April 25, 2024

SFX Entertainment Files for I.P.O

SFX Entertainment, the music company led by the media executive Robert F. X. Sillerman, is looking to raise up to $175 million through an initial public stock offering, with a pitch to investors on the growing popularity of electronic dance music.

In a prospectus filed this week with the Securities and Exchange Commission, SFX calls itself the largest live event producer focused on “electronic music culture,” which it defines as “a global generational movement driven by a rapidly developing community of avid followers among the millennial generation.” According to one recent industry report, the global market for this music will reach $4.5 billion this year.

The offer is being underwritten by UBS Investment Bank, Barclays and Jefferies, according to the prospectus. An initial price was not listed, but the company said it had applied to Nasdaq under the symbol SFXE.

Electronic dance music, or E.D.M., has been a subculture mainstay for decades. But over the last few years it has turned into the music industry’s fastest-growing sector, driven by the popularity of huge festivals like Ultra and Electric Daisy Carnival, and by the dance-driven sound of top pop acts like Lady Gaga and Rihanna.

The trend has led to an investment rush on dance companies, most of them independent groups far from the world of corporate finance. Live Nation Entertainment, the dominant concert company, has acquired a number of top promoters over the last two years. Recently it bought half of Insomniac, the company behind Electric Daisy and other events; terms of the deal were not disclosed, but were reported to value the company at about $100 million.

Mr. Sillerman transformed the live music business in the 1990s by acquiring dozens of regional rock promoters to create a national concert network, which he sold to Clear Channel Communications in 2000 for $4.4 billion. That business became the basis for the concert division of Live Nation.

Mr. Sillerman returned to music last year with stated plans of spending $1 billion to amass a new empire focused on dance music. So far his acquisitions include all or the majority of IDT, the company behind the festivals Tomorrowland and Sensation; Beatport, an online music store; the promoter Disco Donnie Presents; and MMG, a nightclub company in Florida. The prospectus says that SFX is also in the process of buying Made Event, which presents the Electric Zoo festival in New York.

According to SFX’s submission, its holdings had $242 million in revenue last year, and a net loss of $48.9 million. The company has $64.5 million in debt.

The company says it will start more festivals and develop media content for its properties, but in the prospectus it also points out the popularity its festivals already enjoy. Tomorrowland, for example, “sold out all of its approximately 180,000 tickets to the 2013 festival in Belgium in one second.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/28/business/media/sfx-entertainment-files-for-ipo.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Shares Rise After I.P.O. of New Zealand Power Utility

AUCKLAND — Shares in the government-controlled utility Mighty River Power, the first of several such New Zealand companies to be partially privatized, rose nearly 5 percent Friday in their first day of trading.

On Wednesday, the government set the share price at 2.50 New Zealand dollars, or $2.08, giving the company a market capitalization of 3.5 billion dollars. The price jumped 22 cents to 2.72 when the company listed at 12:30 p.m. local time Friday — about 8 percent above the initial price — but settled later in the day to close at 2.62 dollars, a 4.8 percent rise.

Mighty River Power’s initial public offering raised 1.7 billion dollars, and its market capitalization makes it the largest offering of a state-owned company in the country’s history, according to data from Goldman Sachs NZ. Trading volume Friday was 70.5 million shares.

“It’s a pass — probably a pass rather than an outstanding success,” Greg Smith, head of research at the investment research company Fat Prophets, said of the offering.

Mighty River Power is the first company to be partially privatized by the center-right government, which plans to float as much as 49 percent in each of several state-owned companies on the New Zealand stock exchange, the NZX.

The mixed ownership plan has run into financial and political obstacles, including legal action by a group representing the indigenous Maori.

On April 18, the opposition Labour Party and its potential coalition partner, the Green Party, jointly announced plans to create an intermediary between electricity generators and retailers, in an effort to cut prices for consumers. The Labour Party said that would save households between 230 and 330 dollars a year, but the government called the idea a policy of the “far left” that risked deterring foreign investment in New Zealand.

Reflecting the significance of the Mighty River Power offering, on Friday the NZX replaced the front page of its Web site with the company’s logo and its share price displayed in large print.

Mr. Smith, of Fat Prophets, said the share price could come down in the coming months. “The New Zealand share market as a whole has been trading near its all-time highs,” Mr. Smith said.

“If you were to see a bit of weakness in the broader market, you could well see that come back below the 2.50,” he said, adding that the price could even fall below the 2.35-dollar range.

