April 19, 2024

Strategies: Greek Bonds May Offer Contrarian Clues to U.S. Stocks

 “You’ve got to keep your eyes on Greece, if for no other reason than that everyone else is,” said Richard Bernstein, formerly the chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch and now the proprietor of his own firm and a fund manager for Eaton Vance.

Mr. Bernstein says his main focus right now is actually American stocks, which he favors for fundamental reasons: they are relatively cheap, he says, given the earnings they are likely to produce over the next decade. But for the short term, those virtues are often being overlooked by investors, so as a guidepost for Wall Street he has been looking at an unlikely benchmark, the Greek 10-year note.

It has had little intrinsic connection to the American stock market in the past, as Mr. Bernstein is quick to acknowledge. But it has been a perversely contrarian signal of late. As the European rescue plan for Greece appeared at times to unravel last week, Greek 10-year notes hit new lows, falling to less than 30 percent of their nominal value — a 70 percent discount. As the price dropped, the American stock market often rose.

“A decade ago, you’d have thought I was crazy if I told you there was a connection” between American equities and the fixed-income market in Greece, Mr. Bernstein says. Recently, though, there does seem to have been at least a loose correlation, he says, because American banks, both directly and indirectly, are exposed to the debt of Greece and other troubled European countries.

And the ups and downs of the Greek crisis have provided the impetus for the risk-on, risk-off trading that has dominated financial markets worldwide.

Quite often these days, the tone on Wall Street has been set by the frantic efforts to stave off a financial calamity in Europe. The uncertainty has been buffeting the American economy as well, as Ben S. Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, said last week. 

“Most notably,” Mr. Bernanke said, “concerns about European fiscal and banking issues have contributed to strains in global financial markets, which are likely to have adverse effects on confidence and growth.” He added that the Fed remained ready to intervene further, if needed.

Despite these problems, Mr. Bernstein says, investors should be focusing on the handsome profits that American companies are churning out. But he says it’s understandable that people are fixated on the immediate crisis in Greece. So he turns to the Greek bond as a back-of-the-envelope indicator. What’s his logic?

As he sees it, the sinking market price for those bonds tells him that the Greek bailout deal, if it holds together, will be extremely “bullish short term for banks,” and therefore “bullish short term for the stock market in the United States, too.” But in the slightly longer term, however, it will also be bearish for both. Why? 

A “voluntary” 50 percent haircut — or discount — for those bonds was part of the fragile settlement worked out by European leaders late last month. The current market price amounts to a much higher de facto discount of about 70 percent, so if the European settlement holds, it will be a “very good deal” for bond holders — that is, banks, he said — and bank  shares have often dominated the American stock market. 

Slightly longer term, though, the pricing discrepancy implies that the European deal does not adequately account for the reduced value of Greek debt.

“Ultimately, the markets will be skeptical about any deal like this, because the debt has not been written down sufficiently,” he says. “It’s bearish longer term because it suggests that this crisis isn’t close to being over.”

Because prospects for a short-term settlement of the crisis grew shakier in the last week, he says, the implications of the sinking Greek bond may not be translatable into anything more than extreme volatility for global markets.  He says the festering European crisis will probably make American stock markets “quite volatile” for some time, despite what he considers excellent prospects for American companies.

For fixed-income investors, meanwhile, the prospects are likewise not entirely positive, in the view of Kathy A. Jones, fixed-income strategist at Charles Schwab. The Fed “will be keeping interest rates very low for some time to come” on government bonds, she says. And in response to an economic slowdown and to the financial crisis in Europe, the European Central Bank lowered interest rates last week.

This environment, she says, “creates real dilemmas for individual investors,” who will need to decide whether to accept these rates or take on additional credit risk in an effort to get higher yields.

“Unfortunately, there are no easy solutions,” she said.

Scott Minerd, chief investment officer at Guggenheim Partners, says he believes that Treasury yields have already bottomed and are beginning to edge upward. The 10-year Treasury note is likely to breach 3 percent by the end of the quarter, he says, though he observes that the Fed appears to be “preparing the way” for further unorthodox policies aimed at keeping rates low and stimulating the economy. 

He believes that it makes sense to buy some high-yield bonds. “The market for these securities got hammered so hard in anticipation of recession” that the prices are very attractive, he says.

