April 26, 2024

Journalists in Syria Face Dangers of War and Rising Risk of Abduction

Some appear to have been carried out by armed insurgent extremist groups and criminal networks seeking ransom in cash, weapons or both. But others have no declared motive.

Foreign journalists are particular targets, mostly Europeans who have ventured into Syria, usually without the permission of the Syrian government, to cover a conflict now well into its third year. Syrian journalists have been taken, too, as have Syrians working with foreign news organizations.

Foreign reporters were initially welcomed by many insurgents and Syrian civilians, taken for advocates who could publicize grievances against President Bashar al-Assad. Now they are sometimes viewed as interlopers who have no stake in the outcome of the conflict, which has left more than 100,000 people dead.

Spreading economic desperation in Syria has increased the possibility of betrayal, extortion and abduction, according to news media advocacy and rights groups. Some translators, drivers and local guides have reported that criminal groups or jihadists have tried to recruit them to lure journalists into Syria with promises of scoops.

“There have been more abductions and there have been nastier abductions,” said Donatella Rovera, a senior investigator for Amnesty International who has spent long periods traveling in Syria to document rights abuses in the conflict. “There is no denying that the fragmentation of armed groups, and the increased visibility of radical groups, have coincided with an increase in abductions,” she said. “It’s fair to assume there is a relationship there.”

The Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based advocacy group, has reported at least 14 cases of local and international journalists who are missing or have been abducted this year. Reporters Without Borders, based in Paris, has recorded 15 cases of foreign journalists who are missing or have been abducted or arrested. But the total number of abductions is believed to be significantly higher because many cases have not been publicly disclosed, usually at the request of the victims’ families, partly for fear of angering the kidnappers or emboldening them to demand higher ransom payments.

Even at the reported numbers, the pace of abductions of foreign journalists appears on a trajectory to surpass the 25 cases in Iraq in 2007, at the height of the conflict there.

“We see more journalists not abducted by the government, but by independent militias who are going after money, and this is worrying,” said Sherif Mansour, the Middle East and North Africa program coordinator for the Committee to Protect Journalists. The trend toward cash ransom, he said, started in late 2012, “but we can see from the targeting that basically they’re going after nationalities that are going to pay.”

Jonathan Alpeyrie, a French-American photojournalist for the Polaris agency, was abducted by Islamist fighters near Damascus on April 29 and released nearly three months later. He said a $450,000 ransom had been paid on his behalf.

“The rebels are so desperate they don’t care about their reputation abroad,” he said in an interview published on Wednesday by the Paris-based Journal de la Photographie. “They see guys like us as an opportunity.”

Ricardo Garcia Vilanova, a photojournalist and cameraman who has spent more than 13 months in Syria over multiple trips since the conflict began in 2011, said he had sensed a new mistrust toward the foreign news media on his most recent visit. He said many Syrians who opposed Mr. Assad resented the Western military reluctance to intervene.

The list of cases in the past few months includes both Syrian and foreign journalists. On July 25, three Syrian employees of Orient TV, an opposition television channel, were abducted in the northern town of Tel Rifaat: Obeida Batal, Hosam Nizam al-Dine and Aboud al-Atik. On July 24, a Polish photojournalist, Marcin Suder, was taken in the northwestern province of Idlib. On June 6, two French journalists employed by the Europe 1 radio station, Didier François and Edouard Elias, disappeared near Aleppo. On April 24, a Belgian academic, Pierre Piccinin de Prata, who was reporting for the Brussels newspaper Le Soir, disappeared. On April 9, Domenico Quirico, an Italian journalist for the newspaper La Stampa, went missing near the western city of Homs.

Two Americans journalists were publicly acknowledged to be missing in the past year. Austin Tice, a freelancer who had written for The Washington Post, McClatchy newspapers and Al Jazeera’s English-language channel, disappeared near Damascus almost one year ago. And James Foley, who had worked for GlobalPost, a Boston-based news Web site, disappeared Thanksgiving Day in Idlib.

In Mr. Foley’s case, an initial decision was made to withhold news of his disappearance, said Phil Balboni, the chief executive and co-founder of GlobalPost, while it quietly investigated what might have happened. Six weeks later, after consultations with Mr. Foley’s family, GlobalPost announced in a news article that he had been kidnapped by unidentified gunmen.

“We reached the point where we concluded that his likely abductors weren’t going to harm him in any way if we went public,” Mr. Balboni said. Based on information from what he described as credible sources, Mr. Balboni said he believed Mr. Foley had been abducted by pro-Assad militiamen and later turned over to the government in Damascus, despite official Syrian denials.

Peter N. Bouckaert, the emergencies director at Human Rights Watch, said overall abductions began to increase when fighting broke out last year in Aleppo, the country’s once-flourishing commercial hub.

The abductions have increased as the insurgency’s reliance on jihadist groups, like the Nusra Front and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, has grown. “They try to kidnap wealthy Syrians and some journalists for ransom,” Mr. Bouckaert said in an interview in June with Syria Deeply, an independent blog about the conflict. “The kidnappers tend to know the wealth of their victims,” he said.

Mr. Bouckaert said a second category of abduction, in which Sunnis and Shias kidnap each other in tit-for-tat hostilities, has also increased. Unexplained disappearances have proliferated as well, he said, “where people are taken by unknown gunmen and never seen again,” as in the case of two archbishops from Aleppo who vanished in April.

“In general, instability is on the rise in Syria, and these kidnappings are part of this instability,” he said. “Kidnappings are a part of the dangers that civilians in general face in this conflict.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/10/world/middleeast/journalists-in-syria-face-dangers-of-war-and-rising-risk-of-abduction.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Your Money: The Potential Effect of Obama’s Social Security Proposal

The president has proposed slowing the rate at which benefits increase over time, a change that would ultimately hit the oldest of the old, often single women, many of whom have probably exhausted any other savings. Many members of this group also face higher health costs, have little hope of working again and often live without the support of a life partner.

