April 20, 2024

Euro Area Recession Is Expected to Deepen

BRUSSELS — The economic outlook for the European Union has deteriorated and the recession and unemployment blighting the euro area are expected to worsen, the European Commission warned on Friday.

The commission, the main E.U. policymaking arm, said gross domestic product across the 27-nation European Union would shrink by 0.1 percent this year compared with a forecast in February for a slight uptick in growth. The 17-member euro zone is now expected to contract by 0.4 percent this year, compared with earlier expectations for a decline of 0.3 percent.

The outlook for the jobless in Europe is equally grim. Unemployment is expected to reach 11.1 percent across the European Union and 12.2 percent in the euro zone. Joblessness is expected to remain at those levels for much of 2014, the commission said.

The figures were released as part of the commission’s periodic economic forecasts.

The growth forecasts for 2013 still signal a slowing in the pace of contraction compared with last year, when growth fell by 0.3 percent across the Union and by 0.6 percent in the euro area. But the unemployment picture is distinctly worse compared to 2013, when 10.5 percent were without jobs across the Union and 11.4 percent in the euro area.

Olli Rehn, the E.U. commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, said in a statement Friday that leaders needed to “do whatever it takes to overcome the unemployment crisis in Europe.” That is a reflection of growing concerns among officials in Brussels that the levels of unemployment in some countries like Spain could lead to unrest and even become endemic.

Spain is expected to see employment reach 27 percent this year, compared with 25 percent last year, while the outlook for Portugal was 18.2 percent compared with 15.9 percent last year. Unemployment in Greece, which has been in economic intensive care for three years, is expected to reach 27 percent compared with 24.3 percent last year, the commission said.

Yet Mr. Rehn also warned of the need for complementary measures as nations roll back the kind of painful budgetary belt-tightening he has advocated.

“Fiscal consolidation is continuing, but its pace is slowing down,” he said. “In parallel, structural reforms must be intensified to unlock growth in Europe.”

Mr. Rehn has come under blistering attack from economists who say his austerity policies have crimped countries’ ability to restore growth.

Deficits among European Union and euro-area countries are expected to decline in 2013, the commission said. But the combination of a poor economic outlook and the slowing pace of austerity means that national debt, as a ratio of G.D.P., would rise.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/04/business/global/04iht-euro04.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Workers Still Uneasy About Retirement Finances

Americans remain uneasy about their retirement finances despite a brightening economic outlook — perhaps because it is dawning on them just how much they have to save, a long-running survey finds.

The percentage of workers who are confident about having enough money for a “comfortable” retirement is unchanged from the record lows of 2011, the survey from the Employee Benefit Research Institute found.

More than half express some level of confidence, but 21 percent are “not too” confident and 28 percent are “not at all” confident — the highest level of people not at all confident in the 23 years of the Retirement Confidence Survey. The survey is sponsored by the institute and Mathew Greenwald Associates, and financed by roughly two dozen businesses and nonprofit groups.

The survey was conducted in January using 20-minute telephone interviews with 1,003 adult workers and 251 retirees. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus three percentage points.

It may be that the reality of difficult savings ahead is dawning.

A “striking” number of workers cite large targets when asked how much they will need to save to ensure a financially secure retirement, the survey found. Twenty percent said they needed to save between 20 and 29 percent of their income, and nearly a fourth said they needed to save 30 percent or more. But only about half said they had tried to formally calculate how much they will need to save to retire comfortably; the rest essentially guessed.

“Aggressive as those savings targets appear to be, they may not be based on a careful analysis of their individual circumstances,” Jack VanDerhei, the institute’s research director and co-author of the report, said in a statement.

Worker savings remain “modest,” and less than half of workers appear to be taking basic steps needed to prepare for retirement, the survey found. More than half who provided financial information for the survey reported less than $25,000 in total household savings and investments, excluding the value of their home and any pension.

Americans also lack much of a financial cushion. Only about half of workers, and a comparable number of retirees, say they definitely could come up with $2,000 for an unexpected expense in the next month.

Are you able to save both for retirement and unexpected expenses?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/workers-still-uneasy-about-retirement-finances/?partner=rss&emc=rss

European Central Bank Leaves Key Rate Unchanged

As usual, Mr. Draghi was careful to qualify his upbeat assessment of the euro zone crisis, which is now entering its third year. Though financial markets have calmed and some economic indicators have stabilized, he said, it was too early to declare a turning point.

