April 27, 2024

Global Manager: No Room for Lone Achievers

Patrick Imbardelli is president and chief executive of Pan Pacific Hotels Group, which operates more than 30 hotels in Asia, Australia and North America.

Q. Do you remember the first time you became a manager?

A. My father was a restaurateur in Melbourne, Australia, and when I was about 13 years old he put me in charge of the dishwashing team. I still remember them today: one was an Italian lady who didn’t speak English, there was a Lebanese guy who spoke little English, and two elderly ladies, one from Australia and one from Macedonia. My job was to make sure that dishes were washed clean and not too many got broken. Sounds simple, but it was very challenging because of the nature of the team and the issue of communication. In fact, it may have been my biggest challenge. It sounds simplistic but at that age it did create a big impression.

My “real” first management job was a restaurant manager’s job with Hilton in an all-day restaurant. I was about 21 years old and there were about 45 or 50 staff; again, multicultural and predominantly women.

Q. Is there a different challenge in managing a staff of the opposite sex?

A. First, having an over-representation of a core group in your team is always a challenge, whatever that core group is, because of the certain dynamic it creates. In this case, half of the women were mothers and had families. Their agenda and their issues were different from mine, and I had a hard time relating to their concerns.

The situation taught me two things: First, you can’t and don’t have to solve people’s problems. Sometimes you just listen and they can talk themselves into sorting their own problems. Second, I realized I needed to build a management team that was also representative of the work force and could relate to them. So I reorganized the team to bring two ladies on board as supervisors, and that way there was someone there they could go to with an issue.

Q. Is this a lesson you still use today with a diverse work force around the globe?

A. It taught me that diversity is extremely important, otherwise there are certain issues that never get talked about and you’re not challenged enough. I pay a lot of attention to the management team in every hotel. It’s a balance to be reached between having local and international staff.

Even at the corporate office, you will see that there are never more than two or three people that have come from the same previous company. We have staff who have previously worked at Shangri-La, Banyan Tree, Starwood, etc., but we never have more than two and it’s deliberate, because you don’t want to import these other companies’ cultures. You want to have your own overriding culture.

I definitely wouldn’t go out there to hire a team from someone else. It sends a bad message, and it’s hard for them to integrate.

Q. How do you nurture a strong internal culture?

A. Communication is extremely important, and it’s not about quantity but quality. Too many e-mails is the bane of too many organizations. We have a daily e-mail of announcements that links to our Intranet platform, where the details can be found. The announcements are mostly about our people’s successes and recognizing them. And all our messages about new team members are personalized. No passport photos, but something personal so you get a real feel of who that person is.

Not everybody likes this. Not everybody likes to go fuzzy and warm, and you have to recognize that you can’t push this through in every culture.

Q. For example?

A. In China, we are a little bit more task- and outcome-oriented, because the culture’s like that. But in North America and Australia, where there is this culture of catching up after work, it’s different. In Australia I might recognize the achievement of an employee in public, praising him in front of his peers. I would do that less often in China, because our associates are more likely to feel embarrassed to be singled out.

Q. So how would you praise an employee there?

A. Probably one to one, though I do also praise in public. But while in the U.S. I may praise 90 percent in public, in China it’s more like 50 percent or less.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/business/global/11iht-manager11.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Republicans Unveil Plan for Payroll Tax

In a sharp answer to several failed bills produced by Senate Democrats that would cut an employee’s share of the payroll tax and impose a new surcharge on income over $1 million, the House Republican bill would pay for the extension through a mix of changes to entitlement programs and a pay freeze for federal workers.

The House is expected to vote next week on the Republican bill, which includes a provision to speed construction of the Keystone XL pipeline from Alberta, Canada, to the Gulf Coast — a project the White House has sought to delay.

It would also include a measure passed this year in the House that would roll back Environmental Protection Agency rules limiting toxic air pollutants from commercial and industrial boilers, and ban the agency from proposing a new standard in the near future. While both ideas enjoy some support from Democrats, they would have a hard time gaining broad support in the Senate.

Republicans see the added elements as a way of both attracting party support for a tax break that many Republicans oppose, and forcing Democrats to accept provisions they do not like.

But Mr. Obama has threatened to veto any payroll tax measure that would ease approval of the pipeline, and he reiterated that position in an impromptu news conference on Thursday morning.

