May 6, 2024

Ingvar Kamprad to Leave Board of Inter Ikea Group

STOCKHOLM — Ingvar Kamprad, creator of the Swedish furniture retailer Ikea, is taking another step back from his company, as the youngest of his three sons takes a key board role in a gradual handover of power.

Mr. Kamprad, 87, who founded the business in rural southern Sweden 70 years ago, stepped down in 1986 as chief executive of Ikea, which has become the world’s biggest furniture group, famous for its design and do-it-yourself assembly.

He will now leave the board of a key company within the business, Inter Ikea Group, and his youngest son, Mathias, will take over as its chairman.

“I see this as a good time for me to leave the board of Inter Ikea Group,” Mr. Kamprad said in a statement late Tuesday, referring to the company that owns the Ikea brand and which collects 3 percent of Ikea stores’ sales worldwide each year.

“By that we are also taking another step in the generation shift that has been ongoing for some years,” said Mr. Kamprad, a billionaire who has been resident in Switzerland since the 1970s.

The Kamprad family still controls the complex corporate structure that makes up the Ikea empire, and Mr. Kamprad himself keeps a tight grip behind the scenes.

Ingvar Kamprad chairs the Dutch-registered Stiching INGKA Foundation, which controls Ikea Group, the owner of 302 of the 343 IKEA stores worldwide. He is also on the board of family-controlled Interogo Foundation in Liechtenstein, which in turn owns Inter Ikea Group.

Mathias Kamprad is also an Interogo board member and has held various positions in the Kamprad-founded groups, but like all the Kamprads he has kept a low public profile.

Mathias’s two older brothers, Jonas and Peter, also have board roles within the groups.

Inter Ikea Group on Tuesday reported a 2012 net profit of 443 million euros, or $579 million, up sharply from 87 million euros a year earlier, mainly because of a one-time gain.

Soren Hansen, chief executive of Inter Ikea Group since September, said the business climate in Europe, where the bulk of Ikea stores are located, remained challenging, especially in southern Europe.

“What we feel happy about is that we can see that the Ikea concept has stood up relatively well,” he said. “We have in some markets become more relevant, meaning that in some markets we are gaining market share.”

Mr. Hansen said Inter Ikea Group’s other divisions, besides the franchise unit, improved results in 2012 although rapid expansion in the shopping mall and property development divisions still weighed on group results.

In China, which Ikea Group hopes will become one of its biggest markets, Inter Ikea Group is investing 1 billion euros in three shopping centers, the first of which is due to open early year.

Inter Ikea Group’s net revenue grew 7 percent to 2.6 billion euros in 2012, helped by new store openings and positive currency effects.

The one-time gain in the Inter Ikea Group results related to a 3.6 billion-euro capital injection from Interogo Foundation in connection with the transfer of the Ikea trademark from Interogo. Interogo also lent Inter Ikea Group 5.4 billion euros as part of the deal.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/business/global/ingvar-kamprad-to-leave-board-of-inter-ikea-group.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Vikram Akula, Chairman of SKS Microfinance, to Step Down

HYDERABAD, India — SKS Microfinance, a once-admired lender to poor Indian women that has had a stunning fall from grace in the last year, said Wednesday that its executive chairman, Vikram K. Akula, would step down from his post.

Mr. Akula in 1997 started the company that would become SKS as a nonprofit organization aimed at lifting Indians out of poverty by giving them loans of as little as $100 to start businesses — a type of loan operation known as microlending. The organization eventually turned in a for-profit direction, and made a public stock offering in August 2010.

Mr. Akula is leaving as SKS is trying to overcome large losses in its home state of Andhra Pradesh, where about 90 percent of its borrowers stopped repaying loans late last year. The state, of which Hyderabad is the capital, severely restricted lending after politicians criticized SKS and other microlenders of being too aggressive in collecting repayments from impoverished families and driving some borrowers to suicide — a contention that lenders strongly deny.

P. H. Ravikumar, a board member and former commercial banker, will become chairman of SKS. Mr. Akula, who will serve as a consultant to the company until March, said in a statement that his next venture would involve a “mobile banking initiative” unrelated to SKS. SKS is trying to raise 9 billion rupees, or about $180 million, in an additional stock offering to shore up its reserves, which have been depleted somewhat because of its problems in Andhra Pradesh. The company reported a 3.9 billion rupee ($73.6 million) loss in its most recent quarter, compared to a profit of 810 million rupees a year earlier.

The company’s shares have fallen to about one-tenth of their peak level last year. On Wednesday, after news reports speculated that Mr. Akula would be stepping down, shares of SKS closed up 5 percent, to 115.45 rupees.

