April 19, 2024

The Surprise in Apple’s Cheaper iPhone? In China, It’s Expensive

Rather than celebrating, though, the Chinese were raising their eyebrows over the cost of the new models — especially one that had been billed as a cut-price iPhone.

While many analysts had expected Apple to price the iPhone 5C at about $400 in an effort to attract new customers in mainland China, where the company has been struggling, it will actually go for significantly more.

Apple said on its Web site that the iPhone 5C would start at 4,488 renminbi, or $733, without subsidies from mobile operators. That is not far below the price of the new flagship Apple iPhone 5S, which starts at 5,288 renminbi. Both phones were officially announced in California on Tuesday.

“If you look at the price, it’s clearly a high-end phone, not a low- or even midrange phone,” said Jenny Lai, an analyst at HSBC in Taipei, referring to the iPhone 5C.

The price is about 33 percent higher in China than the full, unsubsidized $549 cost in the United States. Chinese carriers don’t generally subsidize the handset price for consumers but they often discount their monthly bills. So the eventual cost to consumers has plenty of room to come down.

But given that Apple has been losing ground to lower-cost rivals in China, some of which make smartphones that sell for less than $100, will the 5C be able to turn around the company’s fortunes there?

After the announcement, the stock prices of several Apple suppliers fell sharply, including that of Pegatron, a company based in Taiwan that is the main assembler of the iPhone 5C. Analysts said sales might fall short of expectations in China unless Apple lowered prices.

“If they had been able to get down in the $350 to $400 range, we would have seen a big bump in the fourth quarter,” said Francis Sideco, an analyst at IHS, a research firm. “They’ll still get a bump, but this would have accelerated it.”

Investors may also have been disappointed by the absence of an agreement to sell the phones through China Mobile, the biggest network operator in China, and the world, with 745 million customers.

Although China Mobile has been the biggest iPhone holdout, expectations of a deal have been fueled by the fact that the new iPhones are compatible with a technology called TD-LTE, which is employed in the next-generation wireless network that China Mobile is building. But that network is not yet operating.

The Telecommunications Equipment and Certification Center, an arm of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, posted a notice on its Web site certifying that it has approved iPhones for use on TD-LTE networks, a necessary regulatory step.

With sales of phones from Chinese companies like Huawei, Lenovo, Xiaomi, Yulong Coolpad and ZTE growing rapidly, Apple’s share of the Chinese smartphone market fell to 5 percent in the second quarter, according to Canalys, a research firm.

Chinese phone buyers are especially price-sensitive because of the way the market is structured. Although carriers in the United States and Europe generally provide upfront subsidies, disguising the true cost of the phone, Chinese network operators typically sell phones at full cost and then, in some cases, provide discounts on monthly bills.

The lower-price iPhone 5C will cost more than twice as much as rival devices like the Xiaomi Mi3, which starts at $327.

“By any standards, it’s a premium price,” Mr. Sideco said. “When you really look at it, they didn’t make a cheaper phone. They made a more expensive phone so that they could call the other one a cheaper phone.”

The iPhone 5C comes in a plastic case, and its hardware is nearly identical to that of the iPhone 5. The iPhone 5S has an aluminum body, a faster processor and a fingerprint scanner, as well as other features.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/technology/the-surprise-in-apples-cheaper-iphone-in-china-its-expensive.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

DealBook: Morgan Stanley’s $481 Million 4th-Quarter Profit Beats Estimates

The headquarters of Morgan Stanley in New York.Shannon Stapleton/ReutersThe headquarters of Morgan Stanley in New York.

10:12 a.m. | Updated

Morgan Stanley reported adjusted earnings for the fourth quarter on Friday that beat analyst estimates, driven by gains in wealth management and investment banking.

Including charges, the firm had a fourth-quarter profit of $481 million, or 25 cents a share. That compares with a per-share loss of 15 cents in the year-ago period.

The results, however, show continued weakness in firm’s fixed income franchise and were affected by one-time accounting charges related to the firm’s credit spreads. Excluding those charges, the firm had a profit of 45 cents a share. That handily beat the estimates of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters, which had estimated a profit of 27 cents a share.

When factoring in the charges, Morgan Stanley’s revenue came in at $7 billion in the fourth quarter, up 23 percent from the year-ago period. But for the full year, the firm’s revenue dropped 19 percent, to $26.1 billion, a significant drop that contrasts with peers. Goldman Sachs, for instance, said its annual revenue rose of 19 percent in 2012.

As a result, Morgan Stanley was forced to increase the percentage of revenue it allots for compensation: a full 60 percent of its 2012 revenue, or $15.62 billion, went to pay employees. This compares with 2011, when just 51 percent of revenue was allotted for compensation and benefits.

The high ratio could raise eyebrows on Wall Street. In 2010, Morgan Stanley’s chief executive, James P. Gorman, said that the firm’s compensation rate of 62 percent that year was a “historic high” that no one on his management team “will ever see again.” He indicated that the rate should be no higher than 50 percent.