Like Mr. Bernstein, Mr. Minerd is bullish on American stocks. He says he believes that the economy will muddle along, “and that it will actually turn out to perform better than the market has anticipated,” driving stocks higher.

Still, high volatility is part of his outlook, too, in large part because of the crisis in Europe.

“We’ve reached a stage where we all understand that a train wreck of some sort is coming,” he says. “The question is what will the wreck actually look like, how much damage will it do, and the markets have already priced in a lot of damage.”

As far as the Greek crisis goes, he says, there appears to be worse to come, though it may not be as bad as the market anticipates.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=a628cbc9bd370dbfcc8fda2e6263ffcc

European Finance Ministers Near Deal on Aid to Banks

On the second day of talks here, the ministers also said that holders of Greek bonds would have to take much bigger losses than the 21 percent originally agreed to in July, though one bank official said that despite the ministers’ consensus, no agreement was near on write-offs that could reach as high as 60 percent.

The ministers also reported that France and Germany had made progress on a third issue, how to increase the firepower of a rescue fund for the euro zone. Germany’s chancellor, Angela Merkel, and the French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, along with other European leaders, continued negotiating later Saturday.

“I believe that now we have reached a more realistic view of the situation in Greece and that we will provide the necessary means to be able to protect the euro,” Mrs. Merkel said as she arrived at a gathering of European center-right leaders outside Brussels. The Sunday meeting would not bring final decisions, she said, adding that the leaders would take definitive steps at another scheduled meeting on Wednesday.

Despite resistance from Spain and Italy, agreement seemed close on a plan worth around 100 billion euros, or $138 billion, to recapitalize European banks. The measure is intended to help banks better withstand turmoil in the markets.

“We have laid down foundations for an agreement on the banking side,” said Anders Borg, Sweden’s finance minister.

The talks on Saturday established an improved tone over the past week, when differences between Mrs. Merkel and Mr. Sarkozy burst into the open.

But the challenge remains for leaders to construct a comprehensive and credible package of measures by Wednesday’s meeting.

Ministers were on track to ask bankers to write off around half of the value of their Greek bond holdings after a report by international lenders suggested that the economy in Greece had deteriorated so significantly that the 60 percent haircut was needed.

“We have agreed yesterday that we have to have a significant increase in the banks’ contribution,” Jean-Claude Juncker of Luxembourg, who is the head of the euro group of finance ministers, said on Saturday. He did not offer a specific figure.

But Charles Dallara, the managing director of the Institute of International Finance, which has been negotiating on behalf of the banks, said the two sides were “nowhere near a deal,” The Associated Press reported.

One remaining worry is that Greece shows few signs of returning to economic growth and, though he declined to say how much in losses banks would be willing to accept, Mr. Dallara added, “We would be open to an approach that involves additional efforts from everyone.”

Greece’s deteriorating economic outlook was the subject of intense discussions among the ministers with Germany and the Netherlands pressing their case that private investors needed to take bigger losses.

According to the international lenders’ report, a 60 percent loss for bondholders would be needed to bring Greece’s debt below 110 percent of gross domestic product by 2020. That represents a huge increase from the 21 percent losses private investors agreed to accept only three months ago.

Without action, Greece’s financing needs could amount to roughly 252 billion euros through 2020, the document said, while under a worse outlook, the needs, including rollover of existing debt, could approach 450 billion euros. The emerging comprehensive package is highly complex and involves painstaking negotiations around issues that are often linked. For example, the deal to strengthen European banks is seen as vital to protect the banks from the fallout from write-downs on Greek bonds.

The ministers agreed on Friday to release the majority of loans worth 8 billion euros to prevent Greece from defaulting. The International Monetary Fund could contribute about 2 billion euros to that fund.

The biggest area of difference between France and Germany seemed to be narrowing after France appeared to be giving ground on how to bolster the euro rescue fund.

Mrs. Merkel had firmly opposed the French suggestion that the fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, should get a banking license, which would enable it to borrow from the European Central Bank.

France’s finance minister, François Baroin, said on Friday that the issue was “not a definitive point of discussion for us,” adding that “what matters is what works.”

On Saturday, the Dutch finance minister, Jan Kees de Jager, said that use of the central bank was “no longer an option” but that two options were under consideration.

Both options involve plans to insure against a portion of losses on Italian or Spanish bonds. Under one version this insurance would be offered by the bailout fund.

