April 19, 2024

DealBook: In Euro Zone, Signs of Progress and Fears of Complacency

Mario Draghi, the president of the European Central Bank, with the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, at an E.U. summit meeting in Brussels in June.Francois Lenoir/ReutersMario Draghi, the president of the European Central Bank, with the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, at a European Union summit meeting in Brussels in June.

PARIS – This may be the year that Europe stops being the ticking time bomb of the global economy.

Ireland is on track to leave international bailout limbo by summer. Talk of Greece leaving the euro is off the table. And financial speculators have generally stopped betting the euro zone will blow up.

But even as the sense of emergency fades, Europe is potentially facing a starker problem.

World Economic Forum in Davos
View all posts

For three years, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and a phalanx of policy makers have been working to shore up the euro’s foundations to prevent the currency union from unraveling. As they gather with academics, executives and various experts this week at the World Economic Forum, which opens Wednesday in Davos, Switzerland, the biggest concern is that leaders might become less vigilant now that the heat is off, ushering in a raft of new troubles that could dog the euro for years to come.

“The risk is that complacency takes hold because there is no more urgency in the crisis, and that everything that has been done up until now will be deemed sufficient,” said Jacob Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. If that happens, he warned, “Europe will turn into the next Japan, and become a permanently depressed or stagnating economic area.”

Ms. Merkel might be forgiven for feeling a sense of vindication. Her deliberate approach to crisis management and refusal to get too far ahead of German public opinion has often frustrated her euro zone peers and foreign allies. And yet, the strategy seems to have worked — so far, at least. Ms. Merkel, who is to speak at Davos on Thursday, and other European leaders have generally done just enough to contain the crisis without alienating taxpayers.

Much of the credit for the current calm in Europe goes to Mario Draghi, the president of the European Central Bank. He appeased financial markets with his promise last summer to do whatever it took to preserve the euro, including buying the government bonds of Spain if necessary to keep a lid on the country’s borrowing costs.

The effect of Mr. Draghi’s promise has been evident: financial markets have stopped driving the borrowing costs of Spain and Italy toward the danger levels that led Ireland, Greece and Portugal to reach for international financial lifelines. Today, few people fear that Europe’s southern countries will break away from the euro union.

Other dire prospects, like Germany and other Northern European countries fleeing the euro union to avoid getting caught in a quagmire, have also dropped off the watch list. If anything, the focus of anxiety is the fiscal situation in the United States, where gridlock in Washington has become just as debilitating for the country’s finances as the euro policy paralysis was for European politicians.

“Some European policy makers who visited the United States recently were delighted to see that because of the fiscal cliff, Europe wasn’t on every channel,” said Kenneth S. Rogoff, a professor of economics at Harvard University. “There is an ecstasy over the fact that they won’t blow apart tomorrow.”

Still, Mr. Rogoff added, Europe must revive economic growth to fully address its problems. “And even if they do, that’s not a long-term solution,” he said. “They need to integrate more fully, or they will fall apart.”

Europe’s political leaders have taken important steps to improve spending discipline among euro members, to provide a financial backstop for troubled euro zone countries and to consolidate supervision of banks. Despite many imperfections, the measures seem to have been enough to convince investors that officials are slowly constructing a more resilient currency union.

“European countries have shown their resolve in making the euro a success and reaffirmed the deep political commitment to work together toward a stronger union,” Vítor Constâncio, the vice president of the European Central Bank, told an audience in Beijing on Jan. 12.

But leaders have yet to address some serious flaws in the structure of the euro zone. For example, they have not solved the problem of how to wind down terminally ill banks without sticking taxpayers with the bill. And they are far away from a deposit insurance fund for Europe, which means the risk of bank runs remains.

“In order to define a turning point, you need a lot of factors besides the stabilization of financial markets,” Mr. Draghi said this month.

But coming events could undermine confidence. Germany will hold national elections in September, which could make Ms. Merkel even more cautious than usual and stall euro zone decision making. Already, her main rivals pulled off an upset in regional elections this weekend in Lower Saxony.

