May 5, 2024

At Paris Show, Some Signs of Renewed Demand for Big Jets

The agreement with a little-known German leasing company, Doric Asset Finance, was for 20 planes, and was valued at $8.1 billion at list prices. Doric was Airbus’s first new customer in nearly two years for its superjumbo plane, which typically seats around 525 passengers.

The order came on the opening day of the Paris Air Show amid a flurry of announcements of orders for wide-body planes made by Airbus’s American rival, Boeing, including a planned stretch model of its flagship 787 Dreamliner and a long-range version of its popular 777 jet.

Airbus has struggled to garner new orders for the A380, which entered commercial service in 2007, after a series of development snags. Airbus, which has sold 282 of the planes, has said it hopes to deliver 750 over the 25-year superjumbo program. Currently, nine airlines operate just over 100 of the planes.

The A380 has been a particularly tough sell to leasing companies because airlines have tended to seek extensive and costly customization of its interior to differentiate themselves from competitors. Such work can be an onerous proposition for lessors, which often roll a plane over to different airlines during its lifetime. Two years ago, International Lease Finance Corporation, one of the world’s largest aircraft lessors, dropped plans to buy 10 superjumbos as the global economic slowdown drove airlines to rein in seat capacity.

But Doric, which is based in Offenbach, near Frankfurt, said on Monday that it was talking with several potential customers for the A380 jets.

“We see how airlines that do not yet have the A380 are interested in it and approach us and ask questions, which shows us that there is pent-up demand for this aircraft,” said Mark Lapidus, Doric’s chief executive. He said he expected his company would easily place the planes with two or three airlines.

“If anything, we are perhaps under-ordering” the jets, he said.

Another leasing company, GE Capital Aviation Services, planned to order up to 10 models of a stretch version of Boeing’s 787, which the American manufacturer was expected to commit to building this week. The larger 787 is expected to seat 320 passengers, compared with the 210 to 290 seats in the Dreamliners currently in production.

Analysts said they were skeptical about a fundamental change in the market for planes with more than 400 seats, like the A380 and Boeing 747.

“Long term, the financial future for the A380 looks pretty weak,” said Saj Ahmad, chief analyst for StrategicAero Research in London. “It’s a very small niche market.”

Despite the dearth of recent A380 orders, “the basics haven’t changed,” said Christopher Emerson, Airbus’s senior vice president for marketing. He attributed the slower-than-expected uptake of A380s to bad timing, noting that the first deliveries came less than a year after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, which set off the global financial crisis and subsequent recession.

“Now that we are coming out of the downturn, you will start to see traffic growing faster,” Mr. Emerson said. “Now is the time for the A380 to do what it was designed to do: capture growth.”

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: June 17, 2013

An earlier version of this article inaccurately characterized an order for Airbus’s A380 jets. Doric Asset Finance is Airbus’s first new customer in nearly two years for its superjumbo plane, it is not its first customer for the jet.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/18/business/global/big-jets-may-be-back-in-demand-with-economy.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

On the Road: Airlines Weigh Costs, and Passenger Pounds

But wait, let me revise that slightly, thanks to a handy new pay-by-your-weight guide that the little South Pacific airline Samoa Air provides when you book a flight.

Now, if I so decide, I can fly one way from Faleolo Airport in Samoa to Pago Pago in American Samoa (I chose Pago Pago because I like saying it) for 159 Samoan tala, which is about $69.90 That fare comes up after I enter in my weight, 75 kilograms, or 165 pounds. But if I still weighed the same as I did last fall, before I lost 30 pounds on a simple diet, that fare would be 186.56 tala ($79.04).

So hooray for Weight Watchers for saving me 15 percent on a trip I have no intention of taking. Yes, you can reliably reduce your fare, on Samoa Air at least, by reducing your weight. The fare is calculated online based partly on the weight you enter, but the honor system doesn’t apply. As the Samoa Air Web site says, “Don’t worry. We will weigh you again at the airport.”

Let’s not get carried away with this development, though. Samoa Air is but a small island-hopping airline that flies little propeller planes where weight and the distribution of weight have always been considerations. Besides, Samoa and the South Pacific region have obesity rates that are among the world’s highest. By imposing a fare scale based on actual weight, rather than just depending on a pilot’s observations about overall payload, Samoa got a lot of worldwide publicity.

But could charging fares based partly on a passenger’s actual weight be a trend? Not a chance, airline executives say — though they will not publicly discuss competitive fares (antitrust rules frown on it) and especially won’t discuss the touchy subject of fat passengers.

Imagine the chaos of standing in line at a departure gate, waiting to step on a scale along with 150 other passengers (or 550 passengers on a big A380), one by one. On the other hand, weight in general is a serious concern for airlines — the concept of flight being a matter of basic physics. Basic economics also counts, with jet fuel prices at nearly record levels.

Periodically, there are news reports of passengers complaining that grossly overweight passengers encroached on their limited personal space on crowded flights, and should be required to buy an extra seat. Airlines have approached this issue gingerly, given the potential for litigation.

Southwest Airlines, for example, has a carefully worded “Customers of Size” guideline that says in part: “Customers who encroach upon any part of the neighboring seat(s) may proactively purchase the needed number of seats prior to travel” or, failing that, have the option of “discussing their seating needs with the customer service agent at their departure gate.”

All over the world, airlines have been assiduously working to reduce the weight any airplane carries. Some international airlines, for example, are eliminating the heavy hardware and wiring required by elaborate in-flight entertainment systems in favor of individual tablets using Wi-Fi technology. Some have eliminated heavy drink carts and instead require flight attendants to hand-carry trays.

Others have eliminated or reduced the size of airplane galleys, especially given that a hot meal in coach has faded into memory. Some replaced silverware in first class with lighter-weight plastic utensils. In Europe, the scrappy discount carrier Ryanair even reduced the page size of its in-flight magazine. And last year, an executive at Ryanair, which is no slacker itself when it comes to generating publicity, even suggested that flight attendants might consider losing a few pounds in the interest of corporate profitability.

E-mail: jsharkey@nytimes.com

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/09/business/airlines-weigh-costs-and-passenger-pounds-on-the-road.html?partner=rss&emc=rss