April 25, 2024

Diageo Names New Chief Executive

Diageo, which is based in London and whose products include Smirnoff vodka and Johnnie Walker Scotch, said its chief operating officer, Ivan M. Menezes, would succeed Paul S. Walsh as chief executive in July. Mr. Walsh, who is credited with turning Diageo into a global company, would stay on for a year before retiring at the end of June 2014.

Under Mr. Walsh, 58, Diageo expanded in faster-growing markets like China to offset dwindling sales in Europe. The company’s share price climbed as its acquisitions won it market share and as he invested in marketing and sales in Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Franz B. Humer, chairman of Diageo, said, “The handover is being made at a time when the business is strong and Ivan takes on the role of chief executive officer at an exciting stage of the company’s global development.”

Mr. Menezes, 53, is expected to continue with Mr. Walsh’s plan to increase growth in markets like Africa, Asia and Turkey, so that the area makes up 50 percent of sales. Sales from those markets now comprise 42 percent of sales.

Mr. Menezes, who was born in India, was directly involved in Diageo’s acquisition of the Brazilian brand Ypioca last year. He also worked with Mr. Walsh on the difficult negotiations to buy a part of Vijay Mallya’s United Spirits in India, the world’s largest whiskey market. Mr. Menezes was widely expected to take over from Mr. Walsh when he was promoted to chief operating officer last year.

“This is a very exciting time of great opportunity for our company,” Mr. Menezes said in a statement. “I look forward to building on the fundamental strengths of our business.”

Diageo generates the largest part of its sales, about a third, in North America, where it recently benefited by raising its prices and increasing its marketing spending. Yet the fastest growing market for the company is South America, where sales increased 18 percent over the last six months of 2012.

After steady growth in earnings, companies like Diageo have begun to be affected by the economic downturn and austerity in Europe, which has constrained consumer spending. Mr. Menezes’s biggest challenge, according to some analysts, will be to ensure that Diageo can continue to win market share in economies where consumer appetite is growing despite growing competition.

“His job number one will be not to allow the foot to come off the pedal of organic growth,” said Martin Deboo, an analyst at Investec. “Then he has to decide what the next chapter of the strategy will be and how best to evolve the portfolio.”

Mr. Menezes arrived at Diageo as the result of a merger. While strategy director at Guinness in 1997, it merged with Grand Metropolitan Public, a British food and beverage company, in the same year to create Diageo.

Mr. Menezes helped to integrate the two businesses and was later named president of Diageo North America. Before Diageo, Mr. Menezes worked in sales, marketing and strategy roles for the consulting firm Booz Allen in the United States and Nestlé in Asia.

In a statement, Mr. Walsh said Mr. Menezes played a pivotal role in making Diageo one of the world’s largest alcoholic-drink companies, which “demonstrates that he is the right person to lead Diageo on the next stage of its journey.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/business/global/08iht-diageo08.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Corner Office: Ilene Gordon of Ingredion, on the Importance of Mentors

Q. What are some leadership lessons you’ve learned from mentors over the years?

A. There was one gentleman in particular. He had three daughters and his attitude was: “Look, you’re really smart, you’re very ambitious and focused. I can help teach you about business.” This was around 1982, and I’d already been out of business school for several years. He made it a priority to help me to hone my business skills.

I was a strategist by training, and I was doing acquisitions. I was smart, I was analytical, but he said to me: “You ought to run some of these businesses and see how good your analysis was. It may look great on paper, but you have to motivate and inspire people. You’re 30 years old and the guy you’re leading is 55. How do you get the best out of him? That’s your challenge.”

So, early on, this mentor gave me that opportunity to run businesses. I’ve been running them since I was 32.

He had a philosophy of putting people in jobs that were bigger than they were. If somebody has talent and good people skills and drive, I think you can stretch them and put them in a job that they’re not quite ready for, so they grow into it. That’s what people did for me, so I’m a big believer in doing that and taking young people and stretching them.