The other would form an agency to buy bonds, perhaps attracting new investors like sovereign wealth funds. This would buy bonds on the primary and secondary markets using insurance offered by the bailout fund, said one official briefed on discussions but not authorized to speak publicly.

One advantage of this plan might be that it could force clearer conditions for reform on countries whose bonds are bought.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/business/global/european-finance-ministers-shaping-greek-rescue-and-effort-to-aid-banks.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Stocks Edge Higher After Jump in Manufacturing

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia said regional manufacturing was “showing signs of recovery.” Its index of manufacturing, shipments and new orders was far better than economists had forecast.

The Dow Jones industrial average rose 37 points, or 0.3 percent, to 11,542 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern.

Other economic reports were mixed. The Labor Department said new applications for unemployment benefits dropped to 403,000 last week, a sign that layoffs are easing. On the down side, sales of previously-occupied homes fell 3 percent last month.

The SP 500 rose 5, or 0.4 percent, to 1,215. The Nasdaq fell 2, or 0.1 percent, to 2,602.

Several large companies reported earnings before the market opened. Southwest Airlines rose 3.7 percent after reporting income that was a penny per share higher than analysts predicted. ATT Inc. lost 0.7 percent after reporting that the number of new iPhones activated last quarter was the lowest in a year and a half.

The New York Times jumped 5.5 percent after the company reported higher profits than expected. Union Pacific was up 5.3 percent after reporting that its income jumped 16 percent, more than analysts had forecast. The railroad operator also said it expects the growth to continue.

Microsoft Corp. will report earnings after the market closes.

European markets were broadly lower. Germany’s DAX fell 1.5 percent, France’s CAC-40 fell 1.2 percent and Italy’s FTSE MIB fell 2.1 percent. Investors are concerned that differences between the leaders of Germany and France may hold up an agreement on how to protect European banks from the likelihood of a default by the Greek government.

Officials from the 17 countries that share the euro will meet at a summit this Sunday to discuss ways to contain the damage. A messy default by Greece could to huge losses for European banks that hold Greek bonds.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=79306f4242dddffae7765b4c97950919

Stocks and Bonds: Worry on Euro Debt Ends 3 Days of Gains

Raw materials companies helped depress the major indexes after prices for commodities like copper and oil plunged.

Traders focused on remarks by Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany suggesting that the second bailout package for Greece might have to be renegotiated. Several European leaders want banks to take bigger losses on Greek bonds, but France and the European Central Bank oppose the idea.

Germany’s Parliament is set to vote Thursday on a measure that would give a European rescue fund more powers to fight the region’s debt crisis. Finland’s Parliament approved the proposal Wednesday, lifting some uncertainty over the crisis, which has dogged financial markets since late July.

“This is a market that has been fluctuating and is thoroughly susceptible to any news, any rumors, any innuendos” about Europe, said Quincy Krosby, a market strategist at Prudential Financial.

The Dow Jones industrial average fell 179.79 points, or 1.6 percent, to close at 11,010.90. It had gained 413 points over the last two days. The Standard Poor’s 500-stock index fell 24.32, or 2.1 percent, to 1,151.06. The Nasdaq composite index fell 55.25, or 2.2 percent, to 2,491.58.

Declines were broad. Only 17 of the 500 stocks in the S. P. 500 rose.

Raw materials stocks were down 4.5 percent. Investors fear that Europe’s problems could cause another global recession, weakening demand for basic materials like copper. The price of copper plunged 5.6 percent; crude oil fell 3.8 percent, to $81.21 a barrel..

The mining company Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold declined 7.2 percent, and Cliffs Natural Resources fell 8.4 percent. The coal producer Alpha Natural Resources was down 11 percent, the most of any company in the S. P.

Orders for durable goods slipped 0.1 percent last month. The modest decline was largely a result of an 8.5 percent drop in orders for automobiles and automobile parts.

Economists looked past the total figure and focused on a 1.1 percent increase in a crucial category that measures business investment plans. That is core capital goods that are not used for defense or transportation.

Shipments of those goods rose 2.8 percent, the fourth consecutive gain in the category. The government looks closely at shipment figures when calculating economic growth.

Economists said the fact that businesses kept expanding and modernizing during the turbulent month suggested many were confident about the future.

