May 6, 2024

What the Latest Jobless Figures Mean for Obama

The economy has added 1.5 million jobs over the last year, and the pace seems to be picking up. The unemployment rate last month, 8.5 percent, was at its lowest level since February 2009, Mr. Obama’s first full month in office.

Of course, the economy has been here before, only to fall back again. In both early 2010 and early 2011, job growth picked up briefly, before the continuing global financial crisis — including Europe’s problems — again reasserted itself.

The White House made the mistake of reacting too quickly and positively to some of that earlier news. It went so far as to refer to the summer of 2010 as “recovery summer.”

As they had in recent weeks, Mr. Obama and his aides noted the good news on Friday, though they said there was a long way to go, and urged Congress to extend the payroll tax cut and pass other parts of the president’s agenda.

“The economy is moving in the right direction,” Mr. Obama said. “We’re creating jobs on a consistent basis.”

But he added: “There are a lot of people that are still hurting out there. After losing more than 8 million jobs in the recession, obviously, you know, we have a lot more work to do.”

And the economy clearly remains a problem for Mr. Obama. Shortly after the release of the jobs report, Mitt Romney, the winner of this week’s Republican caucus in Iowa, said at a campaign stop in South Carolina, “This president doesn’t understand how the economy works.”

In a statement, Mr. Romney called the unemployment numbers “good news” but said it is “no cause for celebration.” He added: “President Obama’s policies have slowed the recovery and created misery for 24 million Americans who are unemployed, or stuck in part-time jobs when what they really want is full-time work.”

The big question is whether the economy will continue to improve. The recent job growth, on its own, is not enough to keep unemployment falling at a significant pace.

But there is some reason for optimism. The Labor Department conducts two surveys each month, one of households and one of businesses. The business survey produces the widely cited number on job changes — 200,000 in December.

The household survey, although usually more volatile, can sometimes provide a more accurate estimate at turning points. IT often captures jobs at new companies that are not included in the business survey.

Over the past six months, the household survey shows an average monthly gain of about 230,000, compared with a gain of only 142,000 in the business survey. Normal population growth means that the economy needs to add between 125,000 and 150,000 a month to keep unemployment from rising.

If the household survey is really the more accurate one, the good news on jobs may well continue, complicating a central point in the Republican case against Mr. Obama.

On the other hand, some of the recent strength comes from the restocking of warehouses, which will not continue. Europe still has not solved its problems. The troubles in Iran could cause oil prices to jump. And American businesses and consumers, still scarred by the financial crisis, are probably still easy to scare.

No one knows what the economy is going to do in 2012, but the chances of it improving markedly are higher than they were a couple of months ago.

Susan Saulny contributed reporting from Conway, S.C.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=3f23a527a1e44f5d4119bebe8a31053d

U.S. Adds a Modest 80,000 Jobs; Rate Drops to 9%

That was the reaction on Friday to the government report that the nation’s employers added just 80,000 jobs in October. While the pace was not exactly robust, it was better than over this summer, when monthly hiring fell to 20,000. Upward revisions in the report for September and August gains contributed to the sense that the economic picture was a little less bleak.

“The underlying momentum of the economy is better now than we thought it was a few months ago,” said Augustine Faucher, the director of macroeconomics at Moody’s Analytics. “We’re doing O.K., even if we’re not doing great. The odds of a double-dip recession are lower, at least.”

But even without a second recession, frustration over the sluggish recovery could impede President Obama’s re-election chances.

The administration is still haunted by its overly optimistic predictions, made in January 2009, of what the economy would look like once Congress passed a $787 billion stimulus package. White House economics advisers predicted that the stimulus would bring unemployment down to 6 percent by the end of this year and close to 5 percent by the end of 2012. Instead, unemployment dipped slightly to 9 percent in October from 9.1 percent, about where it has been all year long. The Federal Reserve is projecting about 8.6 percent for next year.

While the Congressional Budget Office and other nonpartisan organizations have said, again and again, that the recession and recovery would have been even worse without government intervention, Republican presidential contenders argue that today’s weak economy proves that fiscal stimulus cannot create jobs.

The Obama administration has taken the opposite tack, arguing that the economy needs more, not less, government assistance.

“What I take from this report is that the economy is moving in the right direction, but it’s not moving there fast enough, and this is why the administration proposed the American Jobs Act,” said Alan B. Krueger, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers.

The job gains in October were just barely enough to keep up with population growth, so they did not substantially reduce the backlog of 14 million unemployed workers. As a result, the unemployment rate is still about double what it was in the year before the recession began, 4.6 percent.

“It will take years for the U.S. job market to return to its prerecession glory,” said Jason Schenker, president of Prestige Economics.

Economists and politicians typically view the monthly jobs number as a crucial indicator of the nation’s economic health. But with so many potential game changers on the horizon in Europe and at home, the latest report may say little about what Americans should expect.

The fate of Greece has been up in the air for about a year and a half, and this week the political wrangling has been particularly tumultuous in Athens. If the European bailout deal falls through for Greece, the effects could spread to other heavily indebted countries like Italy and perhaps set off another global financial crisis.

“The outlook ahead remains for modest growth, but risks remain to the downside without a convincing resolution of the euro zone crisis, which is conspicuously absent at present,” said Nigel Gault, chief United States economist for IHS Global Insight.

Mitigating these worries, however, is the case of MF Global, an American financial services company that filed for bankruptcy this week after making bad investments in European markets. The bankruptcy of the relatively small firm was taken in stride.

“We had a primary dealer file for bankruptcy this week without seeing any of the waves from 2008 related to Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers,” said John Ryding, the chief economist at RDQ Economics, referring to two bigger financial firms whose collapses helped send global financial markets into a tailspin.

Another potential wild card is Congress’s panel on deficit reductions, the so-called supercommittee. Talks have stalled, and the committee has less than three weeks before an alternative (and more draconian) plan might kick in.

If government spending cuts are put into effect too quickly, they could be a severe drag on the economy and even derail the fragile recovery, economists have said. Governments at various levels have been steadily paring back, and have laid off, on net, 323,000 workers in the last year.

There are other domestic policy unknowns, too. Congress has not yet decided whether to renew a 2 percent payroll tax cut and federal extensions of unemployment benefits — both set to expire in January. Many economists support the measures.

Even if shocks like these do not materialize, the economic outlook is still troubling.

Among the biggest challenges is the army of millions of Americans who have been out of work for months or even years.

The average time an unemployed worker has been pounding the pavement is unusually high, at 39.4 weeks, just shy of the all-time high of 40.5 weeks recorded in September. People who have been out of work for longer spells have significantly more trouble getting rehired, for complicated reasons, including stigma and the deterioration of skills.

“In interviews, they say they’re concerned that my base of skills has been antiquated because of this employment gap,” said Sarah Hoppe, 43, a former account manager in Toledo, Ohio, who was laid off in July 2009.

“I tell them I have a good mind and an infinite capacity to learn,” she said, but employers still pass her over. “It’s absolutely demoralizing.”

In addition to the upward revisions to previous job growth numbers, there were a few other positive signs in the latest jobs report.

Employment in temporary help services rose slightly. Employers often use temp workers before taking the plunge and hiring permanent staff.

Hourly earnings also rose 5 cents, after a gain of 6 cents in September.

The length of the average workweek, however, remained flat at 34.3 hours, where it has been for about a year. Companies usually work their existing employees harder before hiring additional workers, so the stagnant workweek is not a particularly good sign for job growth.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/05/business/economy/us-added-80000-jobs-in-october.html?partner=rss&emc=rss