April 25, 2024

With a Royal Baby Due, News Outlets Are on High Alert

Thanks to their plans, the birth, whenever it happens — any day now, if the tabloids are to be believed — will be a spectacle unlike any other in the modern media age, complete with sweeping helicopter shots of St. Mary’s Hospital in Paddington, London, and Buckingham Palace. “This is probably the most anticipated birth since the dawn of Twitter,” said Jon Williams, the foreign editor for ABC News.

When Prince William and his brother Harry were born in the 1980s, tweets were just sounds made by birds and 24-hour news channels were a novelty. In the 30 years since, media companies have become much better at preparing for big events — sports matches, murder trials, elections, even fashion shows — and capitalizing on them through wall-to-wall coverage on television, commemorative editions of newspapers and magazines, and advertiser-supported special sections on Web sites.

Now, with Prince William’s child on the way, scores of reporters and photographers are on standby in London. ABC News has a whole royal baby section of its site sponsored by Nestlé, plus an online guest book for visitors to sign. NBC News has a site called RoyalBabyGuess.com, asking for predictions about name, birth time and weight. To make it more fun, the people whose guesses come closest might be mentioned on the “Today” show. “We’re going to do our best not to intrude and to be respectful, but also to cover it for people who are really interested,” said Mark Lukasiewicz, the senior vice president for NBC News Specials.

While news organizations will undoubtedly be criticized for spending too much time covering a famous childbirth, executives say there is ample public interest in what will most likely be the quintessential “good news” story, a reprieve of sorts after weeks of stories about the George Zimmerman trial in the United States and uprisings overseas. Not only will the birth be historically consequential, Mr. Williams said, it will also be inherently relatable because “the birth of a baby is something that every family can identify with.”

Including the long wait.

“The big news is still that there is no news,” Tom Sykes of The Daily Beast wrote on the site’s “Royal Baby Watch” live blog on Sunday. For days now, Mr. Sykes and others have been swatting away rumors about the duchess, formerly known as Kate Middleton, checking into the hospital and being in labor.

News executives say they expect to be notified when she does actually arrive, most likely through a side entrance, at the hospital. The main vantage point for camera crews is along a narrow street outside the main entrance to the private wing where the duchess will be — “a typically charming, difficult London street” as Mr. Lukasiewicz described it. With so many foreign broadcasters, including those from throughout the Commonwealth, jockeying for positions there, each news outlet has only a couple of feet of space. “So we’re going to have a narrow correspondent at that spot,” he joked.

More rumors will surely zip across social networks once the duchess is in labor, and news organizations will have to exercise caution. “We will wait for the Palace to confirm,” said Paddy Feeny, a spokesman for BBC News. “This is one announcement where guessing won’t do.”

The birth’s confirmation process is rooted in tradition, but it will be televised in high-definition, which was something else that didn’t exist the last time there was a royal baby. The duchess’s doctors will sign a birth notice. The notice will be hand-carried to a car. The car will be driven to Buckingham Palace. Then the notice will be placed on an easel in the forecourt of the palace, informing the world of the baby’s birth and possibly his or her name.

All the while, a news helicopter belonging to the British broadcaster Sky News, whose pictures will be shared with every network, will be hovering overhead, almost as if covering a slow-speed car chase. But that’s assuming the helicopter, stationed south of the city, can get there in time. News executives expect to get five to 10 minutes notice, at most, before the car starts on its short journey. A Sky News spokeswoman, aware that the world’s news media are counting on its coverage, said she anticipates that the crew will have “enough time to get airborne.”

Sky News and the BBC will also have cameras at the palace to take close-ups of the birth notice. “We are praying for good visibility and no rain,” Mr. Feeny said.

News producers have been holding meetings with palace officials about the staging of the announcement for the last several months. “It’s gotten down to the level of detail that three minutes after the notice has been put on the easel, they’ll cut off the signal,” said one producer involved in the planning, who insisted on anonymity to protect important relationships with the palace.

