December 21, 2024

France’s Gloomy Economic Outlook Haunts Presidential Race

Radmila Zakovic, 59, went for benefits at the local unemployment office for herself and her two sons, both jobless. She had told them that if they finished school, they would find careers. “I feel like I’ve lied to my children,” she said.

As President Nicolas Sarkozy contemplates his race for re-election, with the first round of voting 100 days away, he is confronted with an economy reeling from the euro crisis and nearly zero growth. France has just lost its AAA credit rating and must cut government spending. The unemployment rate is 9.9 percent, a 12-year high, and rising.

The loss of the treasured AAA rating, while expected, was a blow to France’s status in Europe, making it seem less like a power than a problem. The downgrade makes it harder for France to pretend to be Germany’s equal in leading the European Union, which the Franco-German partnership has traditionally dominated. That, in turn, will make it harder for France, Italy and Spain to challenge the German recipe of austerity and to press harder for more liberal, pro-growth policies from the European Central Bank.

The downgrade was also a major political blow to Mr. Sarkozy and his prospects in the coming election. Polls show the main concerns of voters are clear: the size of the French debt, the cost of living, unemployment and general economic insecurity. Mr. Sarkozy’s rivals, fairly or not, leave little doubt where to place the blame.

“It is Sarkozy’s politics that have been downgraded, not France,” said François Hollande, the Socialist candidate who leads in the polls. Mr. Sarkozy’s presidency, with higher debt and higher unemployment, has been a disaster, Mr. Hollande said, but he has provided few details about his own plans.

It is hard to see how France can quickly extricate itself from its economic morass. It is Europe’s most centralized, state-dominated economy, and is deeply invested in its opposition to what the French call the Anglo-Saxon economies of Britain and the United States, whose laissez-faire approach they blame for the 2008 financial crisis.

Yet, like Europe’s lagging Mediterranean countries, though to a lesser extent, France is having trouble competing with the larger German economy, which is more flexible, less confrontational in its relations with employees and more solidly built on industry and exports.

While Mr. Sarkozy blames France’s woes on the 2008 global financial shock, the real problem, said Nicolas Baverez, an economist and historian, “is the unsustainable economic and social model of the last three decades.” France, like other European countries, benefited from cheap credit, leading to a society in which nearly two-thirds of the economic growth depended on consumption, partly financed by social transfers. Those, in turn, were financed by public debt that has ballooned to 86 percent of the gross domestic product in 2011 from 20 percent in 1980.

The main criticism of Mr. Sarkozy is that while he promised “a rupture” with the past to modernize France’s heavily state-dominated economy — liberalizing the tax system, eliminating the 35-hour workweek, reducing bureaucracy and improving purchasing power — he has accomplished little in the face of political and union opposition, save for an important delay in the retirement age. The Socialists, if they win, are unlikely to be much braver, altering the edges of tax and social policy, but not the core.

For Mr. Sarkozy and other European leaders, the euro crisis and the heavy sovereign debts that led to it have created a kind of political prison. Normally, faced with high unemployment and stagnant growth, leaders would spend to stimulate the economy, investing in infrastructure, education and job training. Instead, pressed by the markets and his own promises to limit deficits, Mr. Sarkozy has had to cut government spending and raise taxes in an election year.

But France’s efforts to repair its figures — as with the rest of the countries in the euro zone — are “too little, too late,” said François Heisbourg of the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris.

Elvire Camus, Scott Sayare and Sophie Cohen contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/16/world/europe/frances-gloomy-economic-outlook-haunts-presidential-race.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Miller Buckfire Is Naming Harvey Golub Its Chairman

Harvey Golub in 2007.Chip East/Bloomberg NewsHarvey Golub in 2007.

One of stalwarts of the restructuring world, the boutique investment bank Miller Buckfire, plans to name Harvey Golub its chairman on Tuesday, bringing in a financial services veteran to help oversee a revamping of its operations.

The appointment of Mr. Golub, the former chief executive of American Express and a former chairman of the American International Group, comes amid major changes for the nine-year-old firm. Earlier this year, Miller Buckfire struck a partnership with Stifel Financial in a bid to gain access to the bigger firm’s financing capabilities, which could help it win new business. (Stifel has also indicated that it is interested in eventually buying Miller Buckfire outright.)

But the alliance also coincided with the retirement of Miller Buckfire’s co-founder, Henry Miller, and the departure of several senior bankers.

By naming Mr. Golub, a member of the firm’s advisory board since 2004, Miller Buckfire is hoping to install a mentor to junior bankers and bring in an experienced hand to advise on client matters. It isn’t clear yet how much time that will involve, however.

Revolving Door
View all posts

“I had developed a great affection for both Henry and Ken and a respect for the work they do,” Mr. Golub said in an interview, referring to the firm’s co-founder and chief executive, Kenneth Buckfire. “I thought it would be interesting to work with people I admire and like.”

His appointment also coincides with an expected rise in assignments for firms like Miller Buckfire, as well as rivals like Lazard, the Blackstone Group and Moelis Company. As the credit markets again begin to tighten for riskier borrowers, companies suffering from operational issues or a slowing economy will likely again need financial advice.

