April 23, 2024

Bucks Blog: A Student Debt Repayment Option for Some Parents

Parents who take out federal Parent Plus loans to help pay for their children’s college education typically don’t qualify for some breaks available to student borrowers themselves, like repayment options that take their income into account.

But Mark Kantrowitz, a financial aid expert, says there is a workaround available that may help some parents, especially those who are worried about being able to afford their Parent Plus loan payments as the parents near retirement. The approach involves refinancing the loans through a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan, which may make the debt eligible for more flexible repayment options, he wrote this week on his Web site Fastweb.com.

The approach may enable parents to reduce their monthly payments and stretch out the repayment period on the loan. And in some cases, borrowers may even have the debt forgiven.

The option is of interest, Mr. Kantrowitz said, because federal data suggests that some retirees are still paying off education debt, mostly likely loans taken out for their children, rather than for themselves.

Unlike federal loans taken out by students, Parent Plus loans aren’t usually eligible for income-based repayment, a plan that helps reduce payments for students who have low salaries and significant debt by figuring payments based on their income. The parents’ loans are also not eligible for income-contingent repayment, an earlier version of repayment help that’s calculated a bit differently.

But, Parent Plus loans can become eligible for the second version — income-contingent repayment — if they are refinanced into a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan.  The consolidation loan helps the borrower manage debt by refinancing one or more loans into a new loan, resulting in just one, usually lower, monthly payment and extending payment over a longer period of time. (The interest rate on the new loan is based on an average of the rates on the loans that are consolidated, rounded up to the nearest one eighth of a percent.)

The consolidated loan is eligible for income-contingent repayment, which pegs monthly payments to the borrower’s income, family size and total amount borrowed. The consolidated loan can extended for up to 25 years, after which any balance is forgiven. It’s also discharged if the borrower dies.

Further, once the Parent Plus loan is consolidated, it can also benefit from public service forgiveness, a program that erases any remaining federal student debt after 10 years for borrowers who work in the government or the nonprofit sector. This may benefit borrowers who are employed in those areas and who have 10 years until retirement.

In a confusing conflict of rules, Parent Plus loans are technically eligible for public service debt forgiveness even without consolidation, Mr. Kantrowitz wrote. But, in practice, that doesn’t help much. Because the loans are not eligible on their own for income-related repayment plans, the loans are typically repaid over a standard 10-year repayment period, after which there’s no debt left to forgive.

Parent Plus loan borrowers can get information about consolidation loans through their loan’s servicer or from the Web site of the federal Education Department.

A calculator on Finaid.org, a site created by Mr. Kantrowitz, can help compare the difference between a standard repayment option and an income-contingent option.

Are you worried about paying off Parent Plus loans?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/a-student-debt-repayment-option-for-some-parents/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Showdown on Executive Compensation in Switzerland

GENEVA — For Thomas Minder, a decade-long crusade against “fat cats” is about to come to a head.

The Swiss are set to vote Sunday on whether to adopt his proposal to impose some of the world’s most severe restrictions on executive compensation. The prospect is opposed by the banks and other multinational corporations that have long spearheaded the Swiss economy, who say the rules will damage the country’s business-friendly climate.

Mr. Minder, an entrepreneur and member of the Swiss Parliament, has taken the opposite view.

“If this gets voted, it will be the best export advertisement possible, because investors put their money where they have the most to say, and that will clearly then be Switzerland,” he said. The changes, he added, would guarantee that “investors will no longer have to worry about ridiculous backdoor deals.”

If Mr. Minder’s proposal is adopted, shareholders of companies listed in Switzerland would have a binding say on compensation for executives and board members, and the plan would obligate pension funds to participate in all such votes.

Mr. Minder’s proposal would also ban departure packages like the $78 million payout Novartis, the pharmaceutical company, agreed to give its departing chairman, Daniel Vasella. The payout set off a political storm and brought intense criticism from some investors, forcing Mr. Vasella to tell shareholders last week that his plan had been a mistake.

Those who violate the new rules would be subject to fines worth as much as their salaries for six years and prison sentences as long as three years.

The vote on Mr. Minder’s proposal comes after the United States and Germany, among other countries, authorized shareholders to cast nonbinding votes on executive pay. Such actions have been taken in response to Occupy Wall Street and other movements that have attacked corporate abuses that fueled the world financial crisis. On Wednesday, the European Parliament also agreed to limit bankers’ bonuses to twice their salaries.

The latest opinion polls suggest that voters will endorse his project, and Mr. Minder said the Novartis controversy had illustrated exactly why tougher rules were needed.

“There is something completely sick in a board like that of Novartis, where everybody is just friends with everybody,” he said. As to Mr. Vasella’s U-turn, Mr. Minder said, “It’s easy to renounce something which should in any case never have belonged to you.”

Still, Switzerland’s business lobby is warning of dire consequences if voters approve the proposals. While Switzerland is home to 7.5 million people, it punches far above its weight in economic terms, thanks largely to multinationals in sectors including banking, watches, food, pharmaceuticals and engineering. Many of these companies have most of their shareholding outside Switzerland.

“Switzerland risks becoming one of the most restrictive places for management in the world,” said Meinrad Vetter, an official from EconomieSuisse, the Swiss business federation. For foreign companies, he added, Mr. Minder’s proposal would “clearly be a very bad signal in terms of choosing Switzerland as a location to do business, because Switzerland has in fact always been a country that had been seen as very business friendly.”

Neither have many institutional investors endorsed the plan. The Ethos Foundation, based in Geneva, which is owned by 141 pension and other funds, recognized that Mr. Minder had pinpointed a genuine problem in Switzerland in terms of weak shareholders’ rights. But Mr. Minder’s proposal would push Switzerland “from one extreme to the other,” said Christophe Hans, head of communications at Ethos.

Mr. Hans also warned that Mr. Minder’s proposal could create a new set of managerial problems.

“You cannot give the board the right to choose the C.E.O. but then not make it able to finalize the hiring contract,” Mr. Hans said. “Which employee, let alone a C.E.O., would accept a job offer without first having the salary guaranteed?”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/02/business/global/showdown-on-executive-compensation-in-switzerland.html?partner=rss&emc=rss