December 22, 2024

EADS Profit Soars 19 Percent

PARIS — European Aeronautic Defense and Space, the parent company of Airbus, reported a 19 percent rise in 2012 net profit on Wednesday, propelled by sales of commercial jets and helicopters, while its military business continued to struggle as budget pressures squeeze defense spending in Europe and the United States.

The Toulouse-based company said earnings for the full year climbed to €1.2 billion, or $1.56 billion, from just over €1 billion in 2011, on a 15 percent rise in revenue, to €56.5 billion euros. The company proposed an increase to its 2012 dividend to 60 euro cents per share from 45 cents in 2011.

Almost all of the group’s revenue gains came from double-digit growth in sales of civil aircraft, while military orders stalled. Airbus, which saw a 19 percent rise in commercial jet sales, represented 68 percent of group revenues, little changed from a year earlier.

The persistent weakness of the group’s military business comes as EADS is steeped in a fundamental review of its business strategy. A proposed merger with BAE Systems of Britain failed amid political divisions among Germany, France and Britain.

Much of the logic behind the merger project was based on the expectation that a combination with BAE Systems, a major contractor to the U.S. military, the world’s biggest spender on defense, would help to bring greater balance between commercial and military activities.

At a briefing in Berlin, Thomas Enders, the chief executive, said EADS expected to unveil the outlines of its new strategy around the middle of the year. But he hinted strongly that the group was no longer fixated on its previous target of at 40 percent of defense revenues by 2020.

Given the current budget constraints facing Western governments, Mr. Enders said, “it’s probably not such a bad thing to have rather less exposure to the defense market.” He said that EADS’s main American rival, Boeing, which derives between 40 percent and 50 percent of its revenue from military activity, was growing increasingly reliant on its civil aircraft business as well.

“Right now, I am quite happy with the imbalance we have,” Mr. Enders said. “We are under less pressure than other, pure defense companies.”

EADS began a restructuring last year of its Cassidian unit, which groups most of its defense activities, including Eurofighter, the EADS-led consortium that builds the Typhoon fighter jet. Operating profit at the unit, which announced 850 job cuts last year, plunged by 57 percent to €142 million, in large part due to nearly €200 million in charges linked to the restructuring.

Analysts warned that the outlook for EADS’s defense business was likely to get worse before it got better. “There is clearly the risk of more of this to come as France and Germany have only just begun the process of addressing their defense budgets,” Nick Cunningham, an aerospace analyst with Agency Partners in London, wrote in a note to clients.

Mr. Enders stressed that EADS would remain a “major player” in defense, but said the group was taking a close look at which aspects of its activities — besides fighter aircraft includes missiles, surveillance and cyber-security systems — were likely to be most profitable in future years.

“Our defense business is not negligible,” Mr. Enders said. “We will focus on those areas where we have a comparative advantage and where we know we can make money.””

EADS predicted that its commercial aircraft business would continue to see steady growth in 2013 and said it did not expect to see any major disruption to global air traffic as a result of the economic slowdown and lingering sovereign debt crisis in Europe. The company said it expected Airbus to sell around 700 new jets this year, down from 914 planes in 2012. Aircraft deliveries should increase slightly to between 600-610 jets, from 588 last year, after the company stepped up production of its popular single-aisle A320 planes last October to 42 planes per month from 38 planes previously.

While the group’s net cash position increased slightly last year to 12.3 billion euros from 11.7 billion euros at the end of 2011, analysts warned that the ramp up of the development of Airbus’s forthcoming widebody jet, the A350-XWB, was likely to draw down those cash reserves over the next year. EADS said the production schedule for the A350, which has a late-2014 target for entry into service, remained ”challenging” and cautioned that any unforeseen delays could lead to fresh provisions to compensate airline customers.

Airbus this month abandoned a plan to use a lightweight, high-power lithium-ion battery on board the A350 amid continued uncertainty over an ongoing investigation into what caused similar batteries installed on Boeing’s rival 787 Dreamliner to ignite or emit smoke. Airbus said it would adapt its design to use a conventional nickel-cadmium battery instead in order to avoid any possible delays linked to the safety certification of the technology by aviation regulators.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/business/global/eads-profit-soars-19-percent.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: Christie Gets His Chance for Revenge on Letterman

Correction Appended

4:14 p.m. | Updated Chris Christie has been a favorite target for David Letterman over the last few years, and on Monday night he will get his chance to strike back.

