April 26, 2024

Letters: Letters: Working Hard, Yes, but for Fair Pay?

Re “Whatever Happened to Discipline and Hard Work?” (Economic View, Nov. 13):

Yes, as Tyler Cowen says in the column, it’s true that our American culture has always had high regard for those able to rise from poverty to riches. But throughout our history, we’ve also been guided by a social contract that holds that no one in this country makes it alone, and that the needs of those who have helped the wealthiest to get where they are must also be met.

I’m not talking about handouts. I’m talking about fairly compensating those who have worked hard and long. That has certainly not been the case, especially in recent years when the wealthiest have received an unconscionably huge portion of the benefits.

Alvin Zubasky

Delray Beach, Fla., Nov. 14

To the Editor:

Many Americans are working longer hours for stagnating or declining wages and fewer benefits — and are facing the ugly prospect of financial insecurity in retirement. The problem is not the American worker; the problem is that Wall Street itself has no discipline and is hardly working for the average American.

The “entitlement culture” belongs not to lower-income Americans, but to the reckless Wall Street super-rich who assume that they are entitled to massive wealth for manipulating markets and creating bogus financial instruments.

The only way to bring Wall Street’s peculiar brand of crony capitalism to heel is to tax its transactions and regulate its behavior. If Congress has the will to do that, it will be through the discipline and hard work of millions of Americans who demand it.

Christopher J. Curtis

Northfield, Vt., Nov. 14

To the Editor:

The vision described in the column is not the Founding Fathers’ vision. Theirs was more complete: While discipline and hard work are important, they are less important than equality (of opportunity), fraternity (“a more perfect Union”) and liberty (basic human rights).

The Founding Fathers stressed these points in the Constitution — they did not stress discipline and hard work.

Whoever distorts “pursuit of happiness” into “pursuit of wealth” perpetrates the Animal Farm injustice (“all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others”) on our nation.

Of course, the Founding Fathers also said “We the People.” They did not say “We the corporate persons.” Charles Kick

Honiara, Solomon Islands,Nov. 14

To the Editor:

No matter how disciplined and hard-working any of the “99 percent” are, the cost of education is a huge deterrent to achievement.

The efforts of some of the 1 percent to defund education at all levels leads to an impossibly big debt burden.

Or, it discourages altogether attempts to learn what’s needed to develop and maintain the technological society on which we all depend (especially the 1 percent). Margaret Eiszner

Kalamazoo, Mich., Nov. 15

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=29621abded2ab35899fb753f73903009

Economix Blog: Weekend Business Podcast: Europe, Pensions, Wealth and Phone Bills

For much of the past week, financial markets have fretted more about Italy than about Greece, which had been the main focus of worries for many weeks.

While the markets were calmer on Friday, the problems in the euro zone were hardly over.

In the new Weekend Business podcast, Floyd Norris, a veteran financial reporter, says that Italy’s sheer economic weight makes its problems quite threatening to the world’s financial system. An impending change in political leadership in Italy and a shift that has already occurred in Greece took some of the financial pressure off both countries temporarily. But the stability of the euro zone remains very much in doubt, he says.

In the United States, a Congressional “supercommittee” has been charged with reducing the fiscal deficit by $1.2 trillion. In a separate conversation in the podcast, and in her column in Sunday Business, Gretchen Morgenson says the committee might want to focus on the taxpayer financing of military contractor pensions, which, she says, are underfunded by some $30 billion. Since defined-benefit pensions have been reduced in other sectors, she suggests, it may be worth considering whether taxpayers ought to bear this burden for defense contractors.

Questions posed by the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations are the focus of the Economic View column in Sunday Business by Tyler Cowen, a George Mason economics professor, who says he has a libertarian and conservative perspective. While he says in the podcast that he’s sympathetic to the demonstrators’ targeting of abuses by the “top 1 percent,” he adds that the crucial distinction ought to be how you earn your money, not how much money you earn. The pursuit of wealth has long been valued in American society, he says, along with a culture of discipline and hard work, and in his view these values ought to be strengthened in the future.

Outrageous cellphone bills have raised the hackles of the Haggler, as David Segal calls himself in his Sunday Business column. On the podcast, he discusses his efforts to adjudicate a bill that amounted to more than $25,000 in long-distance charges plus more than $1,000 in recovery fees.

And Phyllis Korkki and Amy Cortese discuss the response of people in Saranac Lake, a small town in upstate New York, who realized that with the demise of a local store there would no longer be anyplace in town to buy underwear. They started a community-owned store, which sells assorted sundries, with the support of some local shopkeepers, who say that a variety of enterprises are needed to build customer traffic and keep the town’s businesses alive.

