December 22, 2024

Bucks Blog: Another Chance on Student Loan Rates

University of Oregon students head to graduation ceremonies last month.Associated Press University of Oregon students head to graduation ceremonies last month.

If you’ve been following the debate over the potential increase in the interest rates on subsidized student loans, you may be wonder how it’s turning out. Today is, after all, July 1 — the deadline by which Congress had to act to fend off a doubling of the rates.

Congress didn’t act before the Fourth of July recess so the interest rate on new, subsidized Stafford loans doubled to 6.8 percent, from 3.4 percent, as scheduled under current law. (Subsidized Stafford loans are federal loans based on financial need; unsubsidized federal loans are available to all students, regardless of need, and rates on those loans were already at 6.8 percent).

But there’s apparently still hope that rates may be knocked back down retroactively in time for students who need to borrow for college this fall. According to the nonprofit Project on Student Debt, the Senate is scheduled to vote July 10 on a bill that would keep the 3.4 percent rate for an additional year, starting today.

The project has a one-page summary of the interest rates that are in effect for the main types of federal student loans, as well as other loan terms for the 2013-14 academic year. And it has summarized the various proposals floating around for what to do about the loan rates.

How would an increase in the subsidized loan rates affect your plans to borrow for college?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/another-chance-on-student-loan-rates/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: A Student Debt Repayment Option for Some Parents

Parents who take out federal Parent Plus loans to help pay for their children’s college education typically don’t qualify for some breaks available to student borrowers themselves, like repayment options that take their income into account.

But Mark Kantrowitz, a financial aid expert, says there is a workaround available that may help some parents, especially those who are worried about being able to afford their Parent Plus loan payments as the parents near retirement. The approach involves refinancing the loans through a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan, which may make the debt eligible for more flexible repayment options, he wrote this week on his Web site Fastweb.com.

The approach may enable parents to reduce their monthly payments and stretch out the repayment period on the loan. And in some cases, borrowers may even have the debt forgiven.

The option is of interest, Mr. Kantrowitz said, because federal data suggests that some retirees are still paying off education debt, mostly likely loans taken out for their children, rather than for themselves.

Unlike federal loans taken out by students, Parent Plus loans aren’t usually eligible for income-based repayment, a plan that helps reduce payments for students who have low salaries and significant debt by figuring payments based on their income. The parents’ loans are also not eligible for income-contingent repayment, an earlier version of repayment help that’s calculated a bit differently.

But, Parent Plus loans can become eligible for the second version — income-contingent repayment — if they are refinanced into a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan.  The consolidation loan helps the borrower manage debt by refinancing one or more loans into a new loan, resulting in just one, usually lower, monthly payment and extending payment over a longer period of time. (The interest rate on the new loan is based on an average of the rates on the loans that are consolidated, rounded up to the nearest one eighth of a percent.)

The consolidated loan is eligible for income-contingent repayment, which pegs monthly payments to the borrower’s income, family size and total amount borrowed. The consolidated loan can extended for up to 25 years, after which any balance is forgiven. It’s also discharged if the borrower dies.

Further, once the Parent Plus loan is consolidated, it can also benefit from public service forgiveness, a program that erases any remaining federal student debt after 10 years for borrowers who work in the government or the nonprofit sector. This may benefit borrowers who are employed in those areas and who have 10 years until retirement.

In a confusing conflict of rules, Parent Plus loans are technically eligible for public service debt forgiveness even without consolidation, Mr. Kantrowitz wrote. But, in practice, that doesn’t help much. Because the loans are not eligible on their own for income-related repayment plans, the loans are typically repaid over a standard 10-year repayment period, after which there’s no debt left to forgive.

Parent Plus loan borrowers can get information about consolidation loans through their loan’s servicer or from the Web site of the federal Education Department.

A calculator on Finaid.org, a site created by Mr. Kantrowitz, can help compare the difference between a standard repayment option and an income-contingent option.