But advocates for retirees say that what is perhaps the most frustrating about all of this is that Social Security, which is self-financed through payroll taxes, does not contribute to the deficit. Yet it is being lassoed into the broader debate.

“With people facing an increasingly insecure retirement, this is no time to say, ‘Let’s cut Social Security,’ ” said Joan Entmacher, vice president for family economic security at the National Women’s Law Center. “It’s even more disturbing to be having a discussion about how much to cut benefits for people who already struggle to make ends meet — while some lawmakers insist that we can’t ask the wealthiest Americans and large corporations to pay a penny more in taxes.”

The Obama administration proposes to water down one of Social Security’s strongest features: the inflation adjustment, which enables retirees to maintain their purchasing power over long periods. Starting in 2015, the program would switch to a measure of inflation that has risen more slowly than the current index — on the order of about 0.3 percentage point less each year.

That does not sound like much. Nor would it lead to a big benefit cut right away. Moreover, President Obama did include a measure to soften the impact of the change, which we will dissect below. But the rate of slower growth would still compound over time and would ultimately cost many older people thousands of dollars over the course of their retirement.

“When you look at the retirement system, people don’t have anything else,” said Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. “And to have the only statement about Social Security solvency being a suggestion that what we need to do is reduce the indexing is not a useful conversation.”

It has been widely reported that if no changes are made to Social Security, its reserves will be exhausted in 2033, according to the latest annual report from the Social Security Administration’s trustees. After that, the payroll taxes collected would be enough to pay about 75 percent of benefits through 2086.

The switch to a different measure of inflation — known as the “chained C.P.I.-U” — would resolve about 20 percent of the program’s current shortfall, according to Social Security’s actuaries. (C.P.I.-U stands for the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers.)

But here is how it would initially hit retirees’ pocketbooks: Workers who retired at age 65 would receive 3.7 percent less in benefits after 10 years than they would under the current system; after 20 years, 6.5 percent less; and after three decades, 9.2 percent less, according to calculations by the Social Security Administration.

The administration has said it will only make a deal that includes some protections, and it incorporated two small benefit “bump-ups” — each equivalent to 5 percent of the average retiree’s benefit check, or about $800 annually in today’s dollars — as part of its proposal. The bumps would be phased in over 10 years, beginning at ages 76 and 95.

So take a woman with an initial benefit of $1,100 a month, or $13,200 a year, which is the median benefit of single women 65 and older, according to the National Women’s Law Center. (This benefit represents about 73 percent of this group’s total income, which is about $18,000.)

By the time she is 75, her benefits would be $41 less a month, or nearly $500 a year less, than under the current program.

“That doesn’t sound like so much,” Ms. Entmacher said. “Well, it’s equal to five days’ worth of food. So if you have your monthly Social Security check and you are trying to figure out how to get to the doctor, how to pay your rent and how you pay your out-of-pocket medical expenses, every dollar counts. So are you going to skip a meal for 15 days, each month, to save five days’ worth of food? Or are you going to cut your pills in half?”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/20/your-money/the-potential-effect-of-obamas-social-security-proposal.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Off the Charts: Strong Manufacturing Revival Seems to Be Fading

Surveys of manufacturing companies around the world indicate that business is still improving for many of them, but that the pace of growth has slowed.

In the United States, the Institute for Supply Management reported that the overall reading for its survey in May fell to 53.5 from 60.4. Figures above 50 indicate that more companies say business is improving than say it is getting worse, so that is hardly a sign of a new recession.

Still, it played into a rising fear that the recovery is slowing again at a time when unemployment remains high.On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the rate rose to 9.1 percent in May, up a tenth of a percentage point.

The drop of 6.9 points was the largest one-month decline since January 1984, a fact that received considerable attention. Less noted was the fact that the earlier decline came off even higher figures and did not presage a return to the recession that ended in late 1982.

The figures show the direction of change, not the magnitude or the existing level. Extremely strong numbers can persist for long periods only if conditions are continually improving.

The accompanying charts show three components of the survey, which is conducted in many countries around the world, and indicate that the slowing of growth is a more general phenomenon. For ease of understanding, the figures are converted to place a 50 reading — one that indicates an equal number of positive and negative responses — at zero.

The slide appears to be worse in Britain, where a strong revival late last year and early this year seems to have vanished. There, readings came in at negative levels for both output and new orders, the first time that had happened since May 2009, when the credit crisis was only beginning to ease. But more companies there continue to say they are hiring rather than reducing payrolls.

In the United States, the figure for new orders remains barely positive, and the output figure also declined, although it remains positive. The figure for employment also fell, but it remained at a level that historically has accompanied good jobs figures. The employment index has been over 55, or 5 in the chart, for 16 consecutive months, the longest such stretch since 1965.

Labor Department figures indicate that the number of manufacturing jobs hit bottom in December 2009 and that employment has been rising more rapidly in that sector than in the economy as a whole, although it fell by 5,000 jobs in May.

On average, the euro zone appears to be stronger than any of the other countries shown, but this is a case where averages can be misleading. The German boom cooled only a little, and France remains strong. But already weak figures in Greece are getting worse, and Spanish manufacturers see some deterioration.

In Japan, the figures show some revival from the blow caused by the earthquake and tsunami in March. The output index went above break-even levels after falling sharply, but as a group, Japanese manufacturers still say they are reducing employment.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=d732a3b4220ed57f90b4dd5ecf4af24b