November 22, 2024

A Mending Spain Finds Willing Bond Buyers

On Thursday, the Spanish Treasury sold €4.5 billion, or $5.9 billion, of debt, including bonds with a maturity of as much as 28 years. The average interest rate paid by Madrid on two-year bonds was 2.71 percent, down from 3.36 percent in December — a level not reached since March of last year.

The interest rate on the benchmark 10-year Spanish bond stood at 5.03 percent Thursday. Last year that rate spiked above 7 percent — a level that many economists believe places an unsustainable burden on governments.

Higher interest rates make it not only more expensive but also more difficult for governments to borrow the money they need. Consistently high borrowing costs helped force Greece, Ireland and Portugal to seek international bailouts.

But the renewed sense of optimism in Spain this week led the government to suggest that the country’s economic recession would not be as deep and prolonged as had been feared. When drafting its 2012 budget, the government had expected the economy to contract 1.5 percent, but officials now expect the final figure for last year to be lower.

“The government is adopting the right measures to overcome the crisis, and these efforts are about to bear fruit,” Foreign Minister José Manuel García-Margallo said at an investment conference here Wednesday. “Foreign investors are coming back.”

But some foreign investors in Mr. García-Margallo’s audience gave a much more cautious reading on the recent market rally, as well as warning that it was too early for talk about an economic turnaround.

“Optimism is the flavor of the day, but perhaps people are overoptimistic,” said Birgitte Olsen, fund manager at Bellevue Asset Management in Zurich. “We’ve now seen some car companies shift their production lines to Spain, but a lot more reforms and work need to be done to return to growth and job creation.”

Still, Ms. Olsen said, “it makes sense for any company that has the opportunity to sell bonds to do it right now.”

Indeed, last year’s trickle of Spanish corporate debt issuance has turned this month into a flow. On Wednesday, Banco Santander sold €1 billion of seven-year bonds at an interest rate of 4 percent. In the first two weeks of January, a handful of other Spanish banks, as well as Telefónica and energy companies including Gas Natural and Red Eléctrica, sold bonds totaling over €7 billion, with most sales heavily oversubscribed.

“The results of some of these Spanish bond issues would have been impossible just three months ago, but it’s unclear to me whether what has now opened is really a long-term window,” said Michael Gierse, a fund manager at Union Investment in Frankfurt, which has €180 billion in assets under management.

The next litmus test for investors, Mr. Gierse said, would come at the end of the month, when the Spanish authorities are expected to lift a ban on the short-selling of all stocks trading on the country’s exchanges. The ban, intended to reduce market volatility, was to be lifted at the end of last October but was then extended by three months to help ailing companies like Banco Popular issue debt. Short-selling lets investors sell borrowed shares in the hope that their price will fall and that they could then be repurchased more cheaply, allowing the investors to pocket the difference.

“Once the short-selling ban gets lifted, we will have a much clearer idea of whether this market rally is for real,” Mr. Gierse said. For now, he added, “I don’t think that investors from outside the euro zone are already back in Spain.”

One reason for such wariness is that investors endured a roller-coaster ride last year.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/business/global/18iht-spaindebt18.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Off the Charts: Risk Creeps Up in Long-Term Bonds

Fed officials do not think that will happen until late 2015, but they could be overly pessimistic. A year ago, they thought that the rate would not get as low as it is now until 2014.

The prolonged low level of interest rates — both short-term rates that are administered by the Fed and longer-term rates that are more subject to market forces — has caused many investors to search for yield by purchasing longer-term bonds.

That has provided a bonanza for companies in the United States and in many emerging markets, where the amounts of newly issued bonds have risen rapidly.

“Almost any kind of corporate activity is acceptable to the bond market,” said Michael Shaoul, the chief executive of Marketfield Asset Management. “That is really a sign the bond market is becoming indiscriminate.”

For a bond investor, there are two things that can go wrong. The first is credit quality, when bonds either default or at least fall in market value because a default seems more likely. The second is interest rate risk — the risk that market interest rates will rise significantly.

Mr. Shaoul said he thought investors in emerging market bonds were more likely to run into credit problems, while American bond buyers were more likely to face interest rate problems as the American economy improved.

“Five years down the road,” he said, “you are likely to have significantly higher interest rates.”

For a bond market investor now, the choice is to stick to shorter-term bonds, and get very low yields, or to move to longer-term ones that pay higher interest rates but that could lose market value if the interest rate offered on new bonds rose.