That producer and several others said they had been assured that the baby’s birth would be announced only between 8 a.m. and 10:30 p.m. in London, or between 3 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. in New York. Sometime later, photographers will have their chance to see the family as they leave the hospital.

Some news organizations, of course, are almost shrugging off the baby drama. CBS News, which has sought a reputation as the most serious American network news division, will depend on its reporters already in London to cover the news, a spokeswoman said.

NBC and ABC, on the other hand, are sending over anchors. The “Today” news reader Natalie Morales flew to London on Sunday. The “Good Morning America” weekend anchor Bianna Golodryga has been there for nearly a week, and she will be joined sometime soon by a regular on the weekday edition, Amy Robach. Mr. Williams said Ms. Robach will board a plane bound for London “as soon as Kate goes into the hospital.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/15/business/media/with-a-royal-baby-due-news-outlets-are-on-high-alert.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bits: Streaming Sites and the Rise of Shared Accounts

We were each going to use HBO Go, the network’s video Web site, to stream the show online — but not our own accounts. To gain access, one friend planned to use the login of the father of a childhood friend. Another would use his mother’s account. I had the information of a guy in New Jersey that I had once met in a Mexican restaurant.

Our behavior — sharing password information to HBO Go, Netflix, Hulu and other streaming sites and services — appears increasingly prevalent among Web-savvy people who don’t own televisions or subscribe to cable.

It’s hard to know exactly how common it is: traditional analytics firms like Nielsen and comScore can’t track it, and cultural research organizations like Pew haven’t done extensive surveying about it. An informal BuzzFeed survey, which was a partial inspiration for this column, found that several dozen people in its office used someone else’s account information for HBO Go. And based on countless anecdotes, conversations, tweets and text messages, such behavior seems to be on the rise.

“It also seems like a pretty serious problem,” wrote John Herrman, a senior editor at BuzzFeed and author of the polling report. “While our office is fairly young and not representative of HBO’s broader customer base, it is representative of a rising generation of people who 1) like watching HBO shows and 2) cannot fathom paying for them.”

Do the companies, particularly HBO, view this as especially problematic? I hesitated before asking, worried that any inquiries would prompt a crackdown, with the result that I’d become the most-hated person on the Internet.

But to the collective relief of nearly everyone I know, the companies with whom I spoke seemed to have little to no interest in curbing our sharing behavior — in part because they can’t. They have little ability to track and curtail their customers who are sharing account information, according to Jeff Cusson, senior vice president for corporate affairs at HBO. And, he said, the network doesn’t view the sharing “as a pervasive problem at this time.”

According to HBO, 6.5 million of its 30 million subscribers have signed up for HBO Go. When I asked Mr. Cusson if the network would consider figuring out a way to capture and monetize those slippery users who were piggybacking on others’ accounts, he declined to speculate on what might be possible.

“The best business approach at the time is in the business model that we currently have,” he said.

In other words, it isn’t financially viable for HBO to offer a cheaper, digital-only subscription, either sold separately or bundled to an Internet service. So, to a point, account sharing is allowed.

OTHER subscription streaming services have a different approach. Spotify, the music streaming service, does not allow two people to play songs simultaneously using the same account. A representative at Hulu says that the company’s paid subscription service, Hulu Plus, is designed for a single user and that the company doesn’t let people stream the same show to different screens at the same time. (Amazon and Netflix did not respond to requests for interviews, but both companies have similar mechanisms in place for their services, though different users on the same account can watch different programs at the same time.)

On Amazon Prime, for example, if two people try to watch the same episode of “Pretty Little Liars” using the same account, both streams will be frozen and a warning message will flash. But one user can simply watch something else until the first person is done trying to figure out who “A” is.

This feels like a missed opportunity for all these services. It’s the failure to grasp the future of television as a shared social experience online. Sure, we are all scattered around, watching all sorts of programs. But then there are moments, as in the days of old, when we are all huddled together — figuratively speaking — tuning into the same show or event at about the same time each night. These days, though, we are watching through some kind of connected device, whether it’s a smartphone, a laptop or a Web-connected television.

