April 29, 2024

Finnish Nuclear Plant Won’t Open Until 2016

PARIS — The troubled Olkiluoto 3 nuclear plant in Finland will probably not start operating before 2016, the power utility behind the plant said Monday, another delay to a project that is already four years overdue.

The Finnish utility for which the plant is being built, Teollisuuden Voima, known as TVO, said recent progress reports received from the plant supplier, the Areva-Siemens consortium, suggested that a previous forecast of a 2014 start was unlikely to be met.

A failure to gain timely regulatory approval for the reactor’s digital instrumentation and control equipment has also delayed the start of operations, TVO said. The International Atomic Energy Agency describes so-called IC equipment as “the nervous system” of a nuclear facility, providing operators with a way to monitor operations and respond to developments.

Areva, the French nuclear company, and Siemens, the German industrial conglomerate, are building a giant 1,600-megawatt facility, big enough to supply 10 percent of Finland’s electricity needs, on an island in the Baltic Sea. The project was to have been finished in 2009.

TVO said it had asked the consortium “to update the overall schedule and provide a new confirmation for the completion date.” The company is battling the builders over who will ultimately bear responsibility for the cost overruns. The case is in arbitration at the International Chamber of Commerce.

The Areva-Siemens consortium fired back, saying in a statement that both the French and British nuclear safety authorities had already largely signed off on the equipment, and blaming TVO for the delays.

“Over the course of the past year, the consortium has asked for significantly more active cooperation from TVO in order to obtain the final approval of the detailed IC architecture,” the statement said. “The Areva-Siemens consortium regrets that TVO continues to not fulfill its obligations to allow for the project to advance properly.”

On completion, the Olkiluoto plant, employing a new-generation European pressurized reactor, will be among the most powerful nuclear facilities ever built. A second E.P.R. plant, being built in Flamanville, France, for EDF, is also significantly over budget.

There are, as yet, no examples of the new reactor type working anywhere in the world, but there are two such plants under construction in China, at a site in Taishan, Guangdong Province; the consortium noted Monday that construction at Taishan “is advancing twice as fast as the Finnish project.”

Jouni Silvennoinen, a TVO spokesman, declined to comment on what the final cost of the plant was likely to be or how much it was now over budget. As a privately held company, TVO does not have to make such information available to the stock market. Mr. Silvennoinen said the announcement Monday had been necessary to meet disclosure obligations to the Nordic electricity market.

Mr. Silvennoinen said a visitor to the site would see what appeared to be a completed power plant, with about 75 percent of the installation work at the nuclear reactor finished and most of the major equipment installed. The turbine facilities, the other half of the facility, are essentially finished, he said, “and just waiting for the steam to come from the reactor.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/business/global/finnish-nuclear-plant-wont-open-until-2016.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Shunning Nuclear Plants at Home, Japan Pursues Building Them Overseas

Japanese industrial conglomerates, with the cooperation of the government in Tokyo, are renewing their pursuit of multibillion-dollar projects, particularly in smaller energy-hungry countries like Vietnam and Turkey. The effort comes despite criticism within Japan by environment groups and opposition politicians.

It may seem a stretch for Japan to acclaim its nuclear technology overseas while struggling at home to contain the nuclear meltdowns that displaced more than 100,000 people. But Japan argues that its latest technology includes safeguards not present at the decades-old reactors at the stricken Fukushima Daiichi plant, which continues to leak radiation.

While Fukushima Daiichi could not withstand the magnitude 9 quake and the tsunami that ravaged much of Japan’s northeast coast in March, Japanese officials argue, their nation has learned valuable lessons — and has good nuclear track record withstanding most earlier earthquakes.

“Many countries of the world are seriously exploring the use of nuclear power, and we have assisted them in improving nuclear safety,” Japan’s new prime minister, Yoshihiko Noda, said at an address at the United Nations General Assembly recently. “We will continue to answer to the interest of those countries.”

Mr. Noda’s government considers foreign reactor projects a way to help stimulate Japan’s export-led economy, which had been struggling even before March’s natural and nuclear disasters. Tokyo’s backing— including financial assistance to the customer countries — has become critical in negotiating deals, especially as global confidence in nuclear safety has faltered in Fukushima’s wake.

The World Nuclear Association, a trade industry group, says the world’s stock of 443 nuclear reactors could more than double in the next 15 years, but analysts say that expansion will require strong support from the governments on both sides of any deal.

In early September, after a six-month hiatus following the earthquake, the Japanese government restarted talks with Vietnamese officials on a 1 trillion yen ($13 billion) project to build two reactors in southern Vietnam. The terms include possible Japanese financial aid.

The project would involve a new government-supported company whose largest shareholder is Tokyo Electric Power, operator of the damaged Fukushima Daiichi plant. The industrial conglomerates Toshiba and Hitachi, which supplied reactors to the Fukushima plant, are also investors. Ichiro Takekuro, a former Tokyo Electric, is the president of the new company, called International Nuclear Energy Development of Japan.

The Vietnam project, if it proceeds, would join a roster of about two dozen other nuclear plant projects that Japanese makers are bidding or working on in countries including the United States, China, Turkey and Lithuania.

Japan’s nuclear drive is a contrast to the recent announcement by Siemens, Europe’s largest engineering conglomerate, that it would stop building nuclear power plants. Siemens, with headquarters in Munich, is responding to Germany’s decision this year to phase out nuclear power — largely in reaction to Japan’s calamity.

But makers of nuclear reactors from other countries, including Areva of France, General Electric of the United States, Russia’s state-owned Rostacom, and several government-backed Chinese conglomerates like China National Nuclear, are pursuing new contracts. Within Japan, Tokyo’s effort has already drawn protest from nuclear opponents.

“The Japanese government’s promotion of nuclear exports is clearly a double standard and a mistake,” the environmental group Friends of the Earth Japan, said in September.

The opposition Liberal Democratic Party has also called for more debate on the nuclear export initiative by Mr. Noda and the ruling Democratic Party, although opinion in both parties remains divided.

“Some people are asking: Why is Japan trying to export something it rejected at home?” said Itsunori Onodera, a Liberal Democratic lawmaker and director of a parliamentary foreign policy panel charged with approving bilateral nuclear agreements. “Even if Japan ultimately does decide to continue nuclear exports, there needs to be more debate on the issue.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/business/global/shunning-nuclear-plants-at-home-japan-pursues-building-them-overseas.html?partner=rss&emc=rss