“I think this cycle will be characterized by an overall rise in stress, but will not result in a giant peak in defaults unless the markets close again,” Mr. Buckfire said in an interview.

Mr. Golub added that such corporate reorganizations may not involve a trip to bankruptcy court, but will still likely involve fixing a company’s capital structure.

Many executives involved in restructurings have questioned about the firm’s fate, especially after the departures of top bankers like Mr. Miller; Durc A. Savini, who went to the Peter J. Solomon Company; and Marc Puntus and Sam Greene, who joined Centerview Partners.

But Mr. Buckfire maintained that the firm had had little trouble hiring new partners.

“What you’ve seen in the cases of the people who’d left, they’d been with us their entire careers,” he said. “When you make a strategic shift, professionals can become uncomfortable.”

Beyond the appointment of Mr. Golub as chairman, Miller Buckfire is also naming William E. Mayer, a former chief executive of First Boston, to its advisory board.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=fc3e7dffb3219abd99e14f94393e11c8

DealBook: Groupon May Delay Its Plans to Go Public

Groupon headquarters in Chicago.Tim Boyle/Bloomberg NewsGroupon headquarters in Chicago.

9:14 p.m. | Updated

Groupon is considering a delay to its long-awaited initial public offering amid turmoil in the stock market.

While the online coupon giant had been hoping to go public by the end of this month, it is studying the market conditions and may push back the timing of the offering, said two people briefed on the matter who were not authorized to speak publicly about internal discussions.

Earlier this summer, Groupon was aiming for an I.P.O. at a valuation near $30 billion and had been considering a roadshow for potential investors next week. The roadshow now appears to be off the table.

The hesitation by Groupon underscores how the continued volatility in the market is rattling even those with the most reason to be confident. Groupon is one of the most anticipated offerings of the year, and offerings of social media companies, like that of LinkedIn, had appeared to be immune to the vicissitudes of the broader market. What Groupon ultimately decides to do could affect the plans of other technology darlings, like Zynga, the online gaming giant; LivingSocial, a big competitor to Groupon; and the biggest of them all, Facebook.

Groupon, however, is also wrestling with other potential issues. The company has been in discussions with the Securities and Exchange Commission over its I.P.O. prospectus. A recent memo from the company’s chief executive, Andrew Mason, may complicate that process.

The memo to employees promoted the company’s growth and strength against rivals. But the memo quickly found its way in the public sphere, raising concerns about whether the company had violated the mandatory “quiet period” that applies to companies waiting to go public.

One possible outcome is that Groupon will need to again amend its I.P.O. filing to include the memo from Mr. Mason and provide additional data to back up his assertions.

Behind the S.E.C.’s rule is an effort to clamp down on possible stock promoting. All relevant financial information about a business is meant to be included in a company’s prospectus.

Groupon would not be the first company to run afoul of quiet-period rules. Google’s co-founders, Larry Page and Sergei Brin, notoriously gave an interview to Playboy magazine conducted shortly before the search giant filed for its I.P.O. The company did not delay its offering, but was forced to amend its prospectus to include the interview.

This would not be the first time Mr. Mason’s team has tangled with regulators either. In August, the daily deal site dropped a controversial accounting metric, called “adjusted consolidated segment operating income,” or A.C.S.O.I., after pushback from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Representatives for Groupon and the S.E.C. declined to comment.

Started less than three years ago, Groupon has emerged as one of the fastest rising start-ups in the technology sector. The company’s valuation has soared in the past year, turbo-charged by increasing sales and early takeover interest from technology giants, like Google and Yahoo. It recorded $878 million in net revenue for the second quarter — a 36 percent increase from the previous quarter.

But the site, the largest of its kind, has drawn sharp criticism from retailers and analysts who question its ability to reduce its marketing expenses and sustain its growth rate. It has also confronted some setbacks abroad, most notably in China, where it is facing stiff competition from a swarm of domestic players.

In the internal memo, Mr. Mason argued that the company had been outstripping its rivals, including services from Google and Amazon. Facebook recently folded its own offering.

News of Groupon’s deliberations was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal online.

Evelyn M. Rusli contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=46d836f4c48ed56a51bdb830a7f21c59

Closed in Error on Google Places, Merchants Seek Fixes

Not in the real world, where it is thriving. Coffee Rules Lounge was listed for a few days as “permanently closed” on Google Maps. During that time, anyone searching for a latte on a smartphone, for instance, would have assumed the store was a goner.

“We’re not far from Interstate 70,” said Mr. Rule, “and I have no doubt that a lot of people running up and down that highway just skipped us.”

In recent months, plenty of perfectly healthy businesses across the country have expired — sometimes for hours, other times for weeks — though only in the online realm cataloged and curated by Google. The reason is that it is surprisingly easy to report a business as closed in Google Places, the search giant’s version of the local Yellow Pages.

On Google Places, a typical listing has the address of a business, a description provided by the owner and links to photos, reviews and Google Maps. It also has a section titled “Report a problem” and one of the problems to report is “this place is permanently closed.” If enough users click it, the business is labeled “reportedly closed” and later, pending a review by Google, “permanently closed.” Google was tight-lipped about its review methods and would not discuss them.

