May 4, 2024

Holder to Tighten Rules for Obtaining Reporters’ Data

The new guidelines, which the official said would take effect almost immediately, would prevent the Federal Bureau of Investigation from portraying a reporter as a co-conspirator in a criminal leak as a way to get around a legal bar on secret search warrants for reporting materials, as an agent did in a recently revealed search warrant affidavit involving a Fox News reporter.

They would also make it harder — though not impossible — for prosecutors to obtain a journalist’s calling records from telephone companies without giving news organizations advance notice, as the department recently did in obtaining a sweeping set of phone records for reporters with The Associated Press. Notifying news organizations in advance would give them a chance to contest the request in court.

“This is as far as the department can go on its own until Congress passes the media shield legislation,” the Justice Department official said, referring to a bill, which the Obama administration backed amid a furor over leak investigations, that would let judges rather than prosecutors be the ultimate decision-makers about subpoenas for journalists’ phone records, among other matters.

Mr. Holder briefed President Obama about the changes at the White House on Friday morning, officials said. Mr. Holder had held a series of meetings with newsroom leaders and lawyers for media companies in recent weeks.

In May, a 2010 affidavit was unsealed that sought a warrant for e-mails from the Google account of James Rosen of Fox News in which he corresponded with a State Department analyst who was suspected of leaking classified information about North Korea. The disclosure touched off a furor among journalists.

Congress, under the Privacy Protection Act, has generally forbidden search warrants for journalists’ work materials, but a federal statute makes an exception to that rule if the reporter is suspected of committing a crime. In the Fox News request, an F.B.I. agent wrote that Mr. Rosen qualified for that exception because he had violated the Espionage Act by seeking secrets to report, including by flattering the analyst and trying to conceal their communications.

No American journalist has ever been prosecuted for gathering and publishing classified information, so the language raised the prospect that the Obama administration — which has brought an unprecedented number of leak cases — was taking its crackdown to a new level. But the administration insisted that it never intended to charge Mr. Rosen.

The revision to the guidelines would essentially forbid prosecutors to use such a tactic to get around the Privacy Protection Act by imposing additional barriers to obtaining a search warrant for a reporter’s records.

The revised policy, the official said, will say that the exception to the Privacy Protection Act may be invoked only when the member of the news media “is the focus of the criminal investigation for conduct going beyond ordinary news-gathering activities.” Search warrants directed at reporters will not be allowed “if the sole purpose is the investigation of a person other than” the reporter.

In addition, the new guidelines will require the attorney general to sign off on any exception to that prohibition. Previously, a deputy assistant attorney general could do so.

The Justice Department also disclosed in May that it had obtained calling records for more than 20 telephone lines of A.P. offices and journalists, including their home phones and cellphones, in connection with an investigation into a leak about a foiled bomb plot in Yemen in 2012.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/13/us/holder-to-tighten-rules-for-obtaining-reporters-data.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Obama, Offering Support for Press Freedom, Orders Review of Leak Investigations

“Journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs,” Mr. Obama said in a wide-ranging address on counterterrorism policy. “Our focus must be on those who break the law.”

Mr. Obama said he raised the issue with Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who he said shared those concerns and would gather representatives from news media organizations as part of the review. Mr. Obama instructed Mr. Holder to report back to him by July 12.

Among the issues likely to be discussed is how broadly the government should be allowed to subpoena telephone, e-mail or other records belonging to journalists who have reported on classified information.

Asking Mr. Holder to lead the review, however, puts the attorney general in the awkward position of scrutinizing investigations that his department has pursued.

Mr. Obama’s remarks came amid deepening concern among many news organizations that the government is breaking new ground in how it investigates leaks of national security secrets. In a case involving The Associated Press, the government seized records of 20 office and home phone lines for A.P. reporters and editors.

In a case involving a Fox News correspondent, James Rosen, prosecutors obtained a search warrant for Mr. Rosen’s phone and e-mail records, after describing him as a possible “co-conspirator” for publishing information about a potential North Korean missile test.

On Wednesday, NBC News reported that Mr. Holder had signed off on the search warrant. Officials at the Justice Department did not return a phone call requesting comment.

Mr. Obama, in his speech, cast the leak investigations as an example of the challenge in balancing national security — particularly the safety of Americans working in dangerous places — with an open society. But he placed the legal onus squarely on those who leak classified information, not on the reporters.

“We must enforce consequences for those who break the law and breach their commitment to protect classified information,” Mr. Obama said. “But a free press is also essential for our democracy. That’s who we are. And I am troubled by the possibility that leak investigations may chill the investigative journalism that holds government accountable.”

It was a more ringing affirmation of press freedom than Mr. Obama’s response when he was first asked about the A.P. case last week. He said then that he would not apologize for being “concerned about information that could compromise their missions or might get them killed,” referring to Americans in hazardous posts.

The president and chief executive of The A.P., Gary Pruitt, criticized the government’s action as “unconstitutional” and said it had impeded the ability of A.P. reporters to do their jobs. The Justice Department, in a letter to Mr. Pruitt, defended its seizure, saying it had exhausted all alternatives before taking that step.

Mr. Rosen’s case has also drawn attention because of reports that the government monitored the phone line of his parents in Staten Island. On Wednesday, the United States attorney for the District of Columbia denied tapping the phones of Mr. Rosen or his parents.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/24/us/politics/obama-offering-support-for-press-freedom-orders-review-of-leak-investigations.html?partner=rss&emc=rss