Still, Mr. Gorman said on Friday that Morgan Stanley’s turnaround strategy, which has been underway since the financial crisis when the firm’s operations were badly damaged, was working. “We believe Morgan Stanley is at a turning point,” he told analysts on a conference call to discuss earnings.

Mr. Gorman has been working since the financial crisis to retool Morgan Stanley by shifting its focus away from potentially riskier businesses like trading and into steadier, less capital-intensive areas like wealth management. While he has notched some successes, the company still faces challenges.

Notably, the firm has reduced the size of its fixed-income department in the wake of ratings downgrades and new regulatory requirements, both of which have forced it to hold more capital against riskier trading activities, reducing profitability. This month, it laid off 1,600 employees, many of them in fixed income.

But there were areas that had notable revenue growth. Excluding the debt charge, institutional securities, which included fixed income and banking, had revenue of $3.5 billion, compared with $1.9 billion in the same quarter in 2011.

The fixed-income sales and trading unit reported adjusted revenue of $811 million for the fourth quarter, compared with a loss of $493 million in the year-ago period. Investment banking revenue also did well, increasing 25 percent, to $1.23 billion, in the fourth quarter.

Wealth management was another bright spot in the quarter, posting net revenue of $3.46 billion, up from $3.22 billion this time last year. Its pretax margin was 17 percent, which is higher than many analysts had anticipated.

Investors seem to like results, driving the company’s stock up nearly 6 percent, to $21.98, in morning trading.

Earlier this week, Goldman Sachs posted profit of $5.60 a share, which outpaced analyst expectations. Citigroup, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase have also recently reported stronger year-over-year earnings.

Article source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/morgan-stanleys-4th-quarter-profit-of-481-million-beats-estimates/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Redfin Backs Off Some Agent Home-Sales Data

Just days after it introduced a tool that lets users search for real-estate agents by name and view their home-selling success statistics, the Web site Redfin backed out of some markets, after getting complaints from local multiple listing services about the use of some data.

Agents also identified some serious flaws in the tool’s information, which Redfin says it has corrected.

Since the “Scouting Report” tool went live last Thursday, two multiple listing services — one in Washington, D.C., and another in the East Bay area of San Francisco — have asked for a review of Redfin’s use of their data, said Glenn Kelman, Redfin’s chief executive. He says the company believes it is using the agent data in compliance with its licensing agreements with the multiple listing services, where agents list properties for sale. But Redfin has suspended offering information from those listing services while it sorts out the situation, Mr. Kelman said Monday.

“We knew this would raise a few eyebrows,” he said.

Also, according to a post on Redfin’s corporate blog, Redfin has discontinued the scouting tool in Sacramento, after determining that its offering did not comply with data-sharing rules there. It discontinued the tool in Atlanta, after determining that the effort there wasn’t ready. And it now requires users to register with the site in order to get access to information in certain markets, including Portland, Ore.

The site also had to correct some serious inaccuracies in its data, which some agents pointed out in angry posts to the site’s blog. In some instances, Mr. Kelman said, the tool showed an incorrect figure for the average length of time — known as “days on market” — that it took agents to sell some properties. (On the blog, Mr. Kelman conceded the mistake was “egregious” and apologized.)

In Phoenix and two other markets, the brokerage affiliations of about 10 percent of the agents were inaccurate. And in at least two markets — Denver and San Diego — the site initially said it was showing three years of data, but in fact just two years of data was available.

Agent Aquarium, a real estate Web site based in Austin, Tex., where Redfin is now offering its own scouting report, said it lets home buyers and sellers find active real estate agents in specific neighborhoods, but in a way that it says offers greater privacy for agents.

Agent Aquarium lets sellers and buyers search for agents by neighborhood or ZIP code and provides details of their sales records. But the agents remain anonymous — they are assigned an identification code — until the site makes an electronic introduction of a consumer and an agent. (The site will also request information from a specific agent, if a consumer requests it; the agent can decide if he or she wants to have the data released. If the information is provided, the consumer pays a $10 fee.)

“It’s the agent’s job and it’s their data, so we just feel it’s right to ask permission first to display their data,” Joe Molinelli, the site’s chief executive, said in an e-mail.

Agent Aquarium earns commissions from sales if the consumer chooses one of its own agents, and a referral fee — typically 25 percent of the agent’s commission — if the consumer chooses an agent who works for another firm, according to its Web site. The site currently is available in Austin and has plans to expand into other Texas markets.

“We don’t have animosity towards Realtors as an industry group,” said Tom Cunningham, Agent Aquarium’s chief operating officer, in a phone interview. “We’re simply trying to find a better way for consumers to vet their Realtors.”

In the case of Redfin, users must search by an agent’s name — they can’t yet search for agents by neighborhood. Mr. Kelman said such a feature is in the works.

Do you think it is fair for real estate agents’ sales histories to be publicly available?

Article source: http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=703b1ada7ba1dd43ef273e30af0fd2ae