April 26, 2024

Two Ad Companies Are Said to Merge, Supplanting Industry Leader

The combination of Publicis, based in Paris, and Omnicom, based in New York, would supplant the advertising industry leader, WPP of London. While Omnicom is slightly bigger than Publicis, the deal is being billed as a merger of equals that would have a combined stock market value of more than $30 billion.

News on Friday of talks between the companies was a surprise to analysts and most of Madison Avenue, including some employees in each agency. On Saturday, Publicis said planned to make a “major corporate announcement” on Sunday. An Omnicom spokeswoman did not return requests for comment. A Publicis spokeswoman declined to comment.

The marriage would bring under one roof separate networks of ad agencies — including BBDO, TBWA and DDB under Omnicom, and Leo Burnett and Saatchi Saatchi under Publicis. Collectively, the conglomerates represent some of the world’s largest brands including ATT, Visa and Pepsi at Omnicom and McDonald’s, Coca-Cola and Wal-Mart at Publicis. How the agencies would handle potential conflicts is expected to be addressed by the companies on Sunday.

In an interview with The New York Times this month, Publicis’s longtime chief, Maurice Lévy, said he expected much of the growth in the advertising sector to come from emerging markets and mobile and digital advertising. Publicis has been making aggressive acquisitions in digital advertising including agencies like Rosetta and Razorfish.

“I think we are all talking a lot about what the future markets of mobile will be and how we will be able to get the revenue we are expecting from this market,” Mr. Lévy said, citing a $15 million investment in a mobile polling start-up that is focused on emerging markets like Africa. “It is a huge market with incredible possibility for the future. Everyone is fighting very hard and trying to find solutions to get these next billion consumers,” he said.

Omnicom, which analysts say has focused more on expanding its digital operations organically as opposed to through acquisitions, stands to benefit from the media buying power of the Starcom MediaVest Group, a division of Publicis that is one of the largest media agencies in the world. In April, Starcom signed a multiyear deal with Twitter to combine some of the resources that they both use for measuring and tracking data and advertising. That deal was estimated to be hundreds of millions of dollars.

Last year, revenue at Publicis increased nearly 14 percent to $8.8 billion, while revenue at Omnicom increased 2.5 percent to $14.2 billion.

The combined company could be jointly run by Mr. Lévy, who has been with Publicis since 1987, and John Wren, who has led Omnicom since 1997, according to the people with knowledge of the talks, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the deal was not completed. Mr. Lévy, 71, has been expected to name a successor since last year.

In a report on Saturday, Brian Wieser, a senior research analyst at Pivotal Research Group, said a merger would be “highly favorable” for the entire ad industry, and “negative for media owners in most traditional media,” because those companies would lose negotiating power.

Some analysts and industry players speculated whether the United States Justice Department would approve such a merger or whether the French government would bristle at a company that was not run by a French national.

But antitrust concerns could be eased if the new company positions itself less as a conglomerate of ad agencies and more of a data company competing with businesses like I.B.M. and Facebook, Mr. Wieser wrote. He added that maintaining Mr. Lévy at the helm or ensuring that a board was dominated by French nationals might be enough to assuage the French government.

News of the talks was first reported by Bloomberg.

Michael de la Merced contributed reporting.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/28/business/media/omnicom-and-publicis-are-said-to-merge.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Wealth Matters: From Honus to Derek, Memorabilia Is More Than Signed Bats

Like many Yankees’ fans, I spent last Saturday watching the coverage of Jeter getting his 3,000th hit over and over. And then, I thought of all the memorabilia that was coming — all the balls, bats, jerseys, photos and anything you could imagine signed by Jeter.

Three days later, I actually saw some of that memorabilia in the making, at the headquarters of Steiner Sports in New Rochelle, N.Y. The Steiner warehouse looked like a cross between a Home Depot and Santa’s workshop, with shelves stacked to the ceiling with sports merchandise. I saw a half-dozen men framing photographs Jeter had signed Sunday night. There were boxes of balls he had also signed, stacked like crates of oranges. Blown-up Sports Illustrated covers of Jeter were in the back, out of the way for the time being.

I had gone to Steiner Sports to see more than just the Jeter memorabilia, though. I also wanted to understand the broader market for baseball collectibles. What types of things appreciate? Can a collector expect to profit from his hobby? Most important, how do you know if what you have is valuable or just an expensive tchotchke? Here is some of what I learned:

STRIKEOUTS Chances are pretty good that the sports memorabilia most people have is not worth much. All the balls, bats and pictures being sold at retail stores and online to commemorate Jeter’s milestone fit into that category.

Brandon Steiner, who in 1987 founded Steiner Sports, which is now owned by Omnicom, said there were different levels of collectors, ranging from those who save programs and tickets to people who buy things that were used in a game.

In between is the market for so-called authentic collectibles. A day after his 3,000th hit, Jeter signed 500 balls and 400 photos for Mr. Steiner’s company. Those balls are selling for $699.99; the photos range from $599.99 to $799.99.

Mr. Steiner said this was a relatively small signing to meet the immediate demand. He has scheduled two more for Jeter to autograph game-used memorabilia as well as things fans send in and pay a fee to have autographed.

And that’s just for one moment in baseball history, awesome though it was. Retired baseball greats and not-so-greats have been signing memorabilia, for a fee, for 30 years at baseball card shows, flooding the autograph market.

The worst offender may be Pete Rose, who holds the record for the most hits ever, 4,256. Since he was caught betting on baseball and banned from the sport, he has been a prolific signer. Balls inscribed “I’m sorry I bet on baseball — Pete Rose” are being sold on Walmart.com for $189.99 and on Amazon.com for $159.95. (A ball with just his name costs $69.99.)

This segment of the memorabilia industry is an easy target for purists. “I have total disdain for the manufactured memorabilia market,” said Richard Simon, a baseball card dealer and authenticator. “That is what is going on right now, as opposed to Babe Ruth signing an autograph book or a photo of himself 70 years ago.”

But Mr. Steiner is unapologetic. “The last three or four years, I’ve been thinking, how do we get to the average fan who can’t afford authentic, let alone game-used?” he said. He cited ballpark dirt and the bricks from the old Yankee Stadium as affordable keepsakes. “People laugh at me about the dirt, but I’ve sold over $10 million worth of dirt.”

Howie Schwartz, chief executive of GrandStandSports.com and a competitor to Steiner, said the relative affordability of Jeter memorabilia — ranging from $400 to $1,000 — matches up well with the huge market for him.

“Look at how many people watch baseball and how many kids play baseball,” he said. The average consumer may think 900 items is a lot. But there were 50,000 fans at Yankees Stadium that day.”

Still, while 50,000 people buying identical signed baseballs may be good for the seller, it is not good for anyone who expects the collectible to increase, or even hold, its value.

HOME RUNS The market for high-end sports memorabilia is different.

The most famous baseball collectible of all time is a baseball card known as the T206. It depicts Honus Wagner, a Hall of Fame shortstop from the early 20th century, and there are only about 60 still around. (Wagner ordered the maker, the American Tobacco Company, to stop production, legend has it, because he was not paid enough for his image or feared that children would buy cigarettes to get it.) The T206 once owned by the hockey legend Wayne Gretzky was sold in 2007 for $2.8 million to Ken Kendrick, owner of the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=85ea56465ccdc9b0bc6d66c587abc390