April 25, 2024

DealBook: Goldman Profit Reflects Bank Sector’s Strength

The headquarters of Goldman Sachs in New York.Mark Lennihan/Associated PressThe headquarters of Goldman Sachs in Manhattan.

10:01 a.m. | Updated

The spate of strong bank earnings continues.

On Tuesday, Goldman Sachs reported first-quarter profit of $2.2 billion, or $4.29 a share, driven by strength in its investment banking business as well as its investing and lending unit.

Across Wall Street, banks are showing signs of strength. Last week, JPMorgan posted a 33 percent jump in quarterly profit, to $6.53 billion. Profit at Wells Fargo rose 22 percent, to $5.17 billion. Citigroup profit surged by 30 percent while BlackRock earnings were up 10 percent.

Goldman, like other banks, is benefiting from the ongoing improvement in the markets and the economy. While banks are adjusting to new regulation, they are finding new ways to bolster profit and cut costs, helping to drive record profit.

Goldman’s results were up from the year-ago period and well ahead of analysts’ expectations of $3.89 a share, according to Thomson Reuters. Earnings per share were up 9 percent compared with the period a year earlier. Goldman shares, however, were down 2 percent in morning trading to around $143.50 a share on a day when the broader market was up.

Analysts had been anticipating a fairly decent quarter for Goldman, in part because many of its rivals have posted strong results in their investment banking and securities divisions.

Related Links



“Our strong client franchise across our businesses drove generally solid results. Still, the potential for macroeconomic instability was felt in the quarter and constrained overall corporate and investor activity. We continue to be very focused on controlling our costs and efficiently managing our capital,” Goldman’s chairman and chief executive, Lloyd C. Blankfein, said in a statement.

The firm reported $10.1 billion in revenue in the quarter ended March 31, almost flat from levels a year ago, when revenue came in at $10 billion. Analysts had been forecasting revenue of $8.35 billion.

Net revenue in Goldman’s powerful division that trades bonds, currencies and commodities was somewhat disappointing after it fell 7 percent, to $3.2 billion, from the period a year earlier. The firm said net revenues were lower in most businesses, “primarily reflecting significantly lower net revenues in interest rate products compared with a strong first quarter of 2012.”

The firm’s investing and lending operations, however, did quite well, posting revenue of $2.07 billion, up 8 percent from the period in 2012. Goldman said this unit benefited from an increase in equity prices and a $24 million gain from the firm’s stake in the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a strategic investment Goldman made in 2006.

Goldman’s investment banking division also weighed in with strong results, as revenue increased 36 percent, to $1.57 billion. The firm said the unit enjoyed a lift from record debt underwriting results as a result of leveraged finance and commercial mortgage-related activity. The bank added that revenue in equity underwriting was also “significantly higher compared with the first quarter of 2012, reflecting an increase in client activity.”

The firm’s annualized return on equity, a key financial measure watched by investors, was 12.4 percent in the quarter, roughly the same as it was in the year-ago period. Although the figure was not as strong as it was before the financial crisis when firms like Goldman were able to produce outsize returns by using unheard levels of borrowed money, it’s still ahead of some of the firm’s rivals.

Goldman is one of a number of Wall Street banks releasing earnings this week. Morgan Stanley will round out bank earnings season on Thursday. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters are expecting that firm to earn 57 cents a share.

Since the financial crisis, Goldman and other firms have been working hard to cut expenses. The bank had 32,000 employees at the end of the quarter, 400 fewer than at the end of 2012.

The firm set aside $4.3 billion to pay employees, or 43 percent of its revenue, which was in line with previous quarters. The compensation amount is set aside quarterly but not paid out until the fourth quarter, when the firm’s full-year results are known.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/goldman-sachss-first-quarter-profit-beats-estimates/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Lagardère Sells EADS Stake for $3 Billion

PARIS — Lagardère, the French media conglomerate, said Tuesday it has sold its 7.4 percent stake in European Aeronautic Defense Space, beginning the long-anticipated overhaul in the ownership structure of EADS, the parent of Airbus.

Lagardère said it raised €2.3 billion, or $3 billion, through the sale, with EADS spending €500 million to buy 1.6 percent of its own shares — a purchase that fell short of some analysts’ expectations.

Société Générale and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, which managed the sale, said 61.1 million EADS shares were placed at €37.35 each. That was a 3.5 percent discount to Monday’s closing price of €38.71.

“Many investors we spoke to believed EADS would acquire €1 billion to €1.5 billion of the stock being placed by Lagardère,” JPMorgan Cazenove analysts said in a research note.

“It is unclear why EADS is not taking a bigger share of this placing but it is possible that EADS is prioritizing increasing its free float over the accretion of a buyback,” the analysts said.

EADS may also want to “retain buyback firepower’ to support its share price over the next 18 months,” the analysts added.

