May 1, 2024

Economix Blog: The Debt Downgrade and Stock Prices

DESCRIPTION

Casey B. Mulligan is an economics professor at the University of Chicago.

The big financial story in the last few days has been the declaration by Standard Poor’s that United States government bonds were no longer worthy of its AAA rating. The agency, in a nutshell, thinks there is some chance that the government will default or be delinquent on its debt payments.

Today’s Economist

Perspectives from expert contributors.

The announcement was followed by a wild ride in the stock market in the last two days — a plunge of almost 7 percent in the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index on Monday, followed by a surge of almost 5 percent on Tuesday.

But with the index down almost 18 percent from its April peak, it is clear that investors’ concerns long predated the downgrade.

The real news is how poorly the economy is doing, and how poor its prospects seem. The chart below shows the changes in several indicators of economic activity over the last nine months. The blue series is an inflation-adjusted stock price index, which (even with Tuesday’s big gain) is lower than it was nine months ago. Through May 2011, real housing prices (black series) were down 7 percent. Real consumer spending (red series) has failed to increase, and inflation-adjusted spending on consumer durables has fallen four months in a row.

All of these indicators are forward-looking in the sense that they depend on what people expect to happen to incomes and profits in the future. These indicators had been looking better during much of 2010 but now it seems that consumers and investors are not optimistic about what is ahead (are they worried about riots like in London? higher taxes? government program cuts?).

In my view, a rating agency does not move the market but rather reacts to some of the same prospects that are reflected in the decisions of consumers and investors. For example, to the degree that incomes continue to remain low, tax collections will also remain low, making it that much more difficult for governments to pay their obligations.

Recovery for the stock market, and the wider economy, needs a lot more than an agency to change its mind about government bond ratings.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=81c3a75304e91c199aa556849e48228f

DealBook: Groupon Drops Criticized Yardstick, but Shows More Growth

Andrew Mason, the chief executive of GrouponSeongjoon Cho/Bloomberg NewsAndrew Mason, the chief executive of Groupon.

Groupon has dropped a much-criticized accounting metric after pushback from the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to an amended prospectus filed on Wednesday.

But the online coupon giant also showed that it had maintained growth, with both its revenue and subscriber base having jumped in just a matter of months.

With its latest disclosure, Groupon is seeking to keep investor interest high for its forthcoming offering, which could come as soon as next month even amid the recent volatility in the stock market. The company is one of the darlings of the latest round of Internet companies, alongside the likes of Facebook and LinkedIn.

But Groupon has faced pressure to show it can maintain its astronomic growth in the face of a rapidly multiplying field of competitors. Beyond other deal sites like LivingSocial — itself seeking to go public — other rivals now include Google and Amazon.

In its new filing, Groupon removed references to “adjusted consolidated segment operating income,” or ACSOI, an unusual measure of the company’s business performance.

Groupon said that the measure — which subtracted its formidable online marketing and acquisition costs from its operating performance — was an important yardstick the company used. (ACSOI was not meant to be used as a valuation measure, Groupon cautioned.)

But critics said that it obscured the company’s losses and ignored a likely need to keep spending on marketing. On a generally accepted accounting principles basis, Groupon reported a $108.9 million net loss attributable to common shareholders for the second quarter, down 26 percent from the first quarter.

After discussions with the S.E.C. in recent weeks, Groupon decided to remove references to ACSOI from its latest prospectus, though it intends to continue using the metric internally, people briefed on the matter told DealBook.

“While we track this management metric internally to gauge our performance, we encourage you to base your investment decision on whatever metrics make you comfortable,” Andrew Mason, Groupon’s chief executive, said in a letter to investors in the prospectus.

In its place, the company substituted CSOI, a slightly less esoteric yardstick that is used by the likes of Amazon and which includes marketing costs. On this basis, Groupon lost $62.3 million for the second quarter this year.

By other measures, however, Groupon showed strong growth. It reported $878 million in net revenue for the second quarter, a 36 percent jump over the first quarter and a 906 percent leap over the same time last year.

Still, the latest filing shows that the company isn’t sustaining the astronomic growth that more than doubled its quarterly revenue several times last year.

Groupon also reported 115.7 million subscribers during that same time period, up 39 percent from the first quarter and 10 times more than a year ago.