The New Jersey governor, whose plus-size figure has been the subject of a seemingly endless string of jokes from Mr. Letterman on his CBS show, will make his first appearance on “Late Show With David Letterman” next Monday.

Mr. Letterman has frequently offered his favorite targets the opportunity to come back at him face to face, including Oprah Winfrey (who took him up on it) and Sarah Palin (who didn’t.)

Most recently during last year’s presidential campaign, Mr. Letterman went to great lengths to try to induce Mitt Romney, whom he had satirized with relish, to be a guest before the election. Mr. Romney declined.

Mr. Christie has already appeared with other late-night hosts, like Jon Stewart, and has said in the past that he accepts the fact that comedians will make fun of his weight – as long as they are genuinely funny doing it.


Correction: January 31, 2013

An earlier version of this article misstated the name of David Letterman’s television show. It is “Late Show With David Lettterman,” not “Late Night.”

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/christie-gets-his-chance-for-revenge-on-letterman/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Renault to Reduce French Labor Force by 7,500

PARIS — France’s ailing industrial sector took another body blow on Tuesday, as Renault said it planned to cut 7,500 domestic jobs by 2016, or about 17 percent of its French labor force, as it adjusted production capacity to the crushing downturn in the European car market.

The plan, which the company said would save €400 million, or $540 million, in annual fixed costs, is needed to lower its “break-even point” — the amount of revenue needed to cover all outlays — and to “clear the way for the new hiring needed for the future.”

The company said that if unions agreed to the plan it hoped to reach its job target without any plant closings, layoffs or buyouts. It would accomplish its goal, it said, mainly by not replacing retiring workers and by offering early retirement.

“Not a single person will be laid off,” said Sophie Chantegay, a Renault spokeswoman.

Of the 135,000 people that Renault employs worldwide, more than 44,600 work in France. Ms. Chantegay said the plan to reduce jobs would affect only the French work force.

Over all, France has lost three-quarters of a million industrial jobs in the past decade, and President François Hollande has made it a priority to try to stop the hemorrhaging.

Like its larger rival, PSA Peugeot Citroën, Renault has been suffering from too much capacity in a weak market. But compared with Peugeot, which generates most of its sales in Europe, Renault has held up relatively well, thanks to international operations that include important alliances with Nissan Motor Co. of Japan and Avtovaz of Russia.

Still, Renault has fallen behind the German leaders. Daimler and BMW, as well as Volkswagen, have continued growing on the strength of their global operations.

Carlos Ghosn, Renault’s chairman and chief executive, said Monday at the Detroit Auto Show that he expected the European market to be “difficult” in 2013, predicting that car sales would fall about 3 percent in 2013, following an 8 percent contraction in 2012.

Renault said that in 2011 its break-even point had been “too close to the 2.72 million cars sold, representing a risk to the enterprise.” Considering the volatility of the car market in recent years and the persistence of uncertainty about the European outlook, Renault said it was now necessary to bring its break-even point about 12 percent below the 2011 sales level.

Gérard Leclercq, the head of Renault’s French operations, said in a statement after a meeting with representatives of the company’s unions that Renault had “reaffirmed its desire to maintain the core of its corporate activities and the heart of its business in France, while acting to reduce its break-even point and preserve its capacity for investment.”

Renault said natural attrition and job cuts announced under a restructuring deal signed in February 2011 would account for about 5,700 of the jobs it plans to eliminate by 2016. It said a “supplementary adjustment” would have to be made to the restructuring plan to bring the total number to 7,500.

Peugeot is planning to cut about 17 percent of its French workers, and last year it agreed to sell a 7 percent stake to General Motors, with which it is planning several joint projects. On Monday, the French newspaper La Tribune reported that Peugeot was in talks about acquiring G.M.’s troubled Opel unit in Germany. Opel denied that report; Peugeot said it did not comment on “rumors.”

Mr. Ghosn said Monday that Renault and Nissan would work together on new inexpensive cars, which Renault will sell in Europe, while Nissan would sell under the Datsun brand in India, Russia and Indonesia. The new common production platform will produce its first cars in 2015, he said.