Google’s rivals, like Bing and Yahoo, have versions of Places — called Bing Local and Yahoo Local — and these let users report a business as closed. But neither has anything close to Google’s traffic, which means they are the scene of far less mischief.

When Google created Places it had an eminently sensible type of crowd-sourcing in mind. The site contains millions of listings, and when owners close without updating their profile, the job falls to customers to keep information current. But like any open system, this one can be abused. Search engine consultants say that “closing” a business on Google has become an increasingly common tactic among unscrupulous competitors.

“I’d say that it was in June that we started to see a big uptick in complaints about this in online forums,” said Linda Buquet of Catalyst eMarketing in San Marcos, Calif. “It might be that a number of consultants are now offering services like ‘nuke your competitor’ in Google Places. But it could just be a competitor, acting alone.”

Nobody is quite sure how prevalent these sham closings have become. In Google Forums, where users can pose questions about Google’d features, there are dozens of exasperated postings like this one, written in July: “Help! My business is listed ‘PERMANENTLY CLOSED’ on Google Maps even though it has always been open! Help!”

But this most likely represents a fraction of viable businesses that have been cyberpadlocked. Many owners, search consultants say, have no idea that they’ve been shuttered online, and many others fix the problem without asking anyone how to solve it.

A Google spokesman, Gabriel Stricker, declined to comment on whether the company kept a running tally of fraudulent closings. But he said Google was aware of the issue and was already working on changes, which will be adopted in coming days, to prevent what he called “malicious or incorrect labeling.”

“We know that accurate listings on Google Maps are an important tool for many business owners,” he wrote in an e-mail. “We take reports of spam and abuse very seriously and do our best to ensure the accuracy of a listing before updating it.”

If there is a historical antecedent to “closing” a company on Google, it is a dirty trick that was fairly common in 19th-century politics, wherein supporters of a candidate would spread rumors that his opponent was dead. This didn’t always work — Thomas Jefferson prevailed in the election of 1800, despite reports of his demise — but the Internet corollary can have terrible consequences.

“For weeks, our bookings for September have been far lower than normal and we were wondering why,” said Charlene Cowan, who owns and operates Macadamia Meadows Farm, a bed-and-breakfast in Naalehu, Hawaii, which has been tagged as “permanently closed” for weeks.  “I can’t imagine a customer is behind this — if someone doesn’t like their visit here, they’d complain on TripAdvisor. I can’t prove it, but this seems like something a competitor did.”

The owner of a closed business, and customers who know better, can click on a button marked “not true,” which appears by all “reportedly closed” and “permanently closed” listings. In some instances, owners say, a business will “open” shortly thereafter. But other owners, like Ms. Cowan, say that the button doesn’t work, or that it takes a week to have any effect. Still others say that immediately after clicking the “not true” button, their business is immediately “closed” again.

“In the last four days, I’ve hit that ‘not true’ button every six to eight hours,” said Daniel Navejas of RBI Divorce Lawyers of El Paso. “It’s getting old.”

In mid-August, a search consultant and blogger named Mike Blumenthal was so rankled by what he considered Google’s cavalier attitude to closings on Google that he committed an act of online disobedience: He “closed” Google’s offices in Mountain View, Calif. For a brief period, Google itself was “reportedly closed,” according to Places. “I did it to point out how annoying this is when it happens,” he said.

On Aug. 15, Mr. Blumenthal posted a screen shot of Google’s Places page “reportedly closed,” noting that it took just two people — him and a friend — to pull off this stunt. It seemed to get the company’s attention. At least one change to closings on Places has already been made. Since late August, a business that is newly tagged “permanently closed,” receives an alert via e-mail from Google, informing the business owner of the change.

Mr. Blumenthal describes this as a good start, but hardly enough. “The company really ought to give a heads-up when a business is tagged ‘reportedly closed,’ ” because those words alone are often enough to put off customers, he said. “Google doesn’t understand how much fear and discomfort businesses have about this. One company gets to decide if you’re open or closed in the online world.”

Although they allow users to report a business as closed, Bing Local and Yahoo Local don’t yet seem to have as many problems.

Case in point: Macadamia Meadows Farm, that bed-and-breakfast in Hawaii, is open for business, according to both Bing Local and Yahoo Local. But after weeks of e-mails and even a call or two to Mountain View, its owner, Ms. Cowan, can’t scrub the “permanently closed” label from Google Places.

“A few days ago, I put on our Places page that we’re running a special,” she said. “I just hope people read that and think ‘Well, they must actually be open.’ ”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=b2e4cee242c1710ce024f96a4b0083e8

DealBook: The Survivor Who Saw the Future for Cantor Fitzgerald

Howard W. Lutnick, chief executive of Cantor Fitzgerald. His push into electronic trading helped the firm stay in business after 658 of its workers were killed in the terrorist attacks.Michael Falco for The New York TimesHoward W. Lutnick, chief executive of Cantor Fitzgerald. His push into electronic trading helped the firm stay in business after 658 of its workers were killed in the terrorist attacks.