And employees love to hear that, because they feel like they’re going to get opportunities. There’s a big competition for talent. People will leave their company if they think they’ll have more opportunities elsewhere. So you need to offer opportunities to your young people. And you’ll have a much better retention.

It’s not all about a 2 percent raise; it’s really about opportunity. I’m taking these lessons in how people treated me as a young professional and use those lessons today to excite our people.

Q. How do you know if somebody’s able to stretch into a big new job?

A. One question somebody once asked me was, “What do you think are important attributes to be successful in leadership?” I said it’s about tenacity. It’s never giving up. It’s having a Plan B. And that’s one of my favorite expressions: Have a Plan B, because Plan A doesn’t always go well, or maybe it’s derailed by a competitor or somebody else’s new product or some type of regulation.

My point is to always have a Plan B that you can implement. Maybe you have to go to Plan C or D, but the point is that you always have to have a backup plan.

I look for young people who have a lot of energy, and who treat other people well, because we’re not looking for bullies. Some people push their way through things and they’re not collaborative. I look for people who don’t give up, who are very focused and organized but are also able to collaborate with other people, because in today’s organizations, you actually may not have anybody directly reporting to you but may have a team of 10 people from other parts of the organization. They’re your virtual team.

So I look for young people who have the energy and drive to get things done, to keep their eye on where they’re going but at the same time realize they can’t do it alone. It’s not just a one-person show. You can’t be the micromanager; you have to be able to get things done through others.

Q. What else do you do to help develop younger managers?

A. I use one dinner a year with my board to bring in young, high-potential managers. We have everybody give an “elevator speech.” You have three minutes to tell the board and other people in the room where you came from, the challenges you’re facing and how you’re trying to create value for the company. Everybody might want to take 15 minutes, but you have to be succinct.

This is part of what we’re looking for in people who have potential; it’s all about communication. What are the challenges you have, and you have three minutes to explain them, because there are 40 of you and we’re going to be here all night otherwise. And if you take somebody else’s time, that’s not respectful. It’s all about being succinct and articulate.

Q. What questions do you ask when you hire? What qualities do you look for in job candidates?

A. I like to look at the person’s résumé, and ask a lot of questions about how they made decisions to go from one company to the other. Did they have a plan? Not everybody has to have a structured plan, but I like to hear their thought process. Did they make things happen for themselves and their companies, or was it just serendipity? And serendipity is sometimes O.K., too.

So that’s how I get into the interview and get people talking, but the key question I always ask, going back to my own theme, is: Who mentored you? Who did you learn from? Because I feel that, with the people we’re hiring, we’re hiring all their mentors, too. I want to know if they learned from somebody who was an operating expert or somebody who was a strategist and what companies those mentors worked in. That’s because I’m not just hiring the person sitting there; I’m hiring the four people who mentored him. I don’t think there’s anybody who’s successful in their role today who hasn’t been mentored by somebody.

Business is always challenging. It doesn’t always go well, and Plan A doesn’t always work. So I look for people who have dealt with some adversity in their life. It could have been in business — maybe their company was acquired, and they had to figure out what they wanted to do and made a change, rather than sitting around for two years lamenting, “Why me?”

Or somebody might have lost their parents early on. The point is, they’ve dealt with some type of adversity or illness and they came back and they persevered.

That’s what I look for, because very few people have had perfect lives. You want people who are able to have a Plan B and C, and to rise above a challenge, move ahead and just get on with it, and have that can-do attitude.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/business/ilene-gordon-of-ingredion-on-the-importance-of-mentors.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Fired Olympus C.E.O. to Press Board on Fees

The dramatic return comes a month after Mr. Woodford was sacked as president and chief executive of the endoscope and digital camera maker after questioning a series of outsized transactions. The company later admitted to using those transactions to hide past investment losses at the company.

Japanese investigators are also looking at possible organized crime links in those transactions, though the company on Monday denied any mob links.

”I am returning to the world headquarters of Olympus,” Mr. Woodford said by phone from London. “And I will use the opportunity to emphasize that all the facts come out.”