Also Thursday, the Bank of England decided to keep its benchmark interest rate unchanged amid a dismal economic outlook for 2013 that could keep the economy on the brink of another recession.

Mr. Draghi listed a number of indicators that the euro zone could be on the mend. Market interest rates on government bonds have fallen, while stocks have risen. The flow of bank deposits from troubled countries has reversed and euro zone economies have become more competitive, he said.

Where problems in one country once infected other members of the currency union, optimism is now spreading, Mr. Draghi said at a news conference following the regular monthly monetary policy meeting of the E.C.B. Governing Council.

“There is a positive contagion when things go well,” Mr. Draghi said. “That’s what is in play now.” But, he added, “the jury is still out. It’s too early to claim success.”

Mr. Draghi’s comments suggested the E.C.B. would not cut its main interest rate further, as some economists have argued it should, given that unemployment is at a record high and inflation is close to the central bank’s target of 2 percent and falling. Many businesses continue to have trouble getting credit, without which a recovery of the European economy is unlikely.

Some analysts read Mr. Draghi’s comments as simply a way of justifying the central bank’s inaction.

“Despite the pervasive weakness of the real economy in the single currency area, the E.C.B. is sitting firmly on its hands in the hope that the upturn in sentiment will eventually filter through to the real economy,” Nicholas Spiro, managing director of Spiro Sovereign Strategy, said in a note Thursday.

But others agreed that there were tentative signs that the euro zone economy could emerge from an economic downturn soon. On Thursday, the Bank of France indicator of sentiment in French industry rose unexpectedly.

“Draghi is right to stress that several leading indicators have stabilized recently,” Jörg Krämer, chief economist at Commerzbank, wrote in a note to clients. “The recession in the euro zone is likely to come to an end in spring. This makes a further E.C.B. rate cut unlikely.”

While cutting interest rates is a standard policy tool of central banks, Mr. Draghi has often complained that the central bank has lost much of its influence over rates in troubled countries like Spain. Commercial banks there are already struggling with problem loans and reluctant to lend except at much higher rates.

The E.C.B.’s Governing Council may have concluded that a rate cut now would be superfluous, or even dangerous if it encouraged some investors to take too much risk. Mr. Draghi said Thursday that some recent leveraged buyout deals were overvalued, though such examples of risky behavior were limited.

Mr. Draghi was asked several times whether the central bank might consider other ways of encouraging credit, for example by emulating the Bank of England’s Funding for Lending Scheme, which rewards banks that lend more. Mr. Draghi said that existing E.C.B. programs were already comparable with what the Bank of England was doing.

The E.C.B has been allowing lenders to borrow as much as they want from the central bank at 0.75 percent, if they can provide collateral. But the E.C.B. cannot compel banks to pass on lower rates to customers, and many do not.

The Bank of England on Thursday decided to leave its interest rate at 0.5 percent, a record low, and also held its program of economic stimulus at £375 billion, or $600 billion.

Positive data from the manufacturing industry in December had surprised some economists, but many warned that the British economy would continue to move at a snail’s pace this year because households were reluctant to spend.

“It’s still not looking good,” Vicky Redwood, an economist at Capital Economics, said before the rate announcement. “The underlying picture is still flat.”

Britain had emerged from a recession in the third quarter, albeit with its economy growing slower than expected.

Many British consumers are concerned that a 2.7 percent inflation rate, which is above the Bank of England’s own 2 percent target, and that the government’s austerity program will squeeze their disposable income. Consumer confidence fell in December and the British Retail Consortium called the holiday sales “underwhelming.”

If the euro zone is indeed stabilizing, Mr. Draghi can probably take much of the credit. The turnaround began after he vowed last year to do whatever it took to preserve the euro zone and announced a program to buy bonds of countries whose borrowing costs were rising too high.

Mr. Draghi provided another example Thursday of how he has been willing to interpret the central bank’s charter more flexibly than his predecessor, Jean-Claude Trichet, a habit that has pleased investors.

The E.C.B.’s prime directive is to contain prices. But Mr. Draghi has been adept at using the language of price stability to justify broader goals. Mr. Draghi noted during the press conference that, unlike the Federal Reserve in the United States, the E.C.B.’s mandate did not require it to promote job creation. But he added that unemployment was “a very important factor in our assessment of price stability.”

Julia Werdigier reported from London.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/business/global/european-central-bank-leaves-key-rate-unchanged.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

At Meeting, Debate Over Length of Fed Program

WASHINGTON – Federal Reserve officials spoke at a December meeting about ending a new round of asset purchases by the middle of 2013, less than a year after the start of its latest effort to drive down unemployment.

