April 23, 2024

U.S. Solar Company Bankruptcies a Boon for China

Some U.S., Japanese and European companies still have a technological edge, although seldom a cost advantage, over Chinese rivals, according to industry analysts. But loans at very low rates from state-owned banks in Beijing, cheap or free land from local and provincial governments across China, huge economies of scale and other cost advantages have transformed China from a minor player in the solar power industry into the main producer of an increasingly competitive source of electricity.

“The top-tier Chinese firms are kind of the benchmark now,” said Shayle Kann, a managing director of solar power studies at GTM Research, a renewable energy market analysis firm based in Boston. “Pricing is determined by where they price, and everyone else prices at a premium or discount to them.”

In addition to Solyndra, Evergreen Solar of Massachusetts and SpectraWatt of New York also filed for bankruptcy in August. BP Solar shut down its factory in Frederick, Maryland, last spring. Those bankruptcies and closings represent almost a fifth of the solar panel manufacturing capacity in the United States, according to GTM Research.

“There is no question that renewable energy companies in the United States feel pressure from China,” said David B. Sandalow, the assistant secretary for policy and international affairs at the U.S. Energy Department. “Many of them say it is cheap capital, not cheap labor, that gives Chinese companies the main competitive advantage.”

China’s Big Three solar power companies — Suntech Power, Yingli Green Energy and Trina Solar — have all announced in the past two weeks that their sales in the second quarter were up between 33 and 63 percent from a year earlier. Yingli and Trina were also profitable in the quarter; Suntech posted a loss mostly because it broke a longstanding agreement to buy solar wafers, a step in the production process, from a Singapore affiliate of MEMC Electronic Materials of Missouri, in order to manufacture more wafers itself.

Shares in large and small Chinese solar power companies have mostly rallied in the past two weeks on the New York and Hong Kong stock markets as investors have welcomed their strong quarterly results and the prospect of dwindling competition from Western rivals; in addition to the bankruptcies in the United States, solar power companies in Germany, another big producer, have been laying off workers and retrenching.

The recent strength of Chinese solar stocks “truly reflects the low cost base of the Chinese solar manufacturers, and it is great to see their positioning, particularly relative to their American and European counterparts,” said K.K. Chan, the chief executive of Nature Elements Capital, a Chinese clean energy investment company based in Beijing. He attributed the Chinese industry’s low costs not to inexpensive labor in China, as solar panel manufacturing is a high-technology industry that is not very labor-intensive, but rather to free or subsidized land from local governments, extensive tax breaks and other government assistance.

Solar panel prices have plunged by 42 percent per kilowatt-hour in the past year as manufacturers have sharply increased capacity, particularly in China. Meanwhile, demand has been somewhat weak in the main markets in the United States and Europe.

Costs for electricity generated by utility-scale solar installations now approach costs for natural gas in some markets, like California’s, when subsidies of as much as 30 percent of the price are included. However, costs remain well above the cost of electricity from coal.

The United States and the European Union have tried to build demand for solar power by subsidizing buyers of solar panels, but increasingly those subsidies are being used to purchase solar panels from China. Chinese government policies have differed in that they have been tightly focused on building the competitiveness of the country’s manufacturers; China exports 95 percent of the solar panels it produces.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/02/business/global/us-solar-company-bankruptcies-a-boon-for-china.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Tokyo Electric Power Defeats Shareholders’ Efforts to Exit Nuclear Business

The management of Tokyo Electric Power also pushed through the appointment of 17 board members, including the reappointment of its 71-year-old chairman, raising questions over the extent of the overhaul that the company has promised in the wake of the unprecedented nuclear disaster.

“I apologize from the bottom of my heart for the trouble and fear that we have brought to our shareholders, and to society,” said the chairman, Tsunehisa Katsumata, at a tightly guarded Tokyo hotel.

“We will do our utmost to bring the accident to a resolution and to work toward our mission of providing a stable source of electricity,” he said.

