May 5, 2024

Fundamentally: Europe’s Markets, No Longer in Lock Step

Money managers point to signs like these: Investors barely flinched during the banking crisis last month in Cyprus, an indication that the Continent may be moving past its manic phase. The Vstoxx index, a measure of stock market volatility in the euro zone, is about half of what it was in the fall of 2011, when the region’s debt crisis spread to Greece and Italy. And Europe has actually been the best-performing major overseas market since the start of 2012, with equities surging nearly 19 percent.

“The markets get that it’s not 2011 anymore,” said Edward A. Gray, a co-manager of the Delaware International Value Equity fund.

But impressive as that change has been, the hard part may be coming now.

That’s because, until recently, the European market has followed a fairly simple, predictable pattern. When investors sensed that the fiscal crisis there was worsening, as in the late summer of 2011, European stocks sold off in lock step. Conversely, investors raced back into the region’s equities anytime there was better-than-expected economic news — like that of the second Greek bailout, in the first quarter of 2012.

Now that European stocks appear to be past these extreme swings, investors are “much more fundamentally focused and discriminating,” said Harry W. Hartford, president of Causeway Capital Management. That means European stocks “are not a homogeneous entity anymore,” he added.

Consider the performance of European stocks in the first quarter. While stock funds that invest broadly in the region returned 2.6 percent, on average, the stock markets of individual countries were all over the map. Greece, for instance, finished the quarter up more than 14 percent and Switzerland gained more than 10 percent. Germany, meanwhile, was flat, while Spain sank 6 percent and Italy fell nearly 10 percent.

Future success in Europe will require investors to distinguish not only among markets, but among sectors and individual stocks as well, money managers say. But it is becoming harder to find decent values among European stocks, said Kimball Brooker Jr., a co-manager of the First Eagle Overseas fund.

Broadly speaking, European equities still trade at lower valuations than domestic or Japanese shares. Yet the broad market’s price-to-earnings ratios don’t necessarily paint an accurate picture of the investment landscape, Mr. Brooker said.

For instance, a few years ago, it was fairly easy to find shares of high-quality multinational companies in the region that were trading at discounted prices relative to their American counterparts, simply because they were based in Europe. Today, those types of industry-leading companies — those with pristine balance sheets that generate a large portion of their sales in faster-growing areas like emerging markets — are becoming expensive.

These are companies like L’Oréal, the beauty products giant based outside Paris, and Diageo, the spirits maker based in London, said Charles de Vaulx, chief investment officer at International Value Advisers. Both stocks are trading at P/E ratios well above 20.

“These stocks are very pricey, but deservedly so,” he said, owing to their strong finances and geographic reach. But that leaves fewer apparent opportunities for value-minded investors looking to put new money to work.

“To find generally cheap stocks in Europe, you have to look for cyclical businesses that require you to believe that we’re on the verge of a major economic recovery,” Mr. de Vaulx said. “Unfortunately, we worry that European economies are decelerating.”

THIS explains why only about 57 percent of the assets in the IVA Worldwide fund, for which Mr. de Vaulx is a co-manager, are currently in equities. That’s down from 71 percent a year ago. Furthermore, only about 145 percent of the total portfolio is in European equities, with double that stake held in the United States.

European stocks are facing increasing competition for global investment dollars now that Japan’s stock market is finally rebounding, said Mark D. Luschini, chief investment strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott.

Japanese stock funds, in fact, soared 15 percent in the first quarter, more than their gains in all of 2012. And over the past six months, the MSCI Japan stock index has climbed by nearly 42 percent.

For European equities to continue to rally in the face of such stiff competition, from both Japan and the United States, “it’s going to require some kind of positive catalyst,” Mr. Luschini said.

In the short run, he said, he does not know whether any economic indicators will provide such a lift.

But over a five-year horizon, he says he thinks European markets could still turn out to be among the more attractive foreign destinations, especially if European companies can keep increasing their profitability while the economy slowly heals.

