April 26, 2024

DealBook: GSV Capital, Placing Bets on Start-Ups, Falters

Michael T. Moe, of the closed-end mutual fund GSV Capital, in Woodside, Calif.Peter DaSilva for The New York TimesMichael Moe, of the closed-end mutual fund GSV Capital, in Woodside, Calif.

Few investors have ridden the recent Internet boomlet like GSV Capital Corporation.

After GSV announced in June 2011 that it was buying a stake in the privately held Facebook, the closed-end mutual fund surged 42 percent that day. Capitalizing on the euphoria, GSV sold another $247 million of its shares, using the money to expand its portfolio of hot start-ups like Groupon and Zynga.

Now, GSV is feeling the Facebook blues.

When the public offering of the social network flopped, GSV fell hard, and it still has not recovered. Shares of GSV, which were sold for an average of $15.35, are trading at $8.54.

“We probably benefited from our stake in Facebook more than we deserved on the way up,” said GSV’s chief executive, Michael T. Moe, “and were certainly punished more than we deserved on the way down.”

GSV, short for Global Silicon Valley, is the largest of several closed-end mutual funds that offer ordinary investors a chance to own stakes in privately held companies, at least indirectly. Closed-end funds like GSV typically sell a set number of shares, and their managers invest the proceeds. In essence, such portfolios operate like mini venture capital funds, taking stakes in start-ups and betting they will turn a profit if the companies are sold or go public.

“I think GSV was really innovative in creating a kind of publicly traded venture capital fund,” said Jason Jones, founder of HighStep Capital, which also invests in private companies.

But the shares of closed-end funds trade on investor demand — and can go significantly higher or lower than the value of the underlying portfolios. The entire category has been hit by Facebook’s troubles, with GSV trading at a 38 percent discount to its so-called net asset value.

Mr. Moe, 49, has previously experienced the wild ups and downs of popular stocks.

A backup quarterback at the University of Minnesota, he started out as a stockbroker at the Minneapolis-based Dain Bosworth, where he wrote a stock-market newsletter called “Mike Moe’s Market Minutes.” He met the chief executive of Starbucks, Howard Schultz, on a visit to Seattle in 1992, and he began covering the coffee chain after its initial public offering.

“I left believing I had just met the next Ray Kroc,” Mr. Moe wrote in his 2006 book, “Finding the Next Starbucks,” referring to the executive who built the McDonald’s empire.

After stints at two other brokerage firms, Mr. Moe became the director of global growth research in San Francisco at Merrill Lynch in 1998. There he ran a group of a dozen analysts at a time when mere business models “were going public at billion-dollar valuations,” he said.

Shortly after the dot-com bubble burst, he founded a banking boutique now called ThinkEquity. At the time, he expected the I.P.O. market to shrug off the weakness and recover in a couple of years. Instead, it went into a decade-long slump.

“Market timing is not my best skill,” Mr. Moe said. In 2007, he sold ThinkEquity.

The next year, he started a new firm to provide research on private companies, NeXt Up Research. He later expanded into asset management, eventually changing the name to GSV. Within two months of starting his own fund, he bought the shares in Facebook through SecondMarket, a marketplace for private shares.

GSV soon raised additional funds from investors and put the money into start-ups in education, cloud computing, Internet commerce, social media and clean technology. Along with Groupon and Zynga, he bought Twitter, Gilt Groupe and Spotify Technology. The goal is finding “the fastest-growing companies in the world,” he said.

But Mr. Moe has paid a high price, picking up several start-ups at high values on the private market. He bought Facebook at $29.92 a share. That stock is now trading at $19.10. He purchased Groupon in August 2011 for $26.61 a share, well above its eventual public offering price of $20. It currently sells at $4.31.

Max Wolff, who tracks pre-I.P.O. stocks at GreenCrest Capital Management, said GSV sometimes bought “popular names to please investors.” “This is such a sentiment-sensitive space, the stocks don’t trade on fundamentals,” Mr. Wolff said, adding: “If there’s a loss of faith, they fall without a net.”

GSV’s peers have similarly struggled. Firsthand Technology Value Fund, which owns stakes in Facebook and solar-power businesses like SolarCity and Intevac, is off 65 percent from its peak in April. “We paid too much” for Facebook, said Firsthand’s chief executive, Kevin Landis.

Two other funds with similar strategies have sidestepped the bulk of the pain. Harris Harris Group owns 32 companies in micro-scale technology. Keating Capital, with $75 million in assets, owns pieces of 20 venture-backed companies. But neither Harris nor Keating owns Facebook, Groupon or Zynga, so shares in those companies have not fallen as steeply.

