April 28, 2024

Cyprus Gets First Tranche of Bailout Funds

PARIS — After striking an unprecedented deal in March to make many bank depositors help pay for an international bailout, Cyprus on Monday received €2 billion, the first installment of that money, aimed at buttressing the economy after the near-collapse of its banking sector.

European officials say the release of the funds, equivalent to $2.6 billion, was recently approved by a working group of the 17 euro zone finance ministers, who gathered Monday evening in Brussels for their regular monthly meeting. Cypriot efforts to stabilize the economy may be on the agenda. A second allocation of up to €1 billion will be transferred by June 30, officials said.

That session was a prelude to the planned meeting of all 27 European Union finance ministers in Brussels on Tuesday, where the focus is expected to be on proceeding with a European banking union that could stabilize the European financial system and avoid future debacles like Cyprus. Officials on Tuesday were to consider a single set of rules for dealing with failing banks throughout Europe, as well as discuss continuing efforts to curb tax havens.

The thorniest issue revolves around whether some depositors in any other European country should be made to suffer losses if their banks require an international rescue, as happened in Cyprus in an unprecedented and still controversial provision for a euro zone bailout.

In exchange for a €10 billion emergency aid package, Cyprus in March agreed to E.U. demands to effectively confiscate up to 60 percent of any depositor’s holdings above €100,000 held in two of the country’s largest banks, Bank of Cyprus and Laiki Bank. At the same time, Laiki Bank was forced to fold, merging into Bank of Cyprus.

On Tuesday in Brussels, part of the debate will involve where depositors should be placed in the hierarchy of creditors in the future rules on shutting down failing banks. The main focus is what to do with depositors holding more than €100,000. Some countries want all E.U. members to have the same rules, while others want the flexibility to decide where savers should be in the hierarchy.

The president of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, said at his recent monthly news conference that ordinary depositors be hit only after people who took risks by buying bonds in banks were forced to take losses. “If it can be avoided,” he said, “uninsured depositors should not be touched.”

In Cyprus, the issue came to a head after Germany and some other E.U. countries insisted on finding a new way to pay for a bailout of troubled Cypriot banks, which held large deposits from wealthy Russians. Some of the money was suspected of having questionable origins, meaning it would be hard for Berlin to justify using German taxpayer funds to clean up Cyprus’s mess. In the end, E.U. and Cypriot officials agreed that wealthy depositors would effectively have to help foot the cleanup bill.

The president of the Cypriot central bank, Panicos Demetriades, said last week that most of the depositors who lost money under the deposit-seizure system were foreigners. “Seventy percent of the value of the deposits concerned overseas residents, leaving Cypriot households and businesses unaffected to a greater extent than was possibly expected,” he said at a news conference.

Cypriot and Brussels officials had abandoned an earlier, even more controversial plan to skim a percentage of insured deposits — those under €100,000 in Cypriot banks. They pulled back that proposal after it set off tremors in global financial markets and raised the specter of a run on euro zone banks because of concerns that even insured deposits might not be safe.

It was still in an emergency atmosphere, though, that Cyprus imposed capital controls in March to prevent a flood of money from leaving banks operating there. Those restrictions have been eased gradually since then, but remain in place for all but a handful of foreign banks, despite initial promises by the government that the strictures might be quickly removed.

The entire episode has dealt a sharp blow to the Cypriot economy.

With restrictions on how much money individuals and businesses can withdraw or transfer from their Cypriot bank accounts, spending has been sharply curtailed. The economy, already in recession, is expected to contract at least 12.5 percent in the next two years. Unemployment, at 12 percent, is forecast to rise as the shrinking of the outsize banking system, demanded by Cyprus’s creditors, curtails lending and leads to job losses.

The bailout has also set off geopolitical tension over a trove of natural gas recently found in Cypriot waters, which Cyprus’s creditors hope could be tapped in the future to help pay off the country’s loans. Last week, the E.U. commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, Olli Rehn, pressed for the four-decade-old division of Cyprus into Greek and Turkish territories to be abolished, saying reunification would give Cyprus a “major boost to economic and social development.”

Such a move could also pave the way for faster exploration of extensive natural gas reserves off the coast of Cyprus, which Turkey, Russia and the European Union are all interested in pursuing.

Cyprus has been divided since 1974 after Turkey invaded the north. Turkish officials have warned the Cypriot government in recent months not to proceed with gas extraction unilaterally, or risk inflaming further political tension with Ankara.

James Kanter contributed reporting from Brussels.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/business/global/Cyprus-Gets-First-Tranche-of-Bailout-Funds.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Deficit Talks Stumble Over Down Payment

President Obama and the House speaker, John A. Boehner, are in general agreement that the relevant Congressional committees must sit down next year and work out changes to the tax code and entitlement programs to save well more than $1 trillion over the next decade.

But before that work begins, both men want Congress to approve a first installment on deficit reduction in the coming weeks. The installment would replace the automatic spending cuts and tax increases that make up the “fiscal cliff,” while signaling Washington’s seriousness about getting its fiscal house in order. That is where the chasm lies in size and scope.

Mr. Obama says the down payment should be large and made up almost completely of tax increases on top incomes, partly because he and Congressional leaders last year agreed on some spending cuts over the next decade but have yet to agree on any tax increases.

Republicans have countered by arguing for a smaller down payment that must include immediate savings from Medicare and other social programs. Republicans, using almost mirror-image language, have said that they do not want to agree to specific tax increases and vague promises of future spending cuts.

Senator Kent Conrad of North Dakota, chairman of the Budget Committee and part of a bipartisan “Gang of Six” senators who devised the two-stage process, said: “I think there’s a lot of confusion between the initial down payment and the framework. That’s for sure.”

The two biggest areas of dispute are tax increases and the big government health insurance programs, Medicare and Medicaid. On the health programs, neither side believes Congress could meaningfully overhaul them in the four weeks that remain before the fiscal deadline.

“Entitlement reform is a big step, and it affects tens of millions of people,” said Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, another architect of the two-stage framework. “It’s not just a matter of cutting spending in an appropriation. It’s changing policy. And that’s why I was reluctant to include it in the down-payment conversation. I want this to be a thoughtful effort on both sides that doesn’t jeopardize this program.”

But Republicans say that it is possible to make some initial changes to the programs in coming weeks. “There are simpler things that can be done,” said Senator Michael D. Crapo, Republican of Idaho and another Gang of Six member. “The real structural changes would come later.”

Mr. Crapo said Congress could agree on some additional cuts to health care providers and change the way inflation is calculated to slow not only automatic increases in Medicare and Social Security benefits, but also the annual rise in tax brackets.

Democrats instead argue that the down payment should consist of a combination of tax increases and cuts to programs outside Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, like farm programs. Mr. Obama has pushed for a return to the top tax rates under President Bill Clinton.

Republican leaders have said that they are willing to raise new tax revenues — albeit not as much as Democrats want — but Republicans want taxes to rise by closing loopholes and curbing tax deductions and credits.

If the two sides are able to come to an agreement on the down payment, it would also likely fix targets for larger savings in the tax code and entitlement programs. The White House and Congress would then spend much of the next year trying to hash out the specific policy changes needed to hit those targets.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/04/us/politics/in-fiscal-cliff-talks-first-step-is-the-hardest.html?partner=rss&emc=rss