Lagardère, whose holdings include the book publisher Hachette and magazines like Elle and Paris Match, has said it plans to use the proceeds mostly to pay down debt and return cash to shareholders, likely via a special dividend.

Lagardère’s exit from EADS will be followed by the withdrawal of Daimler, the German automaker, paving the way for the aerospace group to have a larger free-market float with combined government stakes capped at 28 percent.

Since EADS was created in 2000, the French and German governments had an effective veto over the company’s strategic management decisions. Under the new ownership structure, France and Germany will each hold as 12 percent stake and Spain will have 4 percent.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/10/business/global/lagardere-sells-eads-stake-for-3-billion.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

JPMorgan and Credit Suisse to Pay $417 Million in Mortgage Settlement

The banks did not admit or deny guilt. JPMorgan agreed to pay $296.9 million to settle the charges and Credit Suisse agreed to pay $120 million.

Robert Khuzami, director of the S.E.C.’s Division of Enforcement, in a statement called mortgage products like those sold by the banks “ground zero in the financial crisis.”

Friday’s settlement ends the agency’s investigation into how JPMorgan dealt with its mortgage securities acquired through Bear Stearns, the troubled unit it purchased in the depths of the 2008-9 financial crisis.

Several other Wall Street firms also packaged and sold subprime mortgages, which resulted in billions of dollars in losses for investors.

The S.E.C. has brought more than 100 cases related to the financial crisis, but has struggled to secure a big victory against individuals responsible for some of the reckless behavior that nearly felled the American economy.

 

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/business/jpmorgan-and-credit-suisse-to-pay-417-million-in-mortgage-settlement.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Gilead to Buy Pharmasset for $11 Billion

Test samples in a Gilead Sciences laboratory in Foster City, Calif.David Paul Morris/Bloomberg NewsTest samples in a Gilead Sciences laboratory in Foster City, Calif.

10:54 a.m. | Updated

Gilead Sciences made a bold move on Monday to capture the lead in developing the next generation of hepatitis C drugs, agreeing to pay $11 billion in cash for Pharmasset.

Gilead will pay $137 a share in cash, nearly 89 percent above Pharmasset’s closing price on Friday and almost 55 percent above its 52-week high of $88.52.

The treatment of hepatitis C has already undergone a revolution this year, with new pills from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Merck sharply increasing the cure rates and also often cutting the required duration of treatment.

But those new drugs still must be used with interferon, a type of drug injected once a week that can cause severe flu-like symptoms and other side effects.

Pharmasset, based in Princeton, N.J., is leading the push to develop the first all-oral treatment regimen, doing away with the need for interferon. Its lead drug candidate, PSI-7977, has just entered the final phase of clinical testing and could be on the market as early as 2014, Gilead said.

Pharmasset is “way ahead of everybody else,” Norbert W. Bischofberger, Gilead’s executive vice president for research and development, told analysts on a Monday morning conference call.

Gilead is a leader in developing and selling drugs to treat H.I.V. infection and AIDS, and also sells medicines for hepatitis B. But it has not distinguished itself in the hepatitis C area.

Between Pharmasset’s drugs and Gilead’s own experimental hepatitis C products, “we have all the ingredients in hand now” to explore various combinations of oral drugs, Dr. Bischofberger said.

Eventually, he said, Gilead hopes to combine two or three hepatitis C drugs into a single pill, a strategy that has been very successful for AIDS with its drug Atripla.

Geoffrey Meacham, biotechnology analyst at JPMorgan, called the move “a bold and strategically positive deal” for Gilead. Yaron Werber of Citigroup said the acquisition “propels Gilead to potentially dominate the hep-C market.”

Still, shares of Gilead fell about 10 percent, to $35.64, in trading on Monday morning, perhaps because of concerns about the price of the deal and its effect on earnings. The takeover is expected to dilute Gilead’s earnings through 2014 and then begin contributing to profit in 2015.

Shares of Pharmasset, whose ticker symbol is VRUS, soared about 85 percent on Monday, to $134.20. Before Monday, the stock had already climbed more than 240 percent in the last year on expectations for PSI-7977. The company reported a $91 million loss for the year ended Sept. 30 on revenue of $897,000.

Major drug makers have been on an acquisition spree in the last few years, driven by the need to refill their product pipelines. Gilead, based near San Francisco, has made 10 deals since 2006, though the one for Pharmasset is by far the biggest in Gilead’s 24-year history.

Many of Gilead’s previous acquisitions, like those aimed at moving the company into cardiovascular medicine, have been considered less than successful by many on Wall Street.

Hepatitis C, being a viral disease, fits more with Gilead’s expertise. But there are likely to be questions about why Gilead was paying nearly twice Pharmasset’s market value, which was already considered extremely high for a company without a product on the market.

