May 5, 2024

Your Money Adviser: Trends to Watch for in Employer Health Plans

(Almost anyone can shop on the new exchanges, or marketplaces. But if your job comes with affordable coverage, you’re ineligible for any subsidies and you probably won’t need to shop there).

A few companies have made headlines with big changes to their employee health plans for next year. Walgreen, for instance, is shifting workers to a private health care exchange — separate from the state-based marketplaces created by the Affordable Care Act — where they can shop for plans with a contribution from the company.

And United Parcel Service recently told white-collar workers it would eliminate coverage for spouses who are were eligible for insurance through their own jobs.

So far companies making such major changes remain in the minority. But benefits experts caution that with so much in flux, it’s wise to carefully review the options your employer is offering for next year. “The overarching theme this year is that you have to pay attention,” said Jody Dietel, the chief compliance officer at the benefits management firm WageWorks.

Some trends to watch for include:

■ Higher costs for covering your spouse and children.

If you don’t already, you may pay a surcharge for covering your spouse if your spouse’s job offers coverage. Under the health reform law, companies that offer insurance to workers must also offer it to their children, but you may pay more for covering them, too.

■ Higher deductibles are here to stay.

The trend toward “consumer-driven” plans with high deductibles is continuing, as employers shift costs to workers. Usually, high-deductible plans are offered along with a health savings account, which employees can use to help pay for out-of-pocket medical costs. The idea is that if you are responsible for more of your medical spending, you’ll pay more attention to the cost. Most companies will now offer at least one such high-deductible plan as an option, and more are offering them as the sole plan. “Our best indication is that they’ll be fairly universally offered in the next few years, and in some cases, exclusively offered,” said Christopher Ryan, vice president of ADP’s Strategic Advisory Services, a benefits consultant.

■ Carrots and sticks to influence employee health behavior.

Companies are actively encouraging workers to improve their health, either by offering some sort of payment as an incentive for losing weight or exercising, or higher insurance premiums as a punishment. “Lots of companies are getting aggressive around wellness and health promotion,” said Tom Billet, a health care consultant at Towers Watson.

For instance, your employer may ask you to complete a personal health assessment, or undergo some sort of health screening, like a blood pressure or cholesterol test. As a reward, the company will deposit a bonus into your health savings account.

Here are some questions to consider this year:

Why did my employer gave me information about the state health insurance exchanges if I don’t need to use them?

The law requires employers to inform workers about the marketplaces. But for the “vast majority” of employees with workplace coverage, no action is warranted, Mr. Billet said.

Should I choose coverage under my employer’s plan, or the one offered by my spouse’s employer?

If you and your spouse have coverage available through your respective jobs, you’ll have to “do the math” both ways to see which option makes the most sense financially, said Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health, which represents large employers.

You’ll also want to take into account any restrictions the plans impose. If your spouse’s plan is less expensive but your family’s doctor isn’t in the plan’s network, for instance, you might want to go with your employer’s plan, even if it costs more.

Is there any upside to high-deductible plans?

The plans usually are paired with a health savings account, which can be financed with pretax dollars by either you, your employer or both of you. You can use the money to pay for medical costs that fall under your deductible (and keep in mind that most preventive care is covered outside of the deductible, meaning you shouldn’t have to tap the account to pay for it). If you don’t spend the money, it can be rolled over to the next year.

E-mail: yourmoneyadviser@nytimes.com

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/26/your-money/trends-to-watch-for-in-employer-health-plans.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Pretax Transit Benefits Raised for 2013

Those who commute to work using mass transit or van pools are eligible for the same amount in employer-provided pretax commuter benefits this year as their colleagues who drive and park, thanks to the fiscal package passed by Congress this week.

Workers whose employers offer such benefits can pay for their monthly transportation costs through pretax payroll deductions, saving them money.

In 2012, the amount that mass transit commuters were allowed to set aside monthly in their pretax commuter accounts fell to $125, from $230, while the limit for parking costs increased to $240, from $230, because of a cost of living adjustment.

The new fiscal measure increases the pretax transit benefit to $240 a month. (The actual cap is subject to confirmation by the Internal Revenue Service, which can adjust it in increments of $5, if necessary, to reflect inflation, said Jody Dietel, compliance officer with WageWorks, a benefit management firm.)

But because the fiscal package merely extended this “parity,” rather than making it permanent, its continuation after this year is still subject to future legislative action.

Why is it so difficult to make the equal benefit permanent? It does not seem to make sense to offer more of an incentive to drive than to take mass transit.

Ms. Dietel said the transit benefits were lumped together with various other “extender” provisions in the tax code — items that have to be revisited and approved periodically. Conflicts in Congress make it difficult to reach agreement on fiscal matters. “Congress is very politically charged,” Ms. Dietel said.

The loss in tax revenue from the transit parity provision is estimated at $220 million, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

WageWorks is part of a group working to support transit benefits, which are especially popular in urban areas. “We are working hard to make it permanent,” she said.

Although the measure also makes the benefit parity retroactive for 2012, it is unclear how employees who take public transit will be able to take advantage of that provision. The fiscal act was passed on Jan. 1, after most company payrolls had closed for 2012, Ms. Dietel noted, and “the devil is in the details.” WageWorks and other benefit managers are seeking guidance from I.R.S. on the matter, she said, but it may be that most employees will see the higher transit limit as a benefit in the future.

Do you use pretax commuter benefits?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/pretax-transit-benefits-raised-for-2013/?partner=rss&emc=rss