November 22, 2024

Bucks Blog: Schwab Promotes Lower Cost of Its Index-Only 401(k)

Last year, Charles Schwab began offering an index-fund-only 401(k) option for companies seeking a lower-cost retirement savings option for employees. Ron Lieber, the Your Money columnist, has written about the benefits of retirement plans that offer more index fund choices because the funds have lower investment management costs than actively managed funds. That generally means the employee keeps more retirement savings.

Now that about 50 employers with about 36,000 workers have committed to switching to the new option, and about 20 of the plans are fully up and running, Schwab says the savings on investment costs are in line with what it expected. The index-only option has average investment expenses of just under $15 per $10,000 invested, compared with more than $65 per $10,000 for previous plans that were also provided by Schwab but included actively managed funds.

That means more of the returns on the funds should accrue to employees. Cutting the fees can mean an additional $115,000 over 30 years, depending on the specific assumptions used about the amount saved, employer matching and investment returns, Schwab says.

That does not necessarily mean, however, that all participants in Schwab Index Advantage plans are realizing a 77 percent reduction in average fees, over all. When a company switches to an new index-only plan, its participants are automatically enrolled in a program that offers them individual savings and investment advice from an outside firm called GuidedChoice. The annual fee for the service is about $45 per $10,000, according to Schwab, and is based on the employee’s account balance. That brings the total fees — for investment management, as well as the advice — to just under $60 per $10,000.

That’s a much less significant drop, about 8 percent. But Schwab notes that employees are now getting access to investment advice tailored to each person’s age, income, account balance and savings rate.  In addition, employees can opt out of the advice option — and opt back in, if they change their minds — by going online or calling Schwab. So far, though, most have not. Schwab says 87 percent of employees in the plans are using the advice option.

That’s an important part of the offering, said Steve Anderson, executive vice president for Schwab Retirement Plan Services, because employees who receive individual advice generally save more and are more committed to their goals over the long term. Rather than having the fees go to mutual fund companies, he said, the employees are “paying for the personalized support at the individual level.” (The index-only option is offered to employers with retirement plan assets of $20 million or more.)

Schwab is planning to introduce a 401(k) later this year that offers only exchange-traded funds — nonmanaged mutual funds, pegged to a given index, that trade throughout the day like stocks. Mr. Anderson said Schwab expected investment fees to be even lower on such funds — on the order of $10 per $10,000 invested.

What do you think of the Schwab index-only option? Do you think the individual advice is worth it, or would you opt out?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/26/schwab-promotes-lower-cost-of-its-index-only-401k/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Digital Domain: Online Merchants Again Pursue Same-Day Delivery Service

Kozmo would perish, but some online merchants and their delivery partners are inching back toward that shining vision. Though they aren’t promising free delivery within an hour, they are trying out same-day service for a fee. And in doing so, they are addressing the asymmetry that has bedeviled online purchases of physical goods since Kozmo’s demise: it takes mere seconds to find and buy goods on the Web, but often several days for them to arrive at the doorstep.

Could the wait again be shortened to just an hour? That remains to be seen.

The United States Postal Service will experiment with same-day delivery of online orders in San Francisco. It sees the new option, called Metro Post, as a way to put its delivery infrastructure to fuller use while developing a new source of revenue — a matter of pressing importance as the service’s finances go from bad to worse.

The Postal Service proposes once-a-day pickup of goods ordered online from participating retailers in the city before 2 p.m. and delivery to homes between 4 and 8 p.m.

John G. Friess, a Postal Service spokesman, says the packages won’t go through the normal processing centers, but will instead be passed directly between the Postal Service workers who pick them up and deliver them.

“This will be a new experience,” Mr. Friess says, “having a uniformed Postal Service employee knocking on your front door at this hour, delivering the package that you had ordered earlier in the day.”

A flat rate will be charged for all packages up to 25 pounds, he says, but the price has not been announced and may be adjusted as the trial proceeds.

With its fleets of trucks, United Parcel Service also has the delivery infrastructure for same-city, same-day service. But for now, the company is not set up to do both pickup and delivery in the same day, in the same city, at a modest price.

I used the online U.P.S. pricing guide to find the cost of having a one-pound book picked up at a San Francisco bookstore at 2 p.m. and delivered to a home address a mile and a half away by 8 p.m. the same day. This required U.P.S.’s “Express Critical” service, and the company estimated the cost at $226.46.

