April 26, 2024

DealBook: Wells Fargo’s Mortgage Gains May Be Unsustainable

A Wells Fargo branch in Philadelphia.Matt Rourke/Associated PressA Wells Fargo branch in Philadelphia.

8:40 p.m. | Updated

Wells Fargo has turned its mortgage business into an enormous profit machine. The San Francisco-based bank posted earnings of $5.1 billion in the fourth quarter, a 24 percent increase from the previous year.

But its strong gains may not be sustainable, unless interest rates drop significantly or the housing market recovers substantially. Both are long shots.

“Rates really don’t have to go up very much to discourage a whole swath of people from returning to the housing market,” said Lance Roberts, chief economist at StreetTalk Advisors, an investment advisory firm.

Related Links

In recent years, Wells Fargo has aggressively expanded its mortgage business, a strategy that has helped drive record profits. The company reported net income of $18.9 billion in 2012, up 19 percent from 2011. Revenue rose 6 percent in the same period.

“We saw robust growth across the entire bank, proving that there is a lot of value in a strong, diversified business,” said Timothy J. Sloan, chief financial officer of Wells Fargo.

But after 12 consecutive quarters of rising profits, Wells Fargo may find it difficult to keep up the pace.

Wells Fargo

The bank’s recent mortgage profits largely reflect the government’s efforts to stimulate the economy, rather than a robust recovery in the housing market.

As the Federal Reserve has cut interest rates, millions of borrowers have refinanced their home loans to reduce costs. Refinancing accounted for 72 percent of Wells Fargo’s mortgage origination in the fourth quarter.

That business has been especially lucrative of late.

Banks pass on most of their mortgages to government entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee that the loans will be repaid. With the guarantee attached, banks sell the mortgages to bond investors and book a financial gain.

Profits have ballooned with the government intervention. The Fed has been a big buyer of mortgage bonds in an effort to drive down interest rates. But banks have not cut ordinary borrowers’ rates by the same amount.

That means the difference, or spread, between the rates increased last year. Wells Fargo’s gains from this activity totaled $10.3 billion in 2012, more than double the previous year.

Those gains may be hard to beat.

While the Fed has promised to purchase more mortgage bonds, interest rates may not fall much further. If mortgage rates stagnate or rise, fewer borrowers are likely to refinance or buy a house. And if the mortgage bond market weakens, banks will make less of a gain when selling the mortgages.

Already, refinancing activity appears to be slowing. In the fourth quarter, Wells Fargo handled $125 billion of mortgage originations, up 4 percent from the previous year. But loan production was higher earlier in the year, peaking at $139 billion in the third quarter.

At the same time, the Fed’s low rates are actually hurting other parts of the business. An important measure of a bank’s overall lending profitability, the net interest margin, has eroded. In the fourth quarter, Wells Fargo’s net interest margin dropped slightly to 3.56 percent, from 3.89 percent a year earlier.

Investors shrugged off the strong profits because of such concerns. Wells Fargo’s shares fell slightly on Friday, to $35.10, a 0.85 percent drop.

In an effort to assuage investors’ concerns about the refinancing business, Mr. Sloan, the chief financial officer, said in a conference call on Friday that he saw “billions of dollars in refinancing opportunities.”

Housing market numbers support his optimism. Over 70 percent of mortgages had interest rates above 4 percent in the fall, according to CoreLogic, a housing data firm. Some of those borrowers would benefit financially from refinancing, given that the interest rate on fixed, 30-year loans is 3.4 percent.

If the refinancing boom does sputter, a significant increase in new mortgages could help fill the void. That depends largely on the health of the housing market. While house prices posted annual gains last year, the recovery is far from robust.

Wells Fargo’s servicing business, in which the bank collects payments from homeowners, could also soften the blow. In the fourth quarter, the company reported $926 million in fees from that activity, up 6 percent from a year earlier.

Wells Fargo can also rely on other businesses to pick up some of the slack. In an interview on Friday, Mr. Sloan said that strong loan growth throughout the bank, including in autos and credit cards, reflected potential opportunity.

The bank reported gains in its wealth management business, where profit increased 13 percent, to $351 million. It has also been focusing on its brokerage business as regulations have curbed profits in other areas.

Cost-cutting could be another option. In the past, the bank has shown it can be aggressive on that front.

Recently, Wells Fargo has been developing its online and mobile banking operations so that it can trim staffing costs in its branches. It has also refocused on core businesses and sold units like H. D. Vest Financial Services, which it put on the auction block in 2011.

The company has also cleaned up much of the costly legal mess stemming from the mortgage crisis, striking several deals with federal regulators over the last year. This week, Wells Fargo was among the 10 banks that agreed to an $8.5 billion settlement with the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve over claims of shoddy foreclosure practices, including sloppy paperwork used in home seizures and botched loan modifications. Separately, the bank has allotted $1.2 billion to prevent foreclosures.

With the settlement, Wells Fargo puts an end to an expensive foreclosure review that was mandated by regulators. The review cost the bank an estimated $125 million each quarter.