One of Groupon’s biggest challenges has been proving that it can convert subscribers to its daily listings into paying consumers. The company reported 23.1 million customers for the quarter, who cumulatively purchased 32.5 million deals, a major improvement from the first quarter.

On average, Groupon now sells about four deals per customer, up from 3.8 in the first quarter.

Groupon also began trimming its formidable marketing budget, something it said would happen as more people became aware of the company. It spent 8 percent less on online marketing, or $165.2 million.

At the same time, it has been adding more employees to its sales force. The company reported having more than 4,800 sales representatives in the second quarter, up from more than 3,500 in the first quarter.

Groupon’s gross profit margins shrank from the first quarter, to 38.8 percent from 41.9 percent. The company attributed that to expansion in Asia and in national deals in North America, two areas that yield less profit but help lock in new subscribers.

Its foray into travel deals, Groupon Getaways, also fetches smaller margins, though it draws in more revenue per deal.

Another measurement that Groupon has promoted to investors, free cash flow, showed improvement: at $29.8 million for the second quarter, the company more than quadrupled what it generated earlier in the year.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=006621a1eeec4b7acb46e51d04e27a69

Stocks & Bonds: Relief Rally Vanishes After New Data

On Monday, the three main indexes jumped then slumped for most of the day and closed lower as the reality of the challenges ahead for the economy set in.

This is a trend that some analysts say is likely to persist, even after any resolution in the debt ceiling debate and its prospects for downgrade or default. The main reason is worry about the nation’s economic recovery, which recent data shows to be more fragile than originally thought. On Monday, the manufacturing sector showed signs of losing steam in July.

“Now that the debt ceiling deal, assuming it passes, has averted an imminent catastrophe, attention can return to the underlying state of the economy,” said Nigel Gault, the IHS Global Insight chief United States economist.

“The news there isn’t good.”

On Monday, the stock market in the United States briefly followed European and Asian markets higher, lifting more than 1 percent shortly after the opening. But any relief over the last-minute agreement on the debt deal framework was fleeting.

After the first half-hour of trading, the three main Wall Street indexes turned negative and mostly stayed in the red, bringing the broader market as measured by the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index down more than 4 percent over the past six consecutive days of declines.

Much of the slump was attributed to a report from the Institute for Supply Management showing a slowdown in the nation’s factories. The index registered 50.9 percent in July, down from 55.3 percent in June. A reading over 50 percent means the manufacturing sector expanded for the 24th consecutive month. Production and employment showed continued growth in July, but at slower rates than in June. However, the new orders component fell to 49.2 percent, hitting a notch below 50 percent for the first time since June, 2009, when it was 48.9 percent.

The news was particularly bad on the heels of the Friday report that the nation’s gross domestic product grew at an annual rate of less than 1 percent in the first half of 2011, with the first quarter and the second quarter at 0.4 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively. The G.D.P. data was revised going back to 2003, showing the recession was deeper and the recovery weaker than originally thought.

“July’s I.S.M. report was a shocker,” said economists from Capital Economics in a research note. “The index is not flagging up another recession, at least not yet, but it suggests that the easing in G.D.P. growth in the first half of the year is looking more and more like a sustained slowdown than a short-lived soft patch.”

Nick Kalivas, vice president for financial research at MF Global, said the weekend’s debt deal developments took some risk and “a little” uncertainty from the market.

The deal, he said, “kind of pushes the longer-term issues out to be taken up at another time.”

The S. P. was down 5.34 points, or 0.41 percent, to 1,286.94. The Dow Jones industrial average was off 10.75 points, or 0.09 percent, to 12,132.49, and the Nasdaq index fell 11.77 points, or 0.43 percent, to 2,744.61.

Noting that the American stock market has performed well this year largely because of record corporate profits, James Swanson, the chief investment strategy for mutual-fund company MFS Investment Management in Boston, said that “the economy is disappointing investors because the general assumption has been that U.S. growth would be in the twos to threes and it’s clearly not.”

While bond markets may rally in response to the fact the debt ceiling crisis was averted, some analysts say the size of the agreement is likely to disappoint investors over the long term.

“Foreigners, in particular, are going to look at this deal and say, ‘I thought the U.S. was capable of more than this,’ ” said Zane Brown, the fixed-income strategist at Lord Abbett. “We may find that foreign owners of U.S. Treasury securities may look for opportunities to move elsewhere.”

