April 20, 2024

Hong Kong TV Drama Plays Out Uneasy Ties With China

HONG KONG — In Hong Kong, the tensions between residents and mainland Chinese visitors dominate the headlines of the city’s papers, with mainlanders blamed for a shortage of school slots, bad manners in stores and a hypercharged property market.

So it should come as little surprise that a television show would come along to tap into these anxieties and, perhaps in a gift to the show’s producers, also draw the attention of mainland censors.

“Inbound Troubles” tells the story of two cousins — one from Hong Kong and the other from the mainland — and the tensions in a city whose enviable wealth increasingly rests on a flood of mainland visitors who nevertheless draw scorn for lavish spending and, some say, boorish ways.

In the show, the cousin from mainland China is shown littering, running red lights and parking illegally, while the one from Hong Kong makes his living with a travel agency that specializes in encouraging new arrivals from the mainland to part with more of their cash.

The TVB network show, which has just ended its monthlong run, was aired as the city’s leadership struggled to deal in Whack-A-Mole fashion with the latest supposed peril attributed to mainlanders: a shortage of baby formula said to have been caused by the hoarding of supplies by mainland Chinese who have crossed the border into Hong Kong (apparently out of fear of tainted supplies in China).

Some Hong Kong residents have become so agitated about the formula milk problem that they have asked the U.S. president, Barack Obama, to intervene, using a petition on the White House Web site titled, “Baby hunger outbreak in Hong Kong, international aid requested.”

The petition has already drawn 23,000 signatures.

The show’s candid depictions of mainland-Hong Kong relations — one scene focuses on the formula shortage — have drawn hundreds of complaints to Hong Kong regulators from viewers upset at things like its portrayals of mainlanders and its depiction of the Hong Kong’s tourism industry as predatory. And Chinese officials censored trailers for the program on the mainland, where viewers could see it on TVB’s overseas channel or through video streaming.

China also did some trimming of the version shown on the mainland, once the program began airing there. It snipped out a depiction of a protest outside a Hong Kong clothing store, a scene apparently based on a demonstration against a Dolce Gabbana store that let free-spending mainlanders photograph merchandise while banning Hong Kong residents from doing the same.

Still, the show clearly struck a nerve, becoming the TVB channel’s highest-rated drama so far this year.

To some, the tensions captured in the show are a natural outgrowth of fears about Beijing’s increasing influence in Hong Kong, a former British colony that retained considerable legal autonomy and civil rights after it was handed back to China in 1997.

“Politically, more and more Hong Kongers resent the fact that Beijing is tightening its control over Hong Kong’s political development,” Willy Lam, a scholar on Chinese history and politics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, wrote in an e-mail.

He added that the current leader of Hong Kong, Leung Chun-ying, “is seen as a yes-man chief executive bowing to every instruction from the mainland authorities.”

“There is a common feeling that fat cat mainlanders are driving up real estate prices,” he said. “You have witnessed of course the drama over formula milk powder.”

Although polls show that an increasing number of Hong Kong residents hold pessimistic views about the city’s future and Hong Kong-mainland relations, in “Inbound Troubles” the two cousins gradually acclimate to each other, with the one from the mainland adapting to local ways.

Viewers say they appreciate the show’s realistic depictions of the shifting social dynamics of Hong Kong and the growing impact of mainland China and its visitors on the city.

“I have a few bad experiences with mainlanders — most of them have to do with them jumping queues or being rude,” said Tai Wing-yi, a student at Hong Kong Baptist University. “But not all are like that. Some of my classmates are from the mainland, and they are nice to be around, and they work hard. In fact, they are the ones who contribute more than the locals in group projects.”

“The show highlighted the tension between mainland Chinese and locals in a funny way, and got the message across in a light-hearted manner,” she said.

Chen Min, a mainland journalist who has visited Hong Kong many times, said that his social circle in the city included many more-educated and better-off local residents, who were usually polite, but that not all encounters were so smooth.

“Occasionally you run into problems that you didn’t encounter before,” he said. “Like a taxi driver who refuses to take you because you speak Mandarin, although you’re holding a map and address in Chinese.”

On another occasion, Mr. Chen said, he was lugging a heavy suitcase to a taxi. “The driver joked, ‘Carrying cash to buy an apartment?”’

The popularity of the show — there is already talk of a movie — suggests that it could pave the way for treatments with similar themes, much as, in the United States, “All in the Family” started a subgenre of politically tinged situation comedies during the turbulence of the Vietnam War.

In an opinion piece in Global Times, a populist mainland newspaper, Wendy Wang, a freelance writer from Shanghai, noted that mainlanders have long been derided on Hong Kong television, with men often portrayed as mobsters and women as flirty or worse.