“Business capital spending is rising,” said Christopher Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi in New York. “There is no recession.”

The Dow jumped 126 points minutes after the opening bell on that report. But those gains were gone within an hour, and the selling intensified in the last half-hour of trading.

The decline followed three days of gains. Stocks rose earlier this week on hopes that Europe was moving closer to resolving its debt problems. The Dow soared 272 points on Monday, its fourth-largest increase this year, and 147 points more on Tuesday.

“The market got ahead of itself,” said Joseph Saluzzi, co-head of stock trading at Themis Trading. Investors “assumed some kind of deal would be structured, and that was so far away from happening.”

Technology companies fared better than the overall market. The online retailer Amazon.com shot up 2.5 percent after it unveiled the Kindle Fire, a tablet device that will cost $199 and will compete with Apple’s hugely successful iPad.

Jabil Circuit, an electronics parts maker, rose 8.4 percent. The company reported strong earnings and a fourth-quarter earnings forecast that was better than analysts had expected.

The benchmark 10-year Treasury note fell 2/32 to 101 8/32, pushing its yield to 1.99 percent, down from 1.98 percent on Tuesday.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Speculators Find Value in Lowly Greek Bonds

After a number of investors struck gold by betting against French banks, many have turned their attention to the hot yet risky euro zone trade of the moment: buying Greek government bonds that traders say are changing hands for as little as 36 cents for each euro of face value.

The investors hope to book a fat profit on the expectation that the European Union and the International Monetary Fund will once again bail out Greece, fearing a global financial disaster if they do not.

Under the deal Greece struck in July with its banks as part of Europe’s rescue plan, a substantial portion of its existing bonds are scheduled to be swapped into new longer-term securities that could be valued at more than 70 cents to the euro. If the deal closes in late October — assuming the latest bailout system is ratified by the parliaments of the 17 European Union countries that use the euro — those who bought the bonds recently at distressed prices might in some cases come close to doubling their money.

But what is good for hedge funds is not necessarily good for Greece.

The popularity of this trade is just the latest sign that the carefully constructed debt swap agreed to by Greece and its private sector creditors may be a much sweeter deal for investors than it is for taxpayers.

“Everyone knows this was a good deal for the banks,” said Otmar Issing, a top German economist who served on the executive board of the European Central Bank. “It will not help Greece at all.”

According to a person with direct knowledge of the debt swap, about 30 percent of the investors who are expected to participate in the exchange bought their bonds after July 21. They are not the original debt holders — mostly large European banks — but more speculative investors looking to cash in on the steep fall in Greek bond prices.

The debt swap is expected to cover about 135 billion euros ($183 billion) in existing bonds, suggesting that various hedge funds and other investors have bought as much as 40 billion euros worth of Greek debt since July 21.

The behind-the-scenes deal-making may be obscure but it helps explain why Chancellor Angela Merkel is having such a hard time persuading crucial German lawmakers to vote for the Greek bailout on Thursday.

With people like Mr. Issing arguing that banks and other creditors have not been forced to contribute a larger share of Europe’s ever-rising bailout bill, it’s no surprise that politicians are worried about a harsh public reaction to the bailout. Mr. Issing contends that the owners of Greece’s debt should be required to take a roughly 50 percent write-down on their holdings as part of an “orderly” default that would reduce Greece’s overall debt burden, allowing it to meet its obligations without further borrowing.

Under the current deal, Greece’s debt burden would be reduced to 122 percent of gross domestic product by 2015 — still leaving Greece with the highest debt load in Europe. Speaking Tuesday at a conference in Berlin that discussed the future of the euro zone, Mr. Issing shook his head in frustration, pointing out that in light of the recent collapse in Greek bond prices, some banks might even be able to book a loss that is significantly less than the advertised 21 percent.

While not a member of the government, Mr. Issing is in many ways the leading voice of Germany’s economic establishment.

But supporters of the Greek bailout say it is too late to change the terms and that any effort to alter the equation between Athens and its creditors could scuttle the whole carefully constructed deal. They also argue that many European banks holding Greek debt, particularly those based in Greece itself, are too thinly capitalized to absorb any larger losses now.