The members of the Fed’s policy-making committee did not settle on a timetable. Some argued that purchases should continue until the end of the year, and others said it was too soon to make a judgment, according to a brief account of the meeting that the Fed published Thursday after a customary three-week lag.

But the support for an early end date reflected uneasiness among Fed officials about the effectiveness of asset purchases in stimulating the economy and about the potential costs, including the disruption of financial markets.

The Fed remains committed to continuing other measures well beyond next year. The central bank announced after the December meeting that it planned to hold short-term interest rates near zero at least until the unemployment rate fell below 6.5 percent, provided inflation remained under control, and it estimated that the rate would cross that threshold no sooner than mid-2015.

In addition to purchasing assets in the coming months, the Fed plans to maintain for the time being the vast portfolio of Treasury securities and mortgage-backed securities that it has acquired since 2008.

“Members generally agreed that the economic outlook was little changed since the previous meeting and judged that without sufficient policy accommodation, economic growth might not be strong enough to generate sustained improvement in labor market conditions,” the account of the meeting said.

The Fed’s current program of asset purchases began in September with the announcement that it would buy $40 billion in mortgage bonds each month until the outlook for the labor market “improved substantially.”

In December, the Fed said it would also expand its holdings of Treasuries by $45 billion each month, replacing a program in which it acquired that amount of long-term Treasuries each month by selling the same amount of short-term Treasuries, so that the total size of its portfolio remained unchanged.

In tying the purchases to economic conditions, rather than a fixed timetable, the Fed sought to underscore its commitment to reducing unemployment, which has persisted at high levels for more than four years.

But in deciding not to announce a threshold, as it did for interest rates, the Fed also has created a measure of uncertainty about its intentions.

The account of the meeting showed that this decision reflects a basic reality: the Fed is not sure about its intentions and wants to remain flexible.

“A few members expressed the view that ongoing asset purchases would likely be warranted until about the end of 2013,” the account said, “while a few others emphasized the need for considerable policy accommodation but did not state a specific time frame or total for purchases.

“Several others thought that it would probably be appropriate to slow or to stop purchases well before the end of 2013, citing concerns about financial stability or the size of the balance sheet,” it continued, concluding, “One member viewed any additional purchases as unwarranted.”

The value of this description is somewhat reduced because four of the 12 members of the Federal Open Market Committee ended their terms in December. The minutes of the meeting do not make clear which positions the retiring members held, let alone the views of the four Fed officials who will replace them on the committee at the January meeting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/04/business/economy/at-meeting-debate-over-length-of-fed-program.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Greek Debt Is Focus of Another Euro Zone Finance Ministers Meeting

Euro zone finance ministers will gather here on Monday for their fourth meeting in four weeks. Last week they hashed out a plan by which Greece can try to unlock a long overdue bailout loan installment. The country needs the money desperately to avoid bankruptcy, to pay wages and pensions and to carry out economic changes demanded by its international creditors.

On Monday, the finance ministers are expected to vet Greece’s planned response to a central provision of that plan: a buyback of some of the Greek bonds held by investors, at a discount, as a way to reduce its staggering debt load.

Greece has until Dec. 13 to make that happen if it hopes to receive its next tranche of bailout money.

Even as the Greek economy continues to falter, the latest meeting of finance ministers comes against a backdrop of grim new data for the euro region as a whole. Despite an optimistic forecast on Friday from the European Central Bank president that the euro zone would emerge from recession sometime in the second half of next year, the nearer-term data indicates that things may get worse before they can get better.

Figures released Friday showed euro zone unemployment rising to a new high in October, with nearly 19 million people — 11.7 percent of the 17-nation currency bloc’s work force — without jobs.

Greece’s international lenders froze aid in June because they perceived the government in Athens to be dragging its heels on fulfilling the terms of its bailout program. Since then, the country has accelerated the economic revamping and budget cuts that creditors have demanded.

But the economic outlook for Greece has worsened significantly in the interim — some critics blame the austerity program, in part — prompting the International Monetary Fund to pressure lenders, including Germany, to relieve some of its burden.

A centerpiece of those efforts, agreed upon last week, is the debt buyback. The plan is for authorities in Athens to borrow European funds to buy Greek bonds that are already trading at a deep discount from their face value.

The buyback plan may have allayed fears of an imminent Greek default, but how well it will work remains to be seen. Some in the financial sector have complained about the prospect of being forced to sell bonds at fire-sale prices.

