November 22, 2024

High & Low Finance: Bank of America and MBIA Revisit the Mortgage Debacle

The battle being fought on the most fronts is between Bank of America — the bank that made the critical mistake of acquiring Countrywide Financial, once the country’s largest mortgage lender — and MBIA, the troubled monoline insurer that now warns it may not be able to keep paying claims on structured finance securities unless the bank pays it billions for the sins of Countrywide.

The insurance claims that could well tilt MBIA into bankruptcy are likely to be made by Merrill Lynch, which Bank of America acquired during the financial crisis, not long after it bought Countrywide. Kenneth D. Lewis, the bank’s chief executive then, will go down in history as the Ado Annie of Wall Street, after the character in the musical “Oklahoma” who sang, “I always say ‘Come on, let’s go!’ just when I ought to say nix.”

There was a lot of that willingness to proceed while ignoring risks during the credit boom that preceded the crash. Nowhere was it on display more than in the transactions that led to the battles now being waged.

Put briefly, Countrywide sold a lot of mortgage loans to securitizations it created, and paid small premiums to MBIA to insure that investors would not lose money. MBIA issued that insurance after doing no work at all to verify that the loans met the stated criteria, instead relying on Countrywide’s assurances and promises it would buy back bad loans. The securities got top ratings from Moody’s and Standard Poor’s, which also chose to trust rather than verify.

MBIA in those days — the securitizations in dispute covered second-mortgage loans issued between 2004 and 2007 — was a supremely confident organization. It had grown by selling insurance on municipal bonds, insurance that it was confident would never lead to any claims, or at least not to any significant ones. Other insurers had leapt into its market, and MBIA was fighting for market share in the rapidly growing securitization market.

In 2004, the insurer made a fateful decision, to stop doing due diligence on mortgage loans before it issued insurance on securities based on those loans. Countrywide says the evidence shows that MBIA thought premiums were so low that it needed to cut costs; MBIA says that had it taken the time to check, it would have lost the business to competitors.

Countrywide, also fighting for market share, was cutting corners, too. A lot of the home loans it made and put into securitizations seem not to have met the required criteria, a fact that would have been obvious with even minimal review efforts. But nobody was checking.

After the financial crisis exploded, it became clear that MBIA was in enough trouble that it would never be able to sell any new muni bond policies unless it did something. It came up with a clever idea to split in two. The good — United States muni bond — policies would go into one unit. The unit would be well capitalized and have no responsibility for the bad — the foreign government and structured finance — policies. MBIA got its regulator, what was then the New York State Insurance Department, to approve the deal before those who owned the structured finance policies found out about that.

One suit, in which Bank of America challenged the split, went to trial this year. It has been five months since the trial ended, but no verdict has been announced. Whatever that judge decides, an appeal is likely. Another judge, hearing a suit filed by MBIA claiming that Countrywide committed fraud in unloading bad mortgages into the insured securitizations, may soon decide whether to throw out the suit (as Countrywide wants) or declare MBIA a winner without a trial (as MBIA wants.)

Unfortunately for MBIA, the deadline for getting more cash is approaching. It expects to pay out a lot of money on one set of particularly foolish policies — with Merrill Lynch, now owned by that same Bank of America, as the recipient. It appears that MBIA will not have the cash to pay the claims, although it is not clear how soon that will happen.

Floyd Norris comments on finance and the economy at nytimes.com/economix.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/business/bank-of-america-and-mbia-revisit-the-mortgage-debacle.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Morgan Stanley Reports Loss as Settlement Weighs on Results

Morgan StanleyVictor J. Blue/Bloomberg NewsMorgan Stanley’s headquarters in Manhattan. The firm’s quarterly results were hurt by a legal settlement with the bond insurer MBIA.

Morgan Stanley, hit hard by a big legal charge and a difficult economy, swung into the red in the fourth quarter, reporting a loss of $275 million.

The loss of 15 cents a share compares with a profit of 41 cents a share in the quarter a year ago, but is better than a loss of 57 cents that was expected by analysts polled by Thomson Reuters. Morgan Stanley last posted a loss in the second quarter of 2011.