Another issue weighing on investors is whether America will retain its sterling credit rating.

“I think we’re going to be watching for the reactions of the rating agencies,” said G. David MacEwen, chief investment officer at mutual-fund company American Century Investments in Kansas City, Mo. Pointing to the stance of Standard and Poor’s that suggested it may downgrade the country to a AA rating from a AAA if spending was not reduced by about $4 trillion, Mr. MacEwen said it was a “big question” whether it and the other rating agencies will be satisfied with this deal.

Noting that the manufacturing report followed “terrible” G.D.P. and jobs data, Matt Freund, the senior vice president of investment portfolio management for USAA Investment Management, said, “We think it is a glass half-full economy, but it is getting harder to tell where the water line is.”

Yields have fallen as a result, he noted. The benchmark 10-year Treasury was down slightly at 2.75 percent.

In addition, there have been continued concerns about the outlook for Europe. Stefan de Schutter, an asset manager at Alpha Trading in Frankfurt, said the initial reaction in Europe to the news in the United States was one of relief but he also said European investors remained cautious.

“If we look ahead,” he said, “we’ll see a return to the focus on the economic problems in Europe.” The FTSE 100 in London was down 0.70 percent to 5,774.43, the CAC 40 in Paris lost 2.27 percent to 3,588.05, and the DAX in Frankfurt was off 2.86 percent to 6,953.98, its biggest percentage drop since March.

The key index in Japan jumped 1.3 percent, and the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong added 1 percent, picking up steam after the deal in Washington was announced by President Obama.

Julie Creswell contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/business/asian-markets-rally-after-us-debt-deal.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: BlackRock Profit Rises 25%, to $578 Million

BlackRock headquarters in Manhattan.Daniel Acker/Bloomberg NewsBlackRock headquarters in Manhattan.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, said on Wednesday that its second-quarter profit rose 25 percent, to $578 million, spurred by strong showings in most of its divisions.

While other financial firms get felled by mortgage liabilities, trading misses and other problems, BlackRock continued to chug along, producing double-digit gains in both revenue and profit, in part because it has benefited from the rise in the stock market over the last year.

In discussing BlackRock’s performance, Laurence D. Fink, the chief executive, said it came amid tough conditions in which “investors grew increasingly concerned about uncertainties in the market, including the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, political stalemate on the U.S. debt ceiling, and prospects of slower economic growth.”

The firm also easily surpassed expectations with earnings of $3 a share. Analysts had been predicting $2.88 a share.

Assets under management, an important measure of the firm’s health, rose 16 percent, to nearly $3.7 trillion, buoyed in part by the stock markets. Revenue also increased 16 percent, to $2.35 billion.

Revenue from investment advisory, administration fees and securities lending came in at $2.1 billion, up 17 percent from the $1.8 billion posted in the second quarter of 2010. The firm said the increase was a result of growth in long-term assets under management, which reflected the benefit of both new business and market appreciation of assets over the last year.

BlackRock Solutions was pretty much flat in quarter, reporting revenue of $116 million, up $2 million from the period a year earlier. The group, which flourished during the financial crisis, provides risk management advice to institutions and governments. It gained 10 new assignments in the second quarter, and its clients have included the Irish central bank and the Federal Reserve.

“The level of geopolitical, regulatory and economic uncertainty is exceptionally high and contributing to considerable volatility in the markets,” Mr. Fink said. “Our teams are working tirelessly to communicate with our clients and help navigate these difficult conditions.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=1e2b3fb5fcc66e773df661d749480f6d

Jobless Claims Dip Lower, But Show Less Momentum

The tepid fall in jobless claims signals companies may also be looking to limit hiring, raising the expectation that employment data due Friday will show that payroll gains moderated in May. Slowing job growth may cause households to further curb spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the American economy.

“The job market has clearly lost momentum,” said John Herrmann, a senior fixed-income strategist at State Street Global Markets in Boston. “Jobless claims remain elevated, and payrolls growth for May could come in at a level that’s worrisome. The gains in confidence may be short-lived. From here on, confidence surveys may begin to reflect the broader sense of uncertainty in the economy, the labor market and the stock market.”

Stocks fell on concern the economic recovery was slowing. The forecast for jobless claims was based on a survey of 50 economists. Estimates ranged from 400,000 to 440,000. The Labor Department revised the previous week’s figure to 428,000 from the 424,000 initially reported.