Paul J. Lim is a senior editor at Money magazine. E-mail: fund@nytimes.com.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/your-money/europes-markets-no-longer-in-lock-step.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Reuters Breakingviews: Signs of a Crash Ahead, Not a Recession — Reuters Breakingviews

The stock market may be ahead of the economy. That suggests a crash is more likely than a second recession.

There are many ways to value equity markets. A simple one is to compare an index to nominal gross domestic product. What ratio counts as high is a matter of debate, but 1995 is a good starting point. The Dow Jones industrial average first climbed above 4,000 in February 1995, which was then almost 50 percent above its 1987 peak. It was 38 percent below the level of December 1996, when Alan Greenspan warned of irrational exuberance.

If the market’s value had increased in line with nominal G.D.P. since 1995, the Dow would be 105 percent higher, at 8,200 today. If that sounds low, consider that inflating the Dow’s bear market low of 777 points in August 1982 gives it a current level of 3,600.

Even after its recent decline, the market remains far above these levels. The performance certainly owes nothing to superior economic prospects. Rather, ultralow interest rates together with increased leverage inflated corporate profits over the years.

In addition, modern communications technology has enabled multinationals to profit from low-cost global sourcing of labor. Finally, money-supply expansion, with the St. Louis Fed’s broad money-supply measure up 262 percent since 1995 compared with the G.D.P.’s 105 percent increase, has inflated all asset prices.

Interest rates must eventually rise, to prevent inflation and the decapitalization of the United States through low savings and capital outflow. This will raise the cost of capital compared with labor, which would put millions back to work. Normalization need not cause a recession, although it may slow growth in some emerging economies.

But the return to conventional monetary policy would deflate the asset bubble and reduce corporate profits. That’s almost bound to cause a major bear market in stocks, with the Dow heading toward 3,600. Investors, both individual and institutional, will squawk, but those newly restored to employment may rejoice to see, in Churchill’s words, “finance less proud and industry more content.”

Education Battle

Spring is in the air in Santiago, but the Chilean winter is still in season. Huge street protests over education are expected to resume on Thursday. As easy as it may seem to lump these with unrest elsewhere, Chile’s unrest is different. Fundamentally, it is a test of the economic model that has made the nation Latin America’s shining star.

Chile’s educational system reflects the country’s philosophical preference for private, market-based — rather than public — solutions to social and economic problems. After the brutal dictatorship of Gen. Augusto Pinochet, Chile embarked on a free-market path unlike any of its neighbors’.

This has mostly served Chile well. In 1990, per capita G.D.P. stood at $5,000 a year, on a purchasing power parity basis, in line with the rest of Latin America. Today it’s close to $20,000, some 50 percent ahead of the region, calculates Banchile, a brokerage firm. In that sense, the education debate is a developed world problem. The question isn’t whether Chileans go to school, but rather the quality of instruction they receive.

Yet here the Chilean model hasn’t delivered, in ways that could hamper future growth. The country ranks well below the average of members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in reading, math and science scores, despite households shouldering more of the cost of education than in any other nation. Growth in productivity has been declining for years. Anecdotally, employers complain of a work force unsuited to their needs.

It’s hard not to see Chile’s application of free-market principles to learning as part of the problem. It has created a stratified system where fewer than half of high school students attend public schools because of their low quality. And despite Chile’s financial gains in the post-Pinochet era, the government has been slow to add new public universities.

As a result, protesters want to abolish the profit motive entirely from education. For the center-right government of Sebastián Piñera, the country’s billionaire president, that would be a repudiation of the laissez faire principles on which Chile’s success is based.

But polls show most Chileans favor educational overhaul — and that Mr. Piñera is the least popular Chilean leader since Pinochet. Put it all together, and the price of thawing the Chilean winter looks evident: sacrificing a wee bit of free-market ideology.

MARTIN HUTCHINSON and ROB COX

For more independent financial commentary and analysis, visit www.breakingviews.com.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=78b015103f5835928852ca83da189110