April 16, 2024

Cyprus Makes Fitful Progress on Bank Bailout Deal

Yet, with so many obstacles in the negotiations, the prospect of a default, and even a possible exit from the euro currency union, could not be ruled out.

After passing a portion of a revamped bailout agreement late Friday, the Cypriot Parliament on Saturday was still considering the rest of the package, including a tax of up to 25 percent on large, uninsured bank deposits. It was searching for an agreement before Sunday night, when euro zone finance ministers are scheduled to meet in Brussels.

Cyprus’s president, Nicos Anastasiades, was scheduled to fly to Brussels on Sunday.

All parties were working against a deadline imposed by the European Central Bank, which has said it will cut off crucial short-term financing to Cyprus’s teetering commercial banks on Monday if a bailout deal is not reached by then.

A crowd, estimated at around 2,000 people, marched toward Parliament in the early evening, far more than the hundreds who had gathered there to protest in recent days. Many were demonstrating against the imminent closure of Laiki Bank, which will cost thousands of jobs, as well as the government’s proposal to nationalize state-run pensions.

A cutoff of central bank financing and the absence of a bailout agreement could cause Cypriot banks to collapse. It could also lead to a disorderly default on the government’s debt, with unpredictable repercussions for the euro monetary union, despite the country’s tiny economy.

The central bank, the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund — the so-called troika of lenders — agreed last weekend to arrange a 10 billion euro loan, or $12.9 billion, for Cyprus if the country could come up with 5.8 billion euros of its own money. But the source of Cyprus’s contribution remains elusive. The original proposal, to impose a one-time tax on all bank deposits in the country, met with domestic outrage and international criticism, and Parliament rejected it on Tuesday.

Asked on Saturday whether Cyprus had a backup plan if a deal is not reached, a government spokesman, Christos Stylianides, said, “We are doomed to find a solution, or else everything is ruined.”

European Union leaders “may conclude that it is best to let Cyprus default, impose capital controls and leave the euro zone,” Nicolas Véron, a senior fellow at Bruegel in Brussels and a visiting fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said in a recent assessment. “But such a move would violate the promise of European leaders to ensure the integrity of the euro zone no matter what and potentially set off a chain reaction, including possible bank runs in other euro zone member states, starting with the most fragile ones, such as Slovenia and, of course, Greece.”

In a sign of how chaotic the process has become, even the timing of the meeting of the euro zone’s 17 finance ministers, known as the Eurogroup, was uncertain until Saturday afternoon, when the Dutch finance minister, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, who leads the group, said on his Twitter account that it would be held on Sunday at 6 p.m. in Brussels.

In Friday’s voting, members of the Cypriot Parliament agreed to restructure the nation’s largest and most troubled bank, Laiki Bank, by splitting off its troubled assets into a so-called bad bank. Accounts with no problems would be transferred to the nation’s largest financial institution, the Bank of Cyprus. Lawmakers also voted to require that any bank on the verge of bankruptcy be split in the same way.

They agreed to come up with a portion of the bailout money by nationalizing the pensions of state-owned Cypriot companies, even though Germany, whose political and financial clout dominates euro zone policy, has already indicated it opposes the move.

Parliament was still deciding whether to vote on Saturday or Sunday, ahead of the Eurogroup meeting, on a crucial new proposal that would skim 22 to 25 percent of bank deposits above 100,000 euros through a new tax on Laiki Bank account holders.

Another idea floated was to take at least 10 percent from uninsured deposits above 100,000 euros at all Cypriot banks.

The finance ministers and the troika on Saturday were still calculating how much money those deposit-tax alternatives would raise for the government.

“The good news is that banks were shut last week, and so depositors couldn’t cut up their money into smaller accounts to avoid any tax,” said one European Union official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “But it’s sure that depositors did do this before, so this needs to be assessed.”

At the insistence of the central bank, lawmakers also voted on Friday to impose capital controls to limit withdrawals and bank account closings once Cyprus’s banks reopen. The current plan is to reopen them on Tuesday morning, after a nine-day emergency holiday meant to prevent a classic run on the banks.

But without a bailout, the banks would probably be unable to open.

Earlier in the week, lawmakers rejected a previous deal brokered last weekend by President Anastasiades, the Eurogroup and the troika. “If it had been up to Anastasiades, then we’d already have an agreement,” said one European Union official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because there may be talks with the Cypriot leader in Brussels this weekend.

