April 25, 2024

Bucks Blog: Schwab Promotes Lower Cost of Its Index-Only 401(k)

Last year, Charles Schwab began offering an index-fund-only 401(k) option for companies seeking a lower-cost retirement savings option for employees. Ron Lieber, the Your Money columnist, has written about the benefits of retirement plans that offer more index fund choices because the funds have lower investment management costs than actively managed funds. That generally means the employee keeps more retirement savings.

Now that about 50 employers with about 36,000 workers have committed to switching to the new option, and about 20 of the plans are fully up and running, Schwab says the savings on investment costs are in line with what it expected. The index-only option has average investment expenses of just under $15 per $10,000 invested, compared with more than $65 per $10,000 for previous plans that were also provided by Schwab but included actively managed funds.

That means more of the returns on the funds should accrue to employees. Cutting the fees can mean an additional $115,000 over 30 years, depending on the specific assumptions used about the amount saved, employer matching and investment returns, Schwab says.

That does not necessarily mean, however, that all participants in Schwab Index Advantage plans are realizing a 77 percent reduction in average fees, over all. When a company switches to an new index-only plan, its participants are automatically enrolled in a program that offers them individual savings and investment advice from an outside firm called GuidedChoice. The annual fee for the service is about $45 per $10,000, according to Schwab, and is based on the employee’s account balance. That brings the total fees — for investment management, as well as the advice — to just under $60 per $10,000.

That’s a much less significant drop, about 8 percent. But Schwab notes that employees are now getting access to investment advice tailored to each person’s age, income, account balance and savings rate.  In addition, employees can opt out of the advice option — and opt back in, if they change their minds — by going online or calling Schwab. So far, though, most have not. Schwab says 87 percent of employees in the plans are using the advice option.

That’s an important part of the offering, said Steve Anderson, executive vice president for Schwab Retirement Plan Services, because employees who receive individual advice generally save more and are more committed to their goals over the long term. Rather than having the fees go to mutual fund companies, he said, the employees are “paying for the personalized support at the individual level.” (The index-only option is offered to employers with retirement plan assets of $20 million or more.)

Schwab is planning to introduce a 401(k) later this year that offers only exchange-traded funds — nonmanaged mutual funds, pegged to a given index, that trade throughout the day like stocks. Mr. Anderson said Schwab expected investment fees to be even lower on such funds — on the order of $10 per $10,000 invested.

What do you think of the Schwab index-only option? Do you think the individual advice is worth it, or would you opt out?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/26/schwab-promotes-lower-cost-of-its-index-only-401k/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Tuesday Reading: Early Music Lessons Have Longtime Benefits

September 11

LearnVest Dips Its Toes Into Investment Advice

LearnVest, a financial management Web site, is now offering investment advice from a financial planner for $599 a year but won’t offer specific product suggestions.

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/tuesday-reading-early-music-lessons-have-longtime-benefits/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Your Money: Investment Advice for Doctors: First, Do No Harm

One group of individuals who make more financial mistakes than average may not have much in common with another. But we can learn a lot about what not to do by rubbernecking at each of them in turn.

So over the next couple of weeks, I’ll be sifting through the mistakes of various classes of people in search of particular human frailties, acute messes of the well-meaning, and sins of action or inaction.

We begin with physicians, for whom a combination of factors can conspire against success. They take eight or so years off from the world to do nothing but learn how to be doctors, then receive a six-figure annual paycheck with no real idea of what to do with it. If they can save lives, many believe, managing money ought to be easy. But self-certainty like that can lead to all sorts of horrible mistakes.

Ben Utley, a financial planner in Eugene, Ore., whose clients are almost all physicians, says he doesn’t believe that doctors necessarily make more mistakes than the public at large. But if they make three or four times as much money as the average person, their mistakes are going to be much more noticeable.

“They may have an extra $50,000 annually on an after-tax basis,” he said. “If there is no financial plan, that money tends to wander off.”

Here’s how that ends up happening.

IMPATIENCE The life of a physician-in-training is one mostly of deprivation. After years of debt, apprenticeship and little sleep, it’s no surprise that doctors want to reward themselves when the first big paycheck arrives.

Meanwhile, real estate agents are standing by to speak sweet nothings into their ears, cooing about the trophy house that ought to serve as a marker of their newfound professional standing.

Mr. Utley has a name for the malady that results. He calls it “Residentia,” a disease marked by out-of-control impulses to buy a home two or three times the size of the average American’s, no matter how much medical school debt the doctor may have.

There’s one big problem with giving in, according to Joe Hollen, an emergency room physician turned financial planner in Reno, Nev. Doctors have a shorter working life than many people because they generally start no earlier than age 30 or so. Sure, they earn a lot, but they also pay more in taxes, receive little to no financial aid for their children’s educations and have fewer years for their retirement money to compound.

That makes it all the more important for them to put more money away sooner and not hand too much of it over to mortgage bankers or make other big financial blunders.

FAITH There are all sorts of opportunities for big earners to err financially, and the nature and professional standing of doctors make them particularly vulnerable.

“Doctors are used to a tremendous exchange of information on a very open level,” said Steve Podnos, a cardiac physician turned financial planner in Merritt Island, Fla. “There is no guile, no trickery. Everyone works together in a medical setting to get a good outcome.”

But in the world of financial services? Not so much. “Physicians are viewed as marks, because they are known to have money,” he said.

Barry Kaplan, a former dentist who is now a financial planner in Atlanta, says physicians and dentists can find themselves being pitched on questionable investment schemes. He recalls seeing the same company at every dental convention offering an opportunity to make tax-advantaged donations to one’s own charitable foundation and then use the money for things like college expenses.

“I kept saying to myself, ‘This can’t possibly be legal. Haven’t they found them out by now?’ ” he recalled. “Two plastic surgeons told me that everyone in their office was looking at it. I thought they were out of their minds.”

Eventually, the dentist behind the scheme was found guilty of tax fraud for filing false returns himself.

CONFIDENCE Hubris is perhaps the most common wealth destroyer here. “The problem is that they think they know better, that there is some secret formula to beat the market, and there’s not,” said Carolyn McClanahan, a financial planner in Jacksonville, Fla., who began her career as an emergency room physician. “I used to think that way too.”

Overconfidence is not unique to doctors, but given that they are already well above average in terms of raw intelligence and income, it can be all too tempting for them to think they can size up investments as quickly as they take a patient through triage.

And so they are tempted by all sorts of wacko pursuits. Mr. Podnos recalls a $25,000 marijuana farm investment that one physician client presented to him with a straight face, arguing that the returns were going to be 18 percent annually. Mr. Kaplan remembers a pitch to invest in rubber shoes for horses. “Apparently, all the guys in the doctor’s lounge were talking about it,” he said.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=03c48840cc14b3021cb7e01d6674a33f