But after the 1997 return of Hong Kong to Chinese rule, “mainlanders’ characters grew wealthier but not wiser,” she wrote.

Chris Buckley and Calvin Yang contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/11/business/media/hong-kong-tv-drama-plays-out-uneasy-ties-with-china.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Murdochs Caught a Break at Hearing, Stock Analysts Say

Instead of finding a signal that this was the beginning of the end of Rupert Murdoch’s run at the helm of his company, analysts stressed that there was no single revelatory moment during the proceedings. If the Murdochs seemed at times distant, even oblivious, to what was going on in their own company, there were no obvious admissions of wrongdoing or glaring contradictions in their testimony, analysts said.

“This was the best day these guys have had in a really long time,” said David Bank, media analyst for RBC Capital Markets. “No shoe dropped, no smoking gun was found, it all sort of sounded kind of contained.”

After losing billions of dollars in market value, the News Corporation’s stock recovered a significant chunk of its value on the Nasdaq, rising almost 6 percent during the day to close at $16.25 a share. And after Mr. Murdoch and his son James concluded two hours of often tense testimony to a House of Commons committee, there was little of the widespread scorn that has greeted almost everything the Murdochs have said and done in the more than two weeks since the most recent voice mail hacking scandal at News Corporation’s British newspaper operation erupted.

Summing up the high stakes and low expectations surrounding the hearing, another analyst, Thomas Eagan of Collins Stewart, noted: “Neither Rupert nor James did any damage to the company.”

Inside the company, executives seemed relieved at how relatively smoothly the process went.

“No one is despondent, no one thinks this went poorly,” said one person briefed on Tuesday’s events who asked not to be identified revealing private conversations. “I wouldn’t bet against those two.”

The day was not without its moments of anxiety for News Corporation executives and the team of outside personnel who spent the weekend preparing the Murdochs for their testimony. Both men expected to deliver opening statements. But just minutes before the hearing began, they were informed that no such remarks would be permitted.

The elder Murdoch’s headline remark from the hearing — that Tuesday was “the most humble day of my life” — was actually part of the scripted statement he had hoped to make. The News Corporation released the statement while Mr. Murdoch was still testifying. And Mr. Murdoch spoke it in full at the very end of the hearing.

Mr. Murdoch did appear to be thrown off in the beginning, struggling to complete his thoughts and pausing often as he spoke — a loss of orientation that some in his inner circle attributed to his surprise over not being allowed to deliver introductory remarks. But as the afternoon wore on, he appeared more collected. The same was true of his son.

Analysts noted that the market was watching James in particular, looking for signs of whether the man who is presumed to be the chief executive heir apparent was up to the task.

“It was a credibility-building day for James,” Mr. Bank said. “I don’t know that it makes succession by him any more definite, but it prevented what could have been the event of making it far less likely.”

And the market appeared to like what it saw. “Every time James spoke, the stock ticked up,” Mr. Bank added.

The elder Murdoch was being carefully watched by analysts who had been critical of his recent decisions at News Corporation and who have argued that he should step down as chief executive to remove the financial drag his leadership is causing the stock. Instead, Mr. Murdoch took the opportunity to reassert his control of the company.

When he was asked by Louise Mensch, a Conservative lawmaker, if he had ever considered resigning. “No,” he said emphatically.

“Because I feel that people that I trusted let me down, I think that they behaved disgracefully,” he said. “Frankly, I am the best person to clean this up.”

Even the attack by a pie-wielding assailant on the elder Murdoch seemed to work in his favor. After a 15-minute break in which the assailant was taken away by the police, Rupert Murdoch reappeared at the witness table in shirtsleeves and the dynamic in the room and on the cable channels covering the hearing live shifted in his favor.

The company still faces a reckoning on multiple fronts — in the British and American legal systems, on Wall Street and in the court of public opinion — that threatens its reputation and certainly its future in the newspapers. Reuters reported Tuesday night that the company’s independent directors had hired two prominent lawyers, former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey and Mary Jo White, a former United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, to advise them.

Though Mr. Murdoch may have outperformed many expectations on Tuesday, he showed signs of strain at times.

Martin Dunn, a former News Corporation executive who most recently edited a rival newspaper, The Daily News in New York, said the elder Mr. Murdoch seemed tired, stressed and “a little beaten up” by the hearing process.

“It must be very hard, at 80 years of age, after spending four decades building up a company, to find yourself under attack in what is an unprecedented way,” Mr. Dunn said of the elder Mr. Murdoch. “I think that showed.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=73e84cb4c615a398732f991031890b08