April 24, 2024

Inside Asia: Sea Change in Hiring for India Outsourcers

MUMBAI — Indian information technology outsourcers are relying more on experienced workers, while trimming down on the hordes of entry-level computer coders they normally hire as they try to squeeze more profits out of their staffs.

The shift by Infosys and others is symptomatic of a maturing industry that wants more revenue from its own intellectual property instead of providing only labor-intensive, low-margin information technology and back-office services.

For young graduates who see the $108 billion I.T. industry as a sure pathway to modern India’s growing middle class, the transformation is unsettling.

Dozens of industry aspirants who were recruited by one of the smaller players, HCL Technologies, recently protested outside its offices in several cities. They were offered jobs in 2011, before graduating last year but have not yet been given start dates, much less paychecks.

HCL’s profit and revenue rose in the fourth quarter of 2012, while staff numbers shrank — a rare trick in an industry that has long aspired to break the linear relationship between head count and revenue growth.

Just 20 percent of the 5,000 to 6,000 campus recruits offered jobs by HCL in 2011 have been actually hired since graduation last summer, and HCL said it had made no offers in 2012 to students who would graduate in June this year.

Slower growth, fewer people leaving, greater demand by customers for experienced staff and increased productivity through automation and software have put pressure on all recruits, according to HCL, although it said it expected to accelerate hiring of entry-level staff beginning next August.

“It’s not that the demand doesn’t exist; it exists for different skills,” said Ajay Davessar, an HCL spokesman. “Typical roles, which a student thinks, ‘I’ll just go there and start coding, and have a good life,’ are being tested to reality.”

Tech Mahindra, another outsourcing company, is naming 100 managers to be what it calls mini-C.E.O.’s, who will be given broad latitude to run their parts of the business.

“We’re moving towards a situation like the developed economies, where we’re asking the people to be more deep,” said Sujitha Karnad, who heads human resources at Tech Mahindra. “We want more solution architects to be here.”

While plenty of Indian back-office work — like technical support, processing insurance claims and staffing call centers — will remain labor-intensive, software service companies are looking to move up the value chain, which means raising the productivity of staff members.

Growth in revenue per employee across the industry could expand to 5 percent a year in the next two years from about 3 percent over the past five, said Frederic Giron, principal analyst at Forrester Research. The growth rate is likely to accelerate starting in 2015, as work based on intellectual property accounts for a growing share of the total, he said.

The information technology service industry developed in India in large part because of the availability of inexpensive skilled labor, an advantage that is eroding as wages and other costs rise in the country. In years past, it was cost-effective for I.T. companies to hire new graduates by the thousands and keep a portion idle, awaiting deployment on a client project.

But budget-constrained clients now demand shorter lead times. I.T. vendors that might have hired people six months in advance of an expected contract are now working with a one- or two-month window, said Surabhi Mathur Gandhi, senior vice president at TeamLease, a consulting firm for staffing.

Traditionally, about 30 percent of Indian I.T. workers are idle, or “on the bench,” at any time, often in training, as they await deployment. In the quarter that ended in December, about 70 percent of Infosys staff members were deployed on billable projects; the figure was less than 65 percent at Wipro.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/business/global/sea-change-in-hiring-for-india-outsourcers.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Economix Blog: Job Insecurity Remains High

For the last couple of years, the problem plaguing the job market was that companies have been in a holding pattern: Companies weren’t laying off workers in high numbers. But if you were already laid off, finding a company willing to expand was impossible.

CATHERINE RAMPELL

CATHERINE RAMPELL

Dollars to doughnuts.

Even so, workers still employed remain anxious about their job security, according to new survey data from Gallup.

A USA Today/Gallup Poll conducted in mid-August, based on a survey of 489 adults employed full or part time, found that 30 percent said they were worried about being laid off, similar to the 31 percent who answered this way in August 2009.

DESCRIPTION


The survey also found that workers were concerned that their hours, wages and benefits would be cut back. Benefit cuts were the most common worry, with 44 percent of workers surveyed saying they thought benefits might be on the chopping block.

Lower-income workers were especially likely to be concerned about their job security:

DESCRIPTION

As you can see, workers in households earning less than $50,000 annually were about twice as likely as their counterparts in households making at least $75,000 to be concerned about layoffs, shorter workweeks and off-shoring.