Italian elections are also looming. Mario Monti, the prime minister who has restored Italy’s international credibility and is to speak at Davos on Wednesday, faces a public that is grumpy about a rollback of job protections and other policy overhauls. Silvio Berlusconi, a former Italian prime minister who presided over years of economic standstill, is attempting a populist comeback.

In France, President François Hollande’s pledge to bring the deficit down to 3 percent of gross domestic product this year to adhere to the rules governing euro membership may be challenged if France’s military engagement in Mali and the surrounding region turns into a drawn-out affair.

Across the channel, Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain, who is scheduled to speak at Davos on Thursday morning, has sounded warnings that the country might leave the European Union if changes in its administration are not made. “The danger is that Europe will fail and that the British people will drift toward the exit,” according to prepared text of a speech Mr. Cameron postponed delivering last week because of developments in the hostage crisis in Algeria.

In the meantime, the severe effects of prolonged austerity in several European countries are leaving deep social scars. Tax increases and steep spending cuts have ground many European citizens deeper than ever into hardship, prompting millions to demonstrate in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Recessionary economies in those countries are expected to get worse before they improve.

In Greece, where austerity has hit the hardest, people are burning trash and wood this winter for lack of money to pay electricity bills, and the government’s efforts to enact structural overhauls needed to turn the economy around and attract foreign investors continue to lag.

And then there is Germany, which itself is being tugged into a slowdown as its cash-poor southern neighbors continue to refrain from buying Audis and other high-priced German goods.

Unemployment in the euro zone continues to climb: the jobless rate in the 17 countries of the bloc hit a record 11.8 percent in November. Youth unemployment has surpassed 50 percent in Spain and Greece, a stratosphere of despair. Thousands of bright young people continue to flee Greece, Ireland, Spain and other countries every month for the booming economies of Australia and Canada.

Portuguese workers are even going to Africa in search of a better future, as the middle class there grows along with improving economic conditions on the southern part of the African continent.

Yet painful adjustments are starting to bear some fruit. Labor costs have come down in countries including Spain and Portugal, helping make their work forces more competitive within the region. In Spain, for instance, where unit labor costs have fallen 4 percent since the onset of the financial crisis in 2008, the labor market is now so alluring that Ford, Renault and Volkswagen have announced plans to expand production there.

In addition, the alarming flight of deposits from banks in Spain has come to a stop.

The euro zone’s problems have proven an opportunity for some countries to remove structural impediments to growth. In France, where Mr. Hollande has promised to make the economy more competitive, labor unions have agreed to a deal to overhaul swaths of the notoriously rigid labor market.

The deal would tame some of the French labor code’s most confounding restrictions, including lengthy hiring and firing procedures and outsize business taxes, as the country tries to lift its competitiveness, curb unemployment and improve the budget.

“Is the worst over? Probably yes,” analysts at Barclays Capital wrote in a recent note to clients.

That will be especially true if leaders and businesses persist in using the crisis as a chance to renew European competitiveness.

While some countries may have made enough economic overhauls to enjoy substantial growth, once the crisis is past, said Nicolas Véron, a senior fellow at Bruegel, a research institute in Brussels, “there are a lot of nuts still to crack.”

Jack Ewing reported from Frankfurt.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/21/in-euro-zone-signs-of-progress-and-fears-of-complacency/?partner=rss&emc=rss

You’re the Boss: So You Want to Start a Business

Thinking Entrepreneur

An owner’s dispatches from the front lines.

People start businesses for all kinds of reasons. Some expect to get rich, some want to be their own boss, some want to follow their passion and some want to control their own destiny (or at least try). Many have one thing in common; they fail. More than half, depending on whose number you use and how much time you give it.

When I started my business in 1978, there was very little information out there on how to start, expand and operate a small business. As a matter of fact, even the word entrepreneur was barely used, and if it was, it was often used disparagingly — as to describe the guy on the corner who was selling watches under his sleeve.