Much of the recent issuance in bonds has been because of refinancing, in which companies repay existing bonds with money borrowed on better terms. For holders, it can seem the worst of both worlds: if rates rise, they have old bonds that have lost value. If rates fall, their old bonds are redeemed by the company, depriving them of the yield they expected.

As can be seen in the accompanying graphic, corporate bond issuance in the United States has risen to record levels this year, and the average interest rate on high-yield bonds, also known as junk bonds because they are rated below investment grade, has fallen even more rapidly than have rates on higher-quality bonds.

Martin Fridson, the chief executive of FridsonVision and a veteran high-yield market analyst, said he thought high-yield investors were likely to lose money in 2013, as declines in prices offset the interest income realized from the bonds.

His model says the yield spread between the Bank of America Merrill Lynch High Yield Master II index and similar Treasury securities should now be around 6.5 percentage points, based on historical spreads as well as economic conditions, current default rates and the relative availability of bank credit. The actual difference, as shown by the chart, is about 5.3 percentage points, which he thinks is not enough to offset the risk.

Floyd Norris comments on finance and the economy on nytimes.com/economix.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/business/risk-creeps-up-in-long-term-bonds.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Morgan Stanley Reports Loss as Settlement Weighs on Results

Morgan StanleyVictor J. Blue/Bloomberg NewsMorgan Stanley’s headquarters in Manhattan. The firm’s quarterly results were hurt by a legal settlement with the bond insurer MBIA.

Morgan Stanley, hit hard by a big legal charge and a difficult economy, swung into the red in the fourth quarter, reporting a loss of $275 million.

The loss of 15 cents a share compares with a profit of 41 cents a share in the quarter a year ago, but is better than a loss of 57 cents that was expected by analysts polled by Thomson Reuters. Morgan Stanley last posted a loss in the second quarter of 2011.

Despite the loss, the bank’s chief executive, James P. Gorman, struck a positive note in the earnings release, saying that Morgan Stanley ended the year “in better shape” than where it started and had dealt with a number of outstanding legacy and strategic issues that had been dogging it.

The firm took a one-time $1.7 billion charge related to a legal settlement with the bond insurer MBIA, which weighed on the results for the quarter. The charge accounted for a loss of 59 cents a share.

Fourth-quarter revenue in institutional securities fell 42 percent to $2.07 billion. One number that stood out in the institutional securities division was its compensation ratio. It came in at $1.6 billion, 75 percent of net revenue. The number is high because it includes the MBIA settlement. If that is removed the number drops to a more normalized 41 percent.

Asset management reported a sharp drop in revenue, falling to $424 million for the period, down 50 percent from the year-ago period. Morgan Stanley attributed the drop to lower gains on investments it has made in its merchant banking and real estate investing businesses.

The one main bright spot in the quarter was the firm’s global wealth management division. It posted net revenue of $3.25 billion this quarter, down just 3 percent from the year-ago period. The division had $1.6 trillion assets under management in the quarter, unchanged from the previous quarter.

All told, the firm logged net revenue of $5.71 billion in the quarter, down 26 percent from the year-ago period.

Morgan Stanley also announced that it had set aside $16.4 billion in 2011 to pay its employees, 51.2 percent of its net revenue. In 2010, Morgan Stanley paid $16.05 billion to employees, which also came to roughly 51 percent of its revenue. This year, with money tight, Morgan Stanley, as previously reported, decided to cap all cash bonuses at $125,000 for the year.

Morgan Stanley, like its rivals, is trying to navigate its way through the current difficult economic environment, which is exacerbated by a tighter regulatory regime that has forced firms to hold more capital against certain operations and out of other businesses altogether.

On Wednesday, Goldman Sachs said its profit in the fourth quarter was $978 million, ahead of analyst expectations but still muted compared with its historical earnings power.

Yet, Morgan Stanley was hit harder by the credit crisis than Goldman Sachs and Mr. Gorman has spent the last two years rebuilding the firm. He has reduced the risk in some divisions and focused a lot of his energy building Morgan Stanley’s wealth management division, which is a lower-risk operation that has the potential to deliver steady returns.

Morgan Stanley also declared a quarterly dividend of 5 cents a common share on Wednesday.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=229f448c5d22335747ed1ab706c51887

DealBook: UBS to Slash 3,500 Jobs

UBS, the embattled Swiss bank, said on Tuesday that it would cut 3,500 jobs over the next two and a half years to reduce costs.