Asked what governments and companies could do to address the contraction of the market in Europe, he noted that European sales did not fall as much as United States sales during the recession but had also been slower to recover. Governments should try to determine “why consumers are not buying cars,” Mr. Ghosn said.

Sergio Marchionne, the chief executive of Chrysler and Fiat, said Monday at the Detroit show that European carmakers were collectively losing €4 billion to €5 billion a year. “There has to be a day of reckoning,” Mr. Marchionne said. “No industry can continue to fund losses of that magnitude.”

Vindu Goel reported from Detroit.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/16/business/global/renault-to-reduce-french-labor-force-by-7500.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

European Central Bank Leaves Key Rate Unchanged

As usual, Mr. Draghi was careful to qualify his upbeat assessment of the euro zone crisis, which is now entering its third year. Though financial markets have calmed and some economic indicators have stabilized, he said, it was too early to declare a turning point.

Also Thursday, the Bank of England decided to keep its benchmark interest rate unchanged amid a dismal economic outlook for 2013 that could keep the economy on the brink of another recession.

Mr. Draghi listed a number of indicators that the euro zone could be on the mend. Market interest rates on government bonds have fallen, while stocks have risen. The flow of bank deposits from troubled countries has reversed and euro zone economies have become more competitive, he said.

Where problems in one country once infected other members of the currency union, optimism is now spreading, Mr. Draghi said at a news conference following the regular monthly monetary policy meeting of the E.C.B. Governing Council.

“There is a positive contagion when things go well,” Mr. Draghi said. “That’s what is in play now.” But, he added, “the jury is still out. It’s too early to claim success.”

Mr. Draghi’s comments suggested the E.C.B. would not cut its main interest rate further, as some economists have argued it should, given that unemployment is at a record high and inflation is close to the central bank’s target of 2 percent and falling. Many businesses continue to have trouble getting credit, without which a recovery of the European economy is unlikely.

Some analysts read Mr. Draghi’s comments as simply a way of justifying the central bank’s inaction.

“Despite the pervasive weakness of the real economy in the single currency area, the E.C.B. is sitting firmly on its hands in the hope that the upturn in sentiment will eventually filter through to the real economy,” Nicholas Spiro, managing director of Spiro Sovereign Strategy, said in a note Thursday.

But others agreed that there were tentative signs that the euro zone economy could emerge from an economic downturn soon. On Thursday, the Bank of France indicator of sentiment in French industry rose unexpectedly.

“Draghi is right to stress that several leading indicators have stabilized recently,” Jörg Krämer, chief economist at Commerzbank, wrote in a note to clients. “The recession in the euro zone is likely to come to an end in spring. This makes a further E.C.B. rate cut unlikely.”

While cutting interest rates is a standard policy tool of central banks, Mr. Draghi has often complained that the central bank has lost much of its influence over rates in troubled countries like Spain. Commercial banks there are already struggling with problem loans and reluctant to lend except at much higher rates.

The E.C.B.’s Governing Council may have concluded that a rate cut now would be superfluous, or even dangerous if it encouraged some investors to take too much risk. Mr. Draghi said Thursday that some recent leveraged buyout deals were overvalued, though such examples of risky behavior were limited.

Mr. Draghi was asked several times whether the central bank might consider other ways of encouraging credit, for example by emulating the Bank of England’s Funding for Lending Scheme, which rewards banks that lend more. Mr. Draghi said that existing E.C.B. programs were already comparable with what the Bank of England was doing.

The E.C.B has been allowing lenders to borrow as much as they want from the central bank at 0.75 percent, if they can provide collateral. But the E.C.B. cannot compel banks to pass on lower rates to customers, and many do not.

The Bank of England on Thursday decided to leave its interest rate at 0.5 percent, a record low, and also held its program of economic stimulus at £375 billion, or $600 billion.

Positive data from the manufacturing industry in December had surprised some economists, but many warned that the British economy would continue to move at a snail’s pace this year because households were reluctant to spend.

“It’s still not looking good,” Vicky Redwood, an economist at Capital Economics, said before the rate announcement. “The underlying picture is still flat.”

Britain had emerged from a recession in the third quarter, albeit with its economy growing slower than expected.

Many British consumers are concerned that a 2.7 percent inflation rate, which is above the Bank of England’s own 2 percent target, and that the government’s austerity program will squeeze their disposable income. Consumer confidence fell in December and the British Retail Consortium called the holiday sales “underwhelming.”