The Market Monitoring Group of the Institute of International Finance, a global association of banks and other financial institutions, said last week that it was “critical that any buyback be conducted on a purely voluntary basis,” even as Yannis Stournaras, the Greek finance minister, warned Greek banks holding many of the bonds that participation was a “patriotic duty.”

But unless Greece reduces its debt, the I.M.F. could still refuse to approve aid. That would probably mean another flurry of emergency meetings to draw up yet another plan.

In a sign that at least some investors are eager to sell back their Greek bonds, if the price is right, some big hedge funds have been accumulating the bonds on the open market.

Those funds, including Third Point and Brevan Howard, are betting that to make the buyback succeed, the Greek government will have to meet their price demands. On the open market, the bonds in question are trading at around 30 cents on the euro — in other words, about 30 percent of their face value. The most aggressive hedge funds are insisting that they will not sell for any price below 35 cents on the euro.

That raises a risk that investors will push up the price to a point at which it does not make economic sense for Greece to complete the buyback.

“There is a limited amount of money to do this,” Mr. Stournaras said in an interview on Saturday. “But in the end I do think it will be successful.”

To seal the debt overhaul deal last week, after three late-night, marathon meetings in three weeks, Christine Lagarde, managing director of the I.M.F., had to battle to persuade reluctant finance ministers like Wolfgang Schäuble of Germany. She argued that Greece was sinking so deeply that, without immediate relief, it might never repay its loans.

Mr. Schäuble declined to go along with a relief plan until a way was found to avoid the politically unpalatable step of forgiving Greece’s loans. Besides the debt buyback, the revamped plan included extending the payback dates for some of the debt held by other euro zone governments. Central banks in countries that use the euro also agreed to return to Greece any profits made on Greek bonds purchased by the European Central Bank.

On Friday, the German Parliament approved the new relief plan by a wide margin, a sign of continuing fears about the fate of the euro zone if Greece defaults. But the approval carried a political cost for the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, as nearly two dozen legislators in her own Christian Democrat party voted against the measure.

Landon Thomas Jr. contributed reporting from London, and Niki Kitsantonis from Athens.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/03/business/global/03iht-ministers03.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix Blog: A Critique of Fed Policy

Many economists regard asset purchases as the most powerful tool the Federal Reserve could use to stimulate the economy. But Michael Woodford, an economics professor at Columbia University, argued Friday that a second option would actually be much more effective – both because it would have significant economic benefits, and because the benefits of asset purchases are significantly overstated.

The option favored by Professor Woodford is a modified version of the Fed’s statement that it intends to keep interest rates near zero until late 2014. In a paper presented at the annual monetary policy conference in Jackson Hole, Wyo., he said that the Fed should instead declare its intention to hold down interest rates until the economy meets certain benchmarks, like a specified increase in economic output. In other words, to increase growth now, the Fed must promise to tolerate higher inflation later.

The Fed’s chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, has repeatedly resisted similar ideas, but in a separate speech at the conference earlier on Friday, he appeared to suggest a greater receptivity.

The core of Professor Woodford’s argument is that changes in Fed policy can happen for two reasons: either its economic outlook changes, or the Fed decides to change the way that it responds to a given economic outlook – in other words, a change in strategy, or in circumstances.

The Fed has described its forecasts as reflecting a change in circumstances, not strategy. It has said that it is simply describing the way that it is most likely to act if the economy slogs along at the pace it presently predicts.

Professor Woodford writes that this is at best ineffective and potentially even damaging. It can be described as an effort to push down interest rates by convincing investors that the economy will remain weaker for longer than they had previously believed. But investors may not regard the Fed as having better information about the economic future. And if they do take it seriously, the implications are negative: The situation is worse than they thought, while the planned response is unchanged.

“Forward guidance of this kind would have a perverse effect, and be worse that not commenting on the outlook for future interest rates at all,” he said.

What can work, he writes, is promising to behave differently. In the current situation, where the Fed would push rates below zero if it could, he argues that the proper response is to promise that it will refrain from raising interest rates above zero as quickly as circumstances would otherwise warrant.

“One wants people to understand,” Professor Woodford writes, “that the central bank’s policy will be history-dependent in a particular way — it will behave differently than it usually would, under the conditions prevailing later, simply because of the binding constraint in the past.”