TEN years and a lifetime ago, Howard W. Lutnick was a prince of Wall Street. Forty years old, and already the head of a powerful financial house, he could peer down on rivals from his office on the 105th floor of One World Trade Center.

Then — you know the rest.

American Airlines Flight 11 struck Tower One. Three out of every four people who worked in New York City for Mr. Lutnick at the brokerage firm Cantor Fitzgerald died that September morning — 658 in all. Among the dead was his younger brother, Gary.

That Howard Lutnick survived was, he concedes, blind luck. Some people died because they happened to be at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. Mr. Lutnick lived because he happened to be taking his son, Kyle, to his first day of kindergarten.

And so Mr. Lutnick, who ran Cantor Fitzgerald then and, remarkably, still runs it today, became an unusual, and unusually public, 9/11 survivor: the executive who cried on national television and then quickly began making hard-nosed — some said hard-hearted — business decisions. Four days after the attack, with the nation stunned and ground zero smoldering, Mr. Lutnick cut off paychecks to the families of his employees, before anyone even knew just how many had died.

“I was disgusted,” one widow, whose husband had worked at a Cantor subsidiary, told the television anchor Connie Chung a few weeks later.

And yet, since those dark days, Mr. Lutnick has defied those who said he and Cantor were finished. He has rebuilt his firm, and then some. And many of those who criticized him at the time — notably, spouses and parents of Cantor employees who had died — now say he did the right thing.

Mr. Lutnick and his son, Kyle, on Sept. 11, 2001. They were at Kyle's school when the towers were hit.Courtesy of Howard LutnickMr. Lutnick and his son, Kyle, on Sept. 11, 2001. They were at Kyle’s school when the towers were hit.

By almost any measure, it is a remarkable turnabout. Perhaps more than any other company, Cantor came to symbolize the horrors of Sept. 11. In the number of employees who died, it has no rival. Almost one-fourth of the 2,753 people killed in New York City that morning worked for Mr. Lutnick.

Now 50, he occupies offices in a far lesser skyscraper — a smoked-glass affair in Midtown Manhattan. He sits 103 stories lower than before, on the second floor.

Perched on the credenza near his desk is a bronze sculpture of a hand — a Rodin that was recovered from the wreckage of the towers. It is a vestige of the vast collection that his mentor, Bernie Cantor, amassed over a lifetime. The finish is seared. Several fingers are missing.

The sculpture is a reminder, as if one were needed, of Mr. Lutnick’s improbable journey back.

And it is improbable. Together, Cantor Fitzgerald and BGC Partners, a company he founded after Sept. 11, now employ roughly 5,000 people. That is 2,900 more than Cantor Fitzgerald employed before the attacks. Only 74 remain from the pre-9/11 days.

Mr. Lutnick has slowly rebuilt old businesses and pushed into new ones, including, of all things, sports betting in Las Vegas.

“I believe in what I call the surfer’s theory,” he says. “You see a really, really big wave. You keep surfing, keep going forward. You just don’t look back.”

He is a tough customer. Orphaned in his teens, he bootstrapped his way to the top of the Wall Street bond business. In their heyday, Cantor brokers occupied a lucrative niche as the main middlemen in the enormous market for United States Treasury securities. Cantor Fitzgerald never had the cachet of, say, Goldman Sachs, and it was in some ways a throwback to the time when sons followed fathers and brothers onto the trading floors, when polish and an Ivy League degree mattered less than some fire in the belly.

There is no sugar-coating the fact that before, and even after, Sept. 11, Mr. Lutnick was widely disliked in the industry. A ruthless competitor even by Wall Street standards, he has made more than a few enemies over the years. In 1996, as Mr. Cantor, his mentor, lay dying, Mr. Lutnick fought with Mr. Cantor’s wife, Iris, for control of Cantor Fitzgerald. She later barred him from the funeral.

Such was Mr. Lutnick’s reputation that in the days and weeks after Sept. 11, some of his rivals actually gloated over Cantor’s devastation. They jumped at the opportunity to put an end to his firm, which pocketed many millions in commissions while enabling the great investment houses to trade bonds in relative anonymity.

“Oh, I would love to put one up their bottom,” a senior executive at ICAP, a big Cantor rival, wrote in an e-mail at the time. The e-mail surfaced after Cantor sued ICAP in London for hiring away one of its brokers after Sept. 11. A judge later ruled that ICAP had broken the rules by hiring that one employee but not others, saying Cantor’s “bullying” behavior had driven the other employees away.

All of which makes Cantor’s rebirth, and the redemption of Mr. Lutnick, all the more remarkable. “We dealt with this by quietly doing everything we said we would do,” he says of the last decade. “The only way to take care of everyone was to have a company.”

Harry Waizer, a Cantor tax lawyer, survived the attacks, though he was badly burned, and is still at the firm.Michael Falco for The New York TimesHarry Waizer, a Cantor tax lawyer, survived the attacks, though he was badly burned, and is still at the firm.

“WHAT FLOOR?!”

Mr. Lutnick was shouting into the throng pouring out of the blazing World Trade Center on Sept. 11. He had rushed to what would become known as ground zero from a classroom at the Horace Mann School, on the Upper East Side, where he had just dropped off Kyle for kindergarten.