The Green Party, which opposes privatization, said Friday that trading volumes indicated that many retail investors had already sold off their shares for a quick profit.

“National underpriced the shares so that the price would bounce up after listing,” party co-leader Russel Norman said in a news release, referring to the governing National Party. “That ‘good news’ story came at the cost of tens of millions of dollars in reduced sale revenue to the taxpayer.”

He also criticized the fact that foreign investors were being allowed to buy shares. “Already, we’re seeing the company slip further out of Kiwi ownership,” Mr. Norman said.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/business/global/shares-rise-after-ipo-of-new-zealand-power-utility.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Heated Frenzy for Tech I.P.O.’s Fails to Ignite Freescale

Richard Beyer, right, of Freescale Semiconductor, watched trading at the New York Stock Exchange Thursday.Richard Drew/Associated PressRichard Beyer, right, of Freescale Semiconductor watched trading at the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday.

For the last several weeks, the market for initial public offerings looked red hot, thanks almost entirely to the eye-popping debut of the professional social network LinkedIn.

Shares in the Internet darling more than doubled in their first day of trading and have stayed in the stratosphere even after an 8 percent decline on Thursday.

But it takes more than a connection to technology to cook up a sizzling I.P.O., as Freescale Semiconductor learned this week.

Shares in the chip maker closed on Thursday at $18.33, up 1.8 percent from their offering price, after having risen even higher earlier in the day. But the company’s debut price of $18, set on Wednesday night, was at the bottom of an already reduced price range. It earned Freescale $783 million in proceeds, instead of the original $1 billion target.

Richard M. Beyer, Freescale’s chief executive, said in a telephone interview on Thursday morning that he was pleased with the stock’s performance, even at the reduced initial price.

“We seem to have priced it at a level that the investment community thinks is good,” he said.

Freescale was not even the worst-performing stock debut this week. Spirit Airlines, a low-cost carrier, saw its shares tumble 3.8 percent to $11.55 in its first day of trading on Thursday even after having cut its offering’s price range. And shares in the American International Group remain below the $29 price set for the long-awaited sale of stock owned by the federal government.

Mr. Beyer cited the choppier market for offerings that were not related to social media as the primary driver behind Freescale’s price range.

The experience of Freescale shows how the recent frothiness in the initial offering market has been confined in part to social-media companies like LinkedIn and Yandex, a Russian search engine whose $1.3 billion offering was the largest by an Internet company in the United States since Google’s debut in 2004.

“We did consider changing the name of our company to ‘Freescale Social Networking,’ “ Mr. Beyer joked.

Seriously, he added, “We’re O.K. with the fact that some of those social networking company I.P.O.’s have been doing much better, but those investments weren’t made with macroeconomics in mind.”

Freescale is only the latest company owned by private equity firms to seek a return to the public markets. Earlier this year, Nielsen, the ratings company; the hospital operator HCA; and the oil-and-gas pipeline company Kinder Morgan all held well-received offerings. While Nielsen’s stock remains well above the company’s offering price, shares in HCA and Kinder Morgan have since fallen below their debuts.

All told, initial offerings by buyout-backed companies total $13.9 billion so far this year, according to data from Thomson Reuters. They account for 63 percent of all I.P.O.’s in the United States.

None of Freescale’s private equity owners, including the Blackstone Group, the Carlyle Group, TPG Capital and Permira, sold shares in the offering, unlike other private equity-backed I.P.O.’s this year. Those owners are likely to wait until Freescale’s stock price rises before selling their holdings, hoping to eke out even a small profit.

Freescale’s offering is notable given the company’s reputation as one of the more troubled takeovers of the private-equity boom. It was acquired in 2006 by several buyout firms for $17.6 billion, or $40 a share.

That acquisition left the company with an enormous debt, which now stands at $7.6 billion. All of the proceeds of the initial offering will go to reducing that burden.

Freescale was also battered by the recession, which reduced demand for the products containing its chips like cars, networking equipment and consumer products.

The company reported a loss of more than $1 billion last year, though its revenue began to rise again after a slump in 2009.

Mr. Beyer said that one of Freescale’s biggest priorities was cutting its debt, since the company saves about $8 million in interest expense for every $100 million in obligations it pays off. After the I.P.O., Freescale’s interest expense will shrink to a little more than $500 million a year.

He added that a resurgence in two of Freescale’s core markets, autos and networking, was expected to continue this year, with more than 10 percent growth in the former and about 6 percent in the latter.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=85fd472bfc0253073d10103e2254b126