About half of the job cuts will be in the investment banking division, which has continued to be one of the worst-performing units of the bank. The rest of the cuts are to come from the wealth management and asset management businesses.

The cost-cutting measures would incur one-time charges of about 550 million Swiss francs ($698 million), and most of it would be booked in the second half of this year, UBS said.

The measures were “designed to improve operating efficiency,” UBS, Switzerland’s biggest bank, said in a statement. “UBS will continue to be vigilant in managing its cost base while remaining committed to investing in growth areas.”

The announcement came after the bank’s chief executive, Oswald J. Grübel, said last month that he planned to cut 2 billion francs of costs after profit fell 50 percent in the second quarter, but he did not give more details at the time. The bank had also warned that it would miss its earnings target set two years ago because a weaker economic outlook was expected to curb profit.

UBS said on Tuesday that about 45 percent of the 3,500 job cuts would come from its investment banking unit, which had repeatedly reported dismal figures and failed to fully recover from huge losses during the subprime mortgage crisis.

Some analysts had criticized UBS for lacking a clear strategy for the investment banking unit and questioned just how big the business should be within UBS.

Efforts by Carsten Kengeter, the former Goldman Sachs manager in charge of the investment banking unit, to overhaul the division were hampered recently by a string of departures among senior bankers. Mr. Grübel said in February that the unit’s performance was unsatisfactory and threatened to reduce it if revenue did not recover.

Other banks have announced job cuts recently in light of falling earnings as clients prefer to reduce risks amid concerns about a deteriorating global economy.

HSBC plans to cut 30,000 jobs, Credit Suisse said it would cut 2,000 positions and the Lloyds Banking Group is in the process of eliminating 15,000 jobs.

Profit at UBS fell to 1 billion francs in the three months through June, from 2 billion francs in the period a year earlier. Pretax profit in the investment banking unit slumped to 376 million francs from 1.3 billion francs.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=6d984f78deb29dbd34deb868dcec3a10

DealBook: UBS Weighs Moving Investment Bank Out of Switzerland

LONDON — As new rules to regulate banks take shape around the world, they are increasingly seeking ways to soften the impact.

UBS, one of Switzerland’s biggest banks, is considering a switch to a holding structure, and then incorporating the investment banking business as a separate legal entity in London, two people with direct knowledge of the idea said on Thursday. They declined to be identified because no decision had been made.

UBS said in March that it was “evaluating potential changes to our booking model and corporate structure in view of developing regulatory concerns and requirements.” The bank also said its model of holding most of its capital in Switzerland while booking most of its assets elsewhere would probably have to change.

Under the proposal, the investment banking business, whose losses during the financial crisis required UBS to accept government aid, would be capitalized separately.

The proposal was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal.

UBS said on Thursday that the report was speculation and that the bank “doesn’t comment on speculation.”

Guy de Blonay, a fund manager at Jupiter Asset Management, said: “Reading between the lines they’re saying ‘I’ve got some opportunities that I want to exploit, but under the current regulation I can’t do it, so if you’re too strict we go elsewhere.’ And that’s the same with any other bank.”

Other banks, including Barclays in Britain, were reviewing the way they financed themselves and generated earnings, as regulators have started to introduce stricter capital rules. Barclays and HSBC were among the banks that threatened to move their headquarters abroad should new rules at home be too punishing and hurt their competitiveness.

But any decision has to be put off amid continued uncertainty about the details of the new rules, which have yet to go through the British Parliament.

Switzerland is considering asking UBS and Credit Suisse, the country’s two largest banks, to hold capital equal to at least 19 percent of assets from 2019, more than other countries in Europe. The Basel committee proposed capital requirements of 10.5 percent of risk-weighted assets and said that some countries could set a higher level for its biggest banks.

UBS and Credit Suisse previously warned the Swiss government that introducing rules that were stricter than in other countries would put them at a competitive disadvantage and could hurt the Swiss economy.

In Britain, the government is awaiting the final report of a banking commission, due in September, that is likely to propose a partial separation of investment banking businesses from retail operations.

A so-called ring fencing of deposit-taking parts of the business would help avoid a collapse of the entire bank should the investment banking unit get into trouble, the commission argued.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9af7df4e036da6b0746e1503ec4bd638