Nor does social viewing have to be around a big event. For example, I watched “Friday Night Lights” all winter on Netflix, along with someone I don’t know who also shares the account. Every time I log in, I can see the last episode that this mystery viewer watched — and yet there’s currently no way for us to chat about our reactions to it. That would be much more fun than bugging my other friends about plot twists and turns they saw ages ago, when the show was first broadcast.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/business/streaming-sites-and-the-rise-of-shared-accounts.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: The Breakfast Meeting: Liberty Global Buys Virgin Media and How to Talk About "House of Cards," Sans Spoilers

The international cable company Liberty Global agreed on Tuesday to buy the British cable company Virgin Media for about $16 billion, Mark Scott and Eric Pfanner write in The Times. The deal gives Liberty Global access to Europe’s largest cable market and pits Liberty Global’s owner, the American billionaire John C. Malone, against Rupert Murdoch, the biggest shareholder in Britain’s pay-TV provider British Sky Broadcasting. The takeover ranks as one of the 10 largest cable deals of all time, according to data from Thomson Reuters.

Netflix released all 13 episodes of its new political thriller series “House of Cards” simultaneously, raising thorny questions about how best to communicate about a show that allows viewers to immediately devour an entire season. The show, which stars Kevin Spacey and has received largely positive reviews, creates problems for viewers who hope to discuss it on social media without becoming spoilers, Brian Stelter writes. Fans of the show have worked out several methods for talking about it safely, like starting their Facebook posts or Tweets by saying “I’m in No. 5″ or titling a blog post with the warning “If You’ve Seen All of House of Cards, Let’s Discuss.” One thing’s for certain: with more original shows in production for Netflix, Hulu and Amazon, this conundrum is not going away soon.

The Church of Scientology ran an advertisement promoting a gentler, mildly individualistic view of the religion during the Super Bowl, Tanzina Vega and Michael Cieply report. It called on “the curious, the inquisitive, the seekers of knowledge” to “dare to think for yourself, to look for yourself, to make up your own mind.” The commercial appeared after several months of mounting accusations against the church, including an article in Vanity Fair about Katie Holmes’s experience and Lawrence Wright’s investigative book “Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood the Prison of Belief.” Karin Pouw, a spokeswoman for the church, said the ad was not a direct response to Mr. Wright’s book.

Luna, a nutrition bar marketed for women, has released a new web series called “Debunking the Diet” in an effort to promote their brand in a more engaging manner than a straightforward advertisement, Andrew Adam Newman reports. The spots are two to three minutes long and feature the Funny or Die comedian Erin Gibson questioning women about their dietary needs before detailing the correct requirements in a lab. Luna has focused more on event sponsorship, social media promotion and branded content like “Debunking the Diet” than on traditional commercials. In 2011 the brand earned $180.1 million, a 9.6 percent share of the energy and nutrition bar category.

A Calvin Klein ad featuring the ludicrously-toned male model Matthew Terry during the Super Bowl may have caused more social media uproar than any other. Stuart Emmrich collects some of the best responses. Chris Kluwe, the Minnesota Vikings punter who stood up for same sex marriage during the season, Tweeted: And yes, the Calvin Klein one objectified men just as much as GoDaddy did women. I guess we’re equal now? Hooray?

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/the-breakfast-meeting-liberty-global-buys-virgin-media-and-how-to-talk-about-house-of-cards-sans-spoilers/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix Blog: Live Blog: Inside the Fed’s 2007 Deliberations

Ben S. Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve.Karen Bleier/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images Ben S. Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve.

On Friday the Federal Reserve released the transcripts of its discussions in 2007, the year the housing market, the financial markets, and the broader economy began to unravel. Reporters from The Times are sharing their findings on what the transcripts reveal in the blog entries and tweets below.

Refresh nowUpdating…Feed

Article source: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/inside-the-feds-2007-deliberations/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bits Blog: Twitter Loses Ability to Properly Display Instagram Photos

7:15 a.m. | Updated Adding comment from Kevin Systrom, Instagram’s chief executive.