“Rather than trying to figure out what can they extract politically from me in order to get this thing done, what they need to do is be focused on what’s good for the economy, what’s good for jobs and what’s good for the American people,” said Mr. Obama, who added that he would not leave for a planned vacation in Hawaii until the legislative fight was resolved.

The Senate on Thursday rejected two competing bills to prevent an increase in the payroll tax. Fifty senators voted to take up the Democrats’ latest bill — far short of the 60 needed — and 48 senators voted no. Republicans had even less support for their proposal, as 22 senators voted to take it up and 76 voted no.

More than half of the Republicans voted against the bill drafted by their own leaders. The results were similar to votes on similar legislation last week.

By Thursday afternoon, as members of both chambers raced for the airport to spend their last weekend home before a final stretch of year-end legislative maneuvering, it was difficult to see how the impasse would be resolved. A bill that could please enough conservative Republicans in the House and the Senate would probably repel Senate Democrats, and the expiration of the payroll tax break, while helping to reduce the deficit, could prove a political headache for both parties.

Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, who has supported a modified version of the surtax on high earners to finance extension of the payroll tax cut, said she found it difficult to puzzle out how a bill could appeal to enough members to pass. But, she said, that outcome is “absolutely necessary.”

“It’s going to be pointless if the House sends over bills that the Senate cannot or will not pass,” Ms. Collins said, adding that she assumed leaders in both chambers were negotiating behind the scenes.

Otherwise, she added, “I think we’ll be here Christmas Eve.”

The House Republican plan, among other things, would increase premiums for affluent Medicare beneficiaries, end food stamps and unemployment insurance benefits for millionaires, sell some federal assets, freeze the pay of federal employees, including members of Congress, and reduce the number of federal workers by about 10 percent through attrition.

In addition, House Republicans said their bill would gradually reduce the maximum duration of jobless benefits, to 59 weeks from the 99 weeks now available in some states. If Congress does nothing, benefits for the long-term unemployed will begin to expire early next year, and two million people could lose benefits by mid-February.

House Republicans said their bill would protect doctors from a 27 percent cut in their Medicare fees scheduled to occur on Jan. 1. The measure would solve this problem for two years, giving doctors a 1 percent increase in their fees rather than a deep cut. To help offset the cost, lawmakers said, the bill would take some money provided in the new health care law for preventive and public health services.

The package was met with enthusiasm from House Republicans who last week gave Speaker John A. Boehner an earful about attempts to continue the cut in Social Security payroll taxes for another year.

“It’s a solid plan,” said Representative Paul D. Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin and chairman of the House Budget Committee. “I like the unemployment reforms quite a bit.”

Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, a leader of conservative Republicans in the House, also welcomed the proposals. “The fact that the president doesn’t like it makes me like it even more,” Mr. Jordan said. But Senate Democrats were not impressed.

“They have turned this into a Christmas tree,” said Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, the No. 3 Senate Democrat, “because their rank and file are fundamentally opposed to a tax cut for the middle class.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8a93222151829d174a326fafee6b3557

You’re the Boss: Taking the Bait: Permits, Reservations, Drinking on the Job

Can't a restaurant owner drink at his own bar?Selin SemaanCan’t a restaurant owner drink at his own bar?

Start-Up Chronicle

Getting a restaurant off the ground.

Time to take stock. As always, many of the comments are more entertaining and insightful than the posts. Herein, we respond to the responders of the last month on scuffling for permits, canceling reservations, and drinking on the job.

Having owned my own establishment for 9 years, this question was always on the front of my mind. The sight of an owner who is over indulging at his own bar will cause irreversable PR damage. That being said, customers love to drink with the owner. — bobmartinelli, West Greenwich, RI

mr. martinelli,
This conundrum could drive one to drink.

Yes, smoozing is much easier after a glass or two of decent wine, but wouldn’t this apply to the staff also? Don’t the difficult customers, heat, chaos, etc. that your staff must deal with also seem a little easier with a glass or two? — SirWired, Raleigh, NC

SirWired,
The staff members do not schmooze. They follow 21 steps of service and deliver hot food and work on computers and tabulate money. In an air-conditioned space devoid of chaos. Not well played, Sir.

