May 18, 2024

Digital Domain: Digital Tags Help Ensure That the Price Is Right

Then bar codes and computerized cash registers arrived. In most stores, prices were posted on shelves but not on the items themselves.

I’ve always trusted that the system works well — and I’ve tapped my foot impatiently when a shopper ahead of me slowed the checkout process by closely watching the prices that came up, as if the scanner might have recorded the wrong product code. What I hadn’t realized was that there is valid reason to be vigilant. The potential problems originate on the shelves, in the form of the shelf tags, which may or may not match the current price in a store’s computer.

A typical grocery store puts 5,000 items on sale in a week and removes sale prices from another 5,000. That creates an abundance of opportunities for mismatches when workers print out the new price labels in a back room, then hunt for the proper place on the shelf to attach them.

This has left store technology in an incomplete state: mostly but not entirely computerized. The next step is to go completely paperless by putting small, battery-powered digital price tags on the shelves. Price changes can then be received wirelessly from the store’s network, ensuring that the price displayed on the shelf and the one called up at the checkout counter are the same.

Altierre, a digital tag and sensor maker based in San Jose, Calif., has raised more than $80 million from investors and spent 10 years developing the technology for digital tags and the wireless networks they require. It asserts that outfitting a store with 20,000 to 25,000 tags, each costing about $5, would produce labor savings that would pay back the investment in two to two-and-a-half years.

The tags can provide multiple screens of information. To reduce power consumption, Altierre uses black-on-gray liquid crystal displays, the same type used in digital watches and pocket calculators. The most generous thing that can be said about this type of display is that its legibility is satisfactory.

At Altierre’s headquarters, a full-size mock grocery store is set up with its tags installed on the shelves. There, I was surprised to find that the LCD’s legibility problems didn’t seem so significant: shoppers stand close to the shelves anyway. On some shelves, Altierre showed off an improved tag, at a higher price, that uses E Ink technology. Its text is noticeably crisper than that of an ordinary LCD tag.

I asked Sunit Saxena, Altierre’s chief executive, why grocery stores haven’t leapt at the chance to save themselves money by installing the tags. “They’re treading carefully because the fear is, they’ll put 30,000 of these in a store where people are used to seeing paper and it will be a drastic change,” he said. “They worry that their sales will drop.”

Digital sign technology is hardly new. In France, customers are accustomed to digital signs in grocery stores, where an LCD tag with limited display capacity has been on shelves for about 10 years, says Michel Itié, an I.T. consultant. It shows only the price and the price per weight, so it requires a separate paper tag to show an item’s name.

Many French hypermarkets, which combine grocery stores and department stores, also use the tags. Mr. Itié is working with a company that is installing Altierre’s technology for the hypermarket chain E.Leclerc, which has installed 300,000 new LCD tags in 10 stores and plans to deploy a total of two million tags by year-end.

In the United States, grocery stores still cannot justify making the investment in digital price tags, says Patrick C. Fitzpatrick, president of Atlanta Retail Consulting. “If the payback was advantageous, you’d see them everywhere.”

Stores are eager, however, to find an affordable way to reduce price-related errors. Mr. Fitzpatrick says that when grocery store managers conduct “price integrity audits” and compare price labels on the shelves with the prices in the store computer, paper labels are only 95 percent to 96 percent accurate.

Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: stross@nytimes.com.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/10/technology/digital-tags-help-ensure-that-the-price-is-right.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Changing China’s Growth Model

Visitors looking at housing models during the 24th Shanghai Real Estate Exhibition and Trade Fair.China Photos/Getty ImagesVisitors looking at housing models during the 24th Shanghai Real Estate Exhibition and Trade Fair.

China’s Central Economic Work Conference concluded Sunday. The annual meeting sets economic goals for the year ahead and usually includes a grab bag of policy prescriptions.

China 中国 Insider
View all posts


In keeping with the 18th Party Congress report’s emphasis on shifting to a more sustainable growth model, the official statement from the conference vowed that China would focus on the quality and efficiency of economic growth in 2013, deepen economic reforms, further urbanization and maintain strict property controls. The conference did not publicly provide an economic growth target for 2013 but most analysts believe the government is aiming for at least 7.5 percent.