If U.P.S. decided it wanted to enter the intracity delivery business in a serious way, it could no doubt offer much more attractive pricing. In fact, it would seem positioned to offer a lower price than the Postal Service, whose operational decisions must be approved by the Postal Regulatory Commission. The Postal Service’s filing with the commission to try out Metro Post is timorous in tone and lists self-applied hobbles. For example, the service says it will enlist 10 or fewer companies for the trial and limit the volume to 200 packages a day, at least until it can “further test its operational capabilities.”

The big online retailers are running their own experiments with same-day delivery in some markets.

Last month, Wal-Mart announced that it had begun same-day delivery of online orders in a handful of cities. A check last week of the price of two-hour delivery windows in San Francisco showed flat fees of $6 to $7. (The minimum order is $45.) Amazon also offers a same-day delivery option in 10 markets. In addition to a delivery charge of $8.99 for all orders other than gift cards, it adds a charge of 99 cents for each item in the order.

Very fast delivery of online purchases can be found in Lower Manhattan, the area served by UrbanFetch, which offers 10,000 products online that will be delivered within an hour. The speed is the same as Kozmo’s — in fact, the company was founded in 2005 by Chris Siragusa, who was chief technology officer at Kozmo — but the selection of goods is far larger.

Customers must live within an eight-square-mile service area, and all deliveries are carried by bicycle. There is no delivery fee for orders of more than $100; a $4.95 fee is charged for smaller orders.

When Mr. Siragusa set out to build an online store with home delivery — originally called MaxDelivery — he did not plan to match Kozmo’s one-hour promise. With friends and family, he first tried a service in which the ordering was done earlier in the day and the deliveries in the evening. But he concluded that late-in-the-day delivery was not compelling to customers. “It was still more convenient to walk to the store yourself,” he said.

UrbanFetch’s fast delivery is possible because its goods are physically close to its customers in a densely packed city.  In other places, online customers must be a bit more patient, as Son of Kozmo is not in sight.

Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: stross@nytimes.com.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/technology/online-merchants-again-pursue-same-day-delivery-service.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Stopping Unwanted Catalogs

The holidays are coming, and right on cue, my mailbox is filling up with catalogs. I like getting some of them because it’s fun to browse for gift ideas. (Hmm. I’d spring for the $35 golden Hufflepuff Cup for my Harry Potter-loving children, but the fine print in the catalog from the Noble Collection warns it “cannot be used as drink ware.”)

But the trade-off for a few minutes of amusement is that our recycling bin is overflowing with catalogs from Land’s End, L.L. Bean, Pottery Barn, Restoration Hardware and the other usual suspects. Do I really need all of them, when I can just go online and see what’s on the menu?

So I took note this month when Catalog Choice, an online service that helps you manage your junk mail, introduced a new option to help cut down on mailbox clutter. It’s called Mail Stop Envelope, and it’s just as it sounds: Catalog Choice mails you a big postage-paid envelope, for a fee of $6.75 per envelope. When you get unwanted catalogs or other mail, like phone books, you rip off the mailing labels, stuff them in the envelope (up to 15) and mail the envelope back to Catalog Choice. The service takes it from there — it scans the address labels and fills out “opt out” forms to take you off the senders’ mailing lists. You can even send envelopes to friends and family as gifts.

But wait. Isn’t that the same sort of opt-out service that Catalog Choice already offers online, free?

Well, yes. But it turns out that some people don’t want to mess with entering their e-mail and catalog information online, and would prefer to use snail mail and have Catalog Choice’s staff do the heavy lifting for them. Catalog Choice said it was swamped with requests for the envelopes almost immediately after starting the service a week ago, and has already sold about 5,000 envelopes. People are sending catalog labels, yes, but also sweepstakes offers and donation requests. “This is easier for some people,” said Chuck Teller, Catalog Choice’s executive director.

The service isn’t going totally old school, though. It is working on an iPhone app that will let you take a photograph of the mail label and send it to Catalog Choice for processing, Mr. Teller said.

While I’m a big fan of online services, I can see the simple attraction of the old-fashioned envelope. Just stash it near where you sort your mail. Then, when you see a catalog you don’t want (Sorry, Brookstone. I’ll have to live without  Dave, the remote-controlled Funky Monkey.), you rip off the label, tuck it in the envelope, and recycle the catalog. When the envelope is full, toss it in the mail. Done.

Assuming, of  course, that you really want the catalogs to stop.

I do, I really do, right after I order the $49.95 wind chimes that play “Amazing Grace.”

Would you pay almost $7 to stop delivery of unwanted mail?

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b46610dd819226e420161f513584b1cd