If the euro zone is indeed stabilizing, Mr. Draghi can probably take much of the credit. The turnaround began after he vowed last year to do whatever it took to preserve the euro zone and announced a program to buy bonds of countries whose borrowing costs were rising too high.

Mr. Draghi provided another example Thursday of how he has been willing to interpret the central bank’s charter more flexibly than his predecessor, Jean-Claude Trichet, a habit that has pleased investors.

The E.C.B.’s prime directive is to contain prices. But Mr. Draghi has been adept at using the language of price stability to justify broader goals. Mr. Draghi noted during the press conference that, unlike the Federal Reserve in the United States, the E.C.B.’s mandate did not require it to promote job creation. But he added that unemployment was “a very important factor in our assessment of price stability.”

Julia Werdigier reported from London.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/business/global/european-central-bank-leaves-key-rate-unchanged.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Ex-Officer Is First in C.I.A. to Face Prison for a Leak

In his years as a C.I.A. operative, after all, Mr. Kiriakou had worked closely with F.B.I. agents overseas. Just months earlier, he had reported to the bureau a recruiting attempt by someone he believed to be an Asian spy.

“Anything for the F.B.I.,” Mr. Kiriakou replied.

Only an hour into what began as a relaxed chat with the two agents — the younger one who traded Pittsburgh Steelers talk with him and the senior investigator with the droopy eye — did he begin to realize just who was the target of their investigation.

Finally, the older agent leaned in close and said, by Mr. Kiriakou’s recollection, “In the interest of full disclosure, I should tell you that right now we’re executing a search warrant at your house and seizing your electronic devices.”

On Jan. 25, Mr. Kiriakou is scheduled to be sentenced to 30 months in prison as part of a plea deal in which he admitted violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act by e-mailing the name of a covert C.I.A. officer to a freelance reporter, who did not publish it. The law was passed in 1982, aimed at radical publications that deliberately sought to out undercover agents, exposing their secret work and endangering their lives.

In more than six decades of fraught interaction between the agency and the news media, John Kiriakou is the first current or former C.I.A. officer to be convicted of disclosing classified information to a reporter.

Mr. Kiriakou, 48, earned numerous commendations in nearly 15 years at the C.I.A., some of which were spent undercover overseas chasing Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. He led the team in 2002 that found Abu Zubaydah, a terrorist logistics specialist for Al Qaeda, and other militants whose capture in Pakistan was hailed as a notable victory after the Sept. 11 attacks.

He got mixed reviews at the agency, which he left in 2004 for a consulting job. Some praised his skills, first as an analyst and then as an overseas operative; others considered him a loose cannon.

Mr. Kiriakou first stumbled into the public limelight by speaking out about waterboarding on television in 2007, quickly becoming a source for national security journalists, including this reporter, who turned up in Mr. Kiriakou’s indictment last year as Journalist B. When he gave the covert officer’s name to the freelancer, he said, he was simply trying to help a writer find a potential source and had no intention or expectation that the name would ever become public. In fact, it did not surface publicly until long after Mr. Kiriakou was charged.

He is remorseful, up to a point. “I should never have provided the name,” he said on Friday in the latest of a series of interviews. “I regret doing it, and I never will do it again.”

At the same time, he argues, with the backing of some former agency colleagues, that the case — one of an unprecedented string of six prosecutions under President Obama for leaking information to the news media — was unfair and ill-advised as public policy.

His supporters are an unlikely collection of old friends, former spies, left-leaning critics of the government and conservative Christian opponents of torture. Oliver Stone sent a message of encouragement, as did several professors at Liberty University, where Mr. Kiriakou has taught. They view the case as an outrage against a man who risked his life to defend the country.

Whatever his loquaciousness with journalists, they say, he neither intended to damage national security nor did so. Some see a particular injustice in the impending imprisonment of Mr. Kiriakou, who in his first 2007 appearance on ABC News defended the agency’s resort to desperate measures but also said that he had come to believe that waterboarding was torture and should no longer be used in American interrogations.

