Cheap but crowded neighborhoods are being cleared across China as part of a stepped-up urbanization campaign by the country’s new leaders. China aims to spend an estimated 40 trillion renminbi, or $6 trillion, on infrastructure, including housing, as a projected 400 million people become urban residents over the next decade.
But the clearance of so-called villages within cities removes cheap housing stock for the very people chosen to fuel that migration without providing sufficient replacement units. The land is sold by municipalities to developers who generally erect expensive apartments.
That throws into question how the government can achieve its ambitious goal.
“On the one hand, the law doesn’t allow former farmers to expand housing for migrant workers; on the other hand, local governments don’t have the money to build affordable housing either,” said Li Ping, senior attorney for Landesa Rural Development Institute in Beijing.
About 130 million Chinese migrants live in tiny, subdivided rooms rented out by former farmers whose villages have been surrounded by sprawl, according to government surveys.
Policies to provide government-built housing while razing these villages within cities result in a net loss of housing units, according to urban planners and academics, while choking off the private rental market that for decades has enabled China’s massive urban migration.
The dilemma poses harsh choices for those who have made lives in the cities on the slimmest of margins, like the migrants in the converted shipping containers in Shanghai.
“They can’t just come and ask me to move. I have so many products here that I sell. So much stuff worth at least tens of thousands of yuan,” said Li Yanxin, a migrant from nearby Anhui Province who runs a small convenience store out of his container. His profits — and therefore his ability to pay for his teenager’s education — depend on the low rent he found in the container village.
Local officials put muscle behind a policy of clearing such sites, often declaring these dwellings illegal by noting nonagricultural land allocated to villagers cannot be used for commercial purposes. Land reclassified as “urban” can be sold at a huge profit.
“Not everyone can live in a high rise. Especially those of us who work in the recycling business,” said Zhang Baofa, who rents out used shipping containers. “This is zoned as village land. I borrowed the land. I bought the containers. I rented it out. I would know if it were illegal,” Mr. Zhang said.
Local officials, embarrassed by photos of the container village circulating on the Internet, have vowed to remove the site within days. On Thursday, after four years of operation, they declared Mr. Li’s store to be unregistered.
Chinese cities lack the visible slums of other developing countries, thanks in part to communities like Xinzhuang in Beijing that collectively house about 3.4 million migrants just within the capital.
A high, whitewashed wall and strip of green lawn hide Xinzhuang’s 10,000 residents from surrounding luxury apartment blocks. Three black chickens scratch along a filthy gutter of blue-grey water next to the public latrine. Rooms of about 12 square meters, or 130 square feet, each house families of three, for 500 renminbi a month.
“A regular apartment would be more comfortable, but it’s about 2,000 renminbi a month. That’s too much for the type of people who live here. They want to save what they can. We fill the lowest niche,” said the landlord Dong Gang, whose former farmhouse is now a two-story concrete structure divided into about 30 makeshift rooms.
Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/01/business/global/in-chinas-urbanization-worries-of-a-housing-shortage.html?partner=rss&emc=rss