April 27, 2024

Inflation Cooling Off in China

HONG KONG — Inflation and industrial activity in China cooled markedly in November, according to data released Friday — an important development that raises the likelihood that the authorities in Beijing will seek to inject more momentum into an economy that has become a key engine of global growth.

Consumer price inflation, which had topped 6 percent earlier in the year, sagged to just 4.2 percent in November, the Chinese statistics office reported. The increase was less than analysts had expected and marked a significant improvement from the 5.5 percent reading recorded the previous month.

At the same time, industrial output data, also released on Friday, showed that activity in November expanded just 12.4 percent from a year earlier. That reading was weaker than the 13.2 percent annual increase recorded in October, and highlighted a development that has become apparent in recent months: economic growth, which was red hot in 2010 and early 2011, has moderated significantly this year.

The positive news is that tighter bank lending, higher interest rates, curbs on property speculation and slowing export growth have also helped to ease inflation, which soared well above Beijing’s comfort level over the summer.

Better-than-expected harvests also have helped bring down food price inflation, which is a particularly sensitive issue in a country where many millions still struggle to make ends meet.

Although it may still be too early for China to claim complete victory over inflation, the sharp drop in inflation “does free up some wiggle room for monetary easing,” Xianfang Ren and Alistair Thornton, economists at IHS Global Insight in Beijing, wrote in a note Friday.

The Chinese authorities’ focus has increasingly shifted from fighting inflation to bolstering growth, especially as Europe, a key destination for Chinese-made goods, is mired in a debt crisis that has badly undermined growth prospects there.

The central bank in South Korea on Friday underscored the effect that a slowdown in the West will have across Asia when it lowered its 2012 growth forecast for South Korea to 3.7 percent, from an earlier projection of 4.6 percent.

And in Japan, revised gross domestic product data showed that the economy grew by less than initially expected during the past quarter: 5.6 percent annual growth from a previous estimate of 6 percent, and 1.4 percent quarterly growth from the previous estimate of 1.5 percent.

The worsening environment has already prompted several rate cuts in the Asia-Pacific region as policy makers race to shore up their economies.

The first significant policy response by Beijing came last week, when the central bank loosened the reins on bank lending by lowering the so-called reserve requirement ratio. Lower reserve requirements effectively free up more lending by banks.

The inflation data on Friday suggested that there will be another cut in the reserve requirement ratio in December, economists at ANZ in Hong Kong said in a note. “We also expect two more such cuts in the first half of 2012,” they said.

The government also “has considerable scope to support domestic demand by boosting income growth and by reducing the tax burden for both companies and individuals,” Jing Ulrich, chairwoman of global markets at JPMorgan Chase, wrote in a note on Friday.

Unlike in 2008 and 2009, when the Beijing introduced a 4 trillion renminbi, or $629 billion, stimulus package, the government’s response this time is likely to be “nuanced,” Ms. Ulrich said.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b9b1b2823aa8627f1941771d8be12113

Maids Test Residency Rules in Hong Kong

Tens of thousands of domestic workers fan across places like Victoria Park on Hong Kong Island, huddling together eating, singing, dancing, reading or playing cards. Sunday offers an escape from long days of housekeeping and child care, which often start at dawn and stretch well into the evening.

Some are young and newly arrived, but many have lived here for years, some even decades. Those long-term domestic workers are the focus of a court case that has prompted news conferences, marches and daily coverage in the local media, and has fueled an emotional debate about what it means to be a Hong Kong resident.

Starting Monday, a court will hear arguments from lawyers representing Evangeline Banao Vallejos, a woman from the Philippines who has lived in Hong Kong since 1986 and has worked for the same household for more than 24 years. It is time, her lawyers argue, that she be granted permanent residency.

Many foreigners can apply for that status once they have lived in Hong Kong for seven years. But domestic workers — who number 292,000 in a territory of seven million, according to a government estimate, and who come primarily from Indonesia and the Philippines, making up the bulk of Hong Kong’s non-Chinese population — are specifically excluded.

Observers say a ruling for Ms. Vallejos would be a landmark not just for Hong Kong, but for the region. “In many Asian countries, domestic workers are not even given a day off in a week,” said Nilim Baruah, a chief technical adviser with the International Labor Organization in Bangkok.

The case has fueled spirited debate in Hong Kong. Some decry what they see as discrimination against foreign-born maids; other say that giving them permanent status could have serious economic consequences. The case has also raised questions about the sensitive issue of Hong Kong’s legal independence from Beijing and the “one country, two systems” model that has been in place since Great Britain returned the territory to China in 1997.

“Everyone knows that this is a legal issue, but it is spilling into the political arena,” said Kylie Uebergang, an executive of Civic Exchange, a nonpartisan public policy research group based in Hong Kong.

Neither the Hong Kong nor the Philippine government, citing the sensitive nature of the case, would comment on the legal issues. But in a nod to how polarizing the issue has become, the Hong Kong justice secretary, Wong Yan-lung, asked the public last week to respect whatever ruling the court issues.