John F. Milligan, Gilead’s president and chief operating officer, told analysts that Gilead, unlike Pharmasset, already had the ability to apply for regulatory approvals and to sell PSI-7977 around the world.

“So in our hands, it becomes more valuable,” he said. He also said there was apparently competition to buy Pharmasset.

Desperation might have played a role as well. Dr. Milligan said one of Gilead’s own hepatitis C drugs had not lived up to expectations.

About 3 million to 4 million Americans — and as many as 170 million people worldwide — are estimated to have chronic infections of hepatitis C. Many of those infected in the United States are Baby Boomers who injected drugs using contaminated needles decades ago and might not even know they are infected. The infection can cause liver cirrhosis and liver cancer, but often not for decades after the initial infection.

Until recently, treatment of genotype 1 of the disease, which accounts for about 70 percent of the infections in the United States and is one of the most-resistant strains, involved an almost yearlong regimen of interferon and ribavirin, an oral medicine.

The new drugs, Vertex’s Incivek and Merck’s Victrelis, when combined with the existing two drugs, increase the cure rate for genotype 1 to 60 to 80 percent. And in some cases they require only 24 weeks of treatment.

Pharmasset’s PSI-7977 has been tested mostly for genotypes 2 and 3, which generally require only 24 weeks of treatment with the older drugs. In one small test, 10 of 10 patients treated with the drug and ribavirin were considered cured after only 12 weeks of treatment, a result that astounded researchers.

Pharmasset is now testing that combination in two phase 3 trials aimed at genotypes 2 and 3. It is less clear how well PSI-7977 will do against the tougher and more common genotype 1.

The new drugs work by directly blocking the action of enzymes used by the virus, similar to the strategy used so successfully against H.I.V. PSI-7977 blocks the polymerase enzyme. The Merck and Vertex drugs block the protease enzyme.

As with H.I.V., it is expected that a combination of two or three drugs might be needed, so drug makers will either have to cooperate with each other or make deals to buy up the various ingredients.

Roche, for instance, has made acquisitions and licensing deals in an effort to put together the pieces. It owns rights to one of Pharmasset’s drugs, called mericitabine. And Pharmasset has been testing PSI-7977 in combination with drugs from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Johnson Johnson. Those arrangements are expected to continue despite the takeover.

Pharmasset’s board unanimously approved the deal, which will be carried out through a tender offer, according to a news release from both companies.

Gilead plans to pay for the deal with a combination of cash on hand, bank loans and new bonds, with financing coming from Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Barclays Capital. Gilead said on Monday that it would suspend its share repurchase program for now.

Besides Barclays and Bank of America, Gilead was advised by the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom. Pharmasset was advised by Morgan Stanley and the law firm Sullivan Cromwell.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/11/21/gilead-to-buy-pharmasset-for-11-billion/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Shares Close Down on Wall Street

Trade figures from the world’s two biggest economies, the United States and China, also stoked concerns over the economic outlook, ending a rally in European stocks as well.

The Dow Jones industrial average closed down 40.72 points, or 0.35 percent, to 11,478.13. JPMorgan fell 5.5 percent. Other banks also fell. Citigroup dropped 5 percent, Morgan Stanley 4.4 percent and Bank of America 5 percent.

JPMorgan is the first big American bank to announce quarterly results. Next week Wells Fargo Company, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley will report. JPMorgan is considered one of the industry’s leaders, so its results do not bode well for other financial companies, said Jason Lilly, a portfolio manager at Rockland Trust Investment Management Group.

JPMorgan’s net income fell 4 percent in the July-September period. Fees from investment banking dropped 31 percent because of severe turbulence in financial markets this summer. The bank said it was concerned about the ability of consumers and businesses to manage their debts.

An afternoon rally in technology stocks trimmed some of Wall Street’s losses. Yahoo rose 1.5 percent as investors speculated the company might be bought. Technology stocks in the Standard Poor’s 500 index rose 0.8 percent, the most of any industry group in the index. The technology-focused Nasdaq composite rose 15 points, or 0.6 percent, to 2,620.

“There’s a mounting interest in Yahoo and that has filtered out into tech stocks,” said Quincy Krosby, a market strategist for Prudential Financial.

The Standard Poor’s 500 index fell 3.59 points, or 0.3 percent, to 1,203.66. Financial stocks fell 2.4 percent, the most of the 10 company groups that make up the index.

Investors were also disappointed by a report that China’s trade surplus narrowed for a second month in September. That suggests the Chinese economy is slowing more than previously thought, which could hurt demand for exports from the United States.

The United States trade deficit was essentially unchanged in August at $45.6 billion, with exports and imports both slipping. Lower imports are a bad sign for the United States economy, since it shows weakness in consumer demand.