You can find specific segments of the podcast at these junctures: Floyd Norris on European debt (34:20); news headlines (25:37); Gretchen Morgenson on pensions (23:22); Amy Cortese on Saranac Lake (18:46); The Haggler on phone bills (13:14); Tyler Cowen on wealth (8:44); the week ahead (1:41).

As articles discussed in the podcast are published during the weekend, links will be added to this post.

You can download the program by subscribing from The New York Times’s podcast page or directly from iTunes.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=3a3d681194d14f9fa094fc77c63ee787

Economix Blog: Alan Krueger’s New White House Job

Alan B. Krueger, an economist at Princeton, has been chosen to be the next chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers.

He’s an interesting choice for this job. Usually that position is held by a macroeconomist, and the selection of Dr. Krueger, a microeconomist known for his work on labor issues, sends a strong signal that the administration may be devoting more energy to job creation.

CATHERINE RAMPELL

CATHERINE RAMPELL

Dollars to doughnuts.

Dr. Krueger has an eclectic set of interests, as indicated by not only his academic research but also the columns he wrote for Economix from 2008 to 2009. For example, he has written about rock concerts, happiness, health care, the value of a college education, and terrorism. While he was chief economist at the Treasury Department from 2009 to 2010, he worked on more macro issues related to areas like tax policy and public debt. But still, he is most closely associated with his work on the job market.

Dr. Krueger is also an empiricist: He looks at what is going on in the real world, then tries to make sense of it. (In recent years, you may recall, the economics profession has come under attack for being too theoretical and disconnected from reality.) Sometimes he uses data that is readily available, and sometimes he commissions or designs his own surveys, often working with Gallup.

Partly because he is data-driven and relatively nonideological, he has many fans in the economics community from both left and right — despite the fact that his flagship research is the cornerstone of any liberal campaign to raise the minimum wage. You can see this in reactions throughout the econoblogosphere, including plaudits from conservative economists like Greg Mankiw and Tyler Cowen.

Perhaps his data-driven approach and bipartisan appeal will make his Senate confirmation process an easier endeavor. He has also been through it before, after all, when he was nominated for his Treasury post. Given the administration’s record in getting other nominees through, though, this may still be a long slog.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=29f7b93cf4d66cc1d179597abdefd062

Economix Blog: Podcast: Eurobonds, Star Analysts and Productivity

Financial markets have been showing more signs of stress. The daily swings of stock markets have been growing wider, and investments presumed to be safe, like Treasury bonds and gold bullion, have been rising sharply in price.

While these market movements are global, many of the problems over the last week emanate from Europe. In the new Weekend Business podcast, Graham Bowley and Floyd Norris discuss proposals to create eurobonds as a way to provide financing for troubled members of the European Union. Political opposition in relatively rich countries like Germany, however, makes such bonds unlikely in the near future. Meanwhile, banks in Europe and elsewhere retain considerable exposure to European sovereign debt. No simple solution is at hand, and the markets remain skittish.

In a separate conversation in the podcast, and in an article on the cover of Sunday Business, Susanne Craig says that despite the uncertain market outlook, a bidding war has developed for stock analysts specializing in Internet and social media companies. We haven’t returned to the manic mood of the late 1990s, she says, but the sums being paid to some stock analysts may suggest that we are heading in that direction.

Tyler Cowen, the George Mason University economist, explores the implications of declining labor productivity in his Economic View column in Sunday Business, and in a podcast conversation. This may be the most serious of the many economic problems facing the United States, he says.

Feeling blue about the economy and the markets? Paul Lim, who writes the Fundamentally column for Sunday Business, says in the podcast that he sees a silver lining for stocks. While big American companies have not been hiring in large numbers, they have begun spending in two ways — on tangible things like technology and on acquisitions of other companies. Both should bolster share prices.

The news section of the podcast includes a discussion of Google’s plans to acquire Motorola Mobility.

You can find specific segments of the podcast at these junctures: Europe’s troubles (32:13); news roundup (21:33); star analysts (18:38); Tyler Cowen on productivity (11:51); Paul Lim on stocks (6:30); the week ahead (2:08).

As articles discussed in the podcast are published during the weekend, links will be added to this post.

You can download the program by subscribing from The New York Times’s podcast page or directly from iTunes.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8f93b6c2c681ee3dc1ff022ff0f5775d