Bruce Riedel, a retired veteran C.I.A. officer who led an Afghan war review for Mr. Obama and turned down an offer to be considered for C.I.A. director in 2009, said Mr. Kiriakou, who worked for him in the 1990s, was “an exceptionally good intelligence officer” who did not deserve to go to prison.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/us/former-cia-officer-is-the-first-to-face-prison-for-a-classified-leak.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: CBS Broadcast of Kennedy Center Honors Draws 8 Million Viewers

Among those honored at the Kennedy Center in December were Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin, David Letterman and Buddy Guy.Jason Reed/Reuters Among those honored at the Kennedy Center in December were Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin, David Letterman and Buddy Guy.

CBS’s broadcast of the Kennedy Center Honors, a 35-year holiday tradition for the network, attracted more than eight million viewers on Wednesday, easily outdrawing its competitors for the night.

The network noted that the awards telecast had its highest rating in three years among 25- to 54-year-olds, a target demographic for advertisers.

The awards for lifetime achievement in the performing arts were presented on Dec. 2 in Washington and were edited down to a two-hour format by CBS, as is the network’s custom. The recipients this year were David Letterman, Dustin Hoffman, Buddy Guy, Natalia Makarova and the rock band Led Zeppelin. CBS has supported the awards since they were conceived in 1978.

CBS swept the night in part because the reruns shown by the other broadcast networks were relatively low rated. The Spanish-language network Univision beat all the English language broadcasters, CBS included, among 18- to 49-year-olds for the night with its lineup of telenovelas.


Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/cbs-broadcast-of-kennedy-center-honors-draws-8-million-viewers/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Advertising: George Foreman Grills Advertised Through Weight-Loss Contest

The $3 million campaign, which begins on Friday, is the largest so far by Spectrum Brands Holdings, which obtained the grill brand in 2010 when it bought its then-owner, Russell Hobbs.

George Foreman grills were originally manufactured by Salton, which bought the rights to the former boxer’s name for $137.5 million in 1999. Mr. Foreman promoted the grill as “the lean, mean, fat-reducing grilling machine” for Salton, but Spectrum Brands has not employed him as an endorser.

The new campaign is the grill brand’s second largest in the last five years and the largest since Spectrum Brands purchased it, according to data supplied by Kantar Media. The brand’s advertising budget was $4.6 million in 2008 and $1.9 million in 2010. The grills were not advertised in 2009, and only $169,000 was spent last year.

According to NPD Group, a market research company, total sales of indoor electric grills in the United States dropped 10 percent, to $202 million, in the 12 months through November. Andy Van Wie, vice president for North American sales and marketing for the home appliance division of Spectrum Brands, said Foreman grills accounted for more than 60 percent of United States sales of indoor electric grills that simultaneously cook the top and bottom surfaces of foods.

Ranging in price from $20 to $200, Foreman grills are sold by retailers like Walmart, Target, Sears and Macy’s, as well as by QVC and Amazon.com. Their sloped design is meant to remove fat from the foods they cook.

The new campaign, called the George Foreman Grills Weight Loss Challenge and created by Spectrum Brands and ShopPR, a New York public relations agency, will be introduced on a new Web site, GeorgeForemanCooking.com/WeightLoss, and via e-mail and the brand’s Facebook and Twitter accounts.

A digital ad will also make its debut on Friday above the Toys “R” Us on Broadway and 45th Street in Manhattan. The 15-second spot, which will run 35,000 times through the end of 2013, features Bethanny Ramsey, who participated in a preliminary weight-loss contest run by Spectrum Brands last summer and lost 15 pounds and 35 inches.

The ad shows a svelte Ms. Ramsey holding up a pair of pants she wore before her diet. The accompanying text says, “Drop 2 pant sizes like Bethanny,” and urges viewers to “take the challenge” to “look like a knockout” and win $2,500.

The weight-loss contest will run four times next year; one entrant per contest will win $2,500 in cash and a $500 credit for Whole Health products. Contestants can download a 102-page guidebook from the contest’s Web site that provides tips on calculating calories, shopping for and preparing healthful meals, and exercising.

Digital ads similar to the one in Times Square will begin running Jan. 1 on Web sites like Parents.com and BiggestLoser.com, while in-store grill promotions will take place at Target and Walmart stores. New packaging for the grills mentions the contest and the “Look like a knockout” tagline. In addition, on Jan. 31, Spectrum Brands will announce celebrity chef and Food Network star Gina Neely as the contest’s spokeswoman.