Charles Evans, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, has embraced a version of this approach, arguing that the Fed should maintain interest rates near zero until the unemployment rate falls below 7 percent or the rate of inflation rises above 3 percent. Professor Woodford says this would be an “important improvement,” but he prefers a different approach, tying Fed policy instead to a minimum rate of growth in the nominal gross domestic product (N.G.D.P.), meaning economic growth plus inflation.

Christina D. Romer, former chairwoman of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, has explained the virtues of N.G.D.P. targeting.

Mr. Bernanke has generally resisted proposals for the Fed to shift its policy framework – and he has specifically branded as “reckless” ideas that would raise the Fed’s inflation target, like N.G.D.P. targeting.

But he has also said that in periods of high unemployment the Fed sometimes should move more slowly to restrain rising inflation, and in his speech Friday he appeared to underscore that the Fed, at least in part, is trying to tell markets it plans to move more slowly.

He began with his usual description of the Fed’s policy forecast as consistent with its standard decision-making framework. But he added that “a number of considerations also argue for planning to keep rates low for a longer time than implied by policy rules developed during more normal periods.”

Mr. Bernanke then made the further claim that the Fed was already sending this signal to markets, and that it was being received.

He noted in particular that a regular survey of economic forecasters has documented a steady drop in their estimate of how low unemployment must fall before the Fed’s policy-making group, the Federal Open Market Committee, begins to withdraw its stimulus.

The evidence, he said, “appears to reflect a growing appreciation of how forceful the F.O.M.C. intends to be in supporting a sustainable recovery.”

Article source: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/a-critique-of-fed-policy/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Daikin of Japan Said to Buy Goodman for $3.7 Billion

7:49 p.m. | Updated

Daikin Industries has struck an agreement to buy Goodman Global for about $3.7 billion, a person briefed on the matter said on Tuesday, completing the Japanese air-conditioner maker’s long quest to buy its American rival.

An announcement is expected to be made as soon as Tuesday evening, said this person, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Goodman is currently owned by the private equity firm Hellman Friedman, which bought the company in 2008 for about $1.9 billion. Founded in 1975, Goodman makes heating, ventilation and air-conditioning products for homes and businesses.

Hellman Friedman began shopping the company around early last year, at a time when many private equity firms were looking to lock in profits by selling off their holdings.

The move prompted interest from Daikin, one of the world’s biggest makers of air-conditioning equipment. Yet only three months after confirming its interest, Daikin said last March that it was walking away, citing the uncertain market environment in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster.

At the time, however, a spokesman for Daikin said that it would consider reviving deal talks if Japan’s economic outlook became clearer, according to Reuters.

Daikin, which is based in Osaka, has ample financial resources to buy its American competitor. The company reported about $510 million in profit for the 12 months ended June 30. And it had some $1.5 billion in cash and short-term investments on its books as of June 30.

Hellman Friedman, which is based in San Francisco, has been unusually active in selling off a number of portfolio companies over the last year, including Getty Images, the image service, and AlixPartners, the consulting firm.

A spokeswoman for Hellman Friedman declined to comment. A representative for Daikin was not immediately available for comment. News of the deal was reported earlier by Nikkei.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/daikin-of-japan-said-to-buy-goodman-for-3-7-billion/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Greece Inches Toward Deal in Talks With Its Creditors

The latest progress comes in the wake of two days of talks in Athens between Greece’s political leadership and Charles Dallara of the Institute of International Finance, the bankers’ lobby representing most investors.

Bankers and officials involved in the discussions who were not authorized to speak publicly say that bondholders have made significant concessions with regard to the interest rate, or coupon, that the new Greek bonds would carry. Having insisted previously on an average rate above 4 percent, creditors now seem willing to accept a rate below 4 percent for the 30-year bonds — perhaps as low as 3.6 percent.

The discussions are expected to continue through the weekend, and officials said some type of announcement could come Saturday or Sunday.

Talks have broken down twice before, largely because the International Monetary Fund and European leaders have pushed for a larger debt reduction in light of Greece’s worsening economic outlook, so there is the possibility that these negotiations will founder, too.

Technical talks are continuing with regard to a lump-sum payment of some sort that may be included in later years if the Greek economy improves.

On top of the 50 percent nominal loss, or haircut, already agreed, the lower coupon would produce a total loss for bondholders of more than 70 percent.

It is a tense time for Greece. Officials from the three institutions that are keeping the near-bankrupt nation financially afloat — the European Commission, the monetary fund and the European Central Bank — are demanding another round of spending cuts and reforms to justify a release of as much as 30 billion euros ($39 billion) in the months ahead.

A private sector debt deal is seen as a strict condition to Greece’s securing its next bailout installment.