Maybe the anxiety is unfounded, and companies are not planning layoffs at any increased pace. But such worries can become self-fulfilling if workers start cutting back in preparation for potential job losses. If they cut back their spending, companies don’t sell as much and then starting paring down their own staffs.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=89cbc6e17f2f6d26c2618fa6e0577c02

Payrolls Increased in 31 States in July

Employers in New York increased their staffs by 29,400 workers, while those in Texas added 29,300, figures from the Labor Department showed Friday. Joblessness increased by 0.4 percentage point in Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota and South Carolina. Nevada continued to lead the nation in unemployment with a rate of 12.9 percent.

Widespread job growth is needed to shore up incomes after spending among consumers ground to a halt in the second quarter. That raised concern that the world’s largest economy was stalling. A Labor Department report on Aug. 5 showed employers added 117,000 workers to payrolls last month and the jobless rate fell to 9.1 percent.

“The overall labor market was doing better than previous months, but the bigger point is that it’s a lot weaker than earlier in the year,” Paul Dales, senior United States economist at Capital Economics in Toronto, said before the report. “That’s a concern given that any data from July won’t reflect the market turmoil in the last couple of weeks that really could have prompted some businesses to postpone or cancel any hiring plans.”

After Nevada, the jobless rate was highest in California at 12 percent, and Michigan and South Carolina, both at 10.9 percent.

Payrolls in Michigan rose 23,000 and Tennessee gained by 14,300. They rounded out the top four states showing the biggest increase.

The biggest job losses last month occurred in Illinois, where employers cut payrolls by 24,900, and in Florida, which had a 22,100 decrease.

Over the last 12 months, six states lost jobs, including Indiana, Nevada, Kansas, Alabama, Georgia and Delaware.

The jobless rate in North Dakota, the lowest in the United States, increased to 3.3 percent from 3.2 percent in June.

While payroll growth picked up in July, employment prospects for Americans have dimmed compared with earlier in the year. Employers added 216,000 workers from May to July, compared with 646,000 in the previous three-month period.

The risk of a recession has risen to 30 percent from 14 percent in July, according to the median of the 39 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. A sell-off in stocks, government fiscal austerity and a lack of jobs will hurt American growth, which slowed to a 0.9 percent pace in the first half of 2011, the economists said.

State and local employment data are derived independently from the national statistics, which are typically released on the first Friday of every month. The state figures are subject to larger sampling errors because they come from smaller surveys, making the national figures more reliable, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=4c48bfacc2747cbfbc89e9fd0f8a9b28

Public Workers Strike in Britain Over Pensions

Many schools were operating with skeleton staffs; some were shut altogether. Lectures and classes were canceled at an estimated 75 universities. Numerous government services were affected, including ports and airports, where up to 14,000 staff members of the agency that handles immigration and customs matters were due to walk out.

Other agencies, like the court system, social security benefits offices and unemployment centers had contingency plans to keep going, but might have to offer reduced service with managers taking the jobs of union workers, the government said.

The unions estimated that as many as 750,000 people would join the walkout.

The strike is the latest development in an increasingly bitter dispute between the affected unions — including the National Union of Teachers, the Public and Commercial Services Union, and the University and College Union — and the Conservative-led coalition government.

The government, whose austerity budget is beginning to take affect around the country, says that the current pension system is unsustainable and unaffordable. It has raised the working age and is now proposing that workers should pay a larger proportion of their salaries into their pension plans each month. The government has also proposed recalculating pensions so that they will be based not on a worker’s final salary, but on a “career average” salary, taking into account the worker’s entire working life.

Most workers can currently begin receiving their pensions at 60. One of the proposals being considered would see the age rise to 66 by 2020.

Brendan Barber, general secretary of Trades Union Congress, which represents many of Britain’s unions, said that the strikes were being held in large part by the deep public sector cuts already imposed by the government.

“Nobody wants to see our schools and job centers closed,” he told reporters. “But our resolve is strong, our determination is absolute and we will see this through until we reach a just and fair settlement.”

Francis Maude, the government minister in charge of pension policy, said since talks between the government and the unions were still going on, it was unacceptable for the teachers in particular to go on strike.

“It’s absolutely unjustifiable for parents up and down the country to be inconvenienced like this, forced to lose a day’s work, when they’re trying to go out to work to earn money to pay the taxes which are going to support teachers’ pensions,” he told the BBC.

Dave Prentis, leader of Unison, which has 1.3 million members and is Britain’s largest public-sector union, said that he had not yet balloted his members about going on strike. But he warned the government that that could change if they continued to be “treated with disdain.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=eedcf3d6b41bd97740e3e8bacad48904