The world has changed. Today, there are countless magazines, Web sites, classes, organizations and consultants available to help the aspiring entrepreneur. Given all of these resources, the question arises: Why is the failure rate still so high? For all I know, the failure rate may even have gone up over the years, despite the fact that there are far more resources now. I believe there are three reasons.

First, many entrepreneurs learn to build a business the way some people learn to swim; they just jump in. They might have the basic skill, or even be very talented at the task at hand, whether it is baking or programming or candlestick making. What they lack is basic knowledge of marketing, management and accounting. Even though there are many resources available, they are too busy doing the task to learn how to do the basics. In this case, ignorance is not bliss; it is a ticking time bomb.

Bad management, bad accounting and ineffective marketing will suck the life out of a fledgling business if it is not corrected. I know, I was one of those jump-right-in entrepreneurs. I never had a full-time job, and I never had a mentor. Torture was more my mentor. Today, I am sorry to say, there is a further problem. Yes, there are lots more resources available to beginners, but many of those resources are close to worthless. Academic theory and self-appointed experts (who have never run a small business — except maybe into the ground) run amok. How is a beginner supposed to know whose advice to take?

Second, not everyone is wired to be an entrepreneur — just as not everyone is wired to be a social worker, a lawyer, a salesman or an accountant. The success or failure of a business has less to do with the idea and more to do with personality, drive, skill set and tenacity. Businesses don’t fail, people do. That hurts (again, I know). But failure does not make one a loser, and failure is not permanent. In fact, the lessons learned may very well be the springboard to future success. There are many entrepreneurs who have had fabulous success after fabulous failure.

Third, entrepreneurship is about risk. Sometimes it is calculated risk; sometimes it is a shot in the dark; sometimes it is delusional. This is where the current entrepreneurial fever can get dangerous. We have been led to believe that entrepreneurship is this romantic journey of discovery and creativity and believing in your dream. We all read stories about Facebook and Starbucks and countless other successes, but the large numbers of failures just slip away in the night, along with the owner’s life savings. The people behind those failures all believed in their dreams, too. Again, starting a business is risky. Even the most experienced entrepreneurs cannot always predict what will work and what won’t.

So, what is the solution? First of all, starting a business should not be like going to Las Vegas. There are things you can do to increase your odds of success. Learn enough about accounting to not be dangerous. You don’t have to become a C.P.A., but you should understand the income statement, the balance sheet, the difference between cash flow and profits, the basics of borrowing money and how to operate an accounting program. And no, I can’t do the last one — there were no computers when I started.

Do a business plan so you can see how all of the working parts go together. Go to trade shows and talk to people in similar businesses in other cities where they might be more likely to give honest feedback. And don’t confuse support with intelligent advice. Many of your friends and family will be supportive when you tell them your plan. Don’t confuse support with help. If they don’t own businesses, you are getting love, not wisdom. If you were sick, would you rather have a friend tell you you are going to be O.K. — or would you rather go to the doctor?

Naïveté in business will prove expensive. You will make mistakes, but make sure you can undo them. One mistake that is very hard to undo is going into business with a friend. It sounds like fun. It is comforting. It is probably not a good idea. If you go into business with someone, make sure it is a strategic alliance, with a clear understanding of what skills each person brings to the party. Make sure your goals are aligned. Even so, it is still probably a mistake — not because you are friends but because it is unlikely that you will stay on the same page when the problems start, which they will. Have an agreement in place that will govern the process if  you decide that you want to split up.

One more thing: Going into business is risky, treacherous and demanding. But it is also invigorating, rewarding and beautiful, when it works. It is a lot like nature — with violent hurricanes and beautiful sunsets. I am not sure that you choose to be an entrepreneur; it chooses you.

Jay Goltz owns five small businesses in Chicago.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=82b0fd8f5e81d8955e348aaee4752667