Mr. Van Wie said the campaign was aimed at mothers aged 25 to 44 with an annual household income of $50,000 to $75,000.

Debra Mednick, executive director of NPD Group’s home division, said the indoor electric grill category of home appliances required “an advertising push, an education to help boost the category.” She said the campaign had the potential “to rejuvenate demand for electric grills by building excitement at retail and raising consumers’ awareness.”

Ms. Mednick also said the campaign’s weight loss theme was relevant to many Americans. “There are many millions struggling with obesity,” she said. “It’s certainly an important topic.”

Brian Sheehan, an associate professor of advertising at the S. I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse, said the campaign looked like “Weight Watchers meets Subway,” whose spokesman, Jared Fogle, lost 245 pounds eating low-fat Subway sandwiches.

“What’s really cool about it is that, unlike Weight Watchers or Subway, their product is the enabler between the plan and the food,” Mr. Sheehan said of the grill brand. “Whether it works or not remains to be seen.”

The introduction of the campaign near New Year’s could help it gain people’s attention, “since many individuals are thinking about weight control, looking for different sorts of information to better manage their weight,” said Myles S. Faith, an associate professor of nutrition at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

“Whether this program helps adults better restore calorie balance, we don’t know the answer,” Dr. Faith said. “Science will have to evaluate that.”

Howard Anderson, a senior lecturer of entrepreneurship at the M.I.T. Sloan School of Management, called the campaign a “stretch.”

“Is George Foreman a nutritionist or a doctor? No. We don’t expect any of this stuff from this product,” he said. “It can’t make the leap of faith over the fence and offer credible advice on diets. They’re trying to extend their brand into a place where it has no perceived value.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/business/media/george-foreman-grills-advertised-through-weight-loss-contest.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Green Column: High Energy Costs Plaguing Europe

Asked whether he had considered building the plant in Europe, Voestalpine’s chief executive, Wolfgang Eder, said that that “calculation does not make sense from the very beginning.” Gas in Europe is much more expensive, he said.

High energy costs are emerging as an issue in Europe that is prompting debate, including questioning of the Continent’s clean energy initiatives. Over the past few years, Europe has spent tens of billions of euros in an effort to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The bulk of the spending has gone into low-carbon energy sources like wind and solar power that have needed special tariffs or other subsidies to be commercially viable.

“We embarked on a big transition to a low-carbon economy without taking into account the cost and without factoring in the competitive impact,” says Fabien Roques, head of European power and carbon at the energy consulting firm IHS CERA in Paris. “I think there will be a critical review of some of these policies in the next few years.”

Both consumers and the industry are upset about high energy costs. Energy-intensive industries like chemicals and steel are, if not closing European plants outright, looking toward places like the United States that have lower energy costs as they pursue new investments.

BASF, the German chemical giant, has been outspoken about the consequences of energy costs for competitiveness and is building a new plant in Louisiana.

“We Europeans are currently paying up to four or five times more for natural gas than the Americans,” Harald Schwager, a member of the executive board at BASF, said last month. “Energy efficiency alone will not allow us to compensate for this. Of course, that means increased competition for all the European manufacturing sites.”

The expansion in renewables will probably ensure that Europe will meet its target of reducing greenhouse gases 20 percent from their 1990 levels by 2020. But it has been a disappointment on other levels.

For one thing, emissions continue to rise globally. In a sense, Europe is likely to have exported its emissions to places like China, where polluting economic activity continues to increase while the European economy stagnates.

A striking indicator that the European effort has not achieved all that it intended to is the continued rise in the burning of coal, by far the biggest polluter among fossil fuels.

The International Energy Agency, a Paris-based group formed by consumer nations, recently said that coal was likely to catch up with oil as the world’s largest source of energy in a decade.

Much of the increase in coal use can be blamed on China and India, but not all of it. Europe has increased its coal use this year, and that has led to an increase of about 7 percent in carbon dioxide emissions from power generation, according to IHS. Coal use is increasing in all regions except the United States, the I.E.A. said.

Current European energy policies were mostly shaped when the European economy was booming. In the grim economic climate of today, spending big money on renewables can seem like a luxury. Spain — once a strong supporter of renewables — has sharply cut funding.