Welcome to the Photo Wars.

Instagram on Wednesday disabled the ability for Twitter to properly display Instagram photos on its Web site and in its applications. The move escalates tensions between the two companies, which were once friends in the battle against Facebook but have now become direct competitors.

In a status update on Twitter’s Web site, the company said Instagram had disabled its integration with Twitter cards, which are used to display images and content within Twitter messages.

“Users are experiencing issues with viewing Instagram photos on Twitter,” the post said. “This is due to Instagram disabling its Twitter cards integration, and as a result, photos are being displayed using a pre-cards experience.”

Speaking at the LeWeb technology conference, Kevin Systrom, Instagram’s chief executive, confirmed that the company has removed the ability to send pictures to Twitter, and plans to completely cut off embedding pictures on the Twitter Web site.

“We’ve decided that right now, what makes sense, is to direct our users to the Instagram Web site,” Mr. Systrom said, noting that Instagram images will soon no longer be visible on Twitter. “Obviously things change as a company evolves.”

Mr. Systrom did not say when images will cesase to show up on the site.

Instagram users will still be able to generate a tweet on Twitter when they post a photo. But when someone clicks on the Instagram link in those tweets, they will be taken out of the Twitter site or app and directed to Instagram’s site to view it.

Until now, if someone posted a photo on Instagram and also shared it with their Twitter followers, a click on the “View Photo” link on Twitter’s site would summon it right on the same page.

Mr. Systrom said that photos posted through other sites and services, including Facebook, Tumblr and Foursquare, will not be affected.

For now, Instagram photos appear incorrectly on Twitter, sometimes showing up cropped or off center. It is unclear if Instagram will completely disable the ability for Twitter to show pictures on its Web site.

Photo sharing continues to be a volatile battleground for social networking services, and given the potential advertising dollars at stake, the tensions will likely continue to grow.

Although Instagram and Twitter worked closely together during Instagram’s early days, relations between the two companies have soured since the Facebook acquisition.

Now the companies are competing on a number of fronts for consumer eyeballs. Last month Instagram, which had been almost entirely app-based, began rolling out its own Web-centric pages for its 100 million registered users. And Twitter is expected to introduce photo filters to its mobile applications, much like the ones Instagram offers.

When the Facebook acquisition of Instagram closed, Instagram said in a blog post that the deal “means we can now work together to evolve and build a better Instagram for everyone.”

It looks like “everyone” doesn’t include Twitter.

Article source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/twitter-loses-ability-to-properly-display-instagram-photos/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Gadgetwise Blog: Q&A: Slamming the Door on Twitter Spam

Every once in a while on Twitter, someone will reply to me with a link that goes to an advertising site. How can I stop this?

As with just about every other form of online communication, Twitter is also subject to abuse from spammers and people sending around links to malicious sites and software. As with e-mail and Facebook posts, it’s a good idea to never click on a link from someone you don’t personally know — and maintain suspicion about clicking on such a link if your friend hasn’t made any comment or reference to what the link is about.

Twitter has its own guide to dealing with spam in your feed, but when you do get a random link from an unknown person on your Twitter page that looks dodgy, the company suggests visiting the sender’s account page. On that account’s profile page, click the user drop-down menu (it has an small icon of a human head) and choose the option to report the account for spam. The menu also offers the option to block that account from sending you replies, messages or putting your Twitter account on a list.

If you would prefer to keep your Twitter posts shielded from public view and only visible to people you approve as followers, adjust your account’s privacy settings. Log into your Twitter page on the Web, click your user name in the upper right corner and select Settings. On the Account tab, scroll down and put a check in the box next to “Protect my tweets.” Click the Save button to make the change.

If you use a third-party or standalone Twitter program, check its menus for commands to block or report users who may be spamming or harassing you over the service. If you don’t see any options, log into your account at Twitter.com to take care of matters.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8a3c518fa46437fa19f05402d2c0ca48