What Mr. Lutnick wanted to know was, what floor had people been on? Sixty-seven? Seventy-nine? The highest number he heard was 91 — at least 10 flights below the Cantor offices. Then the north tower began to fall, floor by floor by floor, and Mr. Lutnick ran. He dove under a car, choking on the dirt and dust.
No one on the 101st floor, where Cantor’s headquarters began, had made it out.

Mr. Lutnick spent the next four hours picking through the stunned crowds streaming uptown. As he walked to his home on the Upper East Side, the enormity of what had happened began to sink in.

A damaged Rodin sculpture, recovered from the 9/11 ruins, now sits near Howard Lutnick's desk at Cantor Fitzgerald's new home.Michael Falco for The New York TimesA damaged Rodin sculpture, recovered from the 9/11 ruins, now sits near Howard Lutnick’s desk at Cantor Fitzgerald’s new home.

BEFORE Sept. 11, few people outside financial circles had ever heard of Cantor Fitzgerald. Next to the bigger, richer, more famous firms — the Goldmans and Merrills and Morgans of the world — Cantor might have seemed a bit player.

But behind the scenes, Cantor was and is a major force in the bond market. There is no central exchange for bonds, nothing akin to, say, the New York Stock Exchange. So, for years, financial companies turned to middlemen like Cantor, firms known as interdealer brokers, to trade bonds without tipping their hands.
In 2001, more than 70 percent of all Treasuries were traded through Cantor. Today, with the rise of other firms and other pressures, that figure has fallen to roughly 50 percent, although Mr. Lutnick has compensated by expanding into other parts of the financial markets.

Even before the terrorist attacks, he was leading Cantor Fitzgerald into an electronic future to stay competitive and profitable. In 1999, he took public Cantor’s electronic trading subsidiary, eSpeed. Some of his brokers feared that such electronic trading systems would eventually put them out of work.

In fact, Mr. Lutnick’s electronic push helped Cantor stay afloat after Sept. 11. Cantor lost almost all of its brokers — but eSpeed didn’t need brokers. Without the new trading technology, Cantor might have gone under.

“In a way, eSpeed saved them,” says Richard Repetto, an analyst at Sandler O’Neill, which itself lost 66 employees at the World Trade Center.

So many Cantor brokers were killed that Mr. Lutnick had little choice but to shut many of his trading desks. There simply weren’t enough people left to handle the work.

“The show starts on Wall Street at about 7:30 in the morning, when the curtain goes up,” Mr. Lutnick says. That meant that almost all of his brokers were at their desks when Flight 11 hit: “Everyone who made money for the firm was there.”

The numbers tell the story. On Sept. 10, 2001, Cantor employed 2,100 employees worldwide, 960 of them in New York City. On Sept. 12, only 1,422 were left, roughly half of them in London, and 302 in New York.

And so the desks for corporate bonds, mortgage securities and municipal bonds were closed. So were the offices in Paris and London. Cantor was losing a million dollars a day — and that was excluding compensation still being paid to its families.

Unable to reach Mr. Lutnick on Sept. 11, Lee Amaitis, the head of the London office and a close friend, began mapping out a plan. He helped reconfigure Cantor’s trading systems so that trades could be processed through London, rather than New York.

Mr. Lutnick and his remaining employees in New York soon decamped to a windowless computer center in Rochelle Park, N.J. Thanks to eSpeed, Cantor could clear its trades electronically. Forty-seven hours after the planes hit, as the bond market nervously reopened for business, so did Cantor.

“From survival to when we could take a breath was weeks,” Mr. Amaitis said.

For many, Mr. Lutnick would become the public face of a Wall Street besieged.

“Every person who came to work for me in New York, everyone who was at the office, every single one who was there isn’t there anymore,” he told Larry King on CNN on Sept. 19, his voice cracking. “We can’t find them. All of them. Everyone.”

Mr. Lutnick today defends his decision to stop the paychecks of employees who were dead or missing, a step that drew howls at the time. “It was just math,” he says. “We lost all our producers. There simply was no money.”

But Mr. Lutnick had already come up with another plan, one that would become one of the most expensive corporate efforts of its kind. Cantor, he promised, would give the families 25 percent of its profits over the next five years. And it would provide health insurance coverage to families for 10 years. Mr. Lutnick asked his sister Edie Lutnick, a lawyer who had been running her practice out of Cantor’s offices, to head a charity to administer the program.

Ms. Lutnick, like Howard, was also lucky to be alive: She was due in the office on Sept. 11 but went back to bed after a breakfast appointment fell through.

Mr. Lutnick’s plan was met with a wall of skepticism. Cantor, after all, was losing money. Angry families jeered that 25 percent of nothing was nothing.
Then, that October, Cantor sent out more than $45 million in bonus payments, the first of many checks to come.

“After the first checks went out, guess what happened?” Mr. Lutnick asks. “Silence. Because the checks were larger than the salaries we were paying.”

Its ranks depleted, Cantor couldn’t hire fast enough. For the first year, Mr. Lutnick estimates that he signed up 10 new people a week. By the end of 2002, the firm had roughly 750 people in New York.
Cantor is privately held and doesn’t make public all of its financial information. But based on data released by the company and payouts to families, Cantor and eSpeed made about $150 million a year, on average, in the five years after the attacks.

