April 27, 2024

Tokyo Electric Power Defeats Shareholders’ Efforts to Exit Nuclear Business

The management of Tokyo Electric Power also pushed through the appointment of 17 board members, including the reappointment of its 71-year-old chairman, raising questions over the extent of the overhaul that the company has promised in the wake of the unprecedented nuclear disaster.

“I apologize from the bottom of my heart for the trouble and fear that we have brought to our shareholders, and to society,” said the chairman, Tsunehisa Katsumata, at a tightly guarded Tokyo hotel.

“We will do our utmost to bring the accident to a resolution and to work toward our mission of providing a stable source of electricity,” he said.

Some investors refused to be placated. “Go jump into a reactor and die!” one elderly man shouted at the row of executives present, before being escorted out by attendants.

At one point, when Mr. Katsumata tried to wrap up a question-and-answer session, angry shareholders rushed the stage. The session was continued.

Another woman, her voice shaking, told the entire board that they were unfit to lead the company. She said the company had ignored warnings about the dangers of nuclear power.

“Shame on you!” she cried out. “You should all be sacked.”

Tokyo Electric has been fighting for its survival after the March 11 quake and tsunami ravaged its Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, about 225 kilometers, or 140 miles, north of Tokyo, triggering hydrogen explosions and releases of radioactive material in the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl.

At least 80,000 people have fled their homes, while farmers and fishermen in the area have been forced to abandon their livelihoods. Factories within a 20-kilometer evacuation zone have also relocated or closed.

Tokyo Electric could now face as much as 11 trillion yen, or $136 billion, in compensation claims, analysts have estimated. The cost of dismantling the Fukushima plant may reach an additional 20 trillion yen, according to the Japan Center for Economic Research.

The dismal forecasts have cast a dark cloud on the company’s financial health. Last week, Moody’s cut Tokyo Electric’s credit rating to junk status, following a similar move by Standard Poor’s last month. Shares in Tokyo Electric have plunged more than 80 percent since the earthquake.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan has said the government should provide a safety net for Tokyo Electric to keep it afloat while it pays damage claims. Japan is considering setting aside about 230 billion yen from its planned 2 trillion yen supplementary budget to help Tokyo Electric, according to Bloomberg News.

Though Mr. Kan has been keen to hold Tokyo Electric accountable and avoid dipping into public funds, he wants to avoid a bankruptcy and the chaos that such a move would bring to stock and credit markets.

Financial institutions held about 30 percent of Tokyo Electric shares, while other corporations had 5 percent, as of the end of March. Individual investors held about 44 percent, while overseas investors held 17 percent. The company had about 933,000 shareholders as of March 31.

Nevertheless, many analysts have underscored the need for change at Tokyo Electric.

“A fundamental structural overhaul is needed at the board level to enable Tepco to rebuild its reputation and recover financially,” Glass Lewis, a U.S. company that advises institutional investors, said in a report before the shareholder meeting.

Individual investors at the meeting Tuesday aired similar demands.

About 9,300 investors attended the meeting, the most in Tokyo Electric’s history, forming long lines at the hotel venue. Anti-nuclear protestors also gathered at a nearby park to urge the company to abandon nuclear power.

But even as Tokyo Electric’s board faced a rowdy, hostile crowd on Tuesday, the company management, which has institutional investors and some individual investors on its side, never faced any real danger of defeat.

Tokyo Electric won the approval for the appointment of 17 board members, including Mr. Katsumata, the chairman, and the newly named president, Toshio Nishizawa, a longtime company executive. All but one of the directors are Tepco executives, according to company records.

A more contentious motion was brought by 402 shareholders who asked Tokyo Electric to shut down its existing nuclear power plants and not build any new ones. A similar motion had been rejected at each annual shareholders’ meeting for the past two decades.

“Do you really want to go down in history as rejecting this motion?” said an investor who identified himself as Masaki Kito, a lawyer. “Are you prepared to be responsible for the next big accident?”

But the motion was voted down, ending the six-hour meeting.

At the Fukushima plant, meanwhile, recovery efforts have been slow and perilous. A circulation system that would allow the plant’s reactors to re-use cooling water — which officials have called an important step toward resolving the crisis — was started up Monday but shut down just 1.5 hours later.

The system was designed to reduce the amount of contaminated runoff from the reactors, which are being kept cool with water. Tokyo Electric officials have said that 110,000 tons of radioactive water has already accumulated under the reactors, and there is a danger that the water will overflow.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=097d79d2a9e7617b3ff2b7d86a40e736

Questions Raised on Purchases of Tokyo Electric Power Shares

TOKYO — Japanese regulators and executives of the Tokyo Electric Power Company are asking questions about a seemingly coordinated series of stock purchases two weeks ago that led to an undisclosed buyer or buyers acquiring a large bloc of the utility, which owns Japan’s dangerously damaged nuclear power plant.