The situation is “becoming critical,” the official warned, and “could end with an exit from the euro zone.”

Liz Alderman reported from Nicosia, Cyprus, and James Kanter from Brussels. Andreas Riris contributed reporting from Nicosia.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/business/global/cyprus-makes-fitful-progress-on-bank-bailout-deal.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Is the Web Amplifying Consumers’ Voices?

First, Netflix dropped its plan to make customers have separate accounts for mail order and online movies. Now, Bank of America has reversed plans to charge a $5 monthly fee for some customers who use their debit cards to make purchases. Both decisions came after the original plans were sharply criticized by their customers.

Which leaves us at Bucks wondering: Is consumer power newly ascendant? Or was this just a coincidence involving two separate corporate moves, each of which proved so boneheaded that it had no chance of sticking?

Americans have always been able to make their opinions known by talking to each other and by voting with their feet — the Occupy Wall Street movement, with its “us versus them” theme, is a classic example of the take-it-to-the-streets approach.

But it seems that the new social media may have played a big role here, by making it easier for the masses to organize in-person protests and to voice their unfiltered outrage. (I, for one, first learned of the Netflix move when a Facebook friend vented her frustration.) And it also seems unlikely, if not impossible, that a young woman protesting a bank fee would have rated a personal phone call from a high-ranking Bank of America executive had she not first attracted thousands of supporters on an online petition site.

Yet in other cases, consumer sentiment hasn’t seemed to have much impact on unpopular changes–like, for instance, the addition of fees for checked bags by many major airlines.

What do you think? Are new ways of communicating giving consumers more power to change corporate behavior?

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=80d9683a6d59f5a4d4584751f030623e

Accounts of Chinese Bloggers on Weibo Suspended, Causing Protests

In messages, the operators of Sina.com’s Weibo microblog detailed the suspensions of the bloggers. The announcements provoked a torrent of online protest, some of which was directed at the government on the assumption that it was behind the punishments.

If so, it was the clearest expression yet of the government’s growing concern about its inability to curb free expression on the Internet — particularly searing criticism of official acts — despite a sweeping and extremely sophisticated censorship regime.

On Monday, a member of the Politburo, the Communist Party committee that acts as China’s collective leadership, visited Sina.com officials and said that they should “resolutely put an end to fake and misleading information.” The official, Beijing’s party secretary, Liu Qi, said they should use new technology to better manage the microbloggers, whose numbers have grown explosively in the last year.

The company’s notices stated that two bloggers who had spread false rumors on Weibo would lose their right to post messages or to add followers for a month. One stated that a blogger had been suspended after posting a false report that the accused killer of a 19-year-old woman had been set free after his politically powerful father intervened.

Another disclosed the suspension of a blogger who accused the Red Cross Society of China, which is mired in a financial scandal, of selling blood at a profit.

Some Weibo users sardonically applauded the suspensions, writing that the notices of them spread the rumors more effectively than the original bloggers.

“I didn’t know about the story till now. How tragic!” one blogger wrote. Others expressed outrage. “How does Weibo know what’s true or not?” one user wrote. “Who gives Weibo the right to silence its users?”

Still, one official of a Chinese Internet-related service, speaking on the condition of anonymity about a matter of deep concern to the authorities, predicted that the notices would have a chilling effect.

The official said the announcements may also represent the start of further efforts to keep politically sensitive information out of the public domain. On Monday, People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s official newspaper, appeared to suggest that restrictions were in the works, publishing a full-page article on the “political mission” to control microblogs and other new forms of media.

Sina.com is not the only company feeling new pressure. The operator of China’s other major microblog, Tencent, received a July 19 visit from another Politburo member, Zhou Yongkang, who oversees public security. In a speech to Tencent employees, Mr. Zhou called for “greater self-discipline” to ensure that the Internet promoted social harmony.

The Chinese authorities have pursued two tracks with regard to the Internet, allowing freewheeling debate on topics unrelated to high-level politics and governance, but carefully monitoring — and sometimes banning — discussions on topics deemed too sensitive. Censors frequently notify users that a specific posting “was deleted according to relative laws and regulations.”