The British government, another big backer of clean energy, recently struck a compromise. It promised to soak consumers for billions of pounds of subsidies for renewables like wind power and even new nuclear power plants, but it also gave a cautious green light to shale gas drilling in hopes of finding a cheaper source of natural gas.

A British consumer advocacy group called Which? recently pegged the costs to British consumers of decarbonization and new energy infrastructure at more than £100 billion, or $161 billion, and said that “persistently rising energy prices” were putting “intense financial pressures” on the public. In Germany, renewables subsidies are already adding 10 percent to 15 percent to bills, according to IHS.

Europeans cannot help noticing that the United States has managed, through the shale gas boom, not only to slash natural gas prices but also to cut carbon dioxide emissions to a 20-year low as utilities have shifted from coal to natural gas, which produces much less carbon dioxide.

What can Europe do? If it wants to make a bigger dent in carbon emissions, it needs a serious carbon price — not the current €7, or $9, per metric ton — that has little effect on business decisions. It might also consider a tax on carbon consumption to make sure it is not achieving its goals through deindustrialization. But such measures might make Europe even less competitive unless they are adopted globally.

Dieter Helm, a professor of energy policy at the University of Oxford, thinks that Europe could get a much bigger bang for its euro by putting some of the funding going into uncompetitive existing technologies into basic energy research that might produce much better clean technologies in the future.

Mr. Helm argues that big gains in the reduction of emissions could be achieved in the short term by replacing coal with natural gas — as the United States is doing. Europe may have enormous quantities of shale gas. There has not been enough exploration yet to know. Yet, several countries, including France, seem bent on killing the industry in its infancy. As with so many things in Europe, less ideology and more pragmatism are needed.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/business/energy-environment/27iht-green27.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Navigating Retail Holiday Return Policies

Now that the holiday shopping frenzy is over, it’s time for the traditional Returning of the Gifts.

Edgar Dworsky, founder of the Consumer World Web site, advises that shoppers check a store’s return policy carefully before trying to return an item. Many stores have the same holiday policies as last year, he reports, but a few have made changes that make their return policies more complicated.

Electronics often are subject to shorter return periods than other items. But some stores have changed their policies in general, to shorten the window during which items of all sorts may be returned or exchanged. Many retailers, however, then turn around and make exceptions to those policies, to extend the return period for items bought around the holidays. So shoppers need to pay attention.

“It can be very confusing,” said Mr. Dworsky, who each year publishes a report on retail return policies.

Mr. Dworsky cites Sears’s holiday return policy as an example of one that needs to be read carefully; details vary depending on when the item was purchased.

According to Sears’s Web site, items purchased between Nov. 11 and Dec. 24 that usually have a 30-day return period, like electronics and video games, can be returned through Jan. 24. Items purchased between Nov. 11 and Dec. 24 that usually have a 60-day return period, like major appliances and sporting goods, can now be returned through the later of 60 days from the date of purchase, or Jan. 24.

Target, Mr. Dworsky says, now has a 30-day return policy for items like computers and tablets. But for holiday items (purchases made after Nov. 1), the 30-day clock doesn’t start ticking until Dec. 26.

Because return policies vary, “you really have to read the fine print,” Mr. Dworsky says. “It’s not uniform store to store, or year to year.”

To help returns go smoothly, Mr. Dworsky advises against rushing to the store on Dec. 26, when lines are long and sales clerks harassed. “Don’t go the day after Christmas,” he said. “Wait another day or two.” Take a receipt or a gift receipt with you, and return the item unopened. But be aware, he said, that a gift receipt is unlikely to get you cash; typically, you’ll receive a credit or a store gift card.

Familiarize yourself with the details of the retailer’s return policy before visiting a store and trying to make a return, he urges. That way, if the clerk seems to be shortchanging you, you can be more assertive. And if you are asking for something outside of the official policy, you will know that you’re seeking an accommodation — and can behave accordingly. “Understand the policy,” he said, “so you can know if what you’re asking for is reasonable.”

Are you returning gifts this year? Let us know about your experience.

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/navigating-retail-holiday-return-policies/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Common Sense: Some Columns Revisited: Apple, ‘The Voice’ and Gay Marriage

This time investors fled. Apple stock dropped 4 percent the day of the China event, hitting a 10-month low.

