April 24, 2025

‘The Croods’ and ‘Olympus Has Fallen’ Lead the Box Office

For the first time this year two movies arrived to $30 million or more in ticket sales in North America, giving studios hope that a dismal box-office stretch was behind them. “The Croods,” about a prehistoric family’s road trip, took in an estimated $44.7 million over the weekend, easily enough for No. 1, while “Olympus Has Fallen” took in a stronger-than-expected $30.5 million, for second place.

Even “Spring Breakers,” Harmony Korine’s lurid art-house tale of bikini-clad killers, lived up to its hype, taking in about $5 million in relatively limited national release.

Still, moviegoing in the United States and Canada remains deeply troubled. Ticket sales for the year to date total $2.06 billion, a 13 percent decline from the same period a year ago, according to Paul Dergarabedian, a box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. Attendance has fallen 14 percent.

Star-packed movies like “Gangster Squad” and “The Incredible Burt Wonderstone” have arrived to virtual shrugs. An expensive fantasy, “Jack the Giant Slayer,” flopped outright. Movies aimed at men (“The Last Stand,” “Broken City” and “21 Over”) have disappointed in assembly-line fashion.

One of the few exceptions, “Oz the Great and Powerful” from Walt Disney Studios, sold an additional $22 million in tickets over the weekend, placing third. “Oz” has now taken in $177.6 million in North America over three weeks. (Crucial overseas sales, however, have been soft.)

“The Call” (Sony) was fourth, selling about $8.7 million in tickets, for a two-week total of $30.9 million. “Admission,” a new comedy starring Tina Fey and Paul Rudd, was an underwhelming fifth, taking in about $6.4 million. But it cost Focus Features only an estimated $13 million to make.

DreamWorks Animation urgently needed the cave people of “The Croods” to succeed. The studio’s last release, “Rise of the Guardians,” was a box-office failure, prompting an $87 million write-down. “The Croods” also represents the beginning of a new distribution partnership for DreamWorks Animation, which parted ways with Paramount Pictures late last year in favor of 20th Century Fox.

Opening-weekend results for “The Croods,” which cost at least $135 million to make, are on par with “How to Train Your Dragon,” also from DreamWorks with a March release date, which took in $46.5 million over its first three days in 2010 (after adjusting for inflation) and went on to gross about $500 million worldwide and spawn two sequels, a TV series and a live arena show. But “How to Train Your Dragon” also received much stronger reviews than “The Croods.”

“Olympus Has Fallen,” an R-rated White House action thriller starring Gerard Butler, cost Millennium Films about $70 million to make and was distributed by FilmDistrict. Aside from giving Mr. Butler’s career a much-needed lift, the strong turnout puts pressure on Sony’s similar “White House Down,” planned for June release.

The inexpensive “Spring Breakers,” distributed by A24, played in 1,104 theaters — a huge release by independent film standards but a modest one compared with mainstream Hollywood. (“The Croods,” for example, was booked into 4,046 theaters.) Mr. Korine, still best known for writing “Kids” (1995), has never had this kind of success as a director; his previous four films took in less than $500,000 combined.

Starring Selena Gomez, Vanessa Hudgens and James Franco and fueled by drugs, sex and violence, “Spring Breakers” was backed by an aggressive social media marketing campaign orchestrated by A24, an upstart distributor, and theAudience, a company partly owned by the William Morris Endeavor talent agency that seeks to build (and exploit) networks of fans across Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: March 24, 2013

An earlier version of this article referred incorrectly to the weekend box-office ranking of the film “Admission.”  It was fifth, not fourth;  fourth place was held by “The Call.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/movies/the-croods-and-olympus-has-fallen-lead-the-box-office.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: ‘Lion King’ Has New Life, in Theaters and at Home

First will be a 3-D run for “The Lion King” in movie theaters, then new box sets just 18 days later.Walt Disney PicturesFirst will be a 3-D run for “The Lion King” in movie theaters, then new box sets just 18 days later.

Theater owners are furious with movie studios for speeding up the release of movies on DVD and video-on-demand services. Except when they’re not upset about it at all.

That would seem to be the case with a new 3-D version of On Friday, Walt Disney Studios will release it in theaters. A lightning-fast 18 days later, new “Lion King” DVD and Blu-ray sets, two including 3-D versions, will arrive in stores. And theater owners, who normally get an exclusive period of about 120 days to show a film and have been forcefully protecting that privilege, are totally fine with that plan.

“No, we are not concerned,” said John Fithian, president of the National Association of Theater Owners.

On one level, it’s an example of Hollywood’s tendency to conduct business with confounding inconsistency. (We’re not paying stars $20 million a picture anymore! Until we do.) Theaters, eager to milk the animated classic anew, are looking the other way and calling “The Lion King 3-D” a special case that doesn’t set industry precedent the way Home Premiere did.

Home Premiere is a video-on-demand service, introduced by DirecTV in April, that delivers films into homes about two months after their release in theaters; theater owners were angered because the service shortened by 50 percent their exclusive window.

“The ‘Lion King’ movie was released in 1994,” Mr. Fithian said. “A DVD release in 2011 has a 17-year window. The fact that exhibitioners and our patrons can benefit from a 3-D release is gravy.” Disney’s move is also palatable because “The Lion King 3-D” will play in theaters for only two weeks, which is expected to give consumers who want to experience it on the big screen a sense of urgency.

Surveys that track audience interest indicate that “The Lion King 3-D” could sell $10 million to $12 million in tickets over its first three days, and some marketers with access to the data say $18 million is possible.

But “The Lion King 3-D” and its quickie DVD release — a strategy by Disney to use the attention that comes with a theatrical run to drive disc sales — could still set a precedent that may hurt exhibitors in the long term, industry analysts say. Some consumers, especially those in big cities, could become further disillusioned with moviegoing when they see theaters charging $17 for an adult ticket to a film that they will be able to see in their living rooms just days later.

Disney said “The Lion King 3-D” was not a test; even if it goes well the studio does not plan on routinely converting other beloved films in its library to the format and rereleasing them in theaters. A Disney spokeswoman said the 3-D release was more of a way to keep an aging film fresh while allowing a new generation of children to experience it in theaters.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f0408190e0bbaf21b4e53f4e3aff69be