlightening graphs of what’s facing you task-wise over any period of time, letting you see at a glance whether your deadlines are realistic, what sorts of employee and other resources you’re going to have to put into each task to get it done, and where you’re overextended or slacking off. It’s free, regardless of the numbers of users, projects and tasks. It’s also well-integrated with Google Docs for collaboration.

I told Mr. Goldstein about some of these tools, and he said they sounded like too much trouble. But he admits he might not know what he’s missing. Maybe he’ll give one a try some point … if he thinks of it.

You can follow David H. Freedman on Twitter and on Facebook.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=43c0fd7a7534db066baf578a8d269674