April 26, 2024

Off the Shelf: Of Management and Mosquito Nets

But it’s in the realm of charity, and especially in international aid, where these methods are really succeeding beyond the confines of the corporation, as Alex Perry, chief African correspondent at Time magazine, demonstrates convincingly in “Lifeblood: How to Change the World One Dead Mosquito at a Time” (PublicAffairs, $25.99).

This little gem of a book heartens the reader by showing how eagerly an array of American billionaires, including Bill Gates and the New Jersey investor Ray Chambers (the book’s protagonist), are using concepts of efficient management to improve the rest of the world. “Lifeblood” nominally chronicles the global effort to eradicate malaria, but it is really about changes that Mr. Chambers, Mr. Gates and others are bringing to the chronically mismanaged system of foreign aid, especially in Africa.

Much has been written about how the Wall Street boom of the 1980s and the Internet mania of the 1990s made certain American investors extremely rich. Less has been written about how some of them, inspired in part by Mr. Gates, have used that wealth to improve conditions in the third world. Total private foreign aid from Americans, Mr. Perry writes, reached $37.3 billion in 2008, or “$10 billion more than the U.S. government sent overseas.”

The new philanthropists have realized, however, that money alone wasn’t helping. Much foreign aid can simply be stolen by corrupt third-world bureaucrats, — a chronic problem that the aid world, from the United Nations to nongovernmental organizations, seemed unable to resolve.

Enter Mr. Chambers. Having made his fortune pioneering leveraged buyouts in the 1980s — he and William E. Simon, the former Treasury secretary, completed an early whopper of a deal for Gibson Greetings — Mr. Chambers grew disenchanted with Wall Street and, during the ’90s, threw himself into efforts to improve the city of Newark. The city, while still struggling today, would probably be far worse off if not for his work.

He gave millions, it was true, but his genius was in building what Mr. Perry calls “the Newark triangle,” that is, uniting political leadership, business leadership and the media to confront the city’s ills. “Everything Ray went on to do in malaria,” an aide says, “was built on what he did in Newark.”

When Mr. Chambers, searching for a new challenge, discovered the antimalaria movement about five years ago, he found an effort in disarray. Few Americans appreciate how devastating malaria is to the third world. AIDS gets more press, but malaria — and, to a lesser extent, tuberculosis — have also killed huge numbers of Africans and crippled development efforts. As a result of DDT, mosquito-borne malaria was all but eliminated by the 1960s, but then complacency set in, and the disease came back stronger than ever.

Clearly, malaria is far easier to combat than, say, AIDS. Rates can be cut at least in half by something as simple as handing out pesticide-laden nets for people to place over their beds. In the late 1990s, Exxon Mobil, which has vast operations in Africa, became the first major company to announce widespread efforts to combat the disease, after finding that it was devastating the productivity of the company’s workers.

Malaria’s “defeatability” made the disease an attractive opponent for the Bush administration and scores of charities. Too many, in fact. When Mr. Chambers came along, he found them working at cross-purposes, throwing money (that all too often disappeared) at third-world governments.

Mr. Perry tells the story of how Mr. Chambers united the diverse efforts, brought in the White House to hold antimalaria conferences and then rallied the media. The most important media effort came from, of all sources, “American Idol,” whose “Idol Gives Back” specials did wonders to raise money and awareness.

“Ray approaches social issues like a C.E.O. approaches a company,” one aide tells Mr. Perry. “He breaks it down into supply chains, investment decisions, sales and marketing, accountancy.” Mr. Chambers was so effective that he was named a United Nations special envoy for malaria eradication. He set a goal: to eliminate malaria by 2015. Then he hired a small team of corporate and aid veterans to buy and distribute millions of mosquito nets to the seven African countries hit hardest by the disease.

It’s hard to say which was tougher: herding thousands of bureaucrats toward a single goal or getting all those nets into the hands of so many of the poor, especially in remote areas of Congo, Nigeria and what is now South Sudan. Though the campaign did not meet its every goal, it proved astoundingly successful. Nearly 300 million nets were distributed. Where the nets were used, malaria rates fell like a stone.

At 229 pages — including notes — “Lifeblood” is more like an oversized magazine article. But it has an important story to tell, and Mr. Perry tells it with precision and gusto. The book opens and closes with a visit to Apac, a Ugandan village at the heart of “the most malarious place on earth,” as Mr. Perry calls it. Before the Chambers-led drive, Apac was a ghost town, and the only residents on its streets, the book says, were three naked, staggering “zombies” suffering from malarial brain damage.

Afterward, well, let us just say the transformation is as dramatic as anything you will read in fiction.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d9cd439e90ecdb1a53fb6b1ef83b3fd4

Environmentalists Criticize Indonesia’s Plan to Save Forests

The initiative, in the form of a decree signed by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, commits Indonesia to a two-year moratorium on new permits to clear about 158 million acres of virgin forest and carbon-rich peatland.

The plan had its origins in a climate conference in Oslo in May 2010. It links the $1 billion in financing to “verified emissions reductions” as part of the effort known as Reduced Emissions From Deforestation and Forest Degradation, which is backed by the United Nations. Under the accord, developed countries help pay for the preservation of forests in developing countries.

Scheduled to begin in January, the moratorium was delayed as environmentalists and climate scientists pressed the government to increase the amount of land that would be off limits to new development. Powerful industries and some government departments pushed back.

The moratorium has been promoted as a landmark step in tackling climate change by reducing deforestation, which accounts for nearly 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. The initiative has been seen as a rare bright spot among stalled efforts to reduce worldwide emissions.

The moratorium — which does not affect existing forestry concessions and also allows for the development in virgin forest of some mining and agriculture projects deemed of vital national interest — has left neither environmentalists nor the affected industries entirely satisfied. But the government said the compromise was a step in reversing Indonesia’s record of unchecked clearing of tropical forests.

“I guess everybody has their own expectations,” said Agus Purnomo, Mr. Yudhoyono’s special adviser on climate change. Referring to nongovernmental organizations, he added, “The NGOs, the international community, they would like to see all permits in all forests be suspended.”

“That’s never been the intention,” he said. “All we’ve committed to is natural forests — that is, forests in good standing, untouched by humans.”

Mr. Purnomo said the moratorium was a first step for Indonesia to reach its goal of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions — the third highest in the world by some counts — by at least 26 percent by 2020. Other major measures, like a financing mechanism for anti-deforestation projects and an agency to oversee emission reduction efforts, are still being planned.

The environmental group Greenpeace said the moratorium showed that Indonesia had committed itself to the rhetoric of forest conservation, but it contended that compromises to powerful land-clearing industries like palm oil and pulp and paper would undercut the effort.

“Actually, it’s really a bit disappointing,” said Bustar Maitar, a leading forest activist at Greenpeace. “For sure, industry will be happy with this. This is part of their strong lobbying.”

Aida Greenbury, managing director of Asia Pulp and Paper, one of Indonesia’s largest paper producers, called the plan “a step forward.” But she said it needed to be followed by government action on promises to clear up Indonesia’s confusing system of land classification. The system makes it unclear just what is virgin forest and what is “degraded” land, which is considered to have lower environmental value.

Louis Verchot, chief climate scientist with the Center for International Forestry Research, based in Indonesia, cautioned that the moratorium was only a first step in addressing the long-term need to reduce emissions. “This guarantees a reduction in emissions, but it doesn’t guarantee Indonesia is going to meet its targets,” he said. “This should not be construed in any way as the mechanism by which Indonesia is going to meet its emissions reductions commitments.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=9f0620152982b6e05c89c79085d235ae