Are you worried about paying off Parent Plus loans?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/a-student-debt-repayment-option-for-some-parents/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Jobs Plan Stalled, Obama to Try New Economic Drive

According to an administration official, Mr. Obama will kick off his new offensive in Las Vegas, ground zero of the housing bust, by promoting new rules for federally guaranteed mortgages so that more homeowners, those with little or no equity in their homes, can refinance and avert foreclosure.

And Wednesday in Denver, the official said, Mr. Obama will announce policy changes to ease college graduates’ repayment of federal loans, seeking to alleviate the financial concerns of students considering college at a time when states are raising tuition.

The president’s announcements will bookend a three-day Western trip during which he also will hold fund-raising events in the two cities — both Nevada and Colorado are election battlegrounds — as well as in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

The “We can’t wait” campaign is a new phase in Mr. Obama’s so-far unsuccessful effort — punctuated until now by his cries of “Pass this bill!” on the stump — to pressure Republicans to support the job creation package he proposed after Labor Day. It comes after unanimous votes by Senate Republicans in the past week to block the plan; House Republican leaders have refused to put the measure to a vote.

Polls show overwhelming support for pieces of the $447 billion package, which includes expanded tax cuts for workers and employers, and spending for infrastructure projects and for state aid to keep teachers and emergency responders at work. But Republicans oppose provisions in Mr. Obama’s plan that would offset the costs with higher taxes on the wealthy.

Should the bill ultimately fail, Democrats believe they at least have the better political argument, and they vow to exploit what they call the Republicans’ obstruction in the 2012 campaign.

Yet any political benefit would be small consolation for the White House, given the forecasts of nonpartisan economists that without such a stimulus plan, the economy is likely to relapse into recession next year just as the president faces re-election.

“The only way we can truly attack our economic challenges is with bold, bipartisan action in Congress,” said Dan Pfeiffer, Mr. Obama’s communications director. “The president will continue to pressure Congressional Republicans to put country before party and pass the American Jobs Act, but he believes we cannot wait, so he will act where they won’t.”

Privately, some Republicans worry that they could suffer from that line of attack. On Sunday the Senate Republican minority leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, offered an alternate narrative, saying that Mr. Obama, for all his complaints about Republican opposition, had given little prominence to his signing of three free-trade agreements that won bipartisan approval this month.

“They’re ashamed to mention any of the things that they do with Republicans because it steps on their story line,” Mr. McConnell said on the CNN program “State of the Union.” “Their story line is that there must be some villain out there who’s keeping this administration from succeeding.”

By resorting to executive actions, using his wide-ranging authority to oversee federal laws and agencies, Mr. Obama seems intent on showing that he is not powerless in the face of Republican opposition but is trying to strengthen the economy and help Americans in trouble.

Aides said Mr. Obama would announce at least one initiative each week through the rest of the year, including steps to help returning veterans and small businesses. Yet the officials acknowledge that the coming policy changes, executive orders and agency actions are generally less far-reaching than the legislative proposals now before Congress.

Recent executive actions provide examples of what is to come.

This month the administration expedited approval of payments to small businesses with government contracts. It announced waivers for states with schools falling short of the proficiency standards of the 2002 No Child Left Behind education law — a move that prompted some senators to compromise on an alternative rewrite of the law.

And last week the administration eased regulations stemming from the 2010 health insurance law to encourage hospitals and doctors to coordinate on Medicare patients’ care for better results at lower cost.

The housing proposal that Mr. Obama will announce in Las Vegas is rooted in the independent Federal Housing Finance Agency, the office created to oversee the government-sponsored housing finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after they were forced into conservatorship at the outset of the financial crisis in 2008.

Though the collapse of housing values is considered a major factor holding back economic growth, because of its effect on consumer spending, government programs to stem foreclosures have fallen short of initial promises. For that reason, officials have tried not to raise expectations that the latest plan can help more than a small fraction of the millions in danger of foreclosure.

While details remain sketchy, the initiative is expected to change eligibility standards for the three-year-old Home Affordable Refinance Program to encourage new, lower-cost loans to more homeowners who owe more on their mortgages than their properties are worth.