For all its losses and sorrows, Cantor actually had the wind at its back. ESpeed thrived in 2002 and 2003 thanks in part to the nation’s ballooning debt. As the government sold more bonds to finance its deficit, the bond market grew and Cantor had more Treasuries to trade.

Cantor also continued to rebuild, expanding its investment bank and pushing into new areas like gambling technology.

In 2004, Cantor was essentially running two very different business. It had a stock and bond trading desk and was expanding into investment banking. And it had the broker-driven bond trading operation. This unit had recovered from Sept. 11 but needed a huge capital commitment to move forward.

Mr. Lutnick and Mr. Amaitis decided to create a new company, BGC Partners, to house the brokers. Cantor would retain the trading desks that handled big stock trades and the investment-banking division.

They gave each company its own management team. The move enabled BGC to raise the money it needed.

To do all of this, Cantor for the first time went into debt, borrowing almost $400 million to expand BGC. Over the next few years, Mr. Amaitis embarked on a dizzying shopping spree, buying a string of interdealer brokers. In 2005 alone, BGC added 1,000 brokers. Then, in April 2008, Cantor merged BGC with eSpeed. The deal, valued at $1.3 billion, paired eSpeed’s trading technology with BGC’s brokers.

Today, Cantor and Mr. Lutnick, BGC’s chairman and C.E.O., are among its biggest shareholders. The new company took the BGC name.

HARRY WAIZER is a rarity at Cantor. He is a Sept. 11 survivor — one of the 74 people who worked for Cantor before the attacks and still work there today.

A tax lawyer, Mr. Waizer was in an elevator on his way to Cantor’s offices when the plane hit. Flames engulfed him. Badly burned, he stumbled out on the 78th floor and worked his way down.

He was given a 5 percent chance of survival. He spent two and half years recovering and returned to work in 2004. His scars are still visible. He doesn’t have much stamina. He can’t sit for long and works just three days a week; on one of those days, he spends time with a physiotherapist.

He says Cantor is a different company today. Some of the employees who recently joined were just teenagers in 2001. Some are the children of parents who died that day.

Cantor’s survivors of Sept. 11 have a special bond, he says. “There is a certain intensity it brings among the people who were there,” Mr. Waizer says. “You don’t know it until it is going to happen. It usually hits when we talk about the issue of loyalty.”

Cantor’s success has enabled Mr. Lutnick to honor his pledge to the families of those who were killed. Over the five years, each family got roughly $175,000. Many are still getting health insurance.

The criticism of Mr. Lutnick has mellowed with time. Some widows and other family members who chastised him in the weeks after Sept. 11 now say he did all he could.

Appearing on “20/20” in October 2001, Susan Sliwak, whose husband, Robert, was a bond trader at Cantor, sharply criticized Mr. Lutnick. She told Connie Chung that Mr. Lutnick “was not liked” by many inside the company.

Today, she said Cantor “did everything” it said it would.

Early on, Irene Boehm, who lost her husband, Bruce, a Cantor broker, spoke publicly about her financial concerns. When Cantor sent her a bonus check months later, she called Cantor, saying her husband deserved more. Today, she, too, says the concerns about Mr. Lutnick’s sincerity were overblown.

“They have been wonderful and went overboard,” says Ms. Boehm, who has two daughters now in their 20s. Her husband’s parents also received some money from Cantor.

Mr. Lutnick also hired experts from the University of Chicago to analyze the financial packages offered by the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund and try to get more money for Cantor families.

“I was going to want to put my head in the oven if they didn’t get the right amount of money because that is my reason for being at this point,” Mr. Lutnick recalls. “We studied each person that died and how they were doing. We got a lot more per family.”

While the payments to the families ended five years ago, the Cantor Fitzgerald Relief Fund is still a full-time pursuit for Edie Lutnick. She is called upon to help families hold charitable events, or, more recently, to help find hotel rooms for the ones coming to New York City for 9/11-related events.

Mr. Lutnick says he will never get over Sept. 11. But he has found some peace. He says that for years he had recurring nightmares that spiders were spinning webs on his face, suffocating him. Sleepwalking, he would drag his wife into the closet. Today the bad dreams are gone.

EACH year, Cantor has a service in Central Park for families of its workers who died. This year a larger one will be held at ground zero, where the National September 11 Memorial and Museum will be dedicated.

Ms. Lutnick and Cantor became an important voice in building the memorial. Initially, it was suggested that names be placed randomly, but she successfully argued that the Cantor employees be listed together on the north tower memorial. And friends and families should be listed by one another if requested.

“It still looks random, but Tim O’Brien being next to Glen Wall means something,” says Mr. Lutnick, referring to two friends at Cantor who died Sept. 11. “I think of the two of them, and it is nice they are together. They should be.”

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/09/03/the-survivor-who-saw-the-future-for-cantor-fitzgerald/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bank of America Plans Big Layoffs to Cut Costs

With its stock down more than 50 percent since January, the job cuts by Bank of America may be only the start of a broader restructuring at the company, which is the nation’s largest bank. Brian T. Moynihan, the chief executive of the bank, has said that he hopes to trim quarterly expenses by $1.5 billion. Thousands more job cuts are likely in the months ahead.