I have the feeling that your desire to be that guy (drink! chat! and get paid for it!) is the real reason you got in to the restaurant business in the first place. Which is, of course, why us restaurant lifers have given you such a hard time online. — J, Ga.

Dear J,Ga,
Your feelings are just that. I have never had the desire to be that guy. I am not getting paid. And that is not why I opened a restaurant. Lifers will have to find other reasons for the hard time.

The boss has to be clear headed when around, would you want your banker to be impaired during working hours. — jkl, NYC

jkl,
Could bankers do worse? You should visit Wall Street some day and witness the power lunches. God knows what they imbibe at night.

Emergencies happen at restaurants all the time, and even the chance of slightly delayed response time due to having a drink is simply not worth the risk. Your liability insurer would love to know this information, btw… — Karl, Melrose

Karl,
Having recently been cross-examined by a phalanx of insurance investigators, I can tell you that the one question no one asked was about my drinking habits. They were more concerned with the habits of the architect and the general contractor.

Comment 15, a wordy defense of drinking on the job that runs counter to the prevailing opinion of commenters and yet was mysteriously highlighted, sounds like it was written by Bruce. Who decides which comments to highlight? — Amy, Nevada

Amy,
You think I write wordy defenses of my own wordy blog posts? And then highlight them? You are oh for two. Hope you don’t gamble there in Nevada. (Highlights are chosen by the blog’s editor.)

Enforcing a strict rule for your staff while publicly violating it yourself in front of them is a perfect way to earn their dislike. — CDM, Richmond, CA

CDM,
I have found innumerable ways to earn dislike, but this one can be remedied. No more drinking for me — unless there is a very good reason.

Give those that make reservations and keep them a gift like an extra side or a special dessert creation. — jkl, NYC

JKL, NYC
OMG. Now we are giving away gustatory door prizes for people who actually keep their reservations? Next thing, free drinks for anyone who washes his hands.

Your story reminds of a quote from Randal in the movie Clerks: “This job would be great if it weren’t for all the customers”…It sounds like the only real problem is that it makes the evening more stressful/uncertain than necessary. — anonimitie, Jacksonville, FL

Anonimitie,
What nationality is that name? What? Oh. You’re not saying? One hundred last-minute cancellations affect everybody — the waitlisted who were not contacted, the guests who actually showed up, the kitchen, the bottom line, the whole kit and kaboodle.

It seems like this situation would be a great time to use social media–put out on twitter, facebook, etc when you have a cancellation. good luck! –
Josie, St. Pete/NYC

Josie St. Pete,
Thanks. Might give it a go.

Do you think it’s possible that this blog contributes to some of the reluctance people have to help you (mainly the inspector)? — Lizbeth, NY

Lizbeth,
Good question. For an equally good answer, I refer you to a fellow commenter, Brianvan, NY,NY, who writes:

Lizbeth: The buildings department in Southampton has a duty to provide permits to legal, qualified projects — and not to react to a permit seeker’s maturely-expressed opinions in a newspaper in the process of providing permits. Unless, of course, our small towns are run by immature, petulant, narcissistic adults who only perform their duties when the emotions of the situation suit them.

During the fire drill, were you able to sneak in and cut to the front of the line? — Michael, Washington, DC

Michael,
That was a fantasy. Never happened. Sorry I didn’t make it clear. Getting caught inside town hall during a fire drill may be punishable by burning at the stake.

Placing the blame for Bruce’s permit problems in Southampton and resultant loss of 50 jobs on pro-regulation liberals would be like placing the blame for a global financial crisis and resultant deep recession on anti-regulation conservatives…oh, wait… — MrB, Chicago

MrB,
I’ll take care of the sarcasm around here. May I have my name back, now?

From 400 miles away, this smells so much like an atmosphere that ripe with graft. A building inspector that points out that a wall that was already approved is suddenly illegal? Plans that suddenly appear that didn’t exist? General attitude of a Catch-22 runaround? — MikeSlade, Rochester, NY

Slade,
Joseph Heller lived in East Hampton. I wish he were around to consult.

I was amazed during our store’s construction process the difference that an expediter made. I didn’t want to pay it – seemed like an unnecessary cost, but man, was I wrong about that. — Rebecca, Brooklyn, NY

Rebecca,
Welcome to the party. In many communities, a good and fairly priced expediter is as essential as hammer and nails.