Regulators want to know whether the trades, valued at up to $600 million and placed from Hong Kong during the week of April 3, were structured to circumvent Japanese securities laws, which require the owner of more than 5 percent of a publicly traded company to file disclosure papers identifying the shareholder.

Depending on the prices at which the buy orders were executed, they could add up to nearly 10 percent of Tepco’s shares.

The trading and the questions surrounding it were described by a senior executive in an interview here. The executive insisted on anonymity to protect business and government connections.

Regulators are also making informal queries to determine whether the government of China or any other country might have used its sovereign wealth fund to finance the purchases, although they could have been made by hedge funds, the senior executive said.

“They’re really, really pushing, trying to figure out who it was,” the executive said of the regulators. “There’s somebody out there that holds a whale of a position, and structured the position in such a way that they don’t have to file” a mandatory disclosure.

Hiro Hasegawa, a spokesman at Tokyo Electric, widely known here as Tepco, declined to comment.

The trades were made during a period when the nuclear accident seemed to be threatening the company with financial disaster. Panicked investors were dumping Tepco’s shares, with as many as a fifth of the shares changing hands each day, at prices as low as 292 yen apiece.

Now, the worst of the crisis — after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami damaged the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant — seems to have passed, although worries remain about the possibility of powerful aftershocks and another tsunami.

Hydrogen gas explosions have stopped at the plant, a leak of highly radioactive water has been plugged and robots are starting to enter the reactor buildings to assess the potential for long-term repairs.

Government officials are talking about ways to help pay for the cleanup, including a sales tax or a national surcharge on electricity. Tokyo Electric’s shares have recovered in the last six trading sessions, closing at 467 yen in Tokyo in Monday.

So who was brave enough to buy Tepco’s shares when investors feared its damaged reactors could release a cloud of radiation toward Tokyo at any moment? That is what regulators and Tokyo Electric officials are trying to find out.

Hiroyuki Hara, an official at Japan’s Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission, said the commission was unable to comment on specific cases or investigations. He said, however, that the commission had stepped up checks of market movements in the turmoil after the March 11 disaster, including any indications of market manipulation or insider trading. He declined to say whether any investigations had been opened. 

Kazushi Sato, an official at the foreign currencies section at the Finance Ministry, said that an investigation would only be started if there were grounds to suspect that a foreign investor had pursued ownership totaling over 10 percent of a national security asset like an electric utility without informing Japanese financial authorities and gaining approval. Not doing so would violate Japanese law. He said he was not aware that such an investigation had been opened over Tokyo Electric shares.

An official at the international investment division of Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, which oversees foreign investment in Japanese utilities, said he was not aware of an investigation into trading of Tokyo Electric shares.

When six bankers in Hong Kong and Tokyo were asked about the purchases, two said that they had heard about them but had no idea who was behind them. The other four said they had heard nothing about the transactions.

Trading records show that investors, fearful of Tepco’s liability from the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant, dumped hundreds of millions of Tepco’s shares in the week of April 3. Nearly a fifth of the entire company’s shares, worth $1.2 billion, changed hands on April 6. More than a tenth of the company’s shares changed hands each of the other days of the week; trading volume has gradually dwindled since then.

All of the world’s biggest banks now have offices in Hong Kong. So orders coming from Hong Kong may not have been placed on behalf of a company, investment fund or individual located there. The money could be coming from the banks’ clients all over the world, including in Japan itself.

Japanese officials are quick to look for Chinese involvement in commercial matters, particularly after China imposed a two-month embargo last autumn on shipments of crucial rare earth minerals to Japan during a territorial dispute over islands in the East China Sea.

But bankers said that the China Investment Corporation, the country’s sovereign wealth fund, seemed like an unlikely buyer of a large stake. China Investment has tended to avoid controversial acquisitions. The fund declined to comment on Monday.

A possible buyer might be a Japanese financial institution that did not believe Japan would allow such a prominent business to collapse.

Business leaders have been hostile to conjecture about an outright nationalization of Tokyo Electric, which has long been one of the bluest of Japan’s blue-chip companies and plays a central role in business groups. Nationalization seemed like a possibility two weeks ago, but has faded from the political dialogue since then.

Hiroko Tabuchi contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=222fa7cbc91042b363057f5af771c9ba