“I know it is tough to have to manage through reductions,” Mr. Moynihan wrote in a memo to the company’s senior leadership late Thursday that outlined the cuts. “But we owe it to our customers and our shareholders to remain competitive, efficient and manage our expenses carefully.”

In the memo, obtained by The New York Times, Mr. Moynihan said the company’s broader revamping effort was nearing completion of its first phase, which examines the consumer business and support functions. A third and final review is set for early September.

The company plans to announce the first results of that project next month, which could include further job cuts that would total more than 10,000.

Mr. Moynihan said in the memo that the company had already begun to tell the 3,500 employees that their jobs were to be eliminated, and that the reductions would come throughout the company. Bank of America, which has roughly 280,000 employees, cut about 2,500 jobs in the first half of the year.

Even more than its large rivals, Bank of America has been battered particularly hard by the bursting of the housing bubble and the surge in foreclosures. It has already suffered tens of billions in losses tied to its disastrous acquisition in 2008 of Countrywide Financial, the subprime lender that has come to epitomize the excesses of the housing boom of the last decade.

Investors are also pressing the bank to buy back billions of dollars in securities it assembled from mortgages that later soured. In June, it agreed to pay a group of investors including Pimco, BlackRock and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York $8.5 billion to settle a portion of these claims.

While the settlement represented the culmination of months of negotiations and was seen as an attempt by Mr. Moynihan to finally put Countrywide’s disastrous legacy behind the company, investors  remain skeptical.

Earlier this month, American International Group, the giant insurer, filed suit against the company over mortgage backed securities it assembled, and investors fear the June settlement may actually spur more litigation, rather than resolve it.

The latest job cuts, which were first reported on the Wall Street Journal’s Web site late Thursday, will also hit the company’s Merrill Lynch unit. Bank of America agreed to acquire the firm at the height of the financial crisis in 2008. While Merrill has proved profitable more recently, trading volumes and the flow of deals have slowed substantially in recent months, making it vulnerable to further job reductions.

Despite the huge settlements and other write-downs, Mr. Moynihan has said that he does not plan to issue more stock to raise new capital. Instead, the company has been engaged in the corporate version of a yard sale in recent weeks, raising billions of dollars as it offloads everything from its Canadian credit card business to several commercial real estate properties.

In the recent market downturn, Bank of America shares have been especially hard hit.  Since the beginning of the year, Bank of America shares have fallen from $15 to a closing price of $7.01 on Thursday.

“While the markets reflect many economic factors we cannot control, we must stay focused on what we can control,” Mr. Moynihan said in the memo.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d64031c355b88d1587b392f9aa17de18

Bits Blog: Games Arrive on Google+

Google introduced games to its social network on Thursday. Such games have played a key role in Facebook's success. Google introduced games to its social network on Thursday. Such games have played a key role in Facebook’s success. 

One of the main ways that Facebook addicts users is games, and now Google+ is following Facebook into gaming.

Google began introducing games on its social network Thursday, and while it is starting with just a few options, they include big-name games like Angry Birds from Rovio, Bejeweled Blitz from PopCap Games and most notably, Zynga Poker.

Zynga has built the vast majority of its business on Facebook, and that business is thriving — Zynga has filed to go public and says it earned $90 million in profit on sales of $597 million last year. But analysts have also criticized it for relying too much on one platform.

That is about to change. Google+ has been growing remarkably quickly, and already rivals existing social networks. Though it does not have Zynga’s most well-known games, FarmVille and Mafia Wars, the two companies already have a partnership because Google has invested in Zynga.

Google+ users will see a Games page at the top of their newsfeeds and can click on it to play games or see gaming updates from friends. But updates will be shared only with select circles of people when users are on the Games page, so they will not appear in general newsfeeds — something that has annoyed Facebook users in the past.

“If you’re not interested in games, it’s easy to ignore them,” Vic Gundotra, a senior vice president of engineering at Google who developed its social network, wrote in a blog post. “Your stream will remain focused on conversations with the people you care about.”

Meanwhile, Facebook said Thursday that it was holding an event for gaming developers Thursday night, and that reporters were invited to demo new gaming products and speak with developers Friday.

Google also sent a message to software developers, who have been clamoring to build apps for Google+. It said it was partnering with only a few game developers now, but would open the doors to other developers as soon as it works out some kinks. Google will invite developers slowly, it said, emphasizing the quality of apps over quantity.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f75ce396e710ecec3d611fe5df9f93a9

DealBook: Blankfein Faces Shareholders

Lloyd C. Blankfein

While Goldman Sachs’s annual meetings are usually eventful, this one will make history. For the first time, shareholders are trekking to Jersey City for the gathering.

The investment bank’s chief executive, Lloyd C. Blankfein, had not faced shareholders since Goldman settled civil fraud charges in 2010 that claimed it duped clients by selling mortgage securities that were created by a hedge fund to cash in on the housing market’s collapse. At the meeting, there were shareholder proposals regarding senior executives’ pay and a bylaw amendment so that 10 percent of shareholders can call a special shareholder meeting, among other issues.

Although Goldman’s profit bounced back faster than many of its rivals, its stock has struggled. Shares of the investment bank have fallen more than 10 percent so far this year.

DealBook was on hand for the annual meeting. What follows is a blog of the event.

Refresh nowUpdating…Feed

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5f3cb2d6ad7923df8c238f7945de1319

Nokia Continues Fading in Race With Nimbler Rivals

BERLIN — Nokia, the struggling market leader in mobile phones, said Thursday that it intended to cut costs by nearly 20 percent over three years, a move that will likely eliminate thousands of jobs as it enters an alliance with Microsoft.

The company, based in Espoo, Finland, said it planned to reduce annual operating expenses in its core devices and services business by €1 billion, or $1.46 billion, to €4.65 billion by the end of 2013.

“This reduction is expected to come from a variety of different sources and initiatives,” the company said, “including a reduction in the number of employees and normal personnel attrition, a reduction in the use of outsourced professionals, reductions in facility costs, and various improvements in efficiencies.”

Stephen Elop, the Microsoft executive whom Nokia hired to be chief executive last September, said the company would begin negotiations with its workforce in Finland and elsewhere next week. Prior to those talks, Mr. Elop said Nokia would not speculate on the number of jobs it may eventually cut.

“Speculation on the exact numbers and the timing of those numbers is best postponed until we discuss this with” worker representatives, Mr. Elop said in a conference call with financial analysts.

Some employees will be able to transition into other jobs with Nokia, Mr. Elop said, and Nokia may have new staffing needs as a result of its partnership with Microsoft. Because of those opportunities, Nokia said it would be able to guarantee employment to all of its existing workforce through this year.

Nokia also confirmed that it had signed its agreement with Microsoft to obtain the Windows operating system for Nokia’s smartphone lineup. The two companies had announced the partnership on Feb. 11. Since then, Nokia’s stock price had fallen by about a third.

The cost-cutting initiative came as Nokia lost its lead in cellphone revenue to Apple, the research firm Strategy Analytics said Thursday, according to Reuters.

Apple’s revenue from the iPhone rose to $11.9 billion in the last quarter while Nokia’s phone revenue slipped to $9.4 billion, the research firm said.

“With strong volumes and high wholesale prices, the PC vendor has successfully captured revenue leadership of the total handset market in less than four years,” an analyst, Alex Spektor, said.

Nokia also reported Thurusday that its profit fell slightly to €344 million in the first quarter from €349 million a year earlier.

Sales rose 9.2 percent to €10.4 billion, due largely to gains in Latin America and China, where Nokia’s sales rose 29 percent and 30 percent respectively. Sales in North America fell 36 percent, and sales in Europe fell 5 percent.

Mikko Ervasti, an analyst at Evli Bank, a private bank in Helsinki, said the cuts in operating expenses were needed to bring Nokia in line with its cellphone peers, like Apple, which on average spend only half or even less on research and development than Nokia.

Mr. Ervasti said the cost-cutting could translate into 6,000 fewer jobs in its cellphone R.D. workforce, or roughly 38 percent of Nokia’s total staff for mobile phones. Those employees are currently working in Finland, China, India, Germany, England, Denmark and San Diego, California.

“These cuts were needed and are in line with what the market was expecting,” Mr. Ervasti said. “This is a direct consequence of the Microsoft agreement, and Nokia’s own need to trim expenses.”

Nokia said its sales of smartphones rose 13 percent in the quarter to 24.2 million units from 21.5 million. Meanwhile, the market grew 74 percent over all during the same time, Francisco Jeronimo, an analyst with International Data Corp. in London, said.

On top of that, the average selling price fell 6 percent in the same period to €147 from €155 one year earlier, Nokia said.

The company said it sold 108.5 million cellphones of all types during the quarter, 1 percent more than a year ago. Yet its global share of the cellphone market fell to 32 percent from 34 percent a year ago, according to IDC.

Samsung, the global No. 2, raised its share to slightly more than 26 percent, IDC said.

Mr. Jeronimo said Nokia faced significant challenges as it transitions its mobile lineup away from its own Symbian operating system and towards Microsoft Windows Phone, which will take two years.

Despite the “good performance” of the new, high-end N8 handset in Europe and its mid-tier smartphones, “Nokia is still being affected by the strong Android momentum,” Mr. Jeronimo said, referring to the mobile operating system created by Google, and “by the high-end iPhone, Research In Motion, HTC and Samsung devices.”

The pressure on Nokia could increase, he added, if Nokia users defect from Symbian to rivals in the transition.

Mr. Ervast said the company’s forecast that operating profit margin for devices and services would be 6 percent to 9 percent in the second quarter was slightly better than investors had expected.

Nokia’s share price was up 3.1 percent at €6.12 in Helsinki trading.

Nokia employed 130,951 workers as of March 31, including 59,080 who work for Nokia’s cellphone business and 71,871 who work at its networks venture, Nokia Siemens Networks, and Navteq, its geographic mapping data unit.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=0a54d02230f006b94b843508513882e6