Hopefully what Bruce has shared will help other business owners to talk with someone who has done it before, and hire the right people to expedite or complete tasks and manage relationships with third parties … — Chris, Elizabeth NJ

Chris,
From your keyboard to business owners’ eyes.

It’s naive to think the majority of our local, state, or federal governments will act entrepreneurially because they aren’t entrepreneurs. — chapman

Chapman,
Act entrepreneurially? How about logically or efficiently?

Plan an off season event for locals that some of the beauracrats might attend and enjoy. I’m a resident of a resort area year around and locals can spot locals, and locals get better treatment. — Dan, Washington State

Dear Dan,
I have 33 years that say I’m a local. When a planning board member recently ate at the restaurant, she said, “Had I had known this place would be this nice, I would have been less intransigent.”

Bruce Buschel owns Southfork Kitchen, a restaurant in Bridgehampton, N.Y.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5453aae04fdd1ee67c23cdf200d88f92

Bits: Privacy Isn’t Dead. Just Ask Google+.

Mark ZuckerbergJim Wilson/The New York Times Facebook, run by Mark Zuckerberg, has suffered a number of privacy mishaps over the years.

Some people have a very hard time trusting Facebook.

After dozens of privacy problems over the years, they’ve grown extremely weary of what the company is doing with my personal information.  I, for one, rarely use Facebook anymore, beyond a rare comment or “Like.”

My Facebook fears stem from the several instances when the company has added new features to the site and chose to automatically opt-in hundreds of millions of users, most of whom don’t even know they’ve been signed up for the new feature. I’ve also been sapped by the company’s hyper-confusing privacy policy, which requires users to navigate a labyrinth of buttons and menus when hoping to make their personal information private.

For Facebook, these breaches on people’s personal privacy rarely result in any repercussions: the negative press is usually temporary, and users have mostly stayed with the service, saying that there isn’t a viable alternative social network to talk to family and friends.

That is, until now.

Enter Google+, which started last month and has already grown to 10 million users. Rather than focus on new snazzy features — although it does offer several — Google has chosen to learn from its own mistakes, and Facebook’s. Google decided to make privacy the No. 1 feature of its new service.

I learned this lesson accidentally last week. When I signed up for Google+, I quickly posted a link to a New York Times article I wanted to share with people. Several hours later my Google+ link lay dormant. No comments. No +1 clicks. And no resharing the link.

It wasn’t until later that I realized that my post had been made private by default; a Google+ user has to specifically say they want to share a post publicly. By doing this, Google has chosen to opt users out of being public, rather than the standard practice by most other services to automatically opt users in.

This isn’t to say Google is perfect. Last year the company has had its fair share of privacy problems. This happened most recently when it started Google Buzz, a social networking service, which turned into a privacy disaster and resulted in calls in Congress to investigate the company.

With Google’s latest offering, it seems that the company not only learned its lesson about the importance of privacy for consumers online, but also realized that Facebook hasn’t learned about the importance of this issue either.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=48bbfed1034c7ea3159aa35c2ea6118d

Economix: Community College as a Bridge to New Skills

The recession hastened a trend that has been under way for at least a decade: the disappearance of jobs paying middle-class wages that required no more than a high school education.

On Sunday, I wrote about how vocational programs could help keep students in high school, and in turn, engage them enough to continue to college.

But in the course of the recession and its aftermath, many of those who have flocked to community college programs in health care, manufacturing, aerospace, biotechnology and other vocational subjects are those who lost their jobs during the downturn.

Mark McSweeney, a 34-year-old former welder featured in a report from the video journalists at Purple States, started out trying to improve his skills to find work in a new sector. Halfway through his studies, he lost his job.

After two years, he obtained an associate’s degree in applied science in the metals engineering technology program at Forsyth Technical Community College in Winston-Salem, N.C., where about three-quarters of the students are people who had been working before returning to college. After Mr. McSweeney completed his degree, he landed a job inspecting electronic parts.

“Individuals that did not have high-end skills were the first to be hit” during the recession, said Gary Green, president of Forsyth Tech. “And they are having the most difficulty in the job market today.”