GSV is now dealing with the fallout.

In a conference call in August, Mr. Moe was confronted by one investor who said, “the recent public positions have been a disaster,” according to a transcript on Seeking Alpha, a stock market news Web site. While Mr. Moe expressed similar disappointment, he emphasized the companies’ fundamentals. Collectively, he said, their revenue was growing by more than 100 percent.

“We have been around this for quite some time, and we are going to be wrong from time to time,” Mr. Moe said in the call. “But we are focused on the batting average.”

In the same call, Mr. Moe remained enthusiastic — if not hyperbolic — about the group’s prospects. Many of GSV’s 40 holdings are in “game-changing companies” with the potential to drive outsize growth, he told the investors. Twitter, the largest, “continues to just be a rocket ship in terms of growth, and we think value creation,” he said. The data analysis provider Palantir Technologies helps the Central Intelligence Agency “track terrorists and bad guys all over the world.” The flash memory maker Violin Memory “is experiencing hyper-growth,” he wrote in an e-mail.

But Mr. Moe was a bit more muted in recent interviews. While he says he still believes in giving public investors access to private company stocks, he recognizes the cloud over GSV. “We unfortunately have a social media segment that got tainted. I completely get why our stock is where it is. It’s going to be a show-me situation for a while.”

Acknowledging some regrets, Mr. Moe said he was angriest about overpaying for Groupon, saying, “Yeah, I blew Groupon.” He said that he also did not anticipate what he called a “deceleration” in Facebook’s growth rate, and that it was “kind of infuriating” that some of its early investors were allowed to exit before others. GSV often must hold its shares until six months after a public offering.

But the downturn in pre-I.P.O. shares has a silver lining, Mr. Moe said. Since the Facebook public offering, he has been able to put money to work “at better prices.” He recently bought shares of Spotify at a valuation of about $3 billion, roughly 25 percent below the target in its latest round of financing.

The I.P.O. market is also showing signs of life, he said, with the strong debuts of Palo Alto Networks and Kayak Software. And he still has faith in Facebook. Whatever its current stock price, at least it is a “real company” with revenue and profits, Mr. Moe said. “It’s not being valued off eyeballs and fairy dust.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/08/29/gsv-capital-placing-bets-on-start-ups-falters/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Michael Arrington, TechCrunch Blogger, to Invest in Start-Ups

SAN FRANCISCO — Michael Arrington, whose influential TechCrunch blog covers Silicon Valley, has started a venture capital fund to invest in start-ups, including some that he and his staff write about.

The $20 million CrunchFund is the latest example of Mr. Arrington’s casting aside one of traditional journalism’s cardinal rules — that reporters should avoid conflicts of interest by maintaining distance from the people, organizations and issues they cover — and raises questions about whether industry bloggers are journalists.

Like most news providers, AOL, which reportedly paid $30 million to acquire TechCrunch last year, prohibits reporters at its media sites, including those at The Huffington Post, from investing in the companies they cover.

But AOL has made an exception for Mr. Arrington, who has been the site’s editor. He will take a backseat role at TechCrunch, which is hiring a new managing editor. He will continue to report to Arianna Huffington, who runs AOL’s media properties.

“TechCrunch is a different property and they have different standards,” Tim Armstrong, chief executive of AOL, said in an interview.

“We have a traditional understanding of journalism with the exception of TechCrunch, which is different but is transparent about it.” Not only has AOL approved the fund, it is financing it. AOL invested about $10 million in the CrunchFund, which will operate separately from AOL Ventures, the venture capital fund that AOL brought back to life last year.

Mr. Arrington said that his investments would never influence TechCrunch’s coverage, and that he would continue to disclose that he had invested in start-ups across the site, including on each post about the start-ups.

The fund’s contract with its investors says that Mr. Arrington can continue to publish critical or negative posts or disclose confidential information about the investors or the companies in which they have invested.

“I don’t claim to be a journalist,” Mr. Arrington said, though he breaks news and writes prolifically. “I hold myself to higher standards of transparency and disclosure.”

He argues that his investments would produce less of a conflict of interest than the other conflicts that all journalists have as human beings, because their views are shaped by friendships, romances and personal opinions.

“Friendships and marriage are far more potent than financial conflicts,” he said. “I firmly believe that the reason we are a popular site is because we have built reader trust, and the only way to build reader trust is not to trick them. That’s the most important thing to me.”

The arrangement immediately raised ethical questions. “Journalists write with the principle of public illumination,” said Edward Wasserman, the Knight professor of journalism ethics at Washington and Lee University. “If it’s helping a group of investors make decisions or advancing one’s own portfolio, you’re not really in the journalism business. You’re in the private enrichment business.”