But official concern appears to have risen after two recent episodes demonstrated the potential power of the Chinese Web to mobilize social protest.

In the first, tens of million of online bloggers assailed government railway officials after a June 23 train crash near Wenzhou that killed 40 people, accusing the officials of incompetence, corruption and a cover-up. In mid-August, residents of Dalian in northeast China flooded microblogs with photographs of their protest against a local chemical factory, overwhelming censors’ attempts to delete the posts.

Since then, a welter of commentaries and articles in Communist Party newspapers have debated the need to rein in comments on the microblogs. The Chinese government abruptly blocked Twitter and Facebook in 2009. The services remain blocked today. But many analysts say that the government will not completely close the hugely popular microblogs for fear of a public backlash.

Mia Li and Shi Da contributed research from Beijing.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/27/world/asia/27weibo.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

F.A.A. Impasse That Hit 4,000 Ends, for Now

The agreement signals an end, at least for a few weeks, to a standoff over policy issues that had left 4,000 agency employees out of work, idled tens of thousands of workers at hundreds of airport construction projects and cost the federal government more than $350 million in lost taxes on airline tickets.

Congressional officials said the deal arranges rubber-stamp passage by the Senate on Friday of a bill that was approved by the House last month, extending the aviation agency’s operations through Sept. 16.

Only a few senators need to be present when the Senate convenes at 10 a.m., and if no one objects to the request for unanimous consent to pass the House bill, the impasse will officially be over.

“This agreement does not resolve the important differences that still remain,” Mr. Reid said in a statement. “But I believe we should keep Americans working while Congress settles its differences, and this agreement will do exactly that.” The agreement, in the wake of a nasty and protracted battle over the debt ceiling, was worked out as both the White House and Congress were beginning to feel pressure from voters who said they have grown tired of political fights that hurt working Americans and the economy.

Official Washington has been peppered in recent days by appeals from labor unions employing furloughed F.A.A. employees and construction workers and letters from trade groups representing airport executives and business groups.

Together, they expressed outrage that Congress left this week on a five-week vacation without resolving the F.A.A. issue, letting $30 million a day in airline ticket and fuel taxes go uncollected because of a dispute over $16.5 million in annual cuts to rural air service.

“This shutdown is putting thousands of critical employees out of work,” a coalition of labor unions said in a statement Thursday, before the deal was reached. “Every day this impasse continues is another day that major airport projects are delayed and work is stopped” on upgrades of airport safety and aviation navigation systems.

Mr. Obama said in a statement that he was “pleased that leaders in Congress are working together” to put tens of thousands of Americans back to work. “We can’t afford to let politics in Washington hamper our recovery, so this is an important step forward,” he said.

Senate Democrats had previously refused to pass the House bill because it contained cuts in the Essential Air Service, a subsidy program that helps to pay for commercial airline service to rural airports.

The breakthrough came on Thursday when the transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, told Congressional leaders that he has the authority to issue waivers for the communities affected by the cuts in rural air service contained in the House bill. The White House had been coordinating discussions for days involving Mr. LaHood, House Speaker John A. Boehner, Mr. Reid and others.

Congressional officials said Mr. LaHood had indicated that he would review the affected rural communities for waivers that would postpone the cuts, but added that he had not promised any specific action.

In a statement, Mr. LaHood said: “This is a tremendous victory for American workers everywhere. From construction workers to our F.A.A. employees, they will have the security of knowing they are going to go back to work and get a paycheck — and that’s what we’ve been fighting for. We have the best aviation system in the world and we intend to keep it that way.”

The agreement does not address differences over labor issues that Senate Democrats said were the real reason that Republicans were trying to press for the cuts to rural air service. Democrats had embraced some of those changes in their own long-term F.A.A. reauthorization bill, which was passed earlier this year by the Senate.

The House also passed a long-term F.A.A. bill that included a measure to repeal a rule of the National Mediation Board, which oversees union and labor issues in the airline and railroad industries. The new rule, which passed after President Obama appointed two of the board’s three members, reversed a 76-year-old rule and made it easier for unions to win a representation election. Under the old rule, workers who did not vote were counted as “no” votes; under the new rule, only those casting ballots were counted.

Andrew Pollack contributed reporting from Los Angeles.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=ce8cbbfff5108a0c92d02b18cf51d2a7