Prior to Thursday, stocks had soared for a week on signs that Europe was starting to get a handle on its financial crisis. The Dow had rallied 8.1 percent since last Tuesday, when it hit its lowest point of the year. The Standard Poor’s 500 index rose even more in that time, 9.8 percent. That was the biggest 7-day jump for the S.P. since March 2009, when the market hit 12-year lows.

The sharp highs and lows are typical of the volatility that has plagued markets since August, when investors began reacting to fears that indebted economies in Europe would collapse and the United States would slide back into recession. Many analysts think the market is in for more big swings until a resolution to Europe’s debt is reached.

“Europe will definitely contribute to more volatility. That story isn’t done,” said Mr. Lilly.

In Europe, there was more progress toward strengthening a financial rescue fund aimed at shoring up the region’s banks. Slovakia’s parliament approved a measure that would release large amounts of money to European banks and governments before a full-blown crisis sets in. Slovakia had blocked the bill Tuesday, becoming the only one of the 17 countries that use the euro to do so.

In addition to the stronger bailout package, European Commission leaders had said they would require banks to hold more capital to protect them against losses. But without specifics on how those reforms will be accomplished, traders are getting concerned that the plans will deteriorate.

In corporate news, the BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion fell 1.7 percent after a three-day outage that cut off service to users across the world. The company said it had fixed the problem, which resulted from a breakdown in its European infrastructure.

The Blackstone Group lost 5 percent after a Citi Investment Research analyst dropped the private-equity firm from a list of favorite stocks, saying the firm won’t be able to make strong real estate investments for some time because of the weak economy.

Chip-maker Broadcom rose 2.2 percent after an analyst upgraded the company, saying it was selling more chips for smartphones.

Netflix rose 2.8 percent after the company secured a deal with Warner Bros. Television Group and CBS to stream programs from the CW television network.

In Europe, Britain’s FTSE 100 closed down 0.7 percent, while Germany’s DAX and France’s CAC 40 were both 1.3 percent lower.

In Asia, Japan’s Nikkei 225 index climbed 1 percent to 8,823.25. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng jumped 2.3 percent to 18,757.81 and South Korea’s Kospi index rose 0.8 percent to 1,823.10. Australia’s SP/ASX 200 gained 1 percent to 4,244.50. The Shanghai Composite Index advanced 0.8 percent to 2,438.79.

Oil prices meanwhile tracked European equities lower — benchmark oil for November delivery was down $1.02 to $84.55 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=359a05ef31ba9c3e7541b50a9aebf627

JPMorgan in Talks to Settle S.E.C. Inquiry Into Securities

JPMorgan’s securities unit has been cooperating with agency officials and is “in advanced discussions with the staff concerning a potential resolution of that investigation,” the bank said in a quarterly financial report filed with the S.E.C. on Friday.

JPMorgan did not specify which collateralized debt obligations were the subject of the S.E.C. talks and said there was no assurance that the settlement would be completed.

The C.D.O. investigation gathered momentum last year when the Goldman Sachs Group agreed to pay $550 million and admitted making a “mistake” in its disclosures about a subprime-linked C.D.O.

Separately, JPMorgan, one of the lenders criticized over improper foreclosures on military families’ homes, won approval of a $56 million settlement of claims that it overcharged service members on their mortgages.

Judge Margaret B. Seymour of United States District Court in Columbia, S.C., found that the accord, which provides $27 million in cash to military personnel overcharged on mortgages as well as other benefits, was a fair resolution of suits over the problem loans.

Service members who suffered from the overcharges think the settlement “is phenomenal,” said Jonathon Rowles, a Marine fighter pilot who sued JPMorgan over the handling of his loan.

“They recognized they made mistakes and they took the steps to fix them and compensate people for their damages,” Mr. Rowles said in an interview after the hearing. “I’m pleased with the way it turned out.”

JPMorgan officials acknowledged earlier this year that one of the bank’s units made errors in handling mortgages covered by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. That law was enacted in 1942 to shield deployed military personnel from financial stress.

Bank officials “regret the mistakes our firm made on mortgages for members of the military,” Frank J. Bisignano, a JPMorgan executive who leads the home lending unit, said in an e-mailed statement on Friday.

Under the terms of the settlement, Mr. Rowles and an estimated 6,000 other service personnel whose mortgage accounts were mishandled will split the $27 million, according to court filings. That will provide an average payout of $4,500 per soldier, but recoveries will vary based on the service member’s individual damage claims.

The accord also calls for JPMorgan to cut interest rates on all mortgages held by deployed troops to 4 percent for one year, the filing shows.

The lender has agreed to return houses that were improperly foreclosed upon and not yet sold, and to pay fair market value for those already auctioned off, according to the filing. It also will forgive any remaining mortgage debt of military borrowers who were protected by the law and mistakenly foreclosed upon.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=01ea08eacc2440abaa7bc2514de21352