Though Mr. Woodford was sacked as chief executive on Oct. 14, he technically remains a board member and is legally entitled to attend Friday’s scheduled board meeting.

Earlier Monday, Olympus said that a panel of legal experts had found no evidence of organized crime involvement in a decades-old cover-up of investment losses in which the company has blamed three former executives.

The preliminary finding from the panel comes as Japanese investigators try to determine what happened to at least $4.9 billion that is unaccounted for by Olympus and whether any of the money may have gone to companies with links to organized crime.

In a statement, Olympus said that the panel of experts it appointed Nov. 2 to look into its past finances — led by a former justice of the Japanese Supreme Court — had so far not found any evidence that company funds flowed to organized crime groups. Nor had the panel found evidence of organized crime involvement in a series of past acquisitions by Olympus, which company executives have acknowledged played a part in its cover-up of losses, the statement said.

Earlier this month, Olympus cited the same panel in announcing that it had used a series of unprofitable acquisitions to hide investment losses reaching back to the 1990s.

But Japanese investigators are still conducting their own inquiry.

According to a memo circulated at a recent meeting of representatives from Japanese financial regulators, prosecutors and police agencies, investigators suspect that Olympus made payments amounting to many times the losses it sought to hide.

The memo said that investigators believed ¥376 billion, or $4.9 billion, remained unaccounted for at Olympus and that more than half of that amount might have been channeled to organized crime syndicates.

In the statement Monday, Olympus denied recent reports by “certain foreign media,” saying that “such facts have not been recognized by the committee’s investigations so far.”

Questions were first raised about Olympus’s finances in August by the Japanese magazine Facta. The scandal deepened in October after Olympus fired Mr. Woodford over what it initially said were cultural differences in management style.

But Mr. Woodford later alleged that he had been dismissed after questioning the company’s chairman and board about some of the payments.

Mr. Woodford plans to speak this week with Japanese authorities about the investigation. He has also been cooperating in the United States with the F.B.I. and the Securities Exchange Commission, which are looking into the matter, and has submitted evidence to Britain’s Serious Fraud Office.

Olympus has promised that its six-member panel of experts, led by Tatsuo Kainaka, the former Supreme Court justice, would conduct an “impartial and thorough” investigation. The full results of their investigation are expected next month.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0a3700f2caf5d74c87ff524cea272f9a

DealBook: ConocoPhillips to Split Into Two Businesses

A ConocoPhillips refinery in Wilmington, Calif. The nation's third-largest oil company is spinning off its refining and marketing segment.Jonathan Alcorn/Bloomberg NewsA ConocoPhillips refinery in Wilmington, Calif. James Mulva, chief of ConocoPhillips, plans to retire once the transaction is complete.J. Scott Applewhite/Associated PressJames J. Mulva, chief of ConocoPhillips, plans to retire once the transaction is complete.

ConocoPhillips said on Thursday that it would break itself into two companies, spinning off its refining business to shareholders by the first half of next year.

ConocoPhillips would hold onto its higher-margin exploration operations, and would seek acquisitions to expand that business.

The plan is to let each division focus on its core businesses as a way to bolster the ConocoPhillips stock price.

Shares in the company have risen 42.3 percent in the last 12 months.

“We have concluded that two independent companies focused on their respective industries will be better positioned to pursue their individually focused business strategies,” James J. Mulva, the ConocoPhillips chairman and chief executive, said in a statement.

Mr. Mulva plans to retire once the split is completed.

The plan does not require approval from shareholders.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=12ff61789ed712a709819f9236cddd26

G.E. Posts Earnings That Exceed Forecasts and Raises Dividend

The results easily topped the forecasts of Wall Street analysts, but its shares ended 2.2 percent lower on Thursday, reflecting concern about a decline in industrial margins, some analysts said.