Officials expect that the deeper bond loss will allow Greece to meet its goal of having a debt-to-gross-domestic-product ratio of 120 percent by 2020, a significant drop from the current ratio of 160 percent.

The recent collapse of the economy has made it more difficult for Greece to hit this number.

Though a debt agreement may spur Greece’s next bailout installment, the deeper loss being inflicted on bondholders carries the risk that many investors, in particular hedge funds that in recent months have loaded up on cheap Greek bonds in hopes of a payday this March, will refuse to participate in the deal.

Greece will try to impose the terms on all investors by writing collective-action clauses into the contracts of its old bonds. By doing this, the hope is that the holdouts, estimated to sit on 10 percent to 15 percent of the 206 billion euros ($272 billion) in outstanding securities, will exchange their old bonds for new bonds — preferring the new discounted bonds to their old ones, which may become worthless.

Some hedge funds that have bought at rock-bottom prices may decide to pursue legal action, although such a process could take years with small certainty of success.

Also undecided is what the European Central Bank, which owns 55 billion euros of Greek bonds, will do. Despite public pressure that it, along with investors, accept a loss on its bonds, the bank has not budged.

Greece and European officials continue to discuss a plan that would allow the central bank to swap its Greek bonds for another form of Greek debt that, unlike the bonds it now holds, would not be eligible for a haircut.

If such a swap were to occur, the central bank would not be affected if Greece were to invoke the collective-action clauses and force a loss on all bondholders.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8c91ace40bcb7fa16ee38d5f419beebb

What’s Your Economic Outlook?

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=835ff2aa955fe61fcb189ff077f48203

Asian Markets Fall on Disappointment Over Fed’s Move

The Hang Seng index in Hong Kong led declines across the region, diving 4.5 percent by midafternoon.

The Nikkei 225 index in Tokyo closed 2.1 percent lower, the Kospi in South Korea fell 2.9 percent and the S.P./ASX 200 in Australia dropped 2.6 percent.

European markets followed suit Thursday, with losses of more than 2 percent in morning trading.

The across-the-board declines came from investors’ increasing pessimism over the U.S. and European economies, analysts said.

“It’s just a repetition of the same old stories we have been reading for the past year and a half,” said Stephen Davies, chief executive of Javelin Wealth Management in Singapore.

In Europe, a sovereign debt crisis is threatening to bankrupt Greece and investors fear that Italy will default on its debts, crises that could imperil the banking system across the continent.

On Wednesday the Fed announced it would buy long-term Treasury bonds and sell short-term bonds to help stimulate lending and growth.

But the U.S. central bank also said a complete economic recovery was still years away, adding that the U.S. economy has “significant downside risks to the economic outlook, including strains in global financial markets.”

The Fed pointed to a number of long-term problems in the American economy, including high unemployment and a depressed housing market.

The announcement sent stocks on Wall Street falling. The Dow Jones closed 2.6 percent lower on Wednesday; Standard Poor’s 500 index sank 2.9 percent and the Nasdaq composite dropped 2 percent.

Analysts said the declines in Asia on Thursday showed that investors were unsure that the Fed’s decision would fully address the economic slowdown in the United States.

Meanwhile, House Republican leaders suffered a surprising setback on Wednesday when the House rejected their version of a stopgap spending bill, leaving unclear how Congress will provide money to keep the government open after Sept. 30 and aid victims of a string of costly recent natural disasters.

The export-driven economies in Asia, like South Korea, are most vulnerable to the European and American economic challenges, said Tim Condon, head of Asia research at ING Group in Hong Kong.

Durable goods like automobiles and ships will be hurt most, he said.

Additionally, investors were beginning to worry that China’s rate of growth may slow, said Dariusz Kowalczyk, senior economist and strategist at Crédit Agricole CIB in Hong Kong.

The aversion to riskier assets helped prop up the U.S. dollar in foreign exchange markets on Thursday. The Australian dollar fell closer to parity with the U.S. dollar, and the euro was trading at $1.3550, down from around $1.36 in late New York trading.

The yield on 10-year U.S. Treasuries hit a new low of 1.82 percent during Asian trading.

“It really comes down to political immaturity in both the U.S. and Europe,” said Mr. Davies of Javelin Wealth Management. “The increasing chance of a U.S. recession and European implosion has shortened the odds of an overall second recession.”

Christine Hauser contributed reporting from New York and Robert Pear and Jennifer Steinhauer from Washington.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/business/global/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss