May 3, 2024

Greece Moves Forward on New Austerity Bill

The controversial bill — which includes additional wage and pension cuts, public sector layoffs and changes to collective bargaining rules — passed with all 154 governing party legislators in Greece’s 300-seat Parliament voting in favor. There were 141 votes against the bill with five legislators absent from the roll call. The bill cannot become law until a second vote — on the separate articles of the legislation — on Thursday. The measures are expected to pass.

Earlier, skirmishes between demonstrators and the police had broken out outside the Parliament as tens of thousands of Greeks took to the streets at the start of a two-day general strike called by the country’s two main labor unions. A crowd of dozens of youths took advantage of the moment to smash several storefronts and begin looting.

The police put crowd estimates at around 80,000 people; some news Web sites said more than 100,000. The police would not release official figures yet.

A spokesman for the Athens police said that 38 officers and three demonstrators were hurt in Wednesday’s clashes. Greek media said at least six demonstrators were injured. Police said five people were arrested and another 28 detained briefly for questioning.

The debt-ridden government must pass the austerity measures to secure the next installment of aid from the European Union. Only that will avert a default next month that could shake the euro zone and reverberate through the global economy.

European Union leaders are preparing to meet Sunday to decide on the release of the installment, $11 billion, part of a $150 billion bailout engineered last year. They will also be looking at a much broader European rescue designed to protect the bloc should Greece default.

On Wednesday, shops, bakeries and gas stations closed. Most international travel was suspended, with many flights canceled, the national rail service halted and ferries moored in port. Public transportation was running on a limited service to enable workers to attend protest rallies. Tax offices, courts and schools shut down, hospitals were operating with only emergency staff and customs officials walked off the job.

Civil servants, who have been the most vociferous in their protests, continued sit-ins at ministries and state agencies, obliging government officials to meet in other venues including the Parliament building, which was the scene of violent clashes between protesters and the police in June when the last set of austerity measures was voted into law.

The skirmishes came as small groups of demonstrators wearing hoods and armed with clubs and flags began throwing rocks at the police outside Parliament. The police fired back tear gas. Some demonstrators set fire to a guard booth. Blocks away, demonstrators set fire to garbage dumpsters, which are piled high with trash due to a recent strike by garbage collectors.

Many in the crowds said they did not normally protest, but that the situation had evolved dramatically in recent months.

“We’ve reached a certain limit,” said Vasia Retsou, 30, a public school kindergarten teacher, who said she had come to protest for the first time, as she marched in a group of students.

Anastasia Dotsi, 70, a retired bank worker, said anger had driven her out to protest. “We have been crushed as a people,” she said. She said her son and daughter, who both work in the private sector, had not been paid in months and were struggling to pay their mortgages and support their families.

“There’s no precedent for this,” Ms. Dotsi added. “I have never been a leftist, I voted for Pasok” — the Socialist Party of Prime Minister George Papandreou — “I consider myself a middle-class person. But they’ve pushed us to become extremists.”

As she stood at the base of Syntagma Square, Maria Sarrafidou, 53, a psychiatrist, said that three psychiatric care centers where she had worked had closed down in recent months. At the same time, she added, she sees more patients in her private practice, but they pay her less.

“Mostly panic disorders,” she said. “In the last two years I’ve seen children and adults. They have no hope for the future. They wait and wait, this is the most difficult part,” she added. “They don’t know what’s going to happen.”

The two labor unions that called for the general strike, which represent about 2.5 million workers, are leading resistance to the new package of cutbacks. The measures include additional cuts in wages and pensions, thousands of public-sector layoffs and changes to collective-bargaining rules.

As with the last vote on austerity measures, in June, the latest round of votes are fraught. The governing Socialist Party has a fragile majority of four in the country’s 300-seat Parliament, and some lawmakers are said to be wavering. One legislator, Thomas Robopoulos, resigned his seat in protest on Monday, although he was replaced by another Socialist deputy and so his move did not narrow the government’s majority. Another, former labor minister Louka Katseli, has said she would reject one article in the bill on collective bargaining.

Resistance is limited, with most governing party legislators expected to approve the changes, and support from a smaller opposition party is possible. But the government was taking no chances. In a bid to galvanize support on Tuesday Mr. Papandreou appealed to Socialist lawmakers to put the common good above personal concerns.

“We must endure this battle so that the country can win, we must be calm and rise to the challenge,” he said, noting that passing the new measures were crucial to clinching critical rescue funding from foreign creditors.

“The vote will boost our negotiating position, it will give us strength for the E.U. summit,” he said. The key goal for Greece, Mr. Papandreou said, was “to stay in the euro zone.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/world/europe/greek-workers-start-two-day-anti-austerity-strike.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Goldman Sachs Draws Up Deeper Cuts

The headquarters of Goldman Sachs. The bank is bracing for what could be one of its worst quarters since it went public.Scott Eells/Bloomberg NewsThe headquarters of Goldman Sachs. The bank is bracing for what could be one of its worst quarters since it went public.

Goldman Sachs, bracing for what could be one of its worst quarters since it went public 12 years ago, is preparing to expand its cost-cutting initiative by hundreds of millions of dollars, a move that could lead to additional job losses at the Wall Street bank.

This summer, Goldman said that it would wring out $1.2 billion in costs from its operations by mid-2012 and cut roughly 1,000 jobs, about 3 percent of its work force. But as the market turmoil has weighed on trading and other businesses in recent weeks, senior executives have been debating even deeper reductions, according to people briefed on the matter who were not authorized to speak publicly.

With the company’s third quarter closing on Friday, Goldman has been revising its plans, potentially raising the cuts by as much as $250 million, to $1.45 billion. Based on its 2010 spending, such reductions would amount to 5 percent of the firm’s expenses.

Along with the possibility of additional layoffs, the firm is expected to reduce employee pay, much of which is handed out later in the year. It is also sharpening its focus on noncompensation expenses, like real estate and travel, according to one of the executives with knowledge of the discussions.

The executive warned that no final decision had been made on size of the cuts, and that the numbers could change quickly if the market improved or weakened. The financial firm may address the matter when it releases its earnings on Oct. 18, he added.

Goldman’s move underscores the broader problems on Wall Street. Financial firms have been under pressure for months, amid the European debt crisis and an economic slowdown in the United States, and a raft of regulatory changes is expected to crimp future profits. But the financial situation has deteriorated in recent weeks, as the market rout has ravaged revenue across Wall Street.

With the stock market slumping, analysts are quickly revising their estimates for third quarter earnings, which the banks are set to report in mid-October. Analysts are tempering their predictions for JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Bank of America and others. Goldman is now expected to earn $1.35 a share in the third quarter, less than half what the firm earned in the same period of 2010, according to consensus estimates from Thomson Reuters. A month ago, analysts predicted the bank would make $2.65 a share.

The financial picture could be even more bleak, as analysts at both Barclays Capital and Bank of America Merrill Lynch have predicted a loss for Goldman. The company has reported a quarterly loss only once since going public in 1999; it lost $2.12 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008, months after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy.

“This is an extremely challenging environment, and I am sure every bank will be taking another hard look at expenses after the recent market downturn,” said Glenn Schorr, an analyst at Nomura, the Japanese bank.

In anticipation of a slowdown, banks began trimming their budgets earlier this year and took aim at the biggest expense: compensation. Bank of America, which continues to have losses from the mortgage crisis, has had some of the most severe cuts. It has announced that it would eliminate 30,000 jobs, nearly 10 percent of its total work force, over the next few years. Over all, the bank is looking to cut $5 billion in annual expenses.

JPMorgan Chase is in the midst of a five-year, $1.3 billion cost-cutting plan that will eliminate roughly 3,000 jobs. Morgan Stanley cut some low-producing brokers in its wealth management division, and Credit Suisse laid off administrative assistants in its investment banking unit last week as part of a larger reduction of 2,000 employees.

Wall Street executives are also preparing their staffs for smaller year-end bonuses, although the change is not yet reflected in the expenses. During the first six months of the year Citigroup, JPMorgan, Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America set aside $65.69 billion to cover compensation and benefits, up 8 percent from a year ago, according to data provided by Nomura. But financial firms tend to wait until the fourth quarter to make the call on the annual payouts.

“The third quarter was rough and revenue is sure to be down, so compensation levels will follow,” said Mr. Schorr.

As Wall Street looks to drive down costs in a bid to protect profits, no expense has been overlooked. Goldman Sachs recently downsized the drinking cups in its New York headquarters to 10 ounces from 12 ounces, saving thousands of dollars. It has also gone mostly cashless in the cafeteria and other areas, eliminating the need to pay armored truck companies to haul away the money.

Barclays, which has said it plans to cut 3,000 jobs this year, recently issued a memo reminding employees that work-issued cellphones are to be used “for valid business purposes only.” In addition to closing two-thirds of its 63 data centers, Bank of America did not host an annual field day for its municipal bond department, a country club affair in New Jersey that in past years included sport stations outfitted with beer kegs.

Even foliage is not safe from the chopping block. James P. Gorman, the chief executive of Morgan Stanley, faced questions about plants at a town hall meeting this summer. An employee told Mr. Gorman that he had noticed decidedly less greenery around the office.

“Every dollar we don’t spent is a dollar available for the bottom line,” Mr. Gorman responded.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=cfa80db8751bdca4b585558a92bdd475

U.S. Exports Rise to Record as Trade Deficit Shrinks

WASHINGTON — American manufacturers sold more cars, airplanes and industrial machinery in foreign markets in July, sending exports to a record high and pushing the trade deficit down to its lowest level in three months, the Commerce Department reported Thursday.

The trade deficit narrowed to $44.8 billion in July, down 13.1 percent from June, an improvement that reflected a 3.6 percent rise in exports to the record level of $178 billion. Imports dipped 0.2 percent to $126.9 billion as the bill for imported oil dropped 6 percent to $35.5 billion as crude oil prices fell.

The big jump in exports should provide critically needed support for growth at a time when the United States economy has been in danger of toppling into a recession.

Also Thursday, the Labor Department said the number of people seeking state unemployment benefits in the United States ticked up slightly last week, rising 2,000 to a seasonally adjusted 414,000.

The report suggested that companies were not significantly increasing layoffs, despite weak economic growth. But it also signals that little hiring was taking place. Applications need to fall below 375,000 to indicate sustainable job growth, economists say. They have not been below that level since February.

The four-week average, a less volatile measure, increased for the third straight week to 414,750, the government said.

Overall, the American economy grew at a meager 0.7 percent in the first six months of this year, the slowest growth since the recession ended two years ago. Economists are hoping for a modest rebound in growth in the second half of the year, some of it coming from stronger export sales, like those in July.

A narrowing trade deficit adds to economic growth because it means more products are being produced in the United States and less money is flowing into the hands of foreign producers to buy imports.

The United States trade deficit through July was running at an annual rate of $565.3 billion, 13.1 percent higher than last year’s imbalance of $500 billion.

For July, the American trade deficit with China rose 1.1 percent to $27 billion, the largest imbalance since September 2010. Through the first seven month of this year, the deficit with China is 10 percent higher than the same period in 2010, a year when the trade gap between the two nation’s hit a record high. The Obama administration has been applying pressure to China to allow its currency to rise more quickly in value against the dollar as a way of increasing U.S. exports to China and lowering Chinese imports to this country.

The deficit with Japan jumped by 30 percent in July to $5.3 billion, reflecting a sharp rebound in imports from Japan as that country’s factories resumed more normal production following the March 11 natural disasters. The curtailment of Japanese shipments to the United States restricted U.S. production in such areas as autos where American factories are dependent on getting component parts from Japan.

Oil imports declined because the volume of shipments fell along with the price. The average price of a barrel of imported crude oil dropped to $104.27 in July, down from $106 in June. Because oil prices have declined further since then, economists are expecting oil imports to continue to fall in coming months.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/09/business/economy/us-exports-rise-to-record-as-trade-deficit-shrinks.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Third Solar Company Files for Bankruptcy

Solyndra, which also received more than $700 million in venture capital financing, said it would try to find a buyer quickly to avoid a fire sale liquidation.

The solar industry has been in turmoil this year as a glut of panels has sent prices plummeting 25 percent. Manufacturing capacity expanded just as government austerity measures in Europe eliminated subsidies and undercut demand.

Solyndra cut prices to try to compete but said in court papers that it had been unable to match the extended payment terms offered by foreign competitors.

The company, based in Fremont, Calif., said last week it had suspended operations and laid off 1,100 workers.

Solyndra’s bankruptcy filing followed similar filings by Evergreen Solar and SpectraWatt, a private company that was backed by the Intel Corporation.

Solyndra said in documents filed in Delaware’s bankruptcy court that it planned to spend the next four weeks trying to drum up interest among potential buyers to avoid shutting down permanently and selling its assets piecemeal to repay its creditors.

If it finds a buyer, it could lead to the rehiring of some of its laid-off workers. One of those workers filed a class-action lawsuit against the company in the bankruptcy court, accusing Solyndra of violating the federal law that requires larger companies to give 60 days’ notice of layoffs.

Solyndra did not return a call seeking comment.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=da55036cab513d6f428df97dc5e57143

DealBook: ABN Amro to Cut 2,350 Positions

Gerrit Zalm, chief of ABN Amro.Lex Van Lieshout/European Pressphoto AgencyGerrit Zalm, the chief executive of ABN Amro, which has been working to improve its financial picture.

The ax falls again in finance.

ABN Amro, the nationalized Dutch lender, announced on Friday that it would cut 2,350 jobs over the next three to four years, as it continues to cut costs and improve its capital position.

The layoffs are the latest reductions in an industry hampered by weak earnings, regulatory uncertainty and a global economic malaise. HSBC is cutting 30,000 positions. Credit Suisse said it would eliminate 2,000 positions. And Lloyds Banking Group is cutting 15,000 jobs.

The news comes as ABN Amro steadily improves its financial picture. On Friday, the bank announced profit of $1.25 billion for the first half of the year, compared with a loss of $1.4 billion last year. It also cut its cost structure. Expenses now stand at 63 percent of income, down from 75 percent a year ago.

But ABN Amro warned that the rest of the year could be rocky. Gerrit Zalm, the chairman of ABN Amro, pointed to the sovereign debt crisis as a potential drag on future earnings, adding that he expected “impairments to be somewhat higher in the second half and pressure on interest margins to increase.”

“The impact of the government debt concerns on the global economy is still unclear,” Mr. Zalm said in a statement. “Though our resilient businesses and strong capital base put us in a good position, we remain cautious. Our first-half 2011 results should therefore not be extrapolated to the remainder of the year.”

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a1b2d9c8454e50f0c2a6621a979100cd

Strikers Trade Barbs With Verizon

Verizon officials assert that this is largely a shrewd talking point aimed at wooing public support for the workers. The company insists that the striking employees are handsomely paid and will remain solidly in the middle class even if Verizon wins on some of the disputed issues, like getting the workers to pay at least $1,200 more a year toward health coverage.

Throughout this first week of the walkout by the Communications Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the sides have contradicted each other and talked past each other as they jockey to win public backing and rally their supporters.

For instance, union officials say Verizon’s proposed health insurance changes would cost some workers $6,800 more each year, and its overall proposals would cost workers $20,000 on average each year. But Verizon’s top spokesman called the $6,800 health assertion “distorted” and the $20,000 claim “bogus.”

In the states stretching from Massachusetts to Virginia, where the unions are on strike, workers picketed on Friday at scores of company facilities, with the communications workers president, Larry Cohen, joining the picketing in Philadelphia. In addition to the health insurance changes, Verizon has called for a pension freeze, reduction of sick days and elimination of all job security provisions — a proposal workers fear will lead to far more layoffs and outsourcing, especially of call center workers.

“The package of concessions they’re seeking is so sweeping in terms of wages, benefits, pension, vacation and sick days that it would take what are good union jobs and push people into a very different economic situation,” said Pam Galpern, a Verizon field technician in New York City for 12 years. “We see this as a definite attack on the middle class, and there’s no justification for it from a company that’s so profitable.”

Verizon officials show little patience with union talk about imperiled middle-class workers, “This is a well-worn negotiating and communications ploy — it’s not a statement of fact,” said Peter Thonis, Verizon’s chief spokesman.

Verizon says its unionized workers average $70,000 a year before overtime and $91,000 with overtime. But union officials say only a small percentage of workers earn that much with overtime, an amount they say would require hundreds of hours of it.

Company officials note that the average American worker earns $23 an hour, translating to $48,000 a year for a full-time worker. “The striking workers earn considerably more than many unionized nurses and teachers,” Mr. Thonis said. “We’re at the very top of our industry in terms of compensation.”

He said the strikers were part of a rarefied group who contributed nothing toward their health insurance premiums. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, just 1 percent of American workers pay nothing toward their family coverage premiums. The unions say the workers pay 7 percent of their health coverage through copayments and deductibles.

Doug Anderson, a Verizon field technician for 15 years, said he was barely in the middle class and would fall out of it if Verizon won concessions.

“What we make is just a living wage in the New York area,” said Mr. Anderson, 53, a father of three who lives in Poughkeepsie. “On what I earn, my family can’t even afford to live where I work — Westchester County. And on what we earn, it’s hard to send a child through college.”

Warning that the strike might be a long one, Robert Master, a union spokesman, said the workers were angry because the company seemed intent on cutting compensation costs even though it had $22 billion in profits the last four years. But Verizon officials say that nearly all the striking employees work in its landline division, which faces intense competitive pressures. Its customer base and profit margins have shrunk over the last decade, they said.

Industry analysts estimate that the Verizon workers earn several dollars more an hour than workers at largely nonunion cable competitors like Cablevision and Time Warner.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=f9ce934c43198beaaa50ad46a13d1135

In Minnesota, Above-Average Economy Hides Familiar Pains

During the recession, the state’s unemployment rate never reached the double-digit peak suffered by the nation as a whole. Since the recovery began, it is among a handful of states whose rate has fallen at a faster clip than most other states. Minnesota’s rate is now 6.6 percent, well below the 9 percent across the country now.

Farmers in the state’s large agricultural sector have benefited from surges in the prices for their corn and soybeans. Among big companies with headquarters in the state, 3M and General Mills have recently reported strong earnings growth, and Target and United Healthcare are hiring.

Dig a little, though, and the foundation looks wobblier. Economists point out that some of the drop in state unemployment merely reflects people giving up on the job search or retiring early, as well as an aging work force with fewer young people hunting for jobs.

“It really seems slow here,” said David Vang, an economist at the Opus College of Business at the University of St. Thomas. “So if we’re rapid, other places must be terrible.”

Many people look to Minnesota as a state whose demographics, varied industries, educated citizenry and public policy could together provide a bit of a shield against hard times. But a closer inspection shows a disconnect between the more encouraging economic data of late and the harsher reality that people so often describe, here and across the country.

According to government data, which show that state unemployment peaked at 8.5 percent in the downturn, employers slashed roughly 154,000 jobs but have added back fewer than 27,000 — or only about 18 percent of those lost. Big local employers including Medtronic, a medical device maker, and Hutchinson Technology, which makes components for disk drives, have announced layoffs in recent weeks. Small to medium-size companies say they are nervous about government policy and are reluctant to hire.

A depressed real estate market remains a drag on the local economy — as it does in many other places. In March, foreclosed homes made up more than 40 percent of sales in the Twin Cities. Construction workers have been idled for years, with little hope of much imminent work. And the state government must resolve a $5 billion budget shortfall that some fear will lead to job cuts.

Over all, the nation continues to face a battery of economic challenges. Last week’s employment data showed a welcome bit of job creation for several months’ running, but other recent reports have been more lackluster. Unemployment insurance claims have been running at a higher level, and the main association of small businesses said it expected hiring to be sluggish.

Minnesota has some ability to outpace the rest of the country, with its tilt toward medical and food manufacturing and agricultural strength.

“In some ways it looks like it’s doing a little bit better,” said Terry J. Fitzgerald, senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. “But not a lot better.”

Still, part of the reason Minnesota’s headline unemployment rate may have shown more rapid improvement is that it has fewer young people competing for jobs. According to Thomas Stinson, the state economist and a professor at the University of Minnesota, the proportion of workers in the 20-to-40 age group has slid from nearly half in the 1980s to about 38 percent now.

The people in the 40-to-60 age group, Mr. Stinson said, “are the people whose 401(k)’s got hit so hard and whose housing values have gotten hit so hard. So part of the reason for the slow recovery is that people are not spending, but are rebuilding their 401(k)’s. And we haven’t seen the release of pent-up demand that we would have normally seen” after a recession.

The state also faces many of the same trends that hamper job growth elsewhere. To the extent they are hiring, companies like 3M and General Mills are adding more people abroad than domestically. Connie Pautz, a spokeswoman for Hutchinson Technologies, which will cut about 600 people — or nearly half its Minnesota staff — over the next 12 months, said the company had automated much of its operations. “So we don’t need as many people,” she said.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/14/business/economy/14unemployed.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

China’s Economy Slows Slightly

But data released on Tuesday and Wednesday leaves unclear whether the slowing is enough to bring down inflation — particularly as long as the central bank is pumping tens of billions of renminbi into the economy each week to keep the Chinese currency from rising more quickly against the dollar.

Chinese policy makers now face a delicate balancing act. They must try to divine how much more currency appreciation the country’s highly successful export industry can withstand, before the stronger renminbi makes Chinese goods less competitive on the global market.

Printing fewer renminbi to buy dollars would be the most direct step that China could undertake to fight inflation, Western and Chinese economists say. But policy makers have feared that doing so would let the renminbi rise too quickly and cause layoffs at export factories — even though the latest data show a surge in exports.

Instead of crimping the money supply, policy makers have resorted instead to domestic measures, like raising interest rates and forcing commercial banks to park more of their assets at the central bank instead of lending them. But those moves are now starting to slow the domestic economy in China. Any curb on the domestic economy directly contradicts the government’s long-term goal of shifting from export-led growth to more self-reliant growth with a greater emphasis on domestic consumption.

Even though prices rose a little less quickly at the consumer and producer levels last month than they had in March, the slight slowdown at the consumer price level was less than many economists had expected. Consumer-price inflation edged down to 5.3 percent in April, from 5.4 percent the month before.

Retail sales and construction barreled ahead at a brisk pace in April but not quite as quickly as the month before.

Industrial production slowed last month, but that was partly because factories had expanded so vigorously that they surpassed the electricity supply in some areas. Another factor was that some parts were in short supply from Japan after the natural and nuclear disasters there.

Meanwhile, the purchasing managers index has inched down, although it is still forecasting continued economic growth.

Taken together, the welter of economic data released Tuesday and Wednesday suggests that the Chinese economy is “cooling, but still hot,” said Hongbin Qu, HSBC’s chief economist for greater China.

As a move against inflation, Mr. Qu predicted in a research note, the government could tighten monetary policy further for the domestic economy.

Some economists are starting to ask whether the government might have gone too far in raising interest four times since October. But interest rates on bank deposits remain far below consumer price inflation, while interest rates on corporate loans remain below inflation at the producer level.

Many Chinese business executives say that their sales are still strong, and some are still finding credit readily available.