“By putting these issues behind us, we can focus more of our resources on serving our customers,” the bank’s chief executive, John G. Stumpf, told analysts on Friday.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/11/wells-fargo-profit-jumps-24-percent-in-fourth-quarter-driven-by-mortgages/?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: JPMorgan’s Quarterly Profit Rises 13%, to $5.4 Billion

Jamie Dimon, chief of JP Morgan Chase.Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg NewsJamie Dimon, chief of JPMorgan Chase.

9:27 a.m. | Updated JPMorgan Chase reported on Thursday that second-quarter profit rose 13 percent, to $5.4 billion, from the period a year earlier, despite lingering mortgage troubles and lackluster trading results.

It was a decent start to earnings season for the banking industry, which is confronted by a stagnant economy in the United States, fiscal troubles in Europe and global regulatory uncertainty.

Despite market weakness, JPMorgan had a solid showing in its Wall Street businesses. The results on the consumer side were varied. With credit defaults on the decline, the bank saw a $1 billion benefit from the reversal of more funds that had been set aside for loan losses. Even so, the home lending unit continued to struggle, as the bank added $1.3 billion to its litigation reserves mainly related to the mortgage business.

Overall, JPMorgan announced a profit of $5.4 billion during the second quarter, or $1.28 a share, easily besting analyst consensus estimates of $1.21 a share. Earnings were down modestly from the $5.6 billion, or $1.29 a share that it earned in the first quarter, when its investment banking unit had an unusually strong trading record.

Revenue — under pressure across the banking industry – was relatively strong. At JPMorgan, it rose 7 percent from a year earlier to $27.4 billion, even as a slowdown in mortgage lending and fixed-income trading cut into the bank’s income. Douglas Braunstein, the bank’s chief financial officer, said that level of activity would be sustainable.

“It’s largely business as usual,” he said on a conference call with journalists.

The strong earnings at JPMorgan, a diversified bank that is often considered a crucial indicator for the rest of financial industry, could give a much-needed jolt to bank stocks, which have fallen sharply over the last few weeks. Shares of JPMorgan were up more than 3.5 percent in pre-market trading. Citigroup reports on Friday, while Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, and Morgan Stanley will release their results in the coming weeks.

Still, investors are increasingly worried about the banks’ prospect for growth. Troubling unemployment trends, higher capital requirements, and the eliminating of lucrative fees are raising questions about where they will find new sources of revenue. Stock and bond trading, which has helped prop up the banks results over the last two years, is waning as nervous investors rush to the sidelines with cash.

Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan’s chairman and chief executive, put a positive spin on his bank’s second quarter results. In a statement, he praised a “solid performance across most of our businesses” and noted a marked improvement in credit that was approaching a “more normalized environment” in both its consumer and corporate lending operations. The financial firm felt comfortable enough to buy back $3.5 billion of stock during the second quarter.

But questions loom over two of its biggest businesses: its home lending unit and its investment bank.

With mortgage losses running at almost $5 billion a year, Mr. Dimon replaced several of the managers responsible for running the unit in late June and vowed to fix past mistakes. But troubled loans keep haunting the bank.

The firm faces billions of dollars in potential legal claims stemming from the housing crisis. Federal and state regulators are leaning hard on it and other large servicers to radically overhaul servicing operations, changes that are driving up costs.

Then there’s the expected settlement over mortgage issues. Bank of America warned late last month that it planned to absorb a $20 billion hit to its earnings to clean up its mortgage – and it still could add billions more to cover future losses. Although JPMorgan moved faster that peers to address the issues, it could take awhile to put their mortgage problems behind.

In the statement, Mr. Dimon said that despite a modest improvement in loan performance, he expected that losses would remain elevated. The bank also took another $1 billion charge to cover increased foreclosure expenses and the cost of an expected regulatory settlement, on top of the $1.1 billion hit it took in the first quarter to cover the spiraling costs of servicing loans.

“We have been working hard to fix our problems and address past mistakes,” he said. “Unfortunately, it will take some time to resolve these issues and it is possible that we will incur additional costs along the way.”

The bank put aside another $1.3 billion in the second quarter to cover legal claims from investors seeking to recoup losses on loans that went bad. JPMorgan has added over $7.3 billion to its litigation reserves over the last five quarters, and established a separate reserve of more than $5.6 billion to cover losses stemming from the repurchase of faulty loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled finance companies.

Banking analysts say the mortgage problems could cost the bank up to $9 billion. But armed with those reserves, JPMorgan Chase executives have said they have ample resources to cope with the expected losses.

JPMorgan’s investment bank fared better. Its fixed-income and commodities operations were particularly hard hit, falling more than 18 percent from the first three months of the year amid a sharp reversal in the markets in early May. Stock trading revenue was down 13 from the first quarter because of lower volumes.

But the investment bank benefited from an improvement in its credit portfolio as well as strong performance in its deal advisory and equity writing businesses. Investment banking fees rose 8 percent from first quarter.

The bank’s other major businesses performed well, despite the challenging economic environment. Its credit card lending arm posted a $911 million profit after yet another big release of funds it had set aside to cover losses. The big commercial banking unit booked a $611 profit, amid a 9 percent increase in revenue.

Chase Retail banking, which includes the troubled mortgage group, squeezed out a $582 million profit. Meanwhile, the asset management and treasury services units also had decent quarters amid the turbulent markets.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=dabd05c5dc41a6f7e26d77c3a39d4883