What’s happened to many investors’ favorite stock? Apple is still the world’s largest company by market capitalization by a comfortable margin, and shareholders can hardly complain: even after last week’s decline, its shares have gained 29 percent this year through Thursday, compared to 15 percent for the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index. But since reaching a peak above $700 in September, Apple shares are now barely above $500 — deep into bear market territory — and their luster has dimmed.

Apple’s situation is one of the topics I wrote about this year that warrant an update as the year ends. In February, I pointed out that Apple’s huge market capitalization and exponential growth might cause it to confront the law of large numbers, which posits that variables — in this case, exceptional share gains — tend to revert to a mean. That seemed to hit a raw nerve with Apple enthusiasts, and many responded with furious e-mails.

Hardly anyone was raising any doubts about Apple shares then. Of 57 Wall Street analysts covering the company, 52 rated it a buy or strong buy in February, and only one — Edward Zabitsky, the chief executive and founder of ACI Research in Toronto — rated it a sell. Mr. Zabitsky specializes in telecommunications and has been something of a Cassandra about Apple for years. He’s a favorite target of the Web’s “iPhone death watch,” which takes aim at anyone who questions the Apple juggernaut.

“I can’t say I’m getting any more respect, but there’s definitely less hostility, that’s for sure” Mr. Zabitsky told me this week. “I was all alone out there. People make fun of things they don’t understand. I guess it made them feel better to insult someone like me. But the factors I warned about have been coming to the fore. People are starting to understand what I’m saying.”

What he’s been saying is that Samsung has surpassed Apple as the leading handset maker; apps have become more important than the devices that carry them; and handsets are increasingly being evaluated on their ability to access the cloud and interact with other devices — trends that he believes put Apple at a long-term disadvantage. “When I predicted Samsung would be the market leader in unit sales, people wanted to sue me for slander,” Mr. Zabitsky said. “But Samsung has not only surpassed Apple in sales, it’s out-innovating Apple. Have you seen the new Galaxy Note II? It’s amazing.”

And Apple’s stumble over its maps application for the iPhone 5, which led to a rare apology in September, illustrated both the growing power of apps and the company’s fallibility. Mr. Zabitsky said he didn’t fault Apple for developing its own maps app, but criticizes its decision to supplant Google Maps on the iPhone 5. “It wasn’t ready for prime time,” he said of Apple’s version. (Google said iPhone users downloaded 10 million copies of Google maps app for the iPhone in just 48 hours after it became available last week.)

Of course, the recent slide in Apple’s shares could turn out to be a rare buying opportunity, a mere blip in the stock’s rise to new heights. Fifty of 57 analysts still rate it a strong buy or buy, and Mr. Zabitsky remains the lone analyst with a sell recommendation. His target price is $270, unchanged since February. “The trends I’ve mentioned still haven’t played out,” he said. “I know people don’t want to hear that, but my job as an analyst isn’t to make people feel good.”

‘THE VOICE’ There were plenty of skeptics when NBC introduced its singing competition “The Voice” in April 2011. No wonder: NBC was the long-struggling fourth-place network, and the reality-competition juggernaut “American Idol” on Fox was firmly ensconced at the top of the ratings, with Simon Cowell’s hotly anticipated “X-Factor” waiting in the wings.

“The Voice” proved a surprise hit, displacing “Idol” last March as network television’s No. 1 show. But even then, critics dismissed it as a fluke that benefited from the halo effect of the Super Bowl, which ran on NBC. And some TV executives ridiculed NBC’s decision to use “The Voice” as a lead-in for a new dramatic series, “Smash,” about the making of a Broadway musical, which they deemed too sophisticated to appeal to a broad network audience. NBC executives were cautious. “We’re not going to move to second place, let alone first, just on this show,” Steve Burke, NBCUniversal’s chief executive, told me in March.

“The Voice” completed its latest season with a two-hour live installment on Tuesday and delivered an average of 14.1 million viewers, a record for the show’s finale. Against long odds, and thanks in large part to “The Voice,” NBC was the No. 1 network during the November ratings sweeps for viewers 11 to 49 years old, the group most sought-after by advertisers. NBC had a 23 percent gain in viewers compared to a decline at every other network. NBC has now been the top network for viewers 11 to 49 for 10 of the last 12 weeks, something that hadn’t happened in nearly a decade.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/22/business/some-columns-revisited-apple-the-voice-and-gay-marriage.html?partner=rss&emc=rss