“Orders are strong from stores within China, and we see the potential for the domestic market ever expanding,” said Stan Hu, the sales manager at the Xigo Electric Group Company, an air-conditioner manufacturer in Nantuo, in southern China’s Guangdong province. “It is true that banks have tightened their lending to companies, but we have not been affected given our healthy financial situation.”

Others, though, are struggling for loans — particularly smaller businesses, as well as exporters of low-margin products like mass market clothing.

The worried include Colin Cheng, sales manager of Ningbo Yinzhou Gold-Sun Garments Company, which makes T-shirts, skirts and other knitted garments in Ningbo, in east-central China.

“The banks have tightened lending, especially to enterprises such as ours,” he said. “We still have a three-year loan outstanding from the banks. But once it expires, we have already been informed that it is not likely the loan will be rolled over.”

The strongest facet of the Chinese economy these days is also in many ways the least welcome: exports. China’s exports jumped 25.9 percent last month from a year earlier. That was a contrast to overall industrial production rose only 13.4 percent, as companies devoted more factory capacity to filling orders from overseas, rather than focusing on goods for domestic consumption.

China’s trade surplus in April, at $11.43 billion, was nearly three times what economists had expected, as exports surged past their previous record, set in December. Countries like India, Singapore and Brazil have been dismayed at the extraordinary success of Chinese companies in grabbing business and seizing a large share of the jobs and prosperity created by the world’s gradual recovery from the economic downturn.

A cornerstone of that export success has been the huge intervention in currency markets. The People’s Bank of China issued renminbi to buy an average of $15 billion a week worth of dollars and other currencies during the first quarter of this year, pushing its foreign exchange reserves over $3 trillion for the first time.

The central bank has tried to limit the inflationary effects of this monetary intervention by selling notes to banks at low interest rates, which allows it temporarily to take renminbi back out of circulation.

Forcing banks to park as much as a fifth of their assets with the central bank also reduces the amount of money in the economy, while enabling the central bank to use much of that money to pay for further purchases of dollars.

But this week’s data contained a warning of a possible threat to the central bank’s delicate balancing act: bank lending grew faster than expected, as banks were quick to use cash not tied up at the central bank.

At the same time, Chinese households actually reduced their deposits at banks. That is a sign many families may have concluded that earning an interest rate below the rate of inflation is a bad idea — and that spending on already high-priced real estate, gold and other physical assets may still be a better bet. Even if such spending is likely to add to inflationary pressures.

.

Hilda Wang contributed reporting.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=5031083a55575a8800f316435b902bca

Economix: Four Workers for Every Job Opening

The job market still isn’t good, but at least it’s on its way back.

There were just 4.3 unemployed workers for every available job in March, the best ratio in over two years, according to a new Labor Department report. When conditions were worst, there were nearly seven workers per opening.

DESCRIPTIONSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, via Haver Analytics

March’s jobless-to-jobs figure was still well below its level before the recession, however.

On the other side of the ledger, the raw number of layoffs and discharges continue to be near lows:

DESCRIPTIONSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, via Haver Analytics

The moral is that the  source of problems in the job market isn’t that people are still being laid off, but that those laid off during the Great Recession have nowhere to go. And as we’ve noted before, the longer these workers take to find companies that will hire them, the less employable they become.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=06925fcb1a29b4afd671b6c0d0119da1

Economix: Job Openings on the Rise

Some very good news on the jobs front: The number of job openings rose at their fastest pace in almost seven years in February, according to a new report from the Labor Department.

Of course the total number of job openings is still below pre-recession levels, since this total had fallen so far during the downturn. But even so, the monthly rise is a welcome development for the nation’s 13.5 million unemployed workers.

The growth in job openings, coupled with the drop in the number of people unemployed, means that the ratio of unemployed workers to openings has fallen quite dramatically. The figure in February was 4.4, down from a high of 6.9 in July 2009.

DESCRIPTIONSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, via Haver Analytics

Layoffs and discharges are also near their record low level from the previous month. They have been quite low for a while, as the chief problem plaguing the job market during the recovery has not been layoffs but tepid hiring.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=8b1499ce82c11674bc3208ec68532d2e