Among the economists surveyed by Bloomberg, the median forecast was that payrolls grew by 170,000 workers in May. Payrolls increased by 244,000 in April.

A report released Wednesday from ADP Employer Services showed companies added 38,000 workers last month, the fewest since September and less than the median estimate in a Bloomberg survey.

“The labor market is a little less robust than it was,” said Michael Feroli, chief United States economist at JPMorgan Chase in New York. “This is the eighth consecutive week of claims above 400,000, so it doesn’t look like the move up was an aberration.”

Robert Brusca, president of Fact Opinion Economics in New York, said, “There is nothing in this weekly survey that gives us any confidence things are getting better. There is really not much improvement in the economy.”

Other reports from Thursday showed worker productivity slowed in the first quarter and orders to factories dropped in April.

The measure of employee output per hour increased at a revised 1.8 percent annual rate after a 2.9 percent gain in the prior three months, the Labor Department said. Labor costs climbed at a 0.7 percent rate after dropping 2.8 percent the prior quarter.

Demand for manufactured goods dropped 1.2 percent in April, the most since May 2010, after climbing 3.8 percent the prior month, figures from the Commerce Department showed.

Initial jobless claims reflect weekly firings and tend to rise as job growth — measured by the monthly nonfarm payrolls report — decelerates.

Lower gasoline prices may be giving households some relief. The average price of a gallon of regular gasoline nationally dropped to $3.79 on May 29, down from $3.84 a week earlier, according to AAA, the nation’s largest auto club. It reached $3.99 on May 4, the highest since July 2008.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=cbd4c6c0ae3759e7e39e70a06227cb1a

Stocks Drop at Open as Oil Prices Decline

Crude oil was trading around $97 a barrel Thursday morning, down more than 1 percent. Oil and gas futures dropped sharply Wednesday after a government report showed demand for gasoline fell by the largest amount in seven weeks.

Silver dropped more than 6 percent, extending a deep slide from $48.60 an ounce at the end of April.

The government released reports on unemployment benefits, wholesale prices and retail sales before the stock market opened. The Labor Department said applications for unemployment benefits fell last week to 434,000, after surging the previous week. Economists expected a slightly bigger drop in claims.

Retail sales rose for the tenth straight month in April, but much of the gain came from surging gasoline prices. Excluding the 2.7 percent jump in gasoline sales, retail sales rose just 0.2 percent.

Higher energy costs also pushed wholesale prices up 0.8 percent in April. That marked the seventh month in a row that companies had to pay more for raw materials.

Cisco Systems fell 5 percent in early trading, the largest drop among companies in the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index. The company said earnings slid 18 percent and lowered its earnings forecast. It plans to eliminate jobs to cut costs.

The Dow Jones industrial average was down 69.93 points, or 0.6 percent, to 12,560.10. The S. P. 500 was down 7.62 points, or 0.6 percent, to 1,334.46, and the Nasdaq composite index fell 13.83 points, or 0.5 percent, to 2,831.23.

Major indexes in Europe and Asia were also lower. The CAC 40 in France was down 1.2 percent.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=53ad67fd4f6253062214a3308ea3c85a

Off the Charts: A Recovery Less Robust Than in the ’70s

But by most other measures, the current recovery is far weaker.

Those two downturns were the longest since the Great Depression. The country’s economy took two years to regain its former size in the 1970s, and three years in the recent recession. In each case the stock market lost about half its value and then began a powerful rally a few months before the recession officially ended.

Just 26 months after the market hit its low in early 2009, the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index had doubled, by the end of April. By contrast, the market took more than five years to double after it began to advance in late 1974.

Similarly, the manufacturing economy has rebounded sharply. Industrial production and durable goods orders have risen much more rapidly than they did in the earlier period.

Still, the overall economy, as measured by gross domestic product, rose less than 5 percent in the two years after the market hit bottom, compared with a gain of almost 7 percent during the comparable period in the 1970s.

Personal income, adjusted for inflation and excluding government transfer payments, is up less than half as much as it was in the earlier period. And while private sector employers added jobs at the fastest pace in five years over the last three months, there are still fewer jobs than there were when the stock market bottomed, according to Friday’s employment report for April

One major reason for the slow recovery is that the construction industry continues to suffer. The financial crisis was caused in part by easy credit policies that caused overbuilding, and that led a deep and continuing fall in construction spending. The Census Bureau reported this week that spending ticked up in March, but that may have simply reflected an improvement in weather. The February figure had been the lowest for any month since 1999.