Some investors refused to be placated. “Go jump into a reactor and die!” one elderly man shouted at the row of executives present, before being escorted out by attendants.

At one point, when Mr. Katsumata tried to wrap up a question-and-answer session, angry shareholders rushed the stage. The session was continued.

Another woman, her voice shaking, told the entire board that they were unfit to lead the company. She said the company had ignored warnings about the dangers of nuclear power.

“Shame on you!” she cried out. “You should all be sacked.”

Tokyo Electric has been fighting for its survival after the March 11 quake and tsunami ravaged its Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, about 225 kilometers, or 140 miles, north of Tokyo, triggering hydrogen explosions and releases of radioactive material in the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl.

At least 80,000 people have fled their homes, while farmers and fishermen in the area have been forced to abandon their livelihoods. Factories within a 20-kilometer evacuation zone have also relocated or closed.

Tokyo Electric could now face as much as 11 trillion yen, or $136 billion, in compensation claims, analysts have estimated. The cost of dismantling the Fukushima plant may reach an additional 20 trillion yen, according to the Japan Center for Economic Research.

The dismal forecasts have cast a dark cloud on the company’s financial health. Last week, Moody’s cut Tokyo Electric’s credit rating to junk status, following a similar move by Standard Poor’s last month. Shares in Tokyo Electric have plunged more than 80 percent since the earthquake.

Prime Minister Naoto Kan has said the government should provide a safety net for Tokyo Electric to keep it afloat while it pays damage claims. Japan is considering setting aside about 230 billion yen from its planned 2 trillion yen supplementary budget to help Tokyo Electric, according to Bloomberg News.

Though Mr. Kan has been keen to hold Tokyo Electric accountable and avoid dipping into public funds, he wants to avoid a bankruptcy and the chaos that such a move would bring to stock and credit markets.

Financial institutions held about 30 percent of Tokyo Electric shares, while other corporations had 5 percent, as of the end of March. Individual investors held about 44 percent, while overseas investors held 17 percent. The company had about 933,000 shareholders as of March 31.

Nevertheless, many analysts have underscored the need for change at Tokyo Electric.

“A fundamental structural overhaul is needed at the board level to enable Tepco to rebuild its reputation and recover financially,” Glass Lewis, a U.S. company that advises institutional investors, said in a report before the shareholder meeting.

Individual investors at the meeting Tuesday aired similar demands.

About 9,300 investors attended the meeting, the most in Tokyo Electric’s history, forming long lines at the hotel venue. Anti-nuclear protestors also gathered at a nearby park to urge the company to abandon nuclear power.

But even as Tokyo Electric’s board faced a rowdy, hostile crowd on Tuesday, the company management, which has institutional investors and some individual investors on its side, never faced any real danger of defeat.

Tokyo Electric won the approval for the appointment of 17 board members, including Mr. Katsumata, the chairman, and the newly named president, Toshio Nishizawa, a longtime company executive. All but one of the directors are Tepco executives, according to company records.

A more contentious motion was brought by 402 shareholders who asked Tokyo Electric to shut down its existing nuclear power plants and not build any new ones. A similar motion had been rejected at each annual shareholders’ meeting for the past two decades.

“Do you really want to go down in history as rejecting this motion?” said an investor who identified himself as Masaki Kito, a lawyer. “Are you prepared to be responsible for the next big accident?”

But the motion was voted down, ending the six-hour meeting.

At the Fukushima plant, meanwhile, recovery efforts have been slow and perilous. A circulation system that would allow the plant’s reactors to re-use cooling water — which officials have called an important step toward resolving the crisis — was started up Monday but shut down just 1.5 hours later.

The system was designed to reduce the amount of contaminated runoff from the reactors, which are being kept cool with water. Tokyo Electric officials have said that 110,000 tons of radioactive water has already accumulated under the reactors, and there is a danger that the water will overflow.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=097d79d2a9e7617b3ff2b7d86a40e736