A company spokesman, J. S. Sai, said Mr. Akula would not be available for an interview, and Mr. Akula did not respond to a text message.

About 15 months ago, SKS was on a much different track. Its share price was surging in the weeks after the company raised $350 million in a public offering in the Indian stock market. The offering was expected to be the first of many by rapidly growing Indian microlenders.

But under the surface, politicians, social activists and others were increasingly critical of SKS and the industry, particularly because the companies were earning record profits even as they charged poor women interest rates of 30 to 65 percent. There was also growing evidence that the microcredit, even if it did give the poor a small boost, often did not lift them out poverty, as the lenders had claimed. And a sizable minority of borrowers appeared to have become overly indebted because of the ease with which they could borrow money from competing lenders.

Mr. Akula, a child of Indian immigrants who grew up in Schenectady, N.Y., became a target of much of that ire. He had established a global reputation as a social entrepreneur working to eliminate poverty, appearing at the World Economic Forum and other big global events to extol the benefits of microcredit. But his credibility was eroding in Hyderabad, where SKS is based.

A few months before the initial public offering, he had sold all of his SKS shares, worth about $13 million, in a private sale.

Late last year, politicians in Andhra Pradesh cited the public offering, and what they said was a surge of suicides by borrowers, to pass a law that severely restricted new lending and made it harder for companies to collect loan repayments. Local leaders barred loan officers from entering many villages or forbade borrowers to repay their debts, SKS and other lenders reported.

In addition to the troubles at SKS, other large Indian microlenders like Basix, Share and Spandana are struggling with loan defaults. They are all trying to raise money from investors and renegotiate their own debts with banks.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=2328c81de6648eda6d3c866a787f9096

Fired Olympus C.E.O. to Press Board on Fees

The dramatic return comes a month after Mr. Woodford was sacked as president and chief executive of the endoscope and digital camera maker after questioning a series of outsized transactions. The company later admitted to using those transactions to hide past investment losses at the company.

Japanese investigators are also looking at possible organized crime links in those transactions, though the company on Monday denied any mob links.

”I am returning to the world headquarters of Olympus,” Mr. Woodford said by phone from London. “And I will use the opportunity to emphasize that all the facts come out.”

Though Mr. Woodford was sacked as chief executive on Oct. 14, he technically remains a board member and is legally entitled to attend Friday’s scheduled board meeting.

Earlier Monday, Olympus said that a panel of legal experts had found no evidence of organized crime involvement in a decades-old cover-up of investment losses in which the company has blamed three former executives.

The preliminary finding from the panel comes as Japanese investigators try to determine what happened to at least $4.9 billion that is unaccounted for by Olympus and whether any of the money may have gone to companies with links to organized crime.

In a statement, Olympus said that the panel of experts it appointed Nov. 2 to look into its past finances — led by a former justice of the Japanese Supreme Court — had so far not found any evidence that company funds flowed to organized crime groups. Nor had the panel found evidence of organized crime involvement in a series of past acquisitions by Olympus, which company executives have acknowledged played a part in its cover-up of losses, the statement said.

Earlier this month, Olympus cited the same panel in announcing that it had used a series of unprofitable acquisitions to hide investment losses reaching back to the 1990s.

But Japanese investigators are still conducting their own inquiry.

According to a memo circulated at a recent meeting of representatives from Japanese financial regulators, prosecutors and police agencies, investigators suspect that Olympus made payments amounting to many times the losses it sought to hide.

The memo said that investigators believed ¥376 billion, or $4.9 billion, remained unaccounted for at Olympus and that more than half of that amount might have been channeled to organized crime syndicates.

In the statement Monday, Olympus denied recent reports by “certain foreign media,” saying that “such facts have not been recognized by the committee’s investigations so far.”

Questions were first raised about Olympus’s finances in August by the Japanese magazine Facta. The scandal deepened in October after Olympus fired Mr. Woodford over what it initially said were cultural differences in management style.

But Mr. Woodford later alleged that he had been dismissed after questioning the company’s chairman and board about some of the payments.

Mr. Woodford plans to speak this week with Japanese authorities about the investigation. He has also been cooperating in the United States with the F.B.I. and the Securities Exchange Commission, which are looking into the matter, and has submitted evidence to Britain’s Serious Fraud Office.

Olympus has promised that its six-member panel of experts, led by Tatsuo Kainaka, the former Supreme Court justice, would conduct an “impartial and thorough” investigation. The full results of their investigation are expected next month.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0a3700f2caf5d74c87ff524cea272f9a