Those trends are shown in the accompanying charts, which show the changes for each measure from the time the stock market hit its low point.

The stock market recovery in many ways has been a mirror image of the fall from the market peak reached in the fall of 2007. Nearly every stock went down when the market was sliding, and nearly every stock has gone up during the rebound.

Of the 100 major stocks in the Standard Poor’s 100-stock index, 90 are up by at least a third since the market low. Financial stocks led the way down, and have led the way back up as well, although most are well below where they were when the crisis began.

Floyd Norris comments on finance and the economy on his blog at nytimes.com/norris.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=e932a204be07e1436f09d79b7c221d20

Interest Rates in India Raised to Slow Inflation

MUMBAI — In a bid to rein in persistently high inflation, India’s central bank raised interest rates on Tuesday more than analysts had expected and signaled that it would be willing to raise borrowing costs even further.

The action, which caused the country’s stock market to close 2.4 percent lower, will make it harder for India to achieve the 9 percent growth target set by the government for the current financial year, which ends in March 2012.

The central bank, the Reserve Bank of India, acknowledged that concern but said it had to act to make sure the economy did not suffer long-term damage from rising prices; the central bank said it expected the economy to grow 8 percent, down from 8.6 percent in the previous year.

That slower growth will make it harder for India, the second-fastest-growing major economy in the world, behind China, to pull hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. And it will most likely worsen the Indian government’s already large fiscal deficit.

India has been struggling to control rising prices, especially for food and energy. But in recent months, the cost of other goods has also jumped, raising concern that the Indian economy is overheating.

In March, the country’s benchmark wholesale price index jumped 9 percent and a consumer price index for industrial workers was up 8.8 percent.

On Tuesday, the bank raised its repo rate at which it lends money to banks half of a percentage point, to 7.25 percent. Most analysts had expected an increase of a quarter of a point, which would have been in keeping with the modest increases the central bank has been making in the last year.

The central bank also raised rates on bank savings accounts by one-half point, to 4 percent.

Including the most recent increase, the central bank has raised the repo rate 4 percentage points in the last 12 months. The governor of the central bank, Duvvuri Subbarao, said the bank was willing to risk slowing the economy in the short run to prevent inflation from damaging the longer-term prospects for growth.

“Current elevated rates of inflation pose significant risks to future growth,” Mr. Subbarao said in a statement. “Bringing them down, therefore, even at the cost of some growth in the short run, should take precedence.”

Even before this most recent rate increase, India’s economy had been slowing because of a drop in private investment. Now, analysts say they expect growth to slow faster, even as inflation remains high.

“In the near term, it’s going to be a difficult adjustment for the economy,” said Sonal Varma, an economist at Nomura Securities in Mumbai. “That is the sacrifice that the R.B.I. is making.”

The central bank’s more aggressive stance on inflation will most likely increase pressure on the government to embrace structural policy changes and increase investment in infrastructure.

For instance, Indian officials have long discussed changes to improve productivity and reduce waste in its agricultural sector, where more than half of its people work.

But the government has been reluctant to adopt many of those changes because they are politically unpalatable.

“There are a whole gamut of administrative measures that are needed to bring down structural inefficiencies in the system to bring down inflation,” said Samiran Chakraborty, head of research at Standard Chartered Bank in Mumbai. “As long as those measures are not taken, monetary policy has to do double duty.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=bff8c2c2f9f1c998f410b0a7c2bfe06b

Strategies: The Wall of Worry Has Never Looked So High

Richard Bernstein, who was chief investment strategist for Merrill Lynch until April 2009, says he’s never seen anything quite like it. “This cycle is the biggest wall of worry I have ever seen or will ever see in my entire career,” he said last week, in the offices of the investment advisory firm he now runs in Manhattan.

The stock market’s 80 percent rise since March 2009 has been one of the greatest bull runs in history, he says, and while the American economy has its problems, it is clearly strengthening and corporate profits are rising. Yet anxiety about the American market is profound, he says, and many investors have been avoiding American stocks, pouring money into emerging market stocks and bonds instead. That makes no sense to Mr. Bernstein, a longtime bear who turned resolutely bullish in July 2009.

