April 19, 2024

On the Road: There’s Big Revenue In Those Little Fees

Even so, I almost decided to drive on Sunday, rather than fly, to attend the annual Global Business Travel Association convention, which began that day. But Southwest Airlines had a convenient nonstop, a little over an hour’s flying time (though, of course, it’s over four hours total from home to airport and airport to hotel). So flying made sense.

Why was flying rather than driving even a close call? Well, like a lot of business travelers I routinely hear from, I’ve become so annoyed with airlines and airports that taking the car is increasingly an option, even on trips up to 500 miles or so.

The airlines are adding to that incentive, by the way, with an aggressive new emphasis on blocking out large numbers of seats in coach cabins that are available for the basic fare. That is, when you try to book a flight at the posted fare, you routinely find that only the least desirable seats — like a middle seat in a row at the rear of the plane — are actually available for that price. Most of the rest are available only if you pay extra.

On July 20, for example, I flew on United Airlines from Phoenix to Tampa, Fla. When I booked that ticket, almost a month in advance, only a few seats were available without extra charge — all middle seats in the back of the plane.

United’s booking site informed me that all of the other “complimentary assignment” seats — that is, seats available without having to pay extra — were taken. The better seats were available for fees that ranged from $37 to $91 on the different legs of the round-trip flight.

Did I pay extra to avoid being wedged into a middle seat back by the toilets? Yes, I did, and as such I am an example of just the kind of traveler the airlines are banking on to increase one segment of their growing ancillary-fee revenue, the pot of gold that is the industry’s big cushion for continued profitability.

A very rough estimate of the size of that revenue can be made from data compiled by the Transportation Department, which show that airlines collected $6 billion in fees for checked bags and reservation change penalties in 2012, compared with $1.3 billion in 2007.

But the figures encompass just two big categories of ancillary revenue and don’t take into account the new revenue airlines are gaining from things like the “upsell,” which is how they typically refer to initiatives like charging extra fees for all but the least desirable coach seats. Another favorite tactic is to sell priority boarding, that is, better places in line during the confounding boarding process, giving a passenger who pays up an early crack at the crowded storage space in the overhead bins.

The ancillary-revenue bonanza isn’t limited to the United States. A report last month by IdeaWorks, an airline revenue consultant, noted that “airlines all over the world have been watching this demonstration of ancillary revenue power” by carriers in the United States, and many are devising similar initiatives, especially for flights within Europe.

For airlines, the model has obvious appeal. United Airlines, for example, reported that its ancillary revenue grew 13 percent in the second quarter over the same period in 2012. The sale of coach seats designated Economy Plus was especially strong, James E. Compton, the chief revenue officer, said in an earnings call July 25. “The Economy Plus upsell continues to perform very well, growing 37 percent year over year in the second quarter,” he said.

After years of protesting that airlines make it difficult to budget for added-on fees because many involve sales to the passenger after the initial fare booking, corporate travel managers are basically just trying to keep pace with the changes in the way airlines charge for travel.

“We are long past the discussion about whether fees should exist or not,” said Michael W. McCormick, the executive director of the Global Business Travel Association. But travel managers continue to insist that suppliers provide better transparency on price. “That’s still an ongoing debate with all sectors of business travel — not just airlines,” he said.

I’m glad he makes that distinction, because hotels are also busy devising extra fees, especially convention-style hotels. For example, when I checked into the Hilton San Diego Bayfront hotel on Sunday, the desk clerk offered me a “room with a better view” for an extra $20 above the basic room.

I declined to pay up. Which explains why this is being written from the 19th floor of the Hilton Bayfront, in a room by the elevators, with a sweeping view of the industrial dock where Dole Food transfers fruit from ships onto trucks. I’m watching workers unload a big banana boat right now.

E-mail: jsharkey@nytimes.com

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/06/business/for-airlines-theres-big-revenue-in-those-little-fees.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

You’re the Boss Blog: Maybe There Is Such a Thing as Bad Publicity

Sustainable Profits

The challenges of a waste-recycling business.

In part because we are a social enterprise with a mission that most people support — keeping waste out of landfills and incinerators — TerraCycle has been blessed with a lot of good publicity. In fact, we talk about having what we call a “negative-cost” media department that in 2012 generated more than 4,500 articles around the world. That’s more than 12 articles per day! (You can see an example of this coverage here.) We call the department negative-cost because we have been able to produce marketing — books, TV shows — that earns us money while also promoting the company.

While most of this attention has been positive, ABC’s 20/20 did two segments on TerraCycle in December that some folks on our staff didn’t think were entirely positive. One was focused on holiday parties, the other on “workplace romance” — a segment inspired by a post I wrote for this blog about our somewhat liberal approach to romance at the office.

Both pieces seemed to exploit our openness to try to find something salacious or prurient to titillate viewers. The romance segment focused on sex in the office and “who is hooking up with whom,” and it rubbed a few of us the wrong way because it seemed to take our approach a bit out of context. While we were hoping to depict an environment where we neither encourage nor discourage romance, as long as it is mutual and doesn’t offend anyone, we may have come across as actively encouraging it.

The other segment was about what not to do at an office Christmas party. Here, one of our highly valued team members was mocked for demonstrating “overtone chanting,” a form of singing that is actually quite cool and very hard to do. Again, we felt our actions were taken out of context for the sake of “good TV.”