Analysts say that further debt write-offs are likely to be delayed well into next year, after Europe has put in place a new financing system that could bolster the region’s banks.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=fe9aa70bec7dcb3575b44374c83d99bc

European Banks Are Hard-Selling Greek Bailout Plan

But in the case of the proposed second bailout for Greece — the one that is supposed to make private investors feel the financial pain along with taxpayers — the biggest banks in Europe are on the road now promoting the plan.

It’s not that the banks are suddenly masochists. It’s that this first major bond restructuring in Europe’s long-festering debt crisis is shaping up as a much better deal for the banks than for the Greeks it is supposed to be helping.

Holders of the Greek bonds would get much better value than they could in the open market, while Greece would still owe a lot of money. What’s more, Greece would be surrendering a lot of its negotiating clout if, in the future, it needed to go back to the bailout bargaining table.

This week, bankers representing the Greek government — Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas and HSBC — have been explaining to investors why it is in their interest to trade in their decimated Greek bonds, take a 21 percent loss and accept a new package of longer-dated securities with AAA backing. Those bondholders include big European banks, smaller fund managers and insurance companies.

The bond exchange is a crucial component of the more than 200 billion euro ($286 billion) in rescue packages that Europe and the International Monetary Fund have put together to support the near-bankrupt Greek economy through 2014. The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, and others insisted that banks make such a contribution to give them some political cover at home.

The part of the rescue announced in July is subject to the approval of Germany and the governments of the 16 other member nations of the euro union in coming weeks. If investors balk at the 21 percent write-down that is the price for getting a deal done, the whole package could collapse. European governments would be hard-pressed to come up with those extra funds themselves.

But with the price of Greek debt trading in some cases at 50 cents on the dollar — even lower than when the bailout deal was announced in July — the 21 percent haircut seems to be quite a bargain.

As a bonus, the new bonds would be governed by international law, rather than Greek law. That is a significant alteration of lending terms that would strengthen the negotiating hand of the bondholders if Greece eventually concluded it had no alternative but to default — even after this latest bailout.

The International Institute for Finance, the advocacy group for global banks that is also the chief architect of the deal, says that 60 to 70 percent of the financial institutions holding Greek bonds have agreed to the swap so far. That comes close to the 90 percent threshold that the Greek government has stipulated, although it is too early to predict the final outcome because Greece will not formally make the swap offer until October.

“This is an attractive offer,” said Hung Tran, a senior executive at the institute. “We are making the case that if this deal is implemented it will restore stability to Greece.”

The question remains, however, whether the banks that financed the country’s debt by buying its bonds would get off too easy — and whether the Greek government should have pushed for a larger write-down to ease its debt load.

Analysts also note Greece’s diminished bargaining power in any future debt negotiations with its bankers.

In past debt negotiations involving countries like Argentina, Uruguay and Russia, the bulk of the debt was governed by either United States or British law. That gave the biggest bondholders the upper hand in negotiating terms; they could either hold out for a better deal or challenge the governments in foreign courts.

In the case of Greece’s debt, more than 90 percent of it was issued and is governed under Greek law, as a holdover of the era preceding Greece’s entry into the European monetary union in 2001. That, legal experts say, currently gives the Athens government the flexibility, if it so chooses, to alter bond contracts and secure a more beneficial restructuring deal over the objections of its foreign creditors.

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=541e4a62077588bda472ee0befa3a4df

DealBook: Alpha Bank and Eurobank of Greece to Merge

Greek bank shares climbed on Monday on news of a merger between Eurobank and Alpha Bank.John Kolesidis/ReutersGreek bank shares climbed on Monday on news of a merger between Eurobank and Alpha Bank.

Two of Greece’s biggest lenders, Alpha Bank and Eurobank, announced plans on Monday to merge, in a move to increase confidence in the country’s beleaguered economy.

The combination will create the largest lender in Greece, with total assets of 146 billion euros ($212 billion). Shares of Alpha Bank and Eurobank rose on the news.

“I am confident that the new combined entity will act as an important agent for the economic development of the country,” Efthymios N. Christodoulou, chairman of Eurobank, said in a statement. “It is also well placed not only to withstand the current economic turbulence but also to create new opportunities and play a pivotal role in the future growth of the region.”

The merger is welcome news for a country in the midst of a sovereign debt crisis.

Owning large swaths of the country’s troubled debt, the Greek banks have found themselves at the center of the mess. As Greek bonds essentially proved worthless as collateral, foreign investors balked at lending to Greek financial firms. With few sources of funds, banks pulled back and credit tightened.