“It seems no one wants to believe in the stock market in the United States,” he said. “People don’t accept that the American economy may actually be strengthening. And they go for emerging markets, which are wildly overpriced. What in the world is going on here?”

Even now, he says, many American investors are disillusioned. There has been too much pain from the financial crisis, a severe bear market and lingering recession. Traders are unusually skittish, and, as I wrote recently, markets globally have become increasingly synchronized and volatile, with “risk on, risk off” trades overwhelming all other approaches.

Investors are certainly nervous. But is this a very steep wall of worry — a classic barrier that will be surmounted as the bull market continues? Or is it something else — a vast universe of pain that will only get worse as a bear market takes hold? David A. Rosenberg, formerly chief economist at Merrill Lynch, takes the bleaker view.

Now based in Toronto with Gluskin, Sheff, he agrees that equities in many emerging markets are overpriced. Still ferociously bearish, Mr. Rosenberg parts with his erstwhile colleague in much of the rest of his analysis. “I have great respect for Rich Bernstein, and I tip my hat to him for making that early bullish call,” Mr. Rosenberg said. “But I think that people who are still bullish right now will be in for a very big surprise.”

In a telephone conversation on Wednesday evening, Mr. Rosenberg said that the boom in the American stock market was largely caused by the “radically” expansionary monetary policy of the Federal Reserve. The Fed’s current program of “quantitative easing” — its second bout of purchases of Treasuries and other securities, known as QE2 — is scheduled to end in June.

“There’s no political support” for an extension, he said, but if the Fed ends its asset purchases, “it will be a very big deal — a bad one — for the equity markets.” Furthermore, budget cutting at the state and local level is sucking air out of the economy, and that’s likely to be accompanied by federal budget cuts, he said, with Republicans in Congress vying with President Obama to reverse the explosive growth in government debt over the last several years.

Mr. Rosenberg ticks off other “pernicious headwinds,” including geopolitical risk in the Middle East and North Africa, “acute risk of sovereign debt default” in Europe, surging oil and food prices, the battered housing market and a very tepid economic recovery “that has needed to be propped up by the Fed. “

While Mr. Rosenberg’s relentless bearishness is a minority view, many economists and strategists on Wall Street agree with aspects of it. A survey by Blue Chip Economic Indicators issued on April 10 found that economists on average had downgraded their estimates for real G.D.P. growth in the United States in 2011 to 2.9 percent, down from 3.1 percent only one month earlier. At the moment, they project growth of 3.2 percent for 2012. These are low numbers for an economy rebounding from a recession.

On the other hand, the consensus among Wall Street strategists is bullish: the Standard Poor’s 500-stock index will approach 1,500 within 12 months, according to a Bloomberg News analysis of price estimates for the index’s underlying components. That would be about a 14 percent increase over its current level.

Corporate profits are buttressing these projections. The earnings season for the first quarter began last week, and Michael Thompson, an S. P. managing director, says it will probably be the sixth consecutive quarter of double-digit earnings growth for S. P. 500 companies. Wall Street analysts expect a 12.2 percent increase over the same quarter in 2010, according to S. P.’s Capital IQ unit. Mr. Thompson said he was “guardedly optimistic,” despite rising energy prices.

The richer price of oil over the last several months — it has declined a bit since April 8 — has actually had a positive effect on corporate earnings so far, said Kevin Gardiner, head of global investment strategy for Barclays Wealth. That’s because energy companies, which have profited from the increase, account for a large share of major stock market indexes, while heavy users of energy are relatively small components.

Of course, if energy prices were to seriously crimp consumer spending — and derail the economic recovery — the implications would be very serious, Mr. Thompson said, but that isn’t happening so far. In fact, he said, “consumer spending is actually very strong.” Despite high unemployment in the United States, consumer discretionary companies are doing quite well, suggesting that spending by individuals is helping to propel a “self-sustaining” recovery, he said.

FOR his part, Mr. Bernstein readily concedes that on an “absolute” basis, the picture is hardly perfect, but he says the critical question for the markets is whether the trend is positive or negative. He’s convinced that prospects for American companies are quite bright, and expects that investors will grudgingly climb that wall of worry, moving the markets higher. He advises embracing risk in the American market in a big way. For a global mutual fund he runs for Eaton Vance, he is placing large bets on small-cap growth stocks in the United States.

