March 25, 2023

A Fight Over Coal Exports and the Industry’s Future

It’s part of a push by the nation’s coal industry, hobbled by plummeting demand as Americans turn to cleaner natural gas, to vastly expand what it sends to Asia and Europe. But the aggressive effort to rescue the $40 billion industry is running into fierce opposition from environmental groups, who say pollution caused by burning coal should not be exported to other countries.

The two sides have engaged in an increasingly pitched battle, in regulatory arenas and on the airwaves, scaring off some investors and raising concerns about the fate of the industry, which is seen as a key to economic growth in Western states like Montana and Wyoming.

“The future of the U.S. coal industry is at stake,” said Richard Morse, managing director at SuperCritical Capital, an energy consultancy. “Their future domestically is dim and demand growth internationally is very robust, so it is fair to say that a resuscitation of the industry has to come overseas.”

The future of the impoverished Crow Nation may also hang in the balance since it owns the enormous deposit of up to 1.4 billion tons of coal — more than the United States (?) produces in a year. But before Cloud Peak can mine the land and send the coal to energy-hungry nations in Asia, it needs more export terminals to be built in the Pacific Northwest, and those have been delayed or, in some cases, scuttled after investors grew weary of the continued opposition from environmental groups.

Last week, the Sierra Club and other groups opened another phase in the battle, filing suit in a federal court in Seattle against Burlington Northern Santa Fe railway and several coal companies, saying coal dust escaping from trains has polluted rivers and lakes in Washington. The new export terminals, they say, would only bring more trains carrying coal to the ports and increase the amount of dust.

Coal’s share of electricity generation in the United States has fallen to under 40 percent in the last decade, from 50 percent. Annual production dropped 7 percent in 2012 to just over 1 billion tons, the lowest total in two decades, and the stock prices of many coal companies have been plummeting.

Cheap, abundant and cleaner natural gas produced in new shale fields has replaced much of the coal that American power plants once burned, and regulatory pressures are mounting to curb greenhouse gas emissions from coal combustion. That has left exports as the only sure growth engine for the declining American coal industry.

Last year, American coal exports set a record of 125 million tons in sales, roughly double the volume in 2009, with most of that going to Europe. Exports fell this spring because of slower Chinese demand for steelmaking coal. But energy experts say the big potential market for American coal remains in Asia, and several proposed Pacific Northwest export terminals would have the capacity to nearly double current exports.

For the Crow Nation, which is sitting on the reserves here, and many coal companies like Cloud Peak, exports could make the difference between just getting by and prospering.

While coal mining is the largest private sector provider of jobs, half the adult population is unemployed. Homelessness would be pandemic if it were not customary for three or four families to cram into small trailers so crowded that couples sometimes go to motels for moments of privacy and children struggle to do homework through a blare of television.

Three bright days a year come when families receive small bonuses from the tribe, thanks to one coal mine that operates on the reservation, to buy presents for Christmas and beads and tepee canvas for the tribe’s annual powwow. The Crow hope more bright days may be coming, although some express concerns about the damage more coal mines could do to archaeological sites.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/15/business/energy-environment/a-fight-over-coal-exports-and-the-industrys-future.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Berkshire Hathaway Reports Strong 3rd Quarter

Berkshire earned $3.92 billion, or $2,373 per Class A share, in contrast to $2.28 billion, or $1,380 per share, a year earlier. Book value, Mr. Buffett’s preferred measure of the company’s worth, rose to $111,718 per Class A share, up 11.9 percent since year end.

The conglomerate, with holdings that include ice cream and insurance companies, employs more than a quarter-million people worldwide. Berkshire said its cash holdings grew to $47.78 billion, up $10 billion from the start of the year.

Mr. Buffett told CNBC last week that he was “salivating” for a major acquisition after two deals of more than $20 billion each fell through in the last few months. He knocked off a bit of that cash on Friday with a deal to buy the toy and party supply company Oriental Trading, though at $500 million it has little chance of “moving the needle,” as he has said he would like to do.

Berkshire said in a quarterly filing with securities regulators late Friday that it spent $1.8 billion in total on smaller acquisitions in the first nine months of the year. Many of those deals are never announced.

Berkshire said underwriting profits in its insurance unit fell sharply in the third quarter compared with a year ago, when the business had a one-time gain. One bright spot was the auto insurer Geico, whose underwriting gain nearly quadrupled on a higher policy count and better pricing.

The company’s Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad reported a gain in revenue on higher volumes, leading to stronger earnings.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/business/berkshire-hathaway-reports-strong-3rd-quarter.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Buffett Amasses 5.5% Stake in I.B.M.

Warren Buffett, chief of Berkshire Hathaway.Charles Dharapak/Associated PressWarren E. Buffett runs Berkshire Hathaway.

Warren E. Buffett, the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway, revealed on CNBC that his conglomerate had amassed 64 million shares of I.B.M, a stake of about 5.5 percent.

Berkshire now ranks among the largest shareholders in the company.

“They have laid out a road map, and I should have paid attention to it earlier,” Mr. Buffett said of the company on CNBC. Mr. Buffett, who indicated in the interview that he had not spoken with I.B.M. about his position, felt management had done “an incredible job.”

The $10.7 billion investment is unusual given Mr. Buffett’s long-stated aversion to technology stocks, particularly Internet stocks. Amid an Internet stock boom in 1998, he told Berkshire shareholders, “Technology is just something we don’t understand, so we don’t invest in it,” according to The Associated Press.

His letter to shareholders for 2000 boasted: “We have embraced the 21st century by entering such cutting-edge industries as brick, carpet, insulation and paint. Try to control your excitement.”

And while well known for his value investments, Mr. Buffett is buying I.B.M. at a premium price. The stock has been steadily rising all year, and is up more than 25 percent since January. At a recent $187 a share, I.B.M. currently trades near its record high.

Mr. Buffett said Berkshire had made other such plays in the past. He said the company bought control of Geico, the insurer, at its all-time high, and “bought railroads on the highs.” Berkshire Hathaway owns the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, which he acquired outright in 2009.

Related Links

The I.B.M. position will put Mr. Buffett neck and neck with State Street, the powerhouse Boston financial firm that also owns about 5.5 percent of the company’s outstanding shares, according to Bloomberg data.

The news comes as investment managers are set to release their third-quarter holdings. Though backward looking, these so-called 13F statements can cause market movements when closely watched investors like Mr. Buffett disclose their positions. Berkshire Hathaway is set to report its positions on Monday evening.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=80252f09397f2429b389415bca8040f3