Although hiring is still sluggish, those employers who have openings say they often have a hard time finding qualified applicants, because many of the workers who are currently unemployed don’t have the skills that employers require.

Mr. Green said the college’s biggest challenge was money. The federal government provides Perkins grants to states to help finance improvements to vocational programs at both the high school and community college levels. Such resources often help technical departments buy new equipment to keep up with changes in industry. But for the fiscal year 2012, the Obama administration has requested a 20 percent cut in funds for career and technical education.

“Programs that are needed in today’s economy are often high cost programs that have high personnel costs for people who have the special skills and high equipment costs,” Mr. Green said. In addition to the cuts in Perkins funding, he said, “you are having state budgets being strapped. We’re getting squeezed from all sides at a time when, with the right capacity, there are opportunities to put people to work.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=eaa7cdc2434b083f8f06f0a131220a2d

The Caucus: Obama Hails Auto Industry’s Turnaround in Visit to Chrysler Plant

President Obama received an enthusiastic reception from workers at a Chrysler plant in Toledo, Ohio., on Friday, but he did not mention the day's disappointing jobs report.Doug Mills/The New York TimesPresident Obama received an enthusiastic reception from workers at a Chrysler plant in Toledo, Ohio., on Friday, but he did not mention the day’s disappointing jobs report.

TOLEDO, Ohio – President Obama hailed the auto industry’s comeback at a Chrysler plant here, two years after the company’s bailout, but warned several hundred appreciative workers that “headwinds” continued to buffet the economy – the closest he came to referring to the day’s disappointing employment report.

Mr. Obama’s visit to a century-old auto-manufacturing site that now makes the Jeep Wrangler was intended to draw attention to the good news that the auto industry’s once-threatened Big 3 — Chrysler and General Motors, which were both bailed out, and Ford, which recovered on its own – all were adding workers, making profits, increasing market share and, in the case of Chrysler and G.M., paying back their taxpayer loans. He did not directly address the day’s news that the government’s monthly jobs report showed an uptick in the unemployment rate to 9.1 percent – unlike last month on the Friday that improved jobs numbers were released, when he visited a Maryland plant and noted the improved numbers.

“There are always going to be bumps on the road to recovery,” Mr. Obama said. “We’re going to pass through some tough terrain that even a Wrangler would have a hard time on.” At that the audience sounded a good-natured yell of “No!” in defense of their product.

The job news hardly seemed to dampen the enthusiastic reception Mr. Obama received; instead he was repeatedly thanked by people who said they owed their jobs to him and his decision in early 2009 to provide $60 billion in government assistance to see Chrysler and G.M. through bankruptcy. Mr. Obama was introduced by Chrysler worker who said she and her husband would not have jobs or health coverage but for the bailout.

Taking credit for the controversial decision has become a staple of Mr. Obama’s recent stump speeches and is likely to remain so through his re-election campaign, especially given that the auto states of Ohio and next-door Michigan are election swing states. But in his short speech, Mr. Obama had to balance the congratulatory message with acknowledgment of ongoing weakness in the economy.

“I don’t want to pretend like everything’s solved,” he said. “There’s nobody here who doesn’t know somebody who’s looking for work and hasn’t found something yet,” Mr. Obama added, to which a man yelled “Right!”

“This economy took a big hit,” he said, and continued to face “headwinds” stalling progress. The latest, he said, are high gas prices, the economic disruptions from Japan’s earthquake and tsunami and instability in the Middle East.

But mostly he cited the evidence of the revival of the auto industry and manufacturing generally, and added near the end, ”I want you to remember all those voices who were saying ‘No. No we can’t.’” The workers gave him an effusive send-off and a standing ovation.

The day had the trappings of a campaign, with the factory visit sandwiched between stops at Rudy’s Hot Dog to greet lunch diners and at a Fred’s Pro Hardware store near the Chrysler plant, which Mr. Obama visited to draw attention to the fact that not only auto companies were helped by the bailout but also the suppliers and small businesses in the communities around them. And he stood at the gate at a shift change, greeting the departing workers.

A number thanked him for the government aid. “Nice to meet you. Thanks for bailing out Chrysler,” one woman said. Mr. Obama replied, “Thanks for paying it back.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f3ff2e93c6f16e927a5c366aa7ee1a06