“They’ll give you the best return when the market is going up,” he said. “And I think it’s going to go up.”  

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9c31cdcf9fc646c6d43828e6cfe7d8ec

DealBook: NYSE Euronext Rejects Bid by Nasdaq and ICE

A trader on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.Andrew Gombert/European Pressphoto Agency A trader on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

2:50 p.m. | Updated

The board of NYSE Euronext announced on Sunday that it would reject an unsolicited takeover bid by its rival, the Nasdaq OMX Group, and the IntercontinentalExchange, and stick with its agreement to merge with Deutsche Börse.

The long-expected decision is likely to set off a potential battle over the Big Board operator, as the two bidding groups try to convince NYSE Euronext shareholders of the merits of their respective offers.

Under the proposal by Nasdaq and ICE, announced more than a week ago, the two would split up NYSE Euronext into its two main businesses. Nasdaq would take over the New York Stock Exchange, creating the single biggest stock market in the United States, while ICE would buy NYSE Euronext’s derivatives operations.

Nasdaq and ICE’s cash-and-stock bid for NYSE Euronext is currently worth about $43.13 a share at Friday’s closing prices, or $11.3 billion. Deutsche Börse’s all-stock offer is worth about $36.98 a share, or $9.7 billion.

But in a statement on Sunday, NYSE Euronext’s board outlined several concerns about the Nasdaq offer. Chief among these is the possibility that the Nasdaq bid might not survive review by antitrust regulators.

Nasdaq and ICE expect about $740 million in cost savings three years after the deal closes, a figure driven by cutting jobs and eliminating duplicate back-end systems. Some lawmakers, like Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York, have mentioned the potential job losses in New York City as a hurdle to winning approval.

In its statement, NYSE Euronext also professed concern about the amount of debt Nasdaq would borrow to finance its offer.

NYSE Euronext’s chairman, Jan-Michiel Hessels, instead highlighted the benefits of the company’s existing agreement to merge with Deutsche Börse, which would create a trans-Atlantic powerhouse in stock, options and derivatives trading.

“With Deutsche Börse, we are committed to creating the world’s premier exchange group — a geographically diverse business, with strengths in multiple asset classes across the spectrum of capital markets services,” Mr. Hessels said in a statement.

Representatives for Nasdaq and ICE were not immediately available for comment.

Deutsche Börse said in a statement that it and NYSE Euronext had already made “significant progress on integration planning.”

The proposed merger of NYSE Euronext and Deutsche Börse has been two years in the making, aimed at improving profit by increasing scale. Both the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have lost some ground to upstart electronic markets like BATS and Direct Edge.

Several exchange operators have already proposed mergers that would create new international operators in recent months. But several of those proposals have run into political interference, as national regulators fear diminishing their countries’ standings as global financial capitals.

Last week, Australia formally rejected the Australian Securities Exchange’s plan to merge with the Singapore Exchange, saying the deal “would not be in the national interest” in its current form. And Canadian lawmakers are closely scrutinizing the Toronto Stock Exchange’s proposed merger with the London Stock Exchange.

Nasdaq’s offer is being pitched as creating a new national champion, one based in New York and able to draw new stock listings that might otherwise head to foreign markets.

Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext plan to keep dual headquarters in Frankfurt and New York. Reto Francioni of Deutsche Börse would become chairman of the combined company, while Duncan Niederauer of NYSE Euronext would become its chief executive. Deutsche Börse shareholders would own 60 percent of the merged company, though both exchange operators have argued that the deal is a “merger of equals.”

Nasdaq has said that the combined company would be called Nasdaq NYSE Euronext, a move aimed at alleviating concerns among those like Mr. Schumer, who has insisted on retaining the NYSE name as part of any deal. Deutsche Börse and NYSE Euronext have yet to agree upon a name for their merged operations.

NYSE Euronext is being advised by Perella Weinberg Partners, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Its legal advisers are Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen Katz; Stibbe; and Milbank, Tweed, Hadley McCloy.

Deutsche Börse is being advised by Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan and the law firm Linklaters.

Nasdaq is being advised by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Evercore Partners and the law firm Shearman Sterling. ICE is being advised by Lazard, Broadhaven Capital Partners, BMO Capital Markets and the law firm Sullivan Cromwell.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=ecdbd269c14d9aef0080c834d9d09a0c