G.E. said net income was $3.4 billion in the first three months of 2011, or 31 cents a share, compared with $1.9 billion and 17 cents in the quarter a year ago. Excluding one-time items, earnings were 33 cents a share, exceeding the average estimate of 28 cents from analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters.

Earnings from continuing operations were $3.5 billion compared with $2.4 billion in the period a year ago.

The chief executive, Jeffrey R. Immelt, said in a statement that G.E. had emerged from the recession a stronger company.

“G.E. health care, transportation and aviation delivered strong results,” Mr. Immelt said. “Strategic investments in high-growth segments have strengthened the company’s energy portfolio and position that business to return to growth in the second half of this year.”

Over all, revenue rose 6 percent, to $38.45 billion in the first quarter, exceeding analysts forecasts of $34.64 billion. Revenue in the same quarter a year ago was $36.2 billion.

The results and outlook reflected the company’s efforts to diversify and make acquisitions, while trying to build its businesses in crucial sectors like energy. On Thursday, the company described itself as “cautiously optimistic” about the gas turbine business, with strong orders from the Middle East and plans to help Japan meet its energy demands after its nuclear plant was damaged in the March 11 earthquake and tsunami.

“Our teams are working diligently to support our customers in Japan,” Mr. Immelt said in a conference call.

Early this month G.E. announced plans to build the nation’s largest photovoltaic panel factory, with the goal of becoming a major player in the market.

G.E. also completed the sale of 51 percent of NBC Universal to the Comcast cable network in the quarter, which resulted in an after-tax gain of 4 cents a share. In the deal, Comcast paid General Electric nearly $6.2 billion in cash and contributed its pay television channels like E Entertainment Television and the Golf Channel, worth $7.25 billion, to NBC Universal.

General Electric said when announcing its last results in January that it had a backlog of orders that positioned it for growth in 2011, with the transportation, health care and finance units expected to lead in earnings. On Thursday, Mr. Immelt said the backlog, a gauge of future results, was $177 billion.

Richard Tortoriello, an equity analyst with Standard Poor’s, said the orders numbers suggested growth in the global economy, particularly in emerging markets like Brazil, China and India.

“G.E. is a bellwether in the sense that they are one of the largest industrial companies out there, but they have a larger proportion of what you might call long cycle business than others,” Mr. Tortoriello said.

“We are not taking off like a rocket ship,” he said, “especially with regard to the U.S. and Europe, but the growth is there.”

The company, which is based in Fairfield, Conn., also raised its quarterly dividend by a penny, to 15 cents, beginning in the third quarter, the report said. It increased its dividend twice in 2010. In July, the dividend was raised to 12 cents a share from 10 cents, and in December it was increased further, to 14 cents. The company paid 31 cents a share until February 2009, when, for the first time since the Great Depression, the board cut the dividend to conserve cash.

Timothy A. Hoyle, a vice president at Haverford Investments, said the potential for a dividend increase was apparent in 2010 as the company’s capital unit returned to normal and as it finished a deal involving the sale of NBC Universal. “We saw plenty of excess capital generation,” Mr. Hoyle said. “That is happening.”

But he also noted that G.E. had said it had a decline to 14.3 percent in industrial operating margins because of weakness in the energy sector, partly as a result of lower wind turbine pricing.

The company’s shares fell 45 cents, or 2.21 percent, to close at $19.95 on Thursday.

While G.E. is a household name as a manufacturer of common household products like lights bulbs and electric fans, it also has a diverse portfolio of finance and business units.

Its lending division, GE Capital, the nation’s largest nonbank financial institution, has provided more than half of G.E.’s profit in some recent years. But the unit was struggling amid the fallout from the collapse of the real estate market, and Mr. Immelt has tried to refocus G.E. more toward the industrial sector.

The company said GE Capital reported net income of $1.8 billion in the first quarter, up from $583 million in the period a year ago.

“With losses having peaked, we are originating new business at attractive margins and our funding costs continue to be favorable,” Mr. Immelt said of GE Capital.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/22/business/22electric.html?partner=rss&emc=rss