Many of the top firms in venture capital, which Mr. Arrington also covers on TechCrunch — including Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers and Greylock Partners — have invested in Mr. Arrington’s fund. Accel, Benchmark Capital and Andreessen Horowitz have also invested.

The CrunchFund will generally invest $25,000 to $500,000 in young start-ups. The fund, which is fully subscribed and not accepting new investors , will invest only alongside other venture capitalists, Mr. Arrington said. He will run the fund along with Patrick Gallagher, his college friend and an investor at VantagePoint Venture Partners.

Mr. Arrington, a former Silicon Valley lawyer, started TechCrunch in 2005 and rapidly turned it into one of the most-read blogs in the tech world. It had 3.6 million visitors in July, according to comScore.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=eef2184876584e1bdcb09ba7b0127f7a

You’re the Boss: S.B.A. Unveils New Venture Capital Fund

The Agenda

How small-business issues are shaping politics and policy.

The Small Business Administration announced on Thursday that it had formed a $130 million venture capital fund to invest in high-growth companies in Michigan. The fund is the first of what Karen Mills, the S.B.A. administrator, said is a $1 billion commitment over five years through what the agency calls Impact Investment funds, part of the Obama administration’s Startup America initiative announced in January.

In Michigan, the S.B.A. has joined forces with the State of Michigan Retirement Systems, which will contribute $35 million through its own investment fund, and Dow Chemical, which will invest $15 million. The S.B.A. will provide up to $80 million in debt financing. In the next three or four years, the fund, called the InvestMichigan! Mezzanine Fund, will invest between $5 million and $15 million in about 20 companies that either do business or have a substantial presence in Michigan or are poised to relocate there.

Speaking on a conference call that included the chief executive of Dow and Rick Snyder, Michigan’s Republican governor, Ms. Mills said the state’s dire economic situation made it a logical starting point for the program. “This is an economy in transition,” she said. “But the good news is the opportunity is also there. Many of the high-growth firms in Michigan simply need more capital to grow, scale up, and hire.” (As it happens, the state is certain to be a battleground in the 2012 presidential election.)

The Impact Investment Fund initiative is a new variation on the agency’s longstanding, and grossly under-utilized, investment program. As currently constituted, the program allows funds, called small-business investment companies, to borrow money from the S.B.A. and in turn re-loan that money to their portfolio companies. The S.B.A. then pools the money lent to the small-business investment companies and sells the debt as debentures on Wall Street; because the investment is guaranteed by the government, the interest rate is low. According to Kelly Williams, a managing director of Credit Suisse and a manager of the InvestMichigan! fund, the interest rate on these debentures is presently about 4 percent — much lower than a bank loan.

The program, which is self-financed through the interest payments and fees charged to the investment companies, is authorized to loan $3 billion each year; last year, Ms. Mills said, it committed only half that.

But the initiative does have limitations. Though the program is called Startup America, Invest!Michigan will not invest in start-ups. Because small-business investment company investment is typically more debt than equity — in the case of Invest!Michigan, about 70 percent debt, according to S.B.A. spokeswoman Hayley Meadvin — the companies receiving the investment must have enough cash flow to make regular interest payments to their backers. Indeed, according to Ms. Williams, the fund will seek companies that have already proven themselves, generating revenue of at least $20 million a year and profit of $3 million to $5 million.

Until 2004, the S.B.A. also licensed small-business investment companies that took pure equity stakes in portfolio companies, and so could invest in risky early-stage companies. However, the Bush administration, convinced that losses in that program would cost the government billions of dollars, stopped issuing new licenses for those types of investment companies. The program’s authorization eventually expired, and Congress has not renewed it.

The Obama administration has not sought to renew the equity program, either, though the S.B.A. says it is developing a $1 billion fund for early-stage companies, set to be launched in late 2011 or early 2012. In the meantime, the administration has channeled more private-sector dollars into the debenture program. And with the Impact Investment initiative, it has taken a decidedly more hands-on approach. Unlike a typical S.B.I.C., where an investment manager would first organize the fund and then approach the S.B.A. for a license, this fund was in fact organized by the agency itself.

While many newly elected Republican governors have taken pains to distance themselves from Obama administration initiatives that they view as heavy-handed federal intervention, Gov. Snyder had no such qualms on Thursday. “We’re pleased that you look upon Michigan as a great opportunity, because we want to be a pioneer on an opportunity like this,” he said to Ms. Mills on the conference call. “It’s very exciting to be part of this process.”

Ms. Williams said the fund has already started scouting for prospective investments. The first deal, she said, would close within a month or so.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=ff2c326852e61e5521601467234f9aee