April 20, 2024

Iceland Voters Oust Government

Election officials announced Sunday afternoon that with all the votes counted from Saturday’s election, the two largest center-right parties — the Independence Party and the Progressive Party — had won at least 38 of the 63 seats in Parliament, enough to form a coalition government with a comfortable majority. Together, they won just over half the votes cast.

The two parties capitalized on unhappiness with crippling levels of personal debt that have left many homeowners owing more on their mortgages than they originally borrowed. The parties promised to forgive or renegotiate such loans and to put an end to four years of austerity by lowering taxes, ending capital controls and stimulating foreign investment.

“We are offering a different road, a road to growth, protecting social security, better welfare and job creation,” Bjarni Benediktsson, the leader of the Independence Party, said after the vote.

The Independence Party, which was the dominant force in Icelandic politics for decades, performed worse than usual in the election, but the Progressives made extensive gains, especially among voters in rural areas. Even so, the Independence Party is likely to lead a new center-right government.

Voters turned against a coalition, led by the Social Democrats, that has governed the country for the last four years, even though, in a world of troubled economies, Iceland stands out as a relative success story. Its economy grew last year, unemployment is now below 5 percent — down from a high of 10 percent during the crisis — and inflation, which peaked at about 17 percent, is now closer to 4 percent a year.

But the ruling coalition cut spending and raised taxes, and although it tried to tackle the personal debt problem, it did not do enough to reassure Icelanders who disastrously took out loans in foreign currencies or that were indexed to inflation, said Silja Omarsdottir, a professor of political science at the University of Iceland. Professor Omarsdottir said in an interview that the government’s two big initiatives — rewriting Iceland’s Constitution and applying to join the European Union — failed to seize the popular imagination.

“They completely lost control of the discourse,” she said. “They were not getting their message across. People said: ‘You’re not doing enough. You’ve put all this effort into the Constitution, which we don’t care about, and spent so much money on the E.U. application, which we don’t care about.’ ”

The center-right parties have questioned whether Iceland ought to go ahead with the application to the European Union. The prospect of membership seemed more attractive when Europe looked stable, but the Continent is now mired in its own crisis. The Progressives and Independents have said the negotiations should wait until the country holds a referendum on whether the talks should continue.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/world/europe/iceland-voters-oust-government.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

British Group Backs Renegotiating E.U. Role

LONDON — Is British business fretting about the risks of the country drifting out of the European Union? Or does it crave a looser relationship with Continental allies, one free from meddlesome regulation?

The answer to that question remained unclear Monday after a newly formed group of business leaders argued for a renegotiation of Britain’s membership terms — echoing the policy of Prime Minister David Cameron, who in January promised voters a referendum on whether the country would remain in the Union.

The new group, called Business for Britain, is intended to counter the intervention of pro-E.U. business leaders who have warned of the dangers of Britain slipping out of the 27-nation bloc and its single market of 500 million people. A statement released Monday to announce the group’s formation was signed by about 500 executives.

In the declaration, Business for Britain said Mr. Cameron was “right to seek a new deal for the E.U. and for the United Kingdom’s role in Europe.”

Mr. Cameron has pledged to hold the referendum within five years, if he remains in office after elections scheduled for 2015. But that promise has failed to halt the rise of the U.K. Independence Party, or UKIP, a small but expanding populist group that wants Britain to quit the Union and curb immigration.

So far the opposition Labour Party has resisted calls to commit itself to holding a vote on E.U. membership if it wins power in the next general election, though some analysts believe it may ultimately feel the need to do so.

Never much attracted to the idea of European unity, the British public tends to see the Union in terms of value for money. That means that the verdict of high-profile business leaders is crucial.

In general, big businesses, which depend on international trade, tend to be more pro-European than smaller companies, which are more focused on the domestic market. However, Business for Britain boasts some supporters from larger enterprises, including Karan Bilimoria, founder of Cobra Beer, an international brewing company, and Richard Burrows, chairman of British American Tobacco.

“Far from being a threat to our economic interests, a flexible, competitive Europe, with more powers devolved from Brussels, is essential for growth, jobs and access to markets,” the group said in its statement.

Like Mr. Cameron, Business for Britain has yet to identify what powers London should seek to win back from the Union, though it says it intends to answer that question later this year.

And also like Mr. Cameron, Business for Britain has not said whether it would recommend leaving the Union if negotiations on new membership terms do not lead to significant change.

In January pro-European business leaders including Sir Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Group, and Roger Carr, president of the Confederation of British Industry, a lobbying group, signed a letter that warned against risking Britain’s membership in the European Union.

A group of more skeptical business leaders countered with a letter supporting Mr. Cameron’s approach.

Pro-Europeans were dismissive of the initiative announced Monday.

“Everyone wants reform in Europe but without throwing away the advantages we get from permanent full access to Europe’s single market and maximizing British influence in it,” Peter Mandelson, a former cabinet minister and a former European commissioner, said in a statement.

“This new group of familiar names and small businesses may hinder this process and slide towards UKIP’s rather than David Cameron’s position,” Mr. Mandelson continued. “My fear is that this will not help to advance Mr. Cameron’s cause in Europe.”

Leaders on both sides of the issue argue that the Union needs to reform. Pro-Europeans have begun to rally behind two different campaign groups. One, Business for New Europe, has sought to argue the case that Britain must engage strongly with the European Union in order to bring about any significant reforms. Another organization, called British Influence, describes itself as an independent advocacy campaign that wants Britain to lead in Europe.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/23/business/global/23iht-pound23.html?partner=rss&emc=rss