April 20, 2024

Bucks Blog: Your Agenda for ‘Fiscal Health Day’

A couple of week’s ago, I asked Bucks readers to nominate themselves for a financial tuneup, a day where I would come to their home and help them get through their long list of money-related tasks that have been neglected over the course of the past year.

Nearly 100 people responded, many of whom were in need of much more than a tuneup. This week’s Your Money column focuses on the candidates I ultimately selected: Jennifer and Scott Bartone, a newlywed couple who live in northern New Jersey.

As Mr. Bartone said, he and his wife are financial opposites. Yet they need to reconcile some of those differences if they are going to successfully meet joint goals, like buying a home and potentially starting a family.

So I helped them tackle some big items on their financial to-do list, which included addressing how much credit card debt they actually had, how much they collectively earn and spend, and opening up joint checking and savings accounts.

The fact that they didn’t have a serious talk about money until now was their biggest problem. Ms. Bartone said she avoided the subject because she didn’t want to end up arguing about it, particularly since she had concerns about her husband’s spending. One bit of advice that I didn’t have space to include in the column came from Kristin Harad, a financial planner in San Francisco, who offered a smart solution:

I always recommend that each partner receives a predetermined amount that they direct to a “totally fun” account — one solely for the fulfillment of the individual, spent without judgment or review. The restriction is put on the front end by the amount directed; however, the actual purchase can be whatever the partner desires.  This essential simple freedom relieves an unbelievable amount of marital tension.

Have you set aside a day for a financial house cleaning? What sort of tasks are on your agenda?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/your-agenda-for-fiscal-health-day/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix Blog: A Look at Taxing Marijuana

Anthony Bolante/Reuters

Here’s a thought for a tax increase that might at least break some of the tension in the room between President Obama and John Boehner: a marijuana tax.

It’s not as ludicrous an idea as it might seem. This week, Washington became the first state in the nation where marijuana is legal for recreational use. Colorado is set to follow its lead soon.

The fact that some states are starting to relax their marijuana laws got analysts at the Tax Policy Center thinking. What if the drug were legalized nationwide and taxed?

The center looked at two studies, one of which estimated that a marijuana tax could bring in $9 billion a year in state and federal tax revenues and save roughly the same amount on law enforcement. (The study made certain assumptions about price and demand, and applied taxes comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco, as well as income taxes on those making money in the legalized trade.) Another study, which used the approximate tax on cigarettes as a benchmark, estimated that a marijuana tax could bring in $1.4 billion to California alone.

Now, of course, $9 billion isn’t much. One percent of the country’s gross domestic product is about $150 billion. And this year’s deficit is about $1 trillion. The tax increases and spending cuts set to begin taking effect on Jan. 1 if Mr. Obama and Mr. Boehner aren’t able to agree on a plan to head them off add up to about $600 billion.

Is a marijuana tax a bit fanciful in the near-term? Probably. Federal prosecutors aren’t planning on making it any easier for these states to tax marijuana. In fact, the White House and the Justice Department have been considering whether to pursue legal action against Colorado and Washington to block their new marijuana laws.

Article source: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/taxing-marijuana/?partner=rss&emc=rss