Ms. Vallejos’s supporters say that denying permanent residency to domestic helpers violates Hong Kong’s Basic Law, the mini-constitution that took effect with the 1997 handover, and which spells out the seven-year requirement. Permanent residents have the right to vote and greater access to public services like health care, and may bring spouses, dependent children and, in some cases, parents into Hong Kong.

Opponents of Ms. Vallejos’s cause — notably, political parties and trade organizations affiliated with the government — point out that other groups, like diplomats and contract workers brought in for specific assignments, are also ineligible for permanent residency.

A pro-Beijing political party, the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, has estimated that as many as 125,000 foreign domestic helpers could be eligible to apply for permanent residency now, if the law were changed.

Based on that estimate, and assuming that all eligible domestics would gain permanent status and bring family members to Hong Kong, the party estimated that as many as 500,000 people could move into the territory, a scenario that could worsen unemployment and put new strains on social welfare services and an already tight housing market.

“We cannot afford a sudden influx of 300,000 new residents,” said Joseph Law, chairman of the Hong Kong Employers of Overseas Domestic Helpers Association, offering another estimate. “The public services cannot afford this. We don’t have enough housing for the people already here in Hong Kong.”

Fally Choi, program coordinator for the Asia Monitor Resource Center, a rights group supporting Ms. Vallejos’s appeal, calls such claims “nonscientific and irresponsible,” saying, “This is purely racial discrimination and class discrimination. Other foreign workers are allowed to apply for permanent residency.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/22/world/asia/22iht-maids22.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Lactalis Bids $4.95 Billion for Rest of Parmalat

Lactalis of France, one of the world’s biggest cheesemakers, said on Tuesday that it was bidding 3.4 billion euros, or $4.95 billion, for the rest of Parmalat of Italy that it does not already own — a deal that would create the largest dairy company in the world.

The Lactalis bid comes on the same day President Nicolas Sarkozy of France is arriving in Rome to discuss, among other things, the sensitive issue of French companies acquiring a number of their Italian peers.

“We have an ambitious growth plan for Parlamat, creating a benchmark Italian dairy group on a global level, which would keep its headquarters, organization and management in Italy,” said Emmanuel Besnier, head of the Lactalis Group.

Lactalis is offering 2.60 euros for each Parmalat share for the 71 percent of the company it does not already own. That is 12.45 percent above Parmalat’s closing price on Monday and 21.3 percent above its average share price in the last year.

The French company, which became Parmalat’s largest shareholder last month, has moved quickly to make a bid for the full company in the face of political opposition, citing a “change in the regulatory framework” tied to its investment.

Earlier this month, an Italian court decided to allow Parmalat to postpone its annual shareholder meeting until the end of June. The move would give the Italian government time to create new rules that could protect Italian companies from foreign takeovers.

“Milk is not a strategic product,” said Michel Nalet, a spokesman for Lactalis, citing the General Mills deal last month to buy half of the French yogurt maker Yoplait for $1.1 billion. Lactalis had originally bid for Yoplait, but was rebuffed.

Such cross-border deals have ruffled political feathers. When Pepsi was reported to be weighing a bid for the French yogurt maker Danone in 2005, the French prime minister at the time, Dominique de Villepin, said he would “defend the interests of France.” In the end, no bid was made.

In 2006, Lactalis bought another Italian dairy producer, the cheesemaker Galbani, from the private equity firm BC Partners, in a deal thought to be worth more than 1 billion euros.

“Galbani stayed Italian, and it’s now the second most important cheese in the group,” Mr. Nalet said. “We have the same strategy for Parmalat.”

Lactalis went further to reassure Italian authorities, saying that after the takeover it intended to relist Parmalat on the bourse in Milan, maintaining the necessary minimal free float.

In Rome, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi told reporters, “I do not consider the takeover bid a hostile takeover bid,” according to Reuters.

Parmalat shares rose 27 euro cents, or 11.7 percent, to 2.58 euros on the exchange in midmorning trading on Tuesday.

Parmalat gained notoriety in December 2003, when it disclosed that a bank account that supposedly held some $5 billion did not exist. The company soon toppled into bankruptcy. In December, Parmalat’s founder and former chief executive, Calisto Tanzi, was sentenced to 18 years in prison for his role in the collapse.

When it collapsed, Parmalat had 36,000 employees and was one of the top 10 companies in Italy — it also had 14 billion euros worth of debt. It emerged from bankruptcy in October 2005, the same month it went public, and now has about 14,000 employees.

The company reported 4.3 billion euros in revenue last year.

This month, four major investment banks were cleared by an Italian judge of charges that they had abetted Parmalat in concealing its debt and overstating its profit. Bank of America, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank and their employees were cleared, though the case may be appealed.

On Tuesday, Lactalis said Crédit Agricole, HSBC, Natixis and Société Générale had agreed to finance the deal.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=2fcd6daea755d183e81e01dc48e97015