By merging, Alpha Bank and Eurobank are looking to strengthen the capital position of the combined bank and gain necessary heft to weather the crisis. The deal will help bolster the combined bank’s overall capital position, by eventually increasing its buffer to 14 percent. It also signals foreign interest, with the main shareholders including Paramount Services Holding, a prominent family in Qatar.

“This initiative shows that today’s crisis can be an opportunity for structural moves that boost both the financial sector and the real economy,” the Greek finance minister, Evangelos Venizelos, said in a statement on Monday, according to Reuters. “Qatar’s participation sends an international message of confidence in the prospects of the Greek economy.”

The deal, which still has to be approved by regulators, is expected to be completed in mid-December. Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase served as financial advisers to Alpha Bank, while Eurobank worked with Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs and Rothschild.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/greek-lenders-alpha-bank-and-eurobank-to-merge/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Central Bank Props Up Spain and Italy, for Now

Spanish and Italian bond prices rose and their yields fell on Tuesday after the central bank stepped in for a second day to buy their sovereign debt, part of expanded efforts to prevent the European debt crisis from deepening in two of the largest economies in the euro currency zone.

The central bank’s move, much more ambitious than its previous forays into the bond market, has set off a debate about how far the bank legally can go under its charter. According to bank insiders and analysts, the answer seems to be: as far as it wants.

But the bigger questions may be how much intervention the central bank’s balance sheet can sustain — and how much help it will get from European governments. The pan-European bailout fund, the European Financial Stability Facility, is politically loaded and months away from having new money brought to a vote by member nations in the euro area.

In late trading Tuesday, the yield on Spain’s benchmark 10-year government bonds was down an additional 0.1 percentage point, at 5.019 percent. It had reached a record high of 6.458 percent on Aug. 2. The yield on 10-year Italian bonds, meanwhile, fell Tuesday to a one-month low of 5.143 percent.

To keep Spanish and Italian bond yields at sustainable levels over the long term will be a huge challenge for the European Central Bank, as investors test the bank’s resolve.

“Once they have started buying it will be difficult to stop buying,” said Jacques Cailloux, chief European economist at the Royal Bank of Scotland.

As it has when buying Greek bonds in the past, analysts say, the central bank will probably portray its interventions as a means to maintain control over interest rates and hold down inflation — not as a rescue of any particular country, which is forbidden by treaty.

And analysts expect the bank to make a show of taking as much money out of circulation as it spends buying bonds, to avoid the appearance the central bank is printing money or flooding the economy with cash through so-called quantitative easing of the sort the United States Federal Reserve has resorted to in recent years.

On Tuesday in Washington, the Federal Reserve stopped well short of such a move, instead indicating it would keep rates low through mid-2013. But it said it might again resort to quantitative easing, if economic conditions did not improve.

The European Central Bank, too, is loath to acknowledge any limitations on its monetary policy arsenal. And, in the worst case, it might even engage in quantitative easing if it saw signs of deflation.

“We do what we judge necessary to be sure that we deliver price stability,” Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the central bank, said last week, repeating a phrase he has used often.

Confronted by a fundamental threat to the euro or to Europe’s banking system, the central bank might have no choice but to take further action.

“They will do whatever it takes because they will be forced to,” Mr. Cailloux said. “There are no technical impediments to buying unlimited amounts” of bonds, he added.

But that might require effectively printing money. Previously the central bank has intervened only in the much smaller markets for Greek, Portuguese and Irish bonds, spending 74 billion euros ($105 billion).

Some analysts say the bank may need to spend more than 10 times that to maintain control over yields on Spanish and Italian debt. If so, it might have trouble fully offsetting the purchases by paying banks interest to park money at the central bank, as it has done so far.

The bank’s purchases of Spanish and Italian bonds on Monday and Tuesday, reported by traders but not officially confirmed by the central bank, came amid broader market turmoil after Standard Poor’s downgrading of American debt late Friday.

The central bank felt forced to respond because last week the cost of borrowing for both Spain and Italy soared to record highs, with yields on their 10-year bonds topping 6 percent — a level that could raise the countries’ interest payments to ruinous levels and threaten to undermine the entire euro union.

And despite the bank’s efforts, there were growing signs on Tuesday of heightened tensions in the banking system. Money market indicators showed that European banks’ reluctance to lend to one another was approaching levels not seen since the collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers in 2008.

Jack Ewing reported from Frankfurt and Raphael Minder from Madrid.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/10/business/global/insiders-see-no-limits-to-european-central-banks-arsenal-in-debt-crisis-fight.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

News Analysis: In Greek Debt Deal, Clear Benefits for the Banks

FRANKFURT — Europe’s latest plan to prop up Greece looks suspiciously like a plan to bolster European banks.

By agreeing to contribute a relatively modest amount to the rescue, the banking industry is getting something more valuable in return, analysts say. The industry is unloading much of its Greek risk onto the European Union and helping to quash fears that the sovereign debt crisis could become a second financial crisis.

The agreement reached in Brussels last week may anger anyone who thinks that banks have already gotten enough taxpayer favors. But the debt crisis has always been as much about banks as it has been about Greece. If the deal helps restore confidence, weaker institutions will be able to borrow on money markets again, so they no longer will be dependent on the European Central Bank for financing.

“I think this is a good use of resources,” said Carl B. Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, N.Y. “This prevents the hit from becoming so large that it paralyzes the banking system.”

The oddity, of course, is that Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany went to Brussels last week vowing to make banks pay their share of the cost of aiding Greece. She inadvertently seems to have done them a favor instead.

The plan agreed to by Mrs. Merkel and other leaders calls for banks to voluntarily swap some of their Greek bonds for more solid paper backed by collateral. Though the swap is technically voluntary, Moody’s Investors Service warned on Monday that such action would be considered a default by Greece. Moody’s also downgraded Greece another three notches to just one level above a default grade.

But Moody’s also said that the plan would benefit Europe “by containing the contagion risk that would likely have followed a disorderly payment default on existing Greek debt.”

The debt swap endorsed by European leaders last Thursday will cost banks and other investors 54 billion euros, or nearly $78 billion, according to estimates by the Institute of International Finance, the industry group that represented banks and insurance companies in negotiations with European governments.

That sounds like a lot of money, but, as Mr. Weinberg said, a week ago banks were staring at the possibility that Greece would slide into a disorderly default, with losses in the range of 200 billion euros.

“Compared to a 200-billion-euro hit, this looks to me like a really good deal,” Mr. Weinberg said. In any case, he said, the cost to banks could turn out to be much lower than 54 billion euros.

Financial institutions still have substantial exposure to Greece, said Charles H. Dallara, managing director of the Institute of International Finance, who played an important role in the negotiations. The organization estimates that private sector bond investors still have 200 billion euros at risk in the form of future interest payments by Greece. In addition, only about one-third of the new paper that Greece creditors will get is backed by collateral, Mr. Dallara said.

Still, he agreed that the deal would help keep Greece’s problems from infecting banks.

“This has really injected a new stability into the European financial landscape, which had certainly been lacking in the past week,” Mr. Dallara said. He noted that the Brussels agreement came only a week after European regulators compelled banks to detail their exposure to Greek bonds, an event that also helped clear up doubts about where the risk was buried.

European bank shares rallied late last week as investors appeared to agree that institutions emerged stronger from the Brussels talks. Bank shares fell Monday, but the decline seemed to be driven more by worries about political deadlock in the United States budget negotiations than about Europe.

A crucial test will come on Tuesday when the European Central Bank discloses demand for one-week loans from banks in the euro zone. The amount spiked last week, a sign that many banks were having trouble borrowing money from other banks.

If demand falls Tuesday and in coming weeks, it would be a sign that tensions are easing.

“Banks are suspicious of each other, because they don’t know who is holding the bag,” Mr. Weinberg said.

The impact of the debt agreement will also start to become clear in banks’ quarterly earnings reports. Institutions will begin subtracting the decline in the value of their Greek bonds from profit, perhaps as soon as this week, though most banks will probably wait until the bond swap has occurred. The date for the swap remains uncertain, but it could begin at the end of August, Reuters reported.

Bankers said details of the debt swap and other features of the rescue package remained foggy, and therefore it was tricky to assess the true impact. Many analysts remain skeptical.

“A deeper approach will prove requisite for restoring growth in Greece and thwarting the risk of contagion,” Lawrence Goodman, president of the Center for Financial Stability in New York, said in a statement.