Some argue that China is sending a strong signal on economic reforms but not everyone is convinced. FT Alphaville told readers:

Don’t be misled by the proclamations of “reform” or “quality growth” from China’s central economic work conference at the weekend. It’s more of the same, at least for the time being.

The economy appears to have bottomed out, as evidenced by recent data and the fact that in November China power consumption grew at the fastest pace in nine months. But the growth is still heavily weighted toward investment over consumption and last week the China Academy of Social Sciences published a report warning that that the economic imbalance has significantly worsened over the last 10 years.

The government is aware of the problems and has promised repeatedly to change the growth model. Xi Jinping, in power for barely a month, has raised expectations for reforms, as Xinhua noted in “China Awaits More After Xi’s New Moves“:

Now that the public’s expectations have been raised, the challenge lies in living up to these expectations..

People are also wondering whether monopolies will be broken up or at least weakened, whether more opportunities will be given to the private sector, and whether gaps can be narrowed between different industries and state-owned and private companies.

ONE OF THE KEYS TO WEAKENING MONOPOLIES and strengthening the private sector might be the long-awaited income distribution reform plan. Premier Wen Jiabao has talked about such a plan since 2004 and over the last several months there have been repeated promises in the Chinese press that a plan would be delivered before the end of the year.

Last week, The Wall Street Journal wrote in “China Tries to Shut Rising Income Gap” that:

Now, the plan is finally set to be released this month after a push by Mr. Wen, in the 11th hour of his tenure. But after at least a half-dozen drafts, some of the most significant proposals have been watered down, or dropped completely, after opposition from state-owned firms, researchers involved in the project say. The result is a general set of principles rather than a practical road map with specifics on how to redistribute wealth, they say.

Caijing, one of China’s top business magazines, on Monday reported that the plan would be delayed past the end of the year because of opposition by special interest groups.

This is potentially bad news, though the income distribution reform plan is Wen Jiabao’s initiative and he is a lame duck. It is possible that Mr. Xi and Li Keqiang, Mr. Wen’s successor, want to introduce their own plan sometime in 2013, though if you believe in “seeking truth from facts” this new delay is both a worrisome sign of the power and intransigence of Chinese special interests and a risk for Xi Jinping, as raising expectations can be dangerous if you do not deliver.

China has also raised expectations in its dispute with Japan over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Last week China conducted aerial reconnaissance of the disputed Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands, a move that prompted Washington to “raise concerns” with Beijing. The New York Times reports that the overflight is part of a strategy to regain effective control of the islands that was set three months ago and overseen by Mr. Xi, before the 18th Party Congress.

Toru Hanai/ReutersShinzo Abe

The Chinese government has repeatedly stated that the islands are Chinese territory and any retreat from the more assertive position it has taken over the last several months could be very damaging to the government’s credibility.

On Sunday Japan elected Shinzo Abe as Prime Minister in a landslide victory for his Liberal Democratic Party, whose “manifesto maintains Japan should step up control over the disputed islands and consider stationing officials there permanently.”

OCCUPATION OF THE ISLANDS by either side would be an explosive move. At a conference in Sanya over the weekend, former President Jimmy Carter called for Japan and China to reach a “no occupation” consensus over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands.

The United States, whose top two foreign holders of its debt are Japan and China, is in a difficult position. Last week Mr. Carter was in Beijing and his meetings with Mr. Li and Mr. Xi received top billing in state media. During his meeting, Mr. Xi called for more “positive energy” for the China-U.S. partnership. It appears that Mr. Xi is signaling that he wants a good relationship with the United States, in spite of the growing tensions with Japan.

Given the highly public assertiveness of the last several months however, China will not ignore moves by Mr. Abe to fulfill his campaign pledges to step up control over the disputed islands. Conflict is unlikely, but continued tensions and a growing arms race in the region appear inevitable.


Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/changing-chinas-growth-model/?partner=rss&emc=rss