November 15, 2024

Media Decoder: PBS Demands, and Gets, More Reporting in a Film

On Tuesday, PBS’s “Frontline” will broadcast the film, but not quite the same one, after “Frontline’s” producers, in an unusual move, asked the filmmakers to return to Pakistan to do additional reporting to answer a number of what they called “serious journalism” questions.

The film, in both versions, examines what happens when Pakistani girls and women pursue legal justice for rape charges. Over several years, it followed Kainat Soomro, who was 13 when she said she had been gang-raped by four men, and the efforts by those accused to clear their names.

Habiba Nosheen, 31, and Hilke Schellmann, 34, both based in New York, said in a telephone interview that, like many independent filmmakers, they used their life savings, family loans and a grant to get the film to the festival circuit. Money was so scarce they could not afford to translate all of their interview footage.

“Frontline” agreed to broadcast the film, but Raney Aronson-Rath, the series’ deputy executive producer, said “absolutely not,” when asked if she would have used the original version, which she called a “point of view film.” Instead, “Frontline” gave the filmmakers more money; Ms. Nosheen said the figure was “four times” the film’s budget, which she declined to disclose.

In February, the filmmakers returned to Pakistan, with a list of what Ms. Aronson-Rath said, by phone, were 30 or 40 questions from the “Frontline” producers about the legal investigation.

The filmmakers tracked down a new character, a cleric who seemed to back the accused men’s defense that Ms. Soomro had married one of them. Later, when the filmmakers translated all their footage, they found a startling quote, in which the man who said he was Ms. Soomro’s husband had threatened to kill her.

The extra money was “such an important thing for us; reporting is very expensive,” Ms. Nosheen said. “It was remarkable to us how much of an important and bigger story we could tell by the new information we gathered.”

The new version is “much more nuanced,” Ms. Schellmann added.

“When you do journalism, what emerges is a more powerful portrait for Kainat,” as well giving the men’s side its due, Ms. Aronson-Rath said. “It’s not that what they did was untrue,” she said of the filmmakers’ original version, “it just wasn’t the whole story.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/business/media/pbs-demands-and-gets-more-reporting-in-a-film.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: The People Who Are Spending More This Season

Black Friday shoppers rush into Valley River Center mall in Eugene, Ore.Associated PressBlack Friday shoppers rush into Valley River Center mall in Eugene, Ore.

As Cyber Monday unfolds, consumers seem a bit more comfortable with spending this holiday season, according to an annual survey.

Twelve percent of those surveyed said they would spend more this year, compared with 8 percent last year, according to the survey, which was commissioned by the Consumer Federation of America and the Credit Union National Association.

At the same time, the percentage who said they would spend less declined to 38 percent from 41 percent, the survey found.

ORC International conducted the survey of 1,012 adults by land line and cellphone from Nov. 9-13.

The results indicate continued gradual improvement in holiday spending plans since a sharp decline four years ago, said Bill Hampel, chief economist for the CUNA, in a statement.

The intention of consumers to increase holiday spending may reflect improvement in their financial situation. From 2011 to 2012, the percentage who said their financial situation was better rose from 19 to 24.

Many families, however, remain strapped. Only half (49 percent) said they had extra money to pay for an unexpected expense of $1,000.

What are your spending plans for the holidays this year?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/the-people-who-are-spending-more-this-season/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Bucks Blog: Auto Insurance, Scaredy-Cats and the Rollers of the Dice

In this weekend’s Your Money column, I try to lay out the facts and odds that lay behind the question of whether any of us have enough auto insurance. Some people look at the long odds of a bad wreck and buy the minimum amount that their state requires. Others buy as much as they can, figuring that it’s better to be safe than to be sorry.

So to the rollers of the dice, who have bought little insurance over the decades and have bet that they wouldn’t ever be facing down a large claim, I ask this: Have you ever regretted that choice? Do you still feel comfortable with it?

As for the risk-averse, will you be upset decades from now if you’ve shelled out all of that extra money for premiums and never once made a claim or been subject to one?

In other words, what’s the right way to think about these questions — and how do (and should) our feelings affect our efforts to reckon with the odds?

Article source: http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/24/auto-insurance-scaredy-cats-and-the-rollers-of-the-dice/?partner=rss&emc=rss