Despite the loss, the bank’s chief executive, James P. Gorman, struck a positive note in the earnings release, saying that Morgan Stanley ended the year “in better shape” than where it started and had dealt with a number of outstanding legacy and strategic issues that had been dogging it.

The firm took a one-time $1.7 billion charge related to a legal settlement with the bond insurer MBIA, which weighed on the results for the quarter. The charge accounted for a loss of 59 cents a share.

Fourth-quarter revenue in institutional securities fell 42 percent to $2.07 billion. One number that stood out in the institutional securities division was its compensation ratio. It came in at $1.6 billion, 75 percent of net revenue. The number is high because it includes the MBIA settlement. If that is removed the number drops to a more normalized 41 percent.

Asset management reported a sharp drop in revenue, falling to $424 million for the period, down 50 percent from the year-ago period. Morgan Stanley attributed the drop to lower gains on investments it has made in its merchant banking and real estate investing businesses.

The one main bright spot in the quarter was the firm’s global wealth management division. It posted net revenue of $3.25 billion this quarter, down just 3 percent from the year-ago period. The division had $1.6 trillion assets under management in the quarter, unchanged from the previous quarter.

All told, the firm logged net revenue of $5.71 billion in the quarter, down 26 percent from the year-ago period.

Morgan Stanley also announced that it had set aside $16.4 billion in 2011 to pay its employees, 51.2 percent of its net revenue. In 2010, Morgan Stanley paid $16.05 billion to employees, which also came to roughly 51 percent of its revenue. This year, with money tight, Morgan Stanley, as previously reported, decided to cap all cash bonuses at $125,000 for the year.

Morgan Stanley, like its rivals, is trying to navigate its way through the current difficult economic environment, which is exacerbated by a tighter regulatory regime that has forced firms to hold more capital against certain operations and out of other businesses altogether.

On Wednesday, Goldman Sachs said its profit in the fourth quarter was $978 million, ahead of analyst expectations but still muted compared with its historical earnings power.

Yet, Morgan Stanley was hit harder by the credit crisis than Goldman Sachs and Mr. Gorman has spent the last two years rebuilding the firm. He has reduced the risk in some divisions and focused a lot of his energy building Morgan Stanley’s wealth management division, which is a lower-risk operation that has the potential to deliver steady returns.

Morgan Stanley also declared a quarterly dividend of 5 cents a common share on Wednesday.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=229f448c5d22335747ed1ab706c51887

Morgan Stanley and MBIA Settle Dispute on Derivative Contracts

Opinion »

Can Protests Unseat Putin?

In Room for Debate: Russians’ dissent is a stunning turn, but it may not start a “Slavic spring.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8a95ab0ea769b7d254bc05dd0a481f38

New York Court Permits Banks to Sue MBIA

The state Court of Appeals in Albany, New York’s highest court, announced its decision Tuesday, overturning a lower court ruling.

A state appellate court in January dismissed the suit by the banks, which claimed the bond insurer’s overhaul had been intended to defraud policyholders. The banks claim the revamping was a “fraudulent conveyance” that left MBIA undercapitalized and possibly unable to pay future claims.

The Court of Appeals decision, in a 5-to-2 vote, turned on whether approval of the split by the state insurance superintendent had precluded the bank policyholders’ claims.

“We hold that the superintendent’s approval of such restructuring pursuant to its authority under the Insurance Law does not bar the policyholders from bringing these claims,” Judge Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick wrote for the majority.

The decision restored the banks’ claims of fraudulent conveyance, breach of contract and abuse of the corporate form. The court agreed with the lower court that a claim for unjust enrichment should be dismissed.

The banks said in court filings that the split had transferred $5 billion in cash and securities out of MBIA’s primary operating unit, the MBIA Insurance Corporation, to another entity, now known as the National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation.

The insurer argued that the restructuring had been done to help unfreeze the public finance markets during the financial crisis and had been approved by state regulators after an extensive review that found MBIA Insurance would remain solvent and have sufficient resources to meet claims, according to a brief filed in April with the Albany court.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=33c40e7c8a866c33a12347c0503e3e1a