Typically, refinancing is unavailable to those who do not have equity in their houses; the Home Affordable Refinance Program sought to encourage refinancing for up to 125 percent of a home’s value for mortgages owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. This month the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Edward J. DeMarco, told lawmakers his agency was considering raising that threshold.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., in a CNN appearance on Sunday, said the administration would continue to work with federal agencies “to loosen restrictions on the ability to refinance” and also press the banks, “so they can get in the business of actually doing what we think they should have been doing much more of, and that is sitting down and renegotiating with people who are about to go under.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f5ee2b07d4b21d18d4e9d9e1ee384b8c

Your Money: A New Type of Student Loan, but Still a Risk

The first is to cheer. Borrowers now have a choice similar to people buying homes. Those who want certainty can pay extra for it, while those who wish to roll the dice and hope interest rates don’t rise too much can do that, too.

The second response is to rail against the fact that these loans are even necessary. After all, the federal government will lend most undergraduates up to $31,000. That this is not nearly enough for many families to cover the bills at all sorts of colleges is some kind of national disgrace, right?

Both reactions, it turns out, are valid. So let’s consider them one at a time.

But first, a review (and a semiofficial renaming of the loan at issue here). Not so long ago, federal student loans were variable and you could get them from a bank. Now, they are fixed at as little as 3.4 percent for this coming school year, and you borrow directly from the government.

The federal loans are a good deal, but they are often not enough make up the difference between what a family has saved or can spend out of current income and what the student gets in grants and scholarship money.

This is where private student loans come in — and proceed to send some undergraduates’ total debts spiraling into the six figures by the time they manage to earn a bachelor’s degree. While the government recently introduced lower federal loan payments for graduates with limited income and loan forgiveness for people in public service jobs, the banks don’t have similar programs for their private loan borrowers.

And about this name — private student loans. It’s factually inaccurate. To get the lowest rates, a teenager with limited credit history will need a co-applicant, which usually ends up being a parent.

The vast majority of these loans end up being a joint effort, so let’s call them what they are: private family loans. Yes, banks will often absolve the co-signer of responsibility after a couple of years if every payment has arrived on time, but forgetful young adults don’t always do that. (This, by the way, creates black marks on everyone’s credit history, not just the student’s.)

So here come U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo with their new fixed-rate family loans. Both last for 15 years. The crucial difference is that U.S. Bank offers only one rate: an annual percentage rate of 7.8 percent. An upfront fee can raise the actual annual percentage rate on the loan to as high as 8.46 percent.

Wells Fargo’s fixed-rate loans have no origination fee and are as low as 7.29 percent (or as much as another percentage point lower if you’re a current Wells Fargo banking or education loan customer). But if you don’t have excellent credit, the fixed rate could be high as 14.21 percent for community colleges or trade schools.

The current variable rate ranges from an annual percentage rate of 3.39 to 10.22 percent at U.S. Bank and 3.4 to 11.74 percent at Wells Fargo. Given the size of the gap and no signs that rate increases are imminent, why introduce this option now?

“We think that students and parents are looking for some level of certainty in the long run,” said Lucille Conley, senior vice president of consumer lending for U.S. Bank. “They’ve seen things happen in the housing market that may cause them more concern than they might have had four or five years ago.”

The bankers aren’t suggesting that borrowers actually try to do the math. In fact, it’s nearly impossible. The banks haven’t created calculators that allow you to input a series of interest rate spikes and declines at various points along a 15-year timeline and then compare it with a fixed rate. And since the professionals have no idea themselves what interest rates may do, it makes little sense for them to encourage their customers to guess.

Instead, this is a product for people who sleep better at night knowing what their payment is. Turns out there are lots of people like this. Kirk Bare, Wells Fargo’s business head of education financial services, said the bank was expecting a fairly low adoption of the fixed-rate loan and has been surprised by how many families have chosen it so far.

This is a fine thing, as far as it goes. Fine, that is, until you stop to think about what the mere existence of the private family loan actually means.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0a98ba38b0c1fe82ff70cbf3008b7d6f