January 15, 2025

Helen Hanft, Master of Camp Way Off Broadway, Dies at 79

The cause was complications of an intestinal blockage, said Alan Eichler, her friend and longtime publicist.

Ms. Hanft made her mark in the 1960s and ’70s on Off Off Broadway stages like La MaMa Experimental Theater Club and Joseph Papp’s Public Theater in the East Village, as well as Caffe Cino in Greenwich Village, widely regarded as the birthplace of Off Off Broadway.

She appeared in early plays by Tom Eyen, who later wrote the book and lyrics for “Dreamgirls,” including “Why Hanna’s Skirt Won’t Stay Down,” about a woman, a man and a fun-house air vent, and “Women Behind Bars,” a sendup of the B-movie genre of the title. She was also in “In the Boom Boom Room,” David Rabe’s play about go-go dancers and their lovers of both sexes, none of them suitable partners.

Her performances earned unusual accolades. Phrases like “wonderfully grotesque” and “energetically seedy” appeared in rave reviews. Critics referred to her variously as the Helen Hayes and the Ethel Merman of Off Off Broadway. (Bette Midler, who also acted in Mr. Eyen’s early plays, has told interviewers that in creating her persona as the gleefully campy Divine Miss M, she borrowed liberally from the raunchy dames Ms. Hanft created.)

Between 1965 and 1975 Ms. Hanft appeared in 75 productions, most of which paid her little if they paid at all. She supported herself by working in a series of odd jobs, she said in a 1975 interview with The New York Times. The most enduring of those, as a switchboard operator for the United Jewish Appeal, was, she said, “good voice training for an actress.”

She later had small roles in a string of movies, including Woody Allen’s “Manhattan” (1979), “Stardust Memories” (1980) and “The Purple Rose of Cairo” (1985); Dudley Moore’s 1981 hit, “Arthur”; and Paul Mazursky’s “Next Stop, Greenwich Village” (1976) and “Willie Phil” (1980).

Helen Hanft was born in the Bronx on April 3, 1934, the eldest of Benjamin and Esther Hanft’s three children. Her father was a prominent public relations executive for a number of national Jewish organizations.

Ms. Hanft had problems in school and difficulty finding a sense of purpose until, at her father’s urging, she auditioned for the High School of Performing Arts, which is now part of LaGuardia High School of Music Art Performing Arts, and won admission. There she found her calling, as well as many friends, including the comic actor Dom DeLuise, her sister, Sarah Comma, said.

Ms. Comma is her only survivor. Her husband, William Landers, and a younger sister, Alice, died years ago.

With her smoky voice and steamy laugh, Ms. Hanft began her acting career soon after graduating from high school. Her performance in the title role of Mr. Eyen’s 1965 play “Why Hanna’s Skirt Won’t Stay Down” — as a sexually frustrated woman, in love with a gay narcissist, who gets her only relief by standing à la Marilyn Monroe over the air vent at a Coney Island fun house — made her an underground star.

Beneath its campy iconoclasm, she said in interviews, the play was about the loneliness and isolation people suffer as a result of the obsession in popular culture with image, sex and glamour. Reviewing a 1981 revival, Mel Gussow of The Times voiced a more upbeat view:

“Hanna and Helen Hanft are interchangeable and indefatigable. Perhaps more than any other character, Hanna is an icon of Off Off Broadway in the ’60s. If there were an American Tussaud waxworks, at the entrance there would be a lifelike replica of Miss Hanft’s Hanna, standing over the airstream in an Eyen fun house, letting her hair down and her skirts fly high.”

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/06/theater/helen-hanft-master-of-camp-way-off-broadway-dies-at-79.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

Common Sense: Proposal to Cap Deductions Is Popular, but Not Quite Fair

Mr. Romney’s proposal to limit itemized deductions to a fixed dollar amount, which surfaced during the campaign as a way to close loopholes for the wealthy and broaden the tax base, has attracted a surprising amount of bipartisan support, given its origins in conservative Republican circles.

“There’s renewed interest” in the cap on deductions, Senator Kent Conrad, the North Dakota Democrat who heads the Senate Budget Committee, told The Times last month as budget negotiations heated up.

The political appeal of a proposal that limits deductions without actually naming any — inciting the powerful interests and lobbyists that support them — seems obvious. But many tax experts said that a fixed dollar cap is anything but the evenhanded approach to closing loopholes it appears to be.

Moreover, without addressing larger tax preferences, like a lower rate on capital gains, it does almost nothing to cure the so-called Buffett problem, in which Warren Buffett’s secretary pays a higher effective rate than her billionaire boss. It doesn’t even raise much revenue.

Some tax experts have gone so far as to say it’s a conservative Trojan horse, a stealth tactic that protects the very wealthy while targeting Democrats who itemize deductions and live disproportionately in high-tax states like New York and California. It would also affect donors who support elite colleges, universities, museums — even experimental theater — which are perceived as havens for liberals.

And it would hit people like me: taxpayers in higher brackets who rely on earned income as opposed to investment income or an inheritance, who give to charity and live in a high-tax state. Assuming a $35,000 limit on itemized deductions, my federal tax last year would have risen to 27 percent of my adjusted gross income, from 22 percent.

I wouldn’t mind paying more as long as people who make vastly more did, too. But limiting the itemized deductions of the top 400 taxpayers with an average adjusted gross income of $202 million in 2009 (the most recent year available) would have raised their taxable income by an average of $32 million and their average rate to 25 percent from 20 percent, assuming a marginal rate of 35 percent, and even less if they pay a lower marginal rate, as most do.

That’s a lower rate than I paid, because nearly half their income, on average, was from capital gains.

Martin Feldstein, a Harvard economist and the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Reagan, is widely credited with the idea for an across-the-board cap on itemized deductions as a way to help lower the deficit. His proposal last year called for capping deductions at 2 percent of adjusted gross income.

Mr. Romney embraced the concept, but proposed a fixed dollar cap as low as $17,000 rather than a percentage. Since then, the idea has been embraced by politicians from both parties and the centrist research organization Third Way.

(The proposed cap on deductions shouldn’t be confused with President Obama’s proposed 28 percent cap on the rate at which deductions can be claimed by high-income taxpayers.)

Despite its bipartisan support and seemingly neutral approach, it didn’t take long for the nonprofit sector to figure out that a fixed dollar cap on itemized deductions is a stake aimed at the heart of the charitable deduction. That’s because of the three largest itemized deductions — state and local taxes, mortgage interest and charitable contributions — only charitable contributions are entirely discretionary.

People have to pay state and local taxes, and in high-tax states like New York, Massachusetts and California, that deduction alone would reach the cap and in many cases exceed it, depending on where it’s set. Many people require a mortgage to own their homes, and are contractually obligated to repay it.

Article source: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/business/plan-to-cap-deductions-is-setback-for-charities.html?partner=rss&emc=rss