Some bankers remain wary of the agreement to roll over Greek debt.

Carlos Santos Ferreira, chief executive of Millennium BCP, the biggest private bank in Portugal, said during an interview Monday that he had “mixed feelings” about whether his bank and others in countries that had also needed rescuing should join in the debt swap.

Millennium BCP is the largest Portuguese holder of Greek sovereign debt, with about 700 million euros, and its board is set to discuss the issue later this week.

“I believe the situation is different for banks and insurance companies in countries that are also getting a bailout,” he said.

Another big question is how the deal will affect hard-pressed Greek banks, which are among the largest holders of their country’s debt.

But as surges in the prices of Greek bonds last week showed, the deal restores some value to Greek debt. That means banks in Athens might be able to use their Greek bonds as collateral to borrow from other banks, reducing dependence on the E.C.B. and bolstering lending to the credit-starved Greek private sector.

Raphael Minder contributed reporting from Lisbon.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/26/business/global/propping-up-banks-as-well-as-greece.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Beyond Greece, Europe Fears Financial Contagion in Italy and Spain

Hopes that pledges of new austerity would turn sentiment toward Greece around have proved illusory, and more officials are acknowledging that Greece has to cut its debt, meaning losses for those who hold Greek bonds. But the way forward is immensely complicated, partly because European leaders cannot agree on how much pain to inflict on private-sector bond holders, especially big European banks.

Meanwhile, the European Central Bank continues to demand a response that will not be considered by ratings agencies to be the first default among countries that use the euro, which the bank fears could reduce confidence in the currency’s stability.

It amounts to a game of political and financial chicken, and the markets are becoming fed up with the uncertainty. Investors are now demanding sharply higher interest rates to buy the debt of Italy and Spain — the third- and fourth-largest economies in the euro zone. By doing so they are sending a clear message that Europe has to decide how to absorb the losses necessary to slash Greece’s debt.

Otherwise, the analysts warn, continued confusion about the euro will spread to other weak members of the euro zone, including Italy and Spain, which are considered too big to bail out. Italy alone has debts of 120 percent of its annual gross domestic product, and must refinance nearly a quarter of its debt — nearly 400 billion euros — in the next 18 months. That figure alone is larger than all of Greece’s debt of some 340 billion euros, and at suddenly spiking interest rates of 6 percent or so, even Italy could be teetering toward insolvency.

Officials involved in talks on the new Greek rescue package said that in recent days the debate had moved beyond Greece, and that markets were now questioning the very architecture of the euro, a common currency for sovereign nations with diverse economic and fiscal problems.

“For Spain and Italy, you need to provide a solution for Greece, plus a safety net to prevent contagion,” said Antonio Garcia Pascual, chief southern European economist for Barclays Capital. “But the inaction of policy makers is unhelpful. And we don’t have weeks. It’s a matter of days, especially with Italian and Spanish bonds at this level.”

Until recently, the argument was that any Greek restructuring or default would bring a market frenzy aimed at other countries in difficulty. Instead, the failure to cope with the reality of Greek insolvency has had the opposite effect, causing more contagion, many analysts say.

“To see those yields on highly developed countries like Italy jump so fast has really focused minds,” said Simon Tilford, chief economist for the Center for European Reform in London. Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany has insisted that there is little urgency and that the private sector must be involved in restructuring.

“Merkel is now in a very difficult position,” Mr. Tilford said. “The Germans are now alive to the risk in ways they weren’t before. For all the derision about Silvio Berlusconi, Italy is core Europe and has very strong ties to Germany and France.”

But those pressing for a comprehensive solution may be disappointed, with Mrs. Merkel saying on Tuesday that “a spectacular, single step cannot responsibly be made, including on Thursday.” Instead, she said, “we need a controlled and manageable process of successive steps and measures” for “reducing debt and improving competitiveness.”

European technocrats are reportedly exploring a tax on euro zone banks to cover burden-sharing by the private sector. They are also said to be considering a supposedly voluntary “rollover” of existing bonds for ones with a lower interest rate and a much longer maturity, preserving, at least notionally, the face value of the bond. That idea, originally French, might not be judged a “default” by all ratings agencies.

Steven Erlanger reported from Paris, and Rachel Donadio from Rome.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/20/world/europe/20europe.html?partner=rss&emc=rss