On the other hand, 20/20 is a huge TV show with seven million viewers, and from my perspective, any publicity is good publicity because it increases public awareness of what we do. Think of it this way: a commercial during either of those 20/20 pieces would have cost us hundreds of thousands of dollars, and only given us 30 seconds of exposure. This way, we got more than three minutes on ABC, twice in one month.

The reality is that our “negative cost” publicity does have a cost — it’s just measured not in dollars, but in the control of our own message that we give up because we don’t own the content. When we did a mini-series for the National Geographic Channel (“Garbage Moguls”), there was always some tension because most of the show’s producers insisted that we generate drama that, had I controlled the message completely, I would have preferred not be included. But in the end, TerraCycle made close to $100,000 in talent fees (all profit) and got more than four hours of TV time that has been replayed hundreds of times since, all over the world.

So, yes, there is such a thing as negative publicity — just ask the tobacco companies — but to get lots of attention, you sometimes have to play into what the media outlets want. Just make sure you know what you are getting yourself into. At least, that’s how I look at it.

What do you think?

emTom Szaky is the chief executive of a href=”http://terracycle.net/”TerraCycle/a, which is based in Trenton./em

Article source: http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/maybe-there-is-such-a-thing-as-bad-publicity/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: On Second Night in New Slot, a Ratings Slide for Kimmel

Not that anyone should have expected Jimmy Kimmel to stage an immediate late-night ratings coup, but on his second night in a head-to-head-to-head contest with Jay Leno and David Letterman, Mr. Kimmel fell slightly in the ratings, while both other hosts added viewers.

The strength of Mr. Leno and NBC’s “Tonight” show was underscored by his margin among total viewers. On Wednesday, Mr. Leno averaged 3.55 million viewers, up from 3.27 million the night before. That put Mr. Leno in a strong first-place position among total viewers.

Mr. Letterman also experienced an upward bounce, to 3.04 million total viewers from 2.88 million.

Mr. Kimmel, meanwhile, saw his viewer total drop off to 2.86 million viewers from 3.09 million on Tuesday night — meaning he finished third in viewers on his second night.

But in the contest among the viewers who count the most among advertisers, viewers between the ages of 18 and 49, Mr. Kimmel showed more strength. He picked up significantly from his first night, averaging 1.08 million viewers in that age group, up from 887,000 on Tuesday. That total was a virtual tie with Mr. Leno, who was just 6,000 viewers ahead in the 18-49 category.

Mr. Letterman also picked up significantly in that group, growing to 998,000 viewers in that audience segment from 683,000 on Tuesday.

Article source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/10/on-second-night-in-new-slot-a-ratings-slide-for-kimmel/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Media Decoder Blog: Reduced Role for Rooney on ‘60 Minutes’

Andy Rooney, whose folksy and often curmudgeonly essays have been a staple of “60 Minutes” for more than three decades, will end his regular weekly appearances on the program, CBS said Tuesday.

Andy Rooney will step back from his weekly appearances on “60 Minutes” this fall.John Filo/CBSAndy Rooney will step back from his weekly appearances on “60 Minutes” this fall.

Mr. Rooney, 92, has delivered 1,096 commentaries to the newsmagazine since becoming a regular contributor in 1978, according to CBS. He will formally announce his reduced role in essay No. 1,097 on Sunday night.

His essay will be “preceded by a segment in which Rooney looks back on his career in an interview with Morley Safer,” the network said in a statement.

“It’s harder for him to do it every week, but he will always have the ability to speak his mind on ‘60 Minutes’ when the urge hits him,” said Jeff Fager, the chairman of CBS News and executive producer of the show.

But people close to Mr. Rooney said it was unlikely that he would make many appearances, if any, in the future. The people, who did not want to be identified, said the plan for him to step away from the program had been in the works for some time. Because of the honored place he has occupied on the show, Mr. Rooney’s move is not being characterized in terms of a formal retirement, they said.

“There’s nobody like Andy and there never will be,” Mr. Fager’s statement said. “He’ll hate hearing this, but he’s an American original.”

Through CBS, Mr. Rooney declined to comment.

Mr. Rooney was noticeably absent when the newsmagazine started a new season on Sunday night, and he was not quoted in the announcement by CBS.

The change was first reported by TVNewser. In an interview with that Web site last year, Mr. Rooney said that he planned to work for “60 Minutes” until he “dropped dead,” and he added, “Until somebody tells me different, I’m not going to quit.”

For many viewers, Mr. Rooney’s weekly observations on the foibles of life, commerce and politics became a favorite feature of the program, which was for years the most watched on television. But even as his popularity soared, he occasionally ran afoul of some groups, including Hispanics, American Indians and gays and lesbians, because of his comments.

A war correspondent during World War II, Mr. Rooney joined the network in 1949 as a writer for a show called “Arthur Godfrey’s Talent Scouts.” In the 1960s he wrote and produced television essays for the correspondent Harry Reasoner, and when CBS established “60 Minutes” in 1968, he produced some of Mr. Reasoner’s segments for the program. Ten years later he became a regular commentator.

“60 Minutes” remains by far the most popular newsmagazine on American television. The show has weathered any number of changes over the years, including the death of the correspondent Ed Bradley in 2006. Another veteran correspondent, Mike Wallace, retired from full-time work that year.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f3d6cc1e45c41cd0b676470309f8a79d