May 5, 2024

Swiss Banking Secrecy Under Pressure From Europe

GENEVA — Now that Luxembourg and Austria have given ground on bank secrecy rules, the spotlight has turned to Switzerland, a country famous for the anonymity it provides in equal measure to the rich, the famous and those who want to hide their money.

More than four years ago, the Swiss made painful concessions to American authorities. But as impatience with tax avoiders spreads to a region where governments are desperate for revenue, the Swiss are bracing for a new onslaught on their cherished bank secrecy rules — this time from nations in the European Union.

The pledges to share more bank account data — offered up first by Luxembourg, then by Austria at a European summit meeting on Wednesday — were made on the condition that countries outside the European Union, notably Switzerland, do so, too. As more traditional havens fall into line with demands for greater transparency, the Swiss have become more isolated than ever. Some analysts say that new concessions by the Swiss may now be unavoidable, though few expect those changes to happen overnight.

The pressures on the Swiss and others have built as governments and the public, weary of austerity, force the issue of tax fairness to the front of European policy debates, casting a critical light on who pays and who does not.

In that landscape, Switzerland still stands out. Swiss banks have been linked to political scandals in France, Greece and Spain recently. Secret Swiss accounts were said to have been used by politicians and the politically connected to operate slush funds, skirt taxes and stash away millions, stoking popular anger as citizens are asked to pay more taxes while accepting cuts to a full range of social services, including pensions, transportation and education.

The recent gestures by Luxembourg and Austria further risk Switzerland’s position as the world’s largest private wealth management center, built up over decades by banks that have relied on the country’s studied political neutrality and legal stability to attract wealthy clients.

“The decision by Luxembourg and Austria is probably the death knell for Swiss banking secrecy, because it really leaves Switzerland without any key ally in the European Union,” said Urs Ziswiler, who was Switzerland’s ambassador in Washington. “The E.U. might soon be in a position to demand as much as the U.S. got from Switzerland.”

The consequences could be devastating if the Swiss do not step carefully, others warned. “Switzerland is now in a very bad position, because it failed to negotiate properly the transition to a new world in which you can’t keep secrecy toward the tax authorities,” said Carlo Lombardini, a Geneva-based lawyer who specializes in banking litigation.

Without any banking secrecy rules, funds under management in Switzerland “could easily shrink 20 to 40 percent,” Mr. Lombardini predicted, which would reduce Switzerland’s financial industry to “what you would expect for a country of its size.”

Still, some Swiss politicians and bankers say they see a silver lining. Other offshore centers and havens have faced the same pressures, as government crackdowns and data leaks have exposed tax evasion at the highest levels.

Last month, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based in Washington, released 2.5 million files detailing offshore bank accounts and shell companies belonging to wealthy individuals and companies, mainly in the British Virgin Islands, the Cook Islands and Singapore.

“If the tax evasion problem no longer becomes about Switzerland but is instead really seen as a worldwide issue, that could be a blessing in disguise, because Switzerland would no longer stand out as the ugly little duckling that it has been portrayed to be,” said Christian Lüscher, a lawyer and member of the Swiss Parliament.

Until now, Switzerland offered cooperation with judicial investigations into money laundering, while also negotiating some tax deals bilaterally with the European Union’s member states. But as consensus builds within the bloc for greater transparency, that piecemeal approach may be difficult.

For the Swiss, “the main aim has always been not to give up anything before others,” said Luc Thévenoz, director of the Center for Banking and Finance Law at the University of Geneva.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/business/global/swiss-banking-secrecy-under-pressure-from-europe.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: A Top Goldman Sachs Executive Departs

Edward Forst in 2005.Jagadesh/ReutersEdward Forst in 2005.

Edward C. Forst, co-head of asset management at Goldman Sachs, is retiring from the Wall Street firm, according to an internal memo sent to employees on Friday.

Mr. Forst, who turns 51 this month, is the highest-ranking executive to leave the firm in recent months. He has been a member of the firm’s influential management committee.

Eric S. Lane will take over from Mr. Forst and will help run the division with Tim O’Neill, the other current co-head.

Revolving Door
View all posts

Mr. Forst has deep roots at Goldman. He joined the firm in 1994 and ran a number of key divisions including capital markets. In 2008, he left Goldman to become an executive vice president at Harvard University, helping on finance, human resources and capital planning. About a year later, however, in a move that surprised many on Wall Street, Goldman hired him back as a senior strategy officer. Mr. Forst took over asset management in 2010, replacing Marc A. Spilker, who left the firm.

While Goldman has not had much turnover in its upper ranks of late, an unusually high number of senior people have left in recent months as the firm presses cut costs in the face of weakening revenue. It is not known whether Mr. Forst’s departure was related to this effort.

Copies of the memos are below:

December 2, 2011
We are pleased to announce that Eric S. Lane has been named co-head of the Investment Management Division. Eric, together with Tim O’Neill who has been co-head of IMD since 2008, will lead our efforts to grow our combined asset management and private wealth platform, which continues to represent one of the firm’s most important businesses and growth opportunities.

Eric has served as chief operating officer of IMD since 2009. In that role, he had oversight for the Private Wealth Management, Alternative Investments, Capital Markets and Goldman Sachs Asset Management Distribution businesses. He is co-chair of the Firmwide Suitability Committee and a member of the Growth Markets Operating Committee, and the IMD and Merchant Banking Division Client and Business Standards Committees.

Eric joined Goldman Sachs in 1996 and, since 1999, has held a variety of senior positions across a number of different businesses in the Investment Management Division. He was named managing director in 2001 and partner in 2002.

As a long-tenured leader in IMD, Eric has demonstrated dedication to our clients and a deep understanding of markets. His extensive experience in the division positions him well to lead IMD with Tim.

Please join us in congratulating Eric and wishing him continued success in his new role.

Lloyd C. Blankfein
Gary D. Cohn
December 2, 2011

After 16 years of service, Edward C. Forst, global co-head of the Investment Management Division, has decided to retire from the firm effective at the end of the year.

Ed joined Goldman Sachs in 1994 in Capital Markets of which he subsequently became co-head. He served as chief of staff to both the Equities and FICC divisions and also served as the co-head of the Global Credit business in FICC. In 2004, Ed was appointed the firm’s chief administrative officer and became a member of the Management Committee. He played an important role in developing our global headquarters in New York. He was appointed co-head of the Investment Management Division in 2007.

Ed left the firm in 2008 to become the first executive vice president of Harvard University. In that role, Ed was the University’s senior operating officer, a senior advisor to the president and a member of the board of the Harvard Management Company.

Ed returned to the firm a year later and became the senior strategy officer of Goldman Sachs and in 2010 was named the co-head of the Investment Management Division with Tim O’Neill. Together they have led our efforts to increase our investing capacity and strategically grow our Investment Management businesses around the world, especially in the growth markets. Ed was the Management Committee sponsor of the Firmwide Black Network and previously the sponsor of the Firmwide Hispanic/Latin Network. He was named managing director in 1996 and partner in 1998.

Ed is a trustee of Carnegie Hall and is the treasurer and a member of the board’s Executive Committee. He is co-chair of Harvard University’s Taskforce on Balanced Philanthropy, co-chair of Harvard’s 30th Reunion campaign, and a member of the University’s Stem Cell Science Advisory Board.

Please join us in thanking Ed for his contributions to the firm and wishing him and his family all the best in the future.

Lloyd C. Blankfein
Gary